Is there really anything about me or my statements that you could point to as "afrosaxon"?
Your language, culture, religion, profession, pov, every single aspect of your existence and public thought exteriorization as a culturally embedded being is purely afrosaxon.
The global system of white supremacy caught you hook, line and sinker decades ago brah. Like the high epopt of the tabernacle of global white supremacy, you too wallow in the pseudo innocent enjoyment of white privilege while making inordinate mouth noises (textual) to the contrary. No point in pretending otherwise and keeping racial accounts as if your way of life reflected any substantive or meaningful protest against the same.
DV - OTOH - makes no pretensions to struggle. He embraced his anglosaxon excesses a long time ago, in fully cinematic terms, and wallows in that shit like an egoist on a high-drip dopamine IV. He absolutely worships at the alter of an unbridled western leisure class spectacle, celebrating every minute of it and calling attention to it as yours for the taking.
All that GSWS shit makes its psychic adherents look the part of Patricia Neal in Fountainhead pretending even for a moment that she hain't giving up the nappy.
Sorry Dwight, ran out of battery power waiting for my kids to get out of wushu...,
The reason your statement is an unselfconscious moment of purest afrosaxon comedy gold - is because of the obviousness of its denial of the "reality of the situation."
It is an empirical fact and indisputable reality that you are an entirely western man. Your consciousness is as fully western as your lifestyle. Living one way and talking another can only make you a hypocrite, not a revolutionary.
Talking about a global system of white supremacy and living like a melaninated supremator - is not heroic, not thought criminal, not culturally insurgent, not revolutionary, not even psychologically liberating - rather, it's just unselfconsciously hypocritical.
The facts defining your exclusively anglospheric and since Black identified "afro"-saxon way of life are lost on no outside observer. However, the moment these obvious externalities become lost on you, is the moment you've permitted a set of unfalsifiable deductions to make you stuck on stupid. I'm confident that you don't want to go out like that. As you can plainly see, no other grown-assed, Black identified man or woman permitted their sanity to be thusly assaulted, you shouldn't either.
Oh contrare, Michael. I sincerley appreciate Cnu's opinion. It helps me to understand that I have been remiss in my attepmts at communication with the brah. I'll give him the opportunity to clarify where it appears to me his logic leaps.
I am going to make a huge assumption at this point. I am going to assume we are using at least a reasonably similar definition of the word AfroSaxon. If so, then in fact I happen to agree with some of what he says. I think all of us, even Cnu if he is willing to admit it, have been infected with Anglo-Saxonism to varying degrees, and I also believe that despite our best efforts otherwise, we will likely never completely divest ourselves of the conditioning that has been applied. But CNu, doesn't that prove my point? If in fact we are AfroSaxon, then someone or something is responsible for conditioning us to be that way. I think you see where this is going.
Now as to some of that other stuff, could you clarify exactly how I might "wallow in the pseudo innocent enjoyment of white privilege"? What is "keeping racial accounts"? And do you really think you know me well enough to know what my personal life is, much less how I am going about my meaningful and/or substantive protest?
I think all of us, even Cnu if he is willing to admit it, have been infected with Anglo-Saxonism to varying degrees, and I also believe that despite our best efforts otherwise, we will likely never completely divest ourselves of the conditioning that has been applied. But CNu, doesn't that prove my point? If in fact we are AfroSaxon, then someone or something is responsible for conditioning us to be that way. I think you see where this is going.
Proves nothing beside the fact that we're cultural afrosaxons. Going beyond that is going off the tracks. Are there significant and deeply pernicious problems plaguing the anglosphere in which we're culturally and psychologically embedded? Obviously the answer is yes! Equally obviously, these problems need to be addressed.
Now as to some of that other stuff, could you clarify exactly how I might "wallow in the pseudo innocent enjoyment of white privilege"?
By living an anglospheric way of life (your ontological polity) while clinging to an ideologically oppositional political point of view (your epistemological polity). Thinking anti-anglospheric thoughts while doing purely anglospheric deeds - doesn't make you innocent - it just makes you confused.
