"A public apology, and all the other hoop jumping is the smart move. Or he can be seen as a problem player."D.SMITH said...
And
this is the problem. Seen as a problem player by whom?!! Who gives a
shit?!!˙We're talking about the GOTdam NFL. Ain't a whole bunch of little old ladies straight outta church watching football. It's a bunch of rowdy drunk folk for the most part. And when they leave the stadium or their little Sunday football party, PLEASE believe half them fools will be doing the same thing...driving drunk somewhere.
And what does any of this have to do with playing football? Tiger Woods can fuck all the white chicks other than his wife he wants...what's that got to do with golf?
People want these brothers to entertain them, but seem to get more entertainment sticking their nose all in their personal business...with all their own personal business out of order.
11 comments:
D.Smith - 1
DMG - 0
Ding Ding Ding!
Her Side,
Shut up. D.SMITH and I are having a conversation, we aren't brawling. Maybe you should read all the comments. Simpleton.
Who appointed your weak ass referee anyway. What you need to do is contribute something useful, before you elevate yourself to judge, cause you know that's not an entry level position...
::shaking my head::
DMG, I left that comment with 100% tongue-in-cheek motives. I’ll forgive your unnecessarily personal reply (and name calling) since the internet can’t communicate body language, tone of voice, etc.
I never did understand how strangers get personal and attack others without good reason. I hope it made you feel like a big man to call me a Simpleton today because it was unwarranted and… well... obviously untrue to every human on this planet who knows me.
Her Side,
I get no pleasure in identifying one more simpleton on this planet. Your numbers are frighteningly large already.
It's not personal. It's factual. It's descriptive if you will. Now, if you'll see your way OUT of one of the ONLY pleasant conversations I've had this week...I would much appreciate it thanks.
What I really find annoying is women like you who are all too willing to "step-up" and take a shot, but cower like wilting flowers when you find yourself getting verbally knocked down...and suddenly you are a "lady".
You want to take a shot at me, come with something intellectually mind blowing, or go back to what you were doing. I'm sure there are dishes that need washing. (See, I can FIRMLY place my tongue 100% in cheek too)..
DMG:
DV posted this to his reading public and opened it to comments. I don’t believe you have the authority to ban me from commenting on any posts here. You’re being ridiculous since my original comment wasn’t even directed at you – and certainly wasn’t intended to “take any shots” at you. I happened to support D.Smith’s position and didn’t need to write a thesis about why. You decided to get confrontational.
(I won’t even address all the “lady,” “wilting flower,” and “washing dishes” language which seems to apply in this situation only in your head).
You’re a funny man, and you won’t see me waste any more time communicating with you on this post. ::shaking my head and learning to ignore that which doesn’t deserve my energy::
DMG:
DV posted this to his reading public and opened it to comments. I don’t believe you have the authority to ban me from commenting on any posts here. You’re being ridiculous since my original comment wasn’t even directed at you – and certainly wasn’t intended to “take any shots” at you. I happened to support D.Smith’s position and didn’t need to write a thesis about why. You decided to get confrontational.
(I won’t even address all the “lady,” “wilting flower,” and “washing dishes” language which seems to apply in this situation only in your head).
You’re a funny man, and you won’t see me waste any more time communicating with you on this post. ::shaking my head and learning to ignore that which doesn’t deserve my energy::
DMG:
DV posted this to his reading public and opened it to comments. I don’t believe you have the authority to ban me from commenting on any posts here. You’re being ridiculous since my original comment wasn’t even directed at you – and certainly wasn’t intended to “take any shots” at you. I happened to support D.Smith’s position and didn’t need to write a thesis about why. You decided to get confrontational.
(I won’t even address all the “lady,” “wilting flower,” and “washing dishes” language which seems to apply in this situation only in your head).
You’re a funny man, and you won’t see me waste any more time communicating with you on this post. ::shaking my head and learning to ignore that which doesn’t deserve my energy::
I posted a reply (like 5x) while blogger was having technical troubles. The reply was neither personal nor condescending...
I'll take the tech problems as a reminder that ::ignore:: is the best policy for foolishness that doesn't deserve my energy.
5X makes me think you had something you wanted to get off your chest...
Post a Comment