Submariner said...
What do you see, DV?
Denmark Vesey said ...
1) photoshop2) No Homo
3) probably the greatest English language poet on the planet
4) a Cash Money Millionaire
5) Rich field Niggas luxuriating in the romanticized aesthetic of an antebellum aristocracy that never really existed.
6) One of the few men on the planet capable of effectively articulating the threat of NWO Eugenics to 30 million Plantation Negros.
"Apparently, yeah my daughter be the twinkle of my eye
You hurt her, you kill me and nigga I ain't bout to die
See y'all are at ground, and my daughter is my sky
I swear I look in her face and I just want to break out and fly
Four tears in my face and you ain't never heard me cry
I'm richer than all y'all, I got a bank full of pride"
You hurt her, you kill me and nigga I ain't bout to die
See y'all are at ground, and my daughter is my sky
I swear I look in her face and I just want to break out and fly
Four tears in my face and you ain't never heard me cry
I'm richer than all y'all, I got a bank full of pride"
22 comments:
What do you see, DV?
Oops, my bad. I meant to link this.
Let me clear things up for ya'll:
Straight from Lil' Weezy's vault!
Lil Wayne - Kiss Me Baby
Lyrics:
I Can See You, I Can See It In Your Eyes U Don't Want Nobody But Me. Baby We Can Get Together And Shine Like A Starfish Outta The Sea. U And Me Sound Good, I Thinks That's The Way It's Suppose To Be (uh) U Just To Cold, U Suppose To Be Close To Me.
CASE CLOSED! Next
Casper ... really thinks ... he's said something.
amazing.
Be interesting to know how many OOW kidz been fathered by those "men" in the linked foto...
Why Big Don?
What do you see now?
And now?
A young poor boy from New Orleans who became a great poet and made himself one of the biggest rock stars in the world.
What do you see?
I am waiting with bated breath for you to equate your link with the obvious insanity of the Bernie Mac looking black man in the above photo swearing an oath to be the "wife" of the little old white man.
Oh, is that so? I didn't know that the first shot is a depiction of two men exchanging wedding vows. To me the second shot has more of the flavor and accoutrements of a wedding reception; what with the ornate colonnade, outdoor setting, and the brother holding the champagne glass gazing at two men in a passionately tender kiss. And in two other pictures I saw a young man all too ready to assume a submissive position kneeling before other men sharing the stage.
I forgot to add that in one scene the same young man has the appearance of a hesitantly demure participant in a Satanic ceremony with homoerotic and masochistic elements. To me it's unusual to see a young brother surrounded by white guys wearing masks reaching for him like the Gimp grasping at Marsellus Wallace.
ok
ok
cool.
Ultimately, we all see that which we wish to see.
Which is always my point.
See ... what you want ... to be.
You see a black man submitting to white men.
I see a creative genius at the top of his game. I'm proud of him.
DV sees / wants Black Supremacy.
Byrd sees / wants White Supremacy.
Mke Fisher sees / wants White Supremacy.
Lil Wayne sees / wants Money Supremacy.
DV
Sub won.
No lie, Weezy and Baby have been on that kissing each other shit for a long time. It's suspect.
Not saying they are gay, but there actions are suspect. If any two other rappers regularly kissed each other in the mouth, which these two have done on live television, you would call them suspect. Back off that Wayne crush.
Besides, Wayne wasn't rich, but he wasn't really poor. His mom had a decent job and she picked up extra money holding weight for Baby. He did all right and was even accepted into a magnet high school before he got on with Cash Money.
For a decent chunk of his childhood he lived in the same suburban area I live in, albeit in a rougher area. But, it wasn't the real hood.
I hear you Big Man. But I don't know anything about the cat personally, other than his art.
His art - is NoHomo.
His accomplishments as internationally acclaimed superstar - can't be dismissed.
The details of his circumstances don't really matter to me.
I'm a little taken aback at the number of brothers eager'see what they want to see' - with the: "I'm not saying .. but ... yada yada."
Sub- Well those "guys" probably aren't gay, just bi-sexual. There are some stats to support that...
I agree, Big Don. In my line of work I'm given an exceptional level of access to sensitive and privileged information. More than a few men who have all the trappings of urban thug chic have or have had sex with other men.