What is "keeping racial accounts"? "Keeping accounts" is a "work" term describing an internal dialog in which you maintain an imaginary grievance with non-existent persecutors. Kind of like cussing for 20 minutes and pouting after a driver cuts you off on the road.
And do you really think you know me well enough to know what my personal life is, much less how I am going about my meaningful and/or substantive protest?
Dood, youse an accountant and financial advisor in a suit..., can it get any more quintessentially conventional and in conformity with the status quo than that?
What "what reality of the situation" are you referring to?
uh..., DV was quoting you Dwight. You tell me exactly what YOU had in mind since you said it originally?
Before I deconstruct it let me make sure I really understand it. How exactly am I living like a melaninated supremator?
Do you drive a car? Pay taxes? Vote? Since all these activities support the continuing worldwide projection of American force to preserve the American way of life in which you participate, you're by default a full participant in any and all forms of supremacy practiced by the American state, worldwide.
And while you are at it how about using small words to explain what is a "set of unfalsifiable deductions"?
Nope Dwight - you got a dictionary. Better yet - and more convenient to you - google.com is right there at your fingertips.
"unfalsifiable claims" or "unfalsifiable deductions" are standard enough terms that you're obligated to either familiarize yourself with them if you intend to engage in ideological discourse - or simply quit the playing field for lack of baseline knowledge and skill. Being the professional that you are, I'm confident you won't quit the playing field or waste any more cycles playing dumb. That type of tactical sophistry is beneath you brah.
Why is it going of the tracks? This all started because you denounce me as a hypocrite for expousing a theory of GSWS, and now your own logic veers right into the same lane and it's not relevant?
You need to be more specific CNu. Are you saying because I live in a house rather than an Igloo or a grass hut, I am living anglo-saxon?Is it because I occasionally where a suit? Is it because i do the necessary things to survive in my environment? Be more specific, what exactly is it that you think I am doing?
It's obvious you don't know me if you think I am an accountant, but even if i was, have you never heard of the spook who sat behind the door? wouldn't you need to know what my advice might be before you determined that I was as status quo as you want to believe I am?
Why is it going of the tracks? This all started because you denounce me as a hypocrite for expousing a theory of GSWS, and now your own logic veers right into the same lane and it's not relevant?
Fact check brah. I stated that your claim that DV is involved in anything even remotely resembling your ideological struggle is comedy gold, period.
I then proceeded to prove your basic afrosaxinity. (at your request)
I then quoted your terminology re; "the reality of the situation" to further elaborate on the paradox separating your lived modality from your professed ideology.
As of this juncture, I haven't denounced you at all.
You need to be more specific CNu. Are you saying because I live in a house rather than an Igloo or a grass hut, I am living anglo-saxon?Is it because I occasionally where a suit? Is it because i do the necessary things to survive in my environment? Be more specific, what exactly is it that you think I am doing?
At this point I'm rather certain you're engaging in unbecoming tactical sophistry to buy time to try to mount a more persuasive discursive riff, because I've answered all your questions and plainly pointed out the irreconcilability of your claims to strident ideological oppositionality juxtiposed with a fully compliant way of life.
It's obvious you don't know me if you think I am an accountant, but even if i was, have you never heard of the spook who sat behind the door? wouldn't you need to know what my advice might be before you determined that I was as status quo as you want to believe I am?
My bad, law school graduate. (guess I should use google.com too) Does that mean you're an officer of the court and a practicing attorney? (if so, then your compliance level just went up two orders of magnitude)
As for the rest, whatever motives you claim are patently unfalsifiable here and therefore outside the purview of logical or factual discourse. I and anyone else attending to this thread can no more ascertain your spook-by-the-door status than we can Chuck Barris' claim to being a CIA assassin with 33 kills to his credit. All that we can know for certain is that you are an afrosaxon in good standing and a full and compliant participant in the American way of life. Everything else is merely diversionary conversation....,
Yeah that's right I'm stalling. Trying to work out whether what you are presenting is even worth discussing. Fast becoming certain that it's not.
