A Tale Of Two Fairy Tales. One Secular the other Ecclesiastical.Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Not A Shred of Scientific Evidence ... But Plantation Negros & Plantation Crackas Accept It Without Question ...
A Tale Of Two Fairy Tales. One Secular the other Ecclesiastical.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
26 comments:
i hope no descendant of an african black man believes that shit...the only MF's that has evolved that way is those plantation crackas...if that's your's pos..kool....however there has been an evolution of a created man...that evolution is the evolution of learning......
"evolution" the gradual process in which "something" changes....
dx,
Most mainstream blacks, at least publicly, are on board with the idea of black man evolving from ape. They might not be explicit, but they think evolution is "fact."
The problem with evolution is that if it is not occurring at the individual level in REAL TIME then it does not exist. And if it is occurring at the individual level in real time then this "change" cannot be "fact" unless the "fact" keeps changing to a different "fact?"
TD,
change "is" a fact
dx,
Nah, "change" is what the human mind surmises is the state of the universe. Yet, when dx lays eyes on thordaddy he sees "fact" and not change. Meaning, more important than the assertion of perpetual change is the idea of eternal permanence. This is the backdrop that allows you to brag about seeing what is already self-evident.
That picture is bullshit because man didn't evolve from an ape.
Evolution doesn't teach that man evolved from apes either.
You're misrepresenting evolution.
Peace!!
i hear ya!! however...you too are surmising....all things are mental...that which TD lays his eyes on "dx"....it is a manifestation of the mind of my CREATOR!!!
dx,
I need not surmise if I consciously seek the Truth. Evolution, if it tells any truth at all, tells us the barest of truths. Namely, we change over time.
Other than that, it leaves wide open the answer to questions like where should I lead...? What should I do...? What ought I value...? What is right and what is wrong...? What is good and what is evil...?
Evolution tells you nothing, but consequently leaves your will to power unimpeded. This is the real rationale behind most people's embrace of evolution. It says that you constantly change and therefore other people should accept this uncritically and without judgment.
The Theory of Evolution is Luciferian scripture masquerading as science.
It is an attempt to manifest the promise of the Serpent:
"Ye shall be as Gods" Genesis
Evolution suggests progress. Man's process of BECOMING. Becoming what?
Becoming God.
Apotheosis is the common theme of all occult doctrine from the time of Babylon.
Once the Plantation was able to convince Plantation Occupants that "Science" was the arbiter of truth ... all they had to do was place lies inside the Trojan Horse of science ... and that lie became the new religion of the masses.
Which is why your kids are being taught Evolution & Global Warming in schools that kicked God out years ago.
TD
are you reading my comments??? you seem like a sensible person...you gonna tell me that you need a book to tell you what you should value..whats right and wrong...what is good and evil...shame....keep seeking for the "truth" you'll find it...
dx,
I don't need a book, but a Book of Truth would be mighty helpful. You mean you never read a book to gain truth?
TD
if you dont need a book...why are you asking questions?? then you say a book of truth...please make up your mind...so sound confused....
i've read many books...including the so called bible...truth has no lies attached...
dx,
You know all information is not equal. And that coherent information seems something like intelligence. And intelligence, if it is to mean anything, must be infused with Truth. Falseness cannot be intelligent although it can certainly be information.
The Book of Truth transcends its covers. The book, like the brain, is but a medium to transmit Truth.
Thou shall not murder...
Is this truth or not? You say you don't need the Book of Truth, but that is because the intelligence is already fully ingrained and you take this for granted. You don't need the Bible because you ALREADY accede to its most fundamental Truths. You should count your blessings...
For as little that is known about man's creation a whole lot is known about the bible's creation. So if you want to argue facts based on the bible there you have, your problem. There are very few if any facts in your bible.
These are all theories, not absolute truth, you will never find absolute truth in a relative world, it's nonsense. We can argue all we want about this subject, but I find it arrogant to say this is truth and this is not. I don't believe we evolved from apes, but man had an evolution, just like everything else, just like our conciousness evolves. I do believe there is a super intelligence behind creation, I don't believe in accidents. I would say both theories have valid points. My theory is a third one in which an alien civilization came to genetically engineer man and become what it is now.
Brother Cesar must have small ass to be sitting on that fence so nicely.
I am a proponent of vigorous debate, it's a great workout for the mind. And I'm always annoyed by the uninitiated disguised as a voice of reason.
There is nothing wrong with disagreeing so long as we're not disagreeable. That maybe a paraphrase.
Argue on family there's nothing more refreshing than mental pushups just before bed. Actually that's not true but you get my drift.
The level of the utmost stupidity displayed here is absolutely mind-boggling. Here's a guy who has not a shred of scientific evidence for the existence of God decrying that there supposedly is no scientific evidence for the evolution biological beings.
