Sunday, November 30, 2008
Neocons Heart Obama
Kurt Nimmo November 29, 2008
Max Boot just adores Barack Obama’s proposed national security team, especially the retention of Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense and General Jim Jones over at the NSC. “I have to admit that I am gobsmacked by these appointments, most of which could just as easily have come from a President McCain,” Boot fawns.
Max Boot loves Obama and his CFR handpicked crew because they will pick up where the neocons and Republicans left off.
Max Boot makes well the argument that there is no difference between McCain and Obama, never mind millions of changelings who believe Obama stands for love, peace, and a new road not traveled by the Bushcons. Some of them actually believe Obama will bring the troops home, the poor deluded souls.
So, who is this Max Boot guy and why are his pronouncements on Obama and his nominations significant? Not only is Boot connected to the Project for the New American Century and its warmongering sister group, the American Enterprise Institute, he is also a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. Max Boot is the poster child for the neocon slash neolib crossover, thus demonstrating there is little difference between these two camps, same as there is little difference between McCain and Obama, never mind the convoluted efforts of the corporate media to convince us otherwise during the election.
Not only does Boot want to mass murder Iranians, he also wants to kill a whole lot of Saudis. After bunker-busting the place back to the Stone Age, the U.S. should grab “the Saudi’s oil fields and administer them as a trust for the people of the region,” declares Mr. Boot. Sort of like they are currently administering Iraq’s oil fields, never mind the million plus Iraqis who have died in the process.
It should be noteworthy that a guy of Boot’s psychotic caliber is all ga-ga over Barky. It means Obama, according to Boot, will continue the neocon agenda, which is of course the CFR and neolib agenda with a few minor differences. Can’t tell ‘em apart without a scorecard, a fact Boot admits.Obama’s tentative appointments put “an end to the 16-month timetable for withdrawal from Iraq, the unconditional summits with dictators, and other foolishness that once emanated from the Obama campaign. His appointments suggest that, if anything, his administration will have a Reapolitiker, rather than a liberal, bent, although Clinton and Steinberg at State should be powerful voices for ‘neo-liberalism’ which is not so different in many respects from ‘neo-conservativism’. Both, for instance, support humanitarian interventions in places like Darfur and Bosnia.”
Saturday, November 29, 2008
An internal memo from a top Citibank analyst reveals what the banks really think about the global financial situation, and the outlook is grim.
"The world is not going back to normal after the magnitude of what they have done. When the dust settles this will either work, and the money they have pushed into the system will feed through into an inflation shock," wrote Tom Fitzpatrick, Citibank’s chief technical strategist.
He goes on to explain that the massive money creation efforts by the Federal Reserve and other central banks will end with one of two things: A resurgence of inflation, or a fall into "depression, civil disorder and possibly wars." Either outcome, he says, will cause the price of gold to skyrocket. Gold will push to well over $2,000 per ounce, he explains.
The timing on all this? Sometime in either 2009 or 2010, said the analyst.
This coincides with predictions I’ve made, where I’ve publicly predicted price inflation of 20% - 40% in 2009, and the financial collapse of the United States government (sometime before 2025) due to an irreversible debt burden.
I’ve also predicted that when the people wake up and realize their dollars have been looted by the Treasury and turned into worthless pieces of paper, there will be riots in the streets.
These events have already been set into motion. It is now only a matter of time until they bubble to the surface. On the day the mainstream taxpayers actually figure all this out, don’t be caught out in public. Stay home.
Friday, November 28, 2008
Thursday, November 27, 2008
The majority of the corporate media has gleefully seized upon the terror attacks in Mumbai to claim that they are the work of “Al-Qaeda,” despite clear and contradictory evidence suggesting otherwise, as a pretext to increase bombing campaigns in Pakistan and beef support for the ailing war on terror in Afghanistan.
The swiftness with which the media blamed “Al-Qaeda” was staggering, especially considering the fact that the attacks had not even concluded before the boogeyman was whipped out of the closet once more to act as a poster child for the war on terror and allow the TV networks to show lots of blood, panic and authority figures pointing guns at people.
The only claim of responsibility for the attacks came from the “Deccan Mujahideen,” the Deccan Plateau being an area in southern India, but the press, usually breathless to take the first obscure claim of culpability and set it in stone, are now belittling this explanation as a likely hoax in an attempt to pin the blame on the all-mighty mythical Al-Qaeda.