Unfalsifiable. I like that. Like this statement "a full and compliant participant in the American way of life". Aren't we all. aat least those of us who live here? I drive a car so I'm complicit in the systemic problem. I guess if I rode a horse I would be a cowboy, huh Gus?
"outside the purview of logical or factual discourse". I like this one too. That can be very convenient when you no longer think your logic can withsatnd rational challenge. You don't need any facts or logic if you simply state a fact (like I live in America) and then proceed to determine that the fact of my residence in America fully and completely supports other, much more subjective conclusions.
If as you said, my contention that DV was involved in any kind of struggle is your only point here, then I concede the point that you may indeed be correct that DV is not involved in anything worthwhile.
What I do not concede is that you have "plainly pointed out the irreconcilability of your claims to strident ideological oppositionality juxtiposed with a fully compliant way of life". What you have plainly pointed out is that where there is knowledge outside of your personal sphere of knowing, you choose to conduct yourself as if that knowledge does not exist. Whatever works for you playa. For myself, I think I will simply stick to my unfalsifiable ways until a better program comes along.
I now know how to manage subsequent contacts. Thanks for the enlightenment.
If as you said, my contention that DV was involved in any kind of struggle is your only point here, then I concede the point that you may indeed be correct that DV is not involved in anything worthwhile.
He doesn't claim to be. You OTOH DO claim involvement in some kind of struggle. However, as far as anyone else can gather from your writings, your "struggle" is confined entirely to your own imagination.
What you have plainly pointed out is that where there is knowledge outside of your personal sphere of knowing, you choose to conduct yourself as if that knowledge does not exist.
"nah, nah, nah-boo-boo" would've been stronger than that dood...., but thanks to your handwaving reply, my "personal sphere of knowing" now includes the indisputable fact that you're also entirely incapable of providing empirical evidence for your GS/WS hypothesis.
I now know how to manage subsequent contacts.
You should avoid them the same way a soap bubble avoids contact with hard sharp objects....,
"DV - OTOH - makes no pretensions to struggle. He embraced his anglosaxon excesses a long time ago, in fully cinematic terms, and wallows in that shit like an egoist on a high-drip dopamine IV. He absolutely worships at the alter of an unbridled western leisure class spectacle, celebrating every minute of it and calling attention to it as yours for the taking." CNU
Brilliant! LOL!
Rumble young man Rumble!
Aghhhhhhhh!!!!
CNu, if it weren't for you and Submariner, I'd be bored with these pedestrian adversaries.
And do you really think you know me well enough to know what my personal life is, much less how I am going about my meaningful and/or substantive protest?
Dood, youse an accountant and financial advisor in a suit..., can it get any more quintessentially conventional and in conformity with the status quo than that?
"I and anyone else attending to this thread can no more ascertain your spook-by-the-door status than we can Chuck Barris' claim to being a CIA assassin with 33 kills to his credit.
All that we can know for certain is that you are an afrosaxon in good standing and a full and compliant participant in the American way of life. Everything else is merely diversionary conversation....,"
Damn.
Mayweather ... 10th round ... goes to the body with the jab.
I guess it went over your head that Nulan dissed you in a major way, DV.
Dwight, are the lucid, highly logical , and once again well-reasoned expositions displayed subsequent to my initial question make things clearer to you now?
"Oh Shit! ... GMO Food Sterilizes People ... And It's Really A Form of Population Control?"
"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."
INTELLECTUAL INSURRECTIONISTS
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider - founder Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
Were We All Kunta Kinte? Or Are We Also Mansa Musa?
