But that's how the Plantation gets you. They feed Plantation Negros some silly no-brainer social engineering slogan like the one above that conformists latch on to because it makes them feel superior to ... to ... well ... it makes them feel superior to niggers.
Funny thing is ... there is only some social engineering that is allowed. Social engineering that perpetuates the notion that young black man are irrational, sub humans prone to crime and violence is Allllll Gooood. Fix The Nigger signs are OK.
If we are going to allow social engineering memes to be printed in public spaces and presented like the Law of the Land ... why stop at sagging teens? What about other groups that need a bit of ... correction?
Someone would go to jail.
No. Can't have that. That's intolerant. That's bigotry. That's a hate crime. Objectify and minimize young black men all day .... but leave the faggots alone!
14 comments:
"Social engineering that perpetuates the notion that young black man are irrational, sub humans prone to crime and violence."
Actually, don't the simple facts perpetuate that reality?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3-F-3Vo54
Nobody is discouraging white boys from having multiple tatts, piercings,multi-colored hairstyles, etc.But black boys get so much flack about what they wear. Why so?
I went to school with heavy metal- punk rock white boys and the principal didn't make a single rule about their wardrobe. But the black boys got so much flack.
Funny thing is: Tattoos, piercings and dyed hair is for the most part permanent. But we concerned about some damn jeans you take off at the end of the day.
Yawn!
Man... thanks for the enlightenment... I think the real issue is that like many styles introduced by blacks, it is something that has be co-opted and mainstreamed... and the black leaders have no original thinking and have not been able to evolve ... kind of like a retardation of growth both in spirit and intellectually... Just my opinion...
Um...were the white metal kids showing their dirty underpants to everyone? Just wondering.
The saggy pants thing is functionally the equivalent of the glam and heavy leather metal looks of the 80's. The leather-bondage gear of early 80's metal and the lipstick and high hair of glam or "hair" metal came directly from gay culture. In the case of the leather and chains thing it was directly brought into metal culture by a closeted metal singer, Rob Halford, of Judas Priest. Not hating on his private preferences, but the irony was that all these metal kids were dressing this way in the 80's completely ignorant of where their "look" came from--and most of these metal kids would have been the first to beat up anyone they perceived as homosexual.
The saggy pants thing I see the same way. It's a look that comes from gay prison culture. Sagging your pants meant you were sexually available to play the role of someone's prison "lady." Now, every young, hyper-masculine hip hop kid is walking around like this, like it's "sexy" or maybe that they just wanna have the extra ten seconds headstart in case they suddenly develop a spastic colon. Sorry to be all Bill Cosby with this, but it's not a good look.
And I've seen plenty of hip hop white kids sporting the same look. Not saying I'd advocate making a law against it, because people have the right to walk around dressed like gay prison thugs or unfortunate youth who've developed spastic colons before their time--if they so want without being fined for it or profiled. However, people should also have the guts to get a little Cosby on these kids, be man enough to say,"You do know this is how gay men in prison wear their pants, right?"
Now get off my lawn, you whipper snappers!
"Now, every young, hyper-masculine hip hop kid is walking around like this"
No they're not. You've been watching too much TV. If anything, this shit is played out.
Not watching too much TV, don't even own one. Live in NYC. I see this stuff nearly every subway ride I take.
I only wish it was played out.
It's just the current Eff-You look.
It's happened before with with every generation.
Zoot Suits, Afros, Dashikis, Track Suits, Cross Colours, FUBU, whatever...
It's just how this generation choses to distinguish itself from the ones prior.
"Sagging your pants meant you were sexually available to play the role of someone's prison "lady." "
Um, yea.. I thought it was because prisoners weren't given belts to wear so their pants would sag? Y'all brothers use homosexuality for every argument! Makes HaitianChick wonder...
Quite true. Prisoners don't have belts so the won't be able to hang themselves or others.
More and more kids these days think being gay is cool so to say " you know in prison yada yada" ain't gonna deter a damn thing. It is a played out style and TRYING to deter it is the only reason people still do it.
I saw a similar sign yesterday in the hood that read "thou shall not kill".
Quite true. Prisoners don't have belts so the won't be able to hang themselves or others.
More and more kids these days think being gay is cool so to say " you know in prison yada yada" ain't gonna deter a damn thing. It is a played out style and TRYING to deter it is the only reason people still do it.
I saw a similar sign yesterday in the hood that read "thou shall not kill".
Fair enough. I stand down.
"It's a look that comes from gay prison culture. Sagging your pants meant you were sexually available to play the role of someone's prison "lady."
Back in the day when I was a youth, it was the white boys that I went to school with that wore sagging pants. They would wear sagging cords or jeans without a belt, and they would wear boxers of various colors high up around their wastes.
Their hair was long and hanging over their Black Sabbath, Rolling Stones or Pink Floyd tee shirts, finishing at the feet with a pair of Brogan work boots (that look nothing like the Brogan work boots they sell today.) There were no stylish work boots at the time, no Timbos, just construction worker boots without strings.
As they walked the boots would drag the ground as they made their way somewhere to go get stoned!
So, we all called this bunch of white boys, the Stoners.
If it began in the prison system, my experience says it was this white youth, the Stoners, that emulated this prison style of dress.
Although I've heard the argument that it originated in prison, and although I've seen white boys as described by Ensayn1, I think the bigger issue here is what's at the bottom of the sign:
The Metropolitan Etiquette Authority.
Are they actually going to be "creating jobs" to have some peons go around and enforce this shit? I get tired of seeing kids walk around with their butt out as the rest, but to try and legislate morality and enforcing it with some fake ass cops is stupid.
I asked the same question our host did a few weeks ago, leaving a show in DC with my wife. Walking out of the venue, two white boys wer tongue kissing each other in the mouth and damn near about to disrobe themselves. Where's the "etiquette police" for this shit???
I don't want to see that crap no more than I want to see what's depicted on the sign. The bigger issue is why one is deemed more of a problem than the other, especially when one could be considered a fad and the other a deviant lifestyle that goes against the laws of nature itself. And who's behind making these decisions? What else are they trying to claim authority on?
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=97940
Notice how these advocates influenced the APA's definition the first time, and established themselves as the reference points for the "truth". They would never let their "lifestyle" be questioned and regulated like homeboy on that sign.
"The bigger issue is why one is deemed more of a problem than the other, especially when one could be considered a fad and the other a deviant lifestyle that goes against the laws of nature itself. And who's behind making these decisions? What else are they trying to claim authority on?"
D. SMIFF
Crossover.
Baseline.
Lay up.
Tap Glass.
Buzzer.
Game Over.
Finally. We have arrived at the operative point of the piece.
A+ Mr. Smith
Post a Comment