“Earlier eyewitness reports from the hotels suggested the attackers were singling out British and American passport holders,” reports the BBC.
NWO SAYS "AL -QAEDA" PREPARING TO ATTACK NY SUBWAYS. DOES AL-QAEDA EXIST OR IS IT A TOOL USED TO SCARE THE MASSES?
- Suicide bombers may be used against New York City transit, government says
- Joint FBI, Department of Homeland Security statement says plot unconfirmed
- Attack could be planned for holiday season, statement says
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Federal authorities have received a "plausible but unsubstantiated" report that al Qaeda may have discussed targeting transit systems in or around New York City, the Department of Homeland Security said.
"These discussions reportedly involved the use of suicide bombers or explosives" on subway or passenger rail trains, according to a joint DHS and FBI statement issued Tuesday.
These NWO bitches are planning to make their next move soon.moles on MSNBC I caught one of their yesterday, stirring up the pot about how terrorism is such a threat there and blah blah blah. This NY Times bitch looked like a fox with feathers in his mouth, and so did Mika, interviewing him.
Ain't none of them fooling me anymore; they're just grooming the American people for the next shock and awe in a new country - I'm laying odds that Pakistan will be our next Iraq, if they and India don't nuke each other into the Stone Age first.
Friday, November 21, 2008
“ Properly speaking, homosexuality does not exist among animals.... For reasons of survival, the reproductive instinct among animals is always directed towards an individual of the opposite sex. Therefore, an animal can never be homosexual as such. Nevertheless, the interaction of other instincts (particularly dominance) can result in behavior that appears to be homosexual. Such behavior cannot be equated with an animal homosexuality. All it means is that animal sexual behavior encompasses aspects beyond that of reproduction. [3 The Animal Homosexuality Myth by Luiz Sérgio Solimeo]
Kit (Keep It Trill) said...LOL. CNu ... One of us ... is stone cold crazy.
One of us ... is a stone cold fool. Let's find out who.
The High Priests of Radical Secularism have created the pseudo-religious myth of gay wild animals that perform homosexual "sex" and you subscribe to it with ecclesiastical devotion. Some homo Phd candidate at the University of Manitoba says he observed gay dolphins having sex under water and it soon becomes temporal canon.
Trill. Your girlfriends Lhasa Apsa humped your leg. He aint gay. You are. How you know he wasn't making you his bitch? Could have been some dominance thing.
Where in nature are wild animals having homosexual sex to the point of orgasm? None of this stuff about affectionate baboons or male birds caring for young. Where is the male horse turning down horse punany to bone another stallion in the poop shoot? Aint happenin'.
The U.S. foreign policy blundering has created a new violent hotbed of anti-Americanism in the turbulent Horn of Africa by orchestrating the Ethiopian invasion of another Muslim capital of the Arab League, in a clear American message that no Arab or Muslim metropolitan has impunity unless it falls into step with the U.S. vital regional interests.
The U.S.-backed Ethiopian invasion of the Somali capital, Mogadishu, on Dec. 28 is closely interlinked in motivation, methods, goals and results to the U.S. bogged down regional blunders in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Sudan as well as in Iran and Afghanistan, but mainly in the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories.
Mogadishu is the third Arab metropolitan after Jerusalem and Baghdad to fall to the U.S. imperial drive, either directly or indirectly through Israeli, Ethiopian or other proxies, and the fourth if the temporary Israeli occupation of Beirut in 1982 is remembered; the U.S. endeavor to redraw the map of the Middle East is reminiscent of the British-French Sykes-Pico colonial dismembering of the region and is similarly certain to give rise to grassroots Pan-Arab rejection and awaking with the Pan-Islamic unifying force as a major component.
Their nation devastated by NeoColonial Imperialism - These brothers have grabbed guns, taken to the high seas and collected $150M in ransom this year alone. Hustle Hard.
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Steroid socialization and other forms of temporary amping - though widely done - have fallen afoul of negative public perception. This shyte here is on a whole other level though, not least in its permanence.
I've been following True Blood on HBO and from what I can gather, this writing is so clearly on the wall that it's just ridiculous.