Plantation Negros & The New World Order
Illuminati Want My Mind Soul & My Body - A DV Joint
Barry Goldwater 1909-1998
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. "
Robert Mugabe Speaks To Thunderous Approval At Harlem's Mount Olive Baptist Church
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad
"It Is Easier To Change A Man's Religion Than It Is To Change His Diet"
Private Prison Industry
2,000,000 human beings in American prisons and counting
IS THIS LITTLE GUY A PERSON?
The founders of the American state understood that the proper functioning of a democracy required an educated electorate. It is this understanding that justifies a system of public education and that led slaveholders to resist the spread of literacy among their chattels. But the meaning of "educated" has changed beyond recognition in two hundred years. Reading, writing, and arithmetic are no longer sufficient to decide on public policy. Now we need quantum mechanics and molecular biology. The knowledge required for political rationality, once available to the masses, is now in the possession of a specially educated elite, a situation that creates a series of tensions and contradictions in the operation of representative democracy.
Greater Display of Conspicuous Consumption?
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. P
"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
Louis Pasteur
"The Microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything."
A DV JOINT
Ask Denmark Vesey
DenmarkVesey1822@hotmail.com
Chris Hedges Warns of The Dangers of The "New Atheists" and "Secular Fundamentalists"
Beverly Johnson. Beverly Hills. 1978
Do You Consider Yourself:
"Bra! Tell Me About It!"
"Most of the trouble I have had in advancing the cause of the race has come from Negroes."
Is President Barack Hussein Obama The Driving Force Behind US Policy?
Ted Turner - CNN founder and UN supporter - quoted in the The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June '
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Lord Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science On Society (Routledge Press: New York, 1951).
"At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars.. War has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. The state of affairs might be unpleasant, but what of it?"
Denmark Vesey For President 08
1. Troops Out Of Iraq Immediately. Like By Monday. 2. Money Owed To Haliburton and War Contractors Be Given Directly To The Iraqi People 3. Complete Electoral Reform 4. No Corporate Conglomerate Will Be Allowed To Control More Than 5% Of News Market 5. Federal Reserve Abolished 6. For-Profit Prison Industry Abolished
*George Orwell (1903-1950) English novelist, critic
Men can only be happy when they do not assume that the object of life is happiness... If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear... The great enemy of clear language is insincerity... The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it... To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle... For a creative writer possession of the truth is less important than emotional sincerity.
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society will be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” – Zbigniew Brzezinski
God Don't Make No Mistakes
Subscribe Via eMail
Gordon Parks 1912-2006
"I suffered evils, but without allowing them to rob me of the freedom to expand."
22 comments:
Is there really anything about me or my statements that you could point to as "afrosaxon"?
Your language, culture, religion, profession, pov, every single aspect of your existence and public thought exteriorization as a culturally embedded being is purely afrosaxon.
The global system of white supremacy caught you hook, line and sinker decades ago brah. Like the high epopt of the tabernacle of global white supremacy, you too wallow in the pseudo innocent enjoyment of white privilege while making inordinate mouth noises (textual) to the contrary. No point in pretending otherwise and keeping racial accounts as if your way of life reflected any substantive or meaningful protest against the same.
DV - OTOH - makes no pretensions to struggle. He embraced his anglosaxon excesses a long time ago, in fully cinematic terms, and wallows in that shit like an egoist on a high-drip dopamine IV. He absolutely worships at the alter of an unbridled western leisure class spectacle, celebrating every minute of it and calling attention to it as yours for the taking.
All that GSWS shit makes its psychic adherents look the part of Patricia Neal in Fountainhead pretending even for a moment that she hain't giving up the nappy.
Dwight, I hope the well-reasoned, logical exposition displayed above will make things clear to you.
Sorry Dwight, ran out of battery power waiting for my kids to get out of wushu...,
The reason your statement is an unselfconscious moment of purest afrosaxon comedy gold - is because of the obviousness of its denial of the "reality of the situation."
It is an empirical fact and indisputable reality that you are an entirely western man. Your consciousness is as fully western as your lifestyle. Living one way and talking another can only make you a hypocrite, not a revolutionary.