@td
what kind of question is that?? i would take a MF out if and when necessary!!!! dont sleep!! neither am i a sociopath!!...you gonna tell me that when the so called israelites came to mt sinai they had to be told that murder without justification aint kosher??
no wonder they lost their land!!!
@dr
I have taken my side, but it ain't the science-religion two headed beast.
"My theory is a third one in which an alien civilization came to genetically engineer man and become what it is now."
I agree 100%. The gods in Genesis were the Annunaki - who created human slaves by splicing their genes into Homo Erectus.
This is all established fact now.
What's up Blazing Truth.
Very interesting theory.
Not nearly as ridiculous as that juvenile fairy tale that man emerged from monkeys.
Tell us more about the Annunaki.
The Anunnaki appear in the Babylonian creation myth, Enuma Elish. In the late version magnifying Marduk, after the creation of mankind, Marduk divides the Anunnaki and assigns them to their proper stations, three hundred in heaven, three hundred on the earth. In gratitude, the Anunnaki, the "Great Gods", built Esagila, the splendid: "They raised high the head of Esagila equaling Apsu. Having built a stage-tower as high as Apsu, they set up in it an abode for Marduk, Enlil, Ea." Then they built their own shrines.
According to later Babylonian myth, the Anunnaki were the children of Anu and Ki, brother and sister gods, themselves the children of Anshar and Kishar (Skypivot and Earthpivot, the Celestial poles), who in turn were the children of Lahamu and Lahmu ("the muddy ones"), names given to the gatekeepers of the Abzu temple at Eridu, the site at which the creation was thought to have occurred. Finally, Lahamu and Lahmu were the children of Tiamat and Abzu.
The head of the Anunnaki council was the Great Anu of Uruk and the other members were his offspring. His place was taken by Enlil, (En=lord, lil=wind,air), who at some time was thought to have separated heaven and earth. This resulted in an ongoing dispute between Enlil of Nippur and his half brother Enki of Eridu regarding the legitimacy of Enlil's assumption of leadership. Enki, (En=lord, Ki=Earth), in addition to being the God of fresh water, was also God of wisdom and magic, regarded by some as an alchemist. When the Igigi went on strike and refused to continue to work maintaining the universe, on the Shappatu (Hebrew: שבת, Eng: Shabbath) Enki created humankind to assume responsibility for the tasks the Gods no longer performed.
The more you think about it, the more sense it makes.
That's why the gods/Elohim in Genesis were afraid humans would become as them (gods/Elohim) if they ate from the tree of life too - just like the Reptilian had predicted. Because these humans, being part-alien, had the genetic potential within them to possibly become like the aliens.
That's why humans are also dominant on this planet, yet somewhat physiologically maladapted. We need clothing and cook our food, for instance. Can't survive outdoors well naked without tools. Unlike every other organism here. This is characteristic of a foreign species.
"The archaeological synthesis of the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin proves the "gods" (Sumerian:Annunaki; Egyptian:Neter; Hebrew:Anakim, Nefilim, Elohim) the ancient civilizations insisted came here from space, created humans and gave us civilization, were flesh and blood humanoids from the last planet in our solar system (Nibiru, Planet X) who genetically engineered us as slave animals by splicing their genes with Homo Erectus genes and, eventually, accepted us as limited partners.
The two major paradigms, the Creationist world view and the Evolutionary model, which have molded Western culture have been subsumed, corrected and outmoded by this new meta-paradigm of human nature provided by the profound ramifications of the new archaeological perspective."
Most of the Bible is diluted Sumerian text about the Anunnaki.
Anunnaki/Anakim = this race of gods
Elohim = the gods
Anu = King of Nibiru
Enlil = Anu's son/lord of northern latitude Earth
Enki/Yahweh = Anu's son/lord of southern latitude Earth
Some also believe the ancient caduceus symbolized DNA and genetic engineering. Ergo, the Elohim said, "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness..." "Us" implying a race...and "image" implying a degree of cloning.
Ever wonder why Bible is obsessed with genealogical lineages - with Noah being saved because he was perfect in his generations? As opposed to the offspring of the sons of god and daughters of men? All this had to do with genes and bloodlines, not "sin."
i know y'all dont believe in that mumbo jumbo BS...the bible is not a reliable source for historical truth or any truth for that matter...
The myth of creation, the flood and other myths of the bible all come from ancient sumerian scriptures, this same culture that believed in serpent gods. The 7 tablets of creation for example refer to the 7 days of creation. These tablets are in a museum in Europe. The truth of ourselves lies within ourselves, not outside, it is encoded in our DNA (for science maniacs)
Science focus on the advancement of technology to create superhumans, and that is the agenda behind the theory of evolution, to implant the subconscious idea within our minds that we can become like gods.
Science is a tool being used to deceive, it could be use for good to find facts about ourselves, but evil controls it, just like everything else in the world... and that includes religion.
Who is this cat? Good stuff Cesar.
Welcome to the blog.
Post a Comment