While We Celebrate The Election of An "African-American" President - The United States of America Continues To Kill Africans In Somalia
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
Ummm....the question still remains...who this woman...and does she know she is spread eagle on your site?
Muslims Warn Obama - Obama Must Answer For Parroting Political Rhetoric of NWO or Fake Video Produced By NWO To Create Tension Between BO and Muslims?
"As for the crimes of America which await you, it appears you continue to be captive to the same criminal American mentality towards the world and towards Muslims. The Muslim Ummah received with extreme bitterness your hypocritical statements and stances towards Israel, which confirmed to the Ummah that you have chosen a stance of hostility to Islam and Muslims. You represent the direct opposite of honorable black Americans, like Malik al-Shabazz (May Allah have mercy on him). You were born to a Muslim father, but you chose to stand in the ranks of the enemies of the Muslims, and pray the prayers of the Jews although you claim to be a Christian, in order to climb the rungs of leadership in America. And you promised to back Israel, and you threatened to strike the tribal regions in Pakistan, and to send thousands more troops to Afghanistan, in order for the crimes of the American Crusade to continue."
Soteria said ...
Mel, I am ANNOYED because the gay lobby is mobilizing to FORCE people to accept their lifestyle choices and that is not right. I can respect you as a human being, honor you as a person and not agree with the choices that you make. The lobby would have us believe that if you aren't waving a rainbow flag saying yes Steve and Bob should get married, that- somehow you are a bigot. That is what I have a significant problem with. What exactly did I say that made you feel that I hate someone?
Mel, maybe you can cite for me exactly what in a civil union is different than in marriage, because all of the information that I have seen puts it as having the same rights. Correct me if I am wrong and guide me to that info...
I find it hilarious that the pro- gay lobby's fall back is constantly the dissoluntion of heterosexual marriages. What exactly is your point with that? Obviously every heterosexual has not engaged in premarital sex, infidelity, and divorce...similarly every homosexual person is not out whoring on a nightly basis sleeping with random people.
My point is and remains - God defined marriage and it is defined as that between a man and a woman. It is, what it is. No one is saying that they cannot love whoever they want. What is with the urgency of the title other than to get everyone else to accept their choices?
Casper, in response to your comments I personally do not feel that the majority of people who are gay are born that way. That again is based on my own interaction and conversations with people who are "gay". A lot of them have decided that it was a lifestyle choice that they enjoyed and they went that direction. I have however, met people who have said that they were that way from a child so I do believe that some are born that way. God does not love them less. Just like God loves us all regardless of what we do as well, however we are called to walk in a certain fashion in order to receive the blessings of God in our lives. God does not need your belief in order for truth to be truth. Truth just is.
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
What do you see, DV?
Denmark Vesey said ...
2) No Homo
3) probably the greatest English language poet on the planet
4) a Cash Money Millionaire
5) Rich field Niggas luxuriating in the romanticized aesthetic of an antebellum aristocracy that never really existed.
6) One of the few men on the planet capable of effectively articulating the threat of NWO Eugenics to 30 million Plantation Negros.
You hurt her, you kill me and nigga I ain't bout to die
See y'all are at ground, and my daughter is my sky
I swear I look in her face and I just want to break out and fly
Four tears in my face and you ain't never heard me cry
I'm richer than all y'all, I got a bank full of pride"
Mr. Holder would be the first African-American to serve as the nation’s top law enforcement official. He has long been considered the front-runner for the job as a strong supporter of Mr. Obama who brings to the job a long record as a prosecutor and a judge.
Now in private practice as a partner at the Washington law firm of Covington and Burling, Mr. Holder served as a federal prosecutor, a trial court judge, and United States attorney for the District of Columbia before becoming the top-ranking aide to Attorney General Janet Reno in 1997. He was the first African-American to serve in that post.
His last days at the Justice Department in 2001 were marred by his peripheral involvement in President Clinton’s controversial pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich, as some Republicans blamed Mr. Holder for failing to oppose the pardon. Some Democrats are concerned that the issue will resurface if Mr. Holder is nominated for attorney general.
SLAVERY. PRIVATE PRISON INDUSTRY. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?
Now that a brotha has been elected Massa ... will any of the millions of poor black and poor white men warehoused in corporate prisons be emancipated?