Talking about a global system of white supremacy and living like a melaninated supremator - is not heroic, not thought criminal, not culturally insurgent, not revolutionary, not even psychologically liberating - rather, it's just unselfconsciously hypocritical.
The facts defining your exclusively anglospheric and since Black identified "afro"-saxon way of life are lost on no outside observer. However, the moment these obvious externalities become lost on you, is the moment you've permitted a set of unfalsifiable deductions to make you stuck on stupid. I'm confident that you don't want to go out like that. As you can plainly see, no other grown-assed, Black identified man or woman permitted their sanity to be thusly assaulted, you shouldn't either.
Oh contrare, Michael. I sincerley appreciate Cnu's opinion. It helps me to understand that I have been remiss in my attepmts at communication with the brah. I'll give him the opportunity to clarify where it appears to me his logic leaps.
I am going to make a huge assumption at this point. I am going to assume we are using at least a reasonably similar definition of the word AfroSaxon. If so, then in fact I happen to agree with some of what he says. I think all of us, even Cnu if he is willing to admit it, have been infected with Anglo-Saxonism to varying degrees, and I also believe that despite our best efforts otherwise, we will likely never completely divest ourselves of the conditioning that has been applied. But CNu, doesn't that prove my point? If in fact we are AfroSaxon, then someone or something is responsible for conditioning us to be that way. I think you see where this is going.
Now as to some of that other stuff, could you clarify exactly how I might "wallow in the pseudo innocent enjoyment of white privilege"? What is "keeping racial accounts"? And do you really think you know me well enough to know what my personal life is, much less how I am going about my meaningful and/or substantive protest?
What "what reality of the situation" are you referring to?
(I'm trying to digest this bit by bit, rather than simply reject it all out of hand.)
"Talking about a global system of white supremacy and living like a melaninated supremator "
Before I deconstruct it let me make sure I really understand it. How exactly am I living like a melaninated supremator?
And while you are at it how about using small words to explain what is a "set of unfalsifiable deductions"?
I think all of us, even Cnu if he is willing to admit it, have been infected with Anglo-Saxonism to varying degrees, and I also believe that despite our best efforts otherwise, we will likely never completely divest ourselves of the conditioning that has been applied. But CNu, doesn't that prove my point? If in fact we are AfroSaxon, then someone or something is responsible for conditioning us to be that way. I think you see where this is going.
Proves nothing beside the fact that we're cultural afrosaxons. Going beyond that is going off the tracks. Are there significant and deeply pernicious problems plaguing the anglosphere in which we're culturally and psychologically embedded? Obviously the answer is yes! Equally obviously, these problems need to be addressed.
Now as to some of that other stuff, could you clarify exactly how I might "wallow in the pseudo innocent enjoyment of white privilege"?
By living an anglospheric way of life (your ontological polity) while clinging to an ideologically oppositional political point of view (your epistemological polity). Thinking anti-anglospheric thoughts while doing purely anglospheric deeds - doesn't make you innocent - it just makes you confused.
What is "keeping racial accounts"? "Keeping accounts" is a "work" term describing an internal dialog in which you maintain an imaginary grievance with non-existent persecutors. Kind of like cussing for 20 minutes and pouting after a driver cuts you off on the road.
And do you really think you know me well enough to know what my personal life is, much less how I am going about my meaningful and/or substantive protest?
Dood, youse an accountant and financial advisor in a suit..., can it get any more quintessentially conventional and in conformity with the status quo than that?
What "what reality of the situation" are you referring to?
uh..., DV was quoting you Dwight. You tell me exactly what YOU had in mind since you said it originally?
Before I deconstruct it let me make sure I really understand it. How exactly am I living like a melaninated supremator?
Do you drive a car? Pay taxes? Vote? Since all these activities support the continuing worldwide projection of American force to preserve the American way of life in which you participate, you're by default a full participant in any and all forms of supremacy practiced by the American state, worldwide.