That's why the Omar Little character on The Wire was so palpable and believable. A year or two ago I saw a picture of Jay-Z's protégé Beenie Segal with his tongue in another man's ear. (If anyone can find the photo and provide a link I would be obliged.) Unlike most rappers, Segal is known to be an authentic gangster. And an absolute concomitant of prison culture is homosexual contact either coerced or willing.
Denmark's last response is quite revealing. Note how he distances the subject from his art. Intentional or not, he concedes that aspects of a man's private life are unknown but that even gay sexual identity does not denature his achievements or make him unworthy of emulation and admiration in other areas. At least theoretically, the individual may be homo but his art is no-homo. Sexual preference is not a constraint on identity or cultural prduction. Also private matters are just that-private. "The details of his circumstances don't really matter to me." Well said. Now all that's needed is for DV to put his own words into action and cease with the relentless demagoguery.
Not so fast grasshopper.
Urbanity, chicness nor thuggery is any indication of the presence or absence of homosexual behavior.
The fact that you encounter a great number of homosexual men in your occupation as a physician is by no means alarming.
Nor is it indicative of anything except the unhealthy nature of homosexual sex and the growing decadence of mainstream American culture.
Lil Wayne is one of the most photographed people on the planet. You've cherry picked some photos you seem to think warrant the implication that Lil Wayne may too be a homosexual.
What's your point?
Does the fact that I routinely celebrate the artistic achievement of someone you imply is a homosexual, disqualify my challenge to the absurdity of Homosexual Marriage?
Does it dismiss my assertion that "Gay Rights" is a misleading group identity political tactic?
The Omar Little character wasn't believable "because" he was a homosexual. He was believable because he was a criminal genius brilliantly acted by Michael Williams.
The fact that he engaged in homosexual sex made him no more authentic than the fact that he smoked cigarettes.
What Brother Sub confuses for demagoguery - is actually a celebration of humanity.
I can love and respect a man, because he is a man. He is a human being.
I don't need to participate in these illusions of identity founded upon sexual perversions.
There is no such thing as "Gay People". There are people.
I can love a person without affirming their sexual habits just like I can love a person without affirming their drug habits.
Doesn't mean I hate people who do drugs.
If we changed the name of people who engage in Incest to Joy People, would they deserve the right to marry?
Joy Rights!
Flip Flop DV... Flip Flop!
McCain Shame!
Actually DV, the adverse outcomes associated with heterosexual contacts are magnitudes greater than the homosexual variety.
I don't think that Lil Wayne is a homosexual. I just wanted to explicitly show the mist of uncertainty surrounding that which you call (rappers and hip hop) the last redoubt of masculinity and the limits of making possible homosexual encounters the prism through which to view Weezy and Bird as men.
Gay sex, like tattoos and braids, is absolutely linked with extended and repetitive incarceration.
Thanks for calling that out Casper.
"Gay sex, like tattoos and braids, is absolutely linked with extended and repetitive incarceration." Sub
I like that. Good point.
"Actually DV, the adverse outcomes associated with heterosexual contacts are magnitudes greater than the homosexual variety."
Can't possibly be true Doc.
pound for pound. toe to toe. No way, hell no.
yang / yang contacts will always have more adverse outcomes than yin / yang contacts.
It's a universal law no CA Court can change.
Casper is a fool and a NWO parrot.
Trust me on this bro. Although less publicized and prevalent in America, there are fetal afflictions linked to prosaic things like herpes and chlamydia. On a hypothetical note, homosexuality may be an evolutionary plus if resource allocation is a concern.
I'm no doctor,
but I play one on this blog.
After 50 years of Secular Jihad, I can only imagine the state of sexual health in this society. However, herpes and chlamydia are by no means exclusive to heterosexual sex. For comparative purposes anecdotal evidence of fetal afflictions cannot be used as a measurement of hetero vs homo adverse sexual outcomes. Homos don't produce fetuses.
Nah Sub, you my favorite young intellectual - but you are going to have to come better than that to support your assertion that the adverse outcomes of heterosexual sex are magnitudes greater than homosexual sex.
Homosexuality is by definition slow suicide.
We live in a universe of divine opposites. Homo nothing works.
"Sex is sacred"
- Barack Obama
Post a Comment