And while you are at it how about using small words to explain what is a "set of unfalsifiable deductions"?
Nope Dwight - you got a dictionary. Better yet - and more convenient to you - google.com is right there at your fingertips.
"unfalsifiable claims" or "unfalsifiable deductions" are standard enough terms that you're obligated to either familiarize yourself with them if you intend to engage in ideological discourse - or simply quit the playing field for lack of baseline knowledge and skill. Being the professional that you are, I'm confident you won't quit the playing field or waste any more cycles playing dumb. That type of tactical sophistry is beneath you brah.
Why is it going of the tracks? This all started because you denounce me as a hypocrite for expousing a theory of GSWS, and now your own logic veers right into the same lane and it's not relevant?
You need to be more specific CNu. Are you saying because I live in a house rather than an Igloo or a grass hut, I am living anglo-saxon?Is it because I occasionally where a suit? Is it because i do the necessary things to survive in my environment? Be more specific, what exactly is it that you think I am doing?
It's obvious you don't know me if you think I am an accountant, but even if i was, have you never heard of the spook who sat behind the door? wouldn't you need to know what my advice might be before you determined that I was as status quo as you want to believe I am?
Why is it going of the tracks? This all started because you denounce me as a hypocrite for expousing a theory of GSWS, and now your own logic veers right into the same lane and it's not relevant?
Fact check brah. I stated that your claim that DV is involved in anything even remotely resembling your ideological struggle is comedy gold, period.
I then proceeded to prove your basic afrosaxinity. (at your request)
I then quoted your terminology re; "the reality of the situation" to further elaborate on the paradox separating your lived modality from your professed ideology.
As of this juncture, I haven't denounced you at all.
You need to be more specific CNu. Are you saying because I live in a house rather than an Igloo or a grass hut, I am living anglo-saxon?Is it because I occasionally where a suit? Is it because i do the necessary things to survive in my environment? Be more specific, what exactly is it that you think I am doing?
At this point I'm rather certain you're engaging in unbecoming tactical sophistry to buy time to try to mount a more persuasive discursive riff, because I've answered all your questions and plainly pointed out the irreconcilability of your claims to strident ideological oppositionality juxtiposed with a fully compliant way of life.
It's obvious you don't know me if you think I am an accountant, but even if i was, have you never heard of the spook who sat behind the door? wouldn't you need to know what my advice might be before you determined that I was as status quo as you want to believe I am?
My bad, law school graduate. (guess I should use google.com too) Does that mean you're an officer of the court and a practicing attorney? (if so, then your compliance level just went up two orders of magnitude)
As for the rest, whatever motives you claim are patently unfalsifiable here and therefore outside the purview of logical or factual discourse. I and anyone else attending to this thread can no more ascertain your spook-by-the-door status than we can Chuck Barris' claim to being a CIA assassin with 33 kills to his credit. All that we can know for certain is that you are an afrosaxon in good standing and a full and compliant participant in the American way of life. Everything else is merely diversionary conversation....,
Yeah that's right I'm stalling. Trying to work out whether what you are presenting is even worth discussing. Fast becoming certain that it's not.
Unfalsifiable. I like that. Like this statement "a full and compliant participant in the American way of life". Aren't we all. aat least those of us who live here? I drive a car so I'm complicit in the systemic problem. I guess if I rode a horse I would be a cowboy, huh Gus?
"outside the purview of logical or factual discourse". I like this one too. That can be very convenient when you no longer think your logic can withsatnd rational challenge. You don't need any facts or logic if you simply state a fact (like I live in America) and then proceed to determine that the fact of my residence in America fully and completely supports other, much more subjective conclusions.
If as you said, my contention that DV was involved in any kind of struggle is your only point here, then I concede the point that you may indeed be correct that DV is not involved in anything worthwhile.
What I do not concede is that you have "plainly pointed out the irreconcilability of your claims to strident ideological oppositionality juxtiposed with a fully compliant way of life". What you have plainly pointed out is that where there is knowledge outside of your personal sphere of knowing, you choose to conduct yourself as if that knowledge does not exist. Whatever works for you playa. For myself, I think I will simply stick to my unfalsifiable ways until a better program comes along.
I now know how to manage subsequent contacts. Thanks for the enlightenment.
If as you said, my contention that DV was involved in any kind of struggle is your only point here, then I concede the point that you may indeed be correct that DV is not involved in anything worthwhile.
He doesn't claim to be. You OTOH DO claim involvement in some kind of struggle. However, as far as anyone else can gather from your writings, your "struggle" is confined entirely to your own imagination.
What you have plainly pointed out is that where there is knowledge outside of your personal sphere of knowing, you choose to conduct yourself as if that knowledge does not exist.
"nah, nah, nah-boo-boo" would've been stronger than that dood...., but thanks to your handwaving reply, my "personal sphere of knowing" now includes the indisputable fact that you're also entirely incapable of providing empirical evidence for your GS/WS hypothesis.
I now know how to manage subsequent contacts.
You should avoid them the same way a soap bubble avoids contact with hard sharp objects....,
"DV - OTOH - makes no pretensions to struggle. He embraced his anglosaxon excesses a long time ago, in fully cinematic terms, and wallows in that shit like an egoist on a high-drip dopamine IV. He absolutely worships at the alter of an unbridled western leisure class spectacle, celebrating every minute of it and calling attention to it as yours for the taking." CNU
Brilliant! LOL!
Rumble young man Rumble!
Aghhhhhhhh!!!!
CNu, if it weren't for you and Submariner, I'd be bored with these pedestrian adversaries.
These ... local yocals.
These Negros of thinly veiled low self-esteem.
Good stuff man.
"Thinking anti-anglospheric thoughts while doing purely anglospheric deeds - doesn't make you innocent - it just makes you confused."
LOLOLOL OhMyGod OhMyGod OhMyGod LOL
Wheeeeeeewwww ...
man!
That was an Ali-Liston II over-hand right to the jaw "Get up Sucka!".
And do you really think you know me well enough to know what my personal life is, much less how I am going about my meaningful and/or substantive protest?
Dood, youse an accountant and financial advisor in a suit..., can it get any more quintessentially conventional and in conformity with the status quo than that?
AGHHHHHHHH!!!!!! LOLOL AGGJHcough cough AGhhhhh
This mafucka needs to be on stage.
CNu. Stop man.
I'm wakin' kids up.
"I and anyone else attending to this thread can no more ascertain your spook-by-the-door status than we can Chuck Barris' claim to being a CIA assassin with 33 kills to his credit.
All that we can know for certain is that you are an afrosaxon in good standing and a full and compliant participant in the American way of life. Everything else is merely diversionary conversation....,"
Damn.
Mayweather ... 10th round ... goes to the body with the jab.
CNu, this is a virtuoso performance.
I guess it went over your head that Nulan dissed you in a major way, DV.
Dwight, are the lucid, highly logical , and once again well-reasoned expositions displayed subsequent to my initial question make things clearer to you now?
Michael, I assure you that I am as amused by their antics as they appear to be. I concede your point; things are crystal clear to me at this point.
Good, Dwight, let's move on then.
Note, by the way, that DV has yet to contradict Telemaque.
Maybe a lesson for all of us, me thinks.
Michael Fisher said...
"Note, by the way, that DV has yet to contradict Telemaque."
I missed that Brother Mike. My fault. Contradict what?
I missed that Brother Mike. My fault. Contradict what?
DV you might be a lot of things, but you ain't stupid.
So don't act like you missed anything whatsoever.
And you aint clairvoyant.
Honestly Mike, I skimmed most of that homoerotic conversation between you and your alter-ego ... "Telemaque".
You / Telemaque asked this question more than once. I want to make sure I answer it.
Contradict what Mike / Telemaque?
Post a Comment