"Space grows at the same rate as our awareness of space grows."
"From wondering what's beyond some enchanted forest, to thinking that the
world was flat, to a heliocentric universe, to new discoveries by
Hubble - our concept of the Universe is always growing.
And then there is the stuff below the Planck scale in the other (but still the same) direction."
And then there is the stuff below the Planck scale in the other (but still the same) direction."
25 comments:
UBJ,
You might want to read Piaget's work on object permanence. You'll probably think about retracting that statement.
Why should what Piaget says automatically make UBJ retract his statement?
Maybe you should have a read and figure it out?
in other words ....
"ITZ SO Cuh Massa Say It So!
Massa Say duh whole worl cum frum nuffin... duh whole worl cum frum nuffin!!
Massa Say Don't Nuffin exist dat he can't qwantifigh. If Massa caynt measure it ... it don exist! Massa iz uh wadical impeerasist!"
DV. Thanks for pointing out that dark-skinned men with African features and nappy hair are ugly as a mofo.
the wackest so b.i.z.ee
puttin words in your mouth DMG,
she need to be shot with hot pee;
But cats just can't agree to disagree ...
Jigaboos want to argue with DV
trying to pick little playfights with DV
worried about what others think of DV
DV the quintessence of faggotry...,
It' just that our host can't figure out what I'm talking about.
Not even by Googling "Piaget object permanence"?
Electricity Bra! As it is above, so it is below.
Gravity is not a unique force of it's own right. Rather it is an electric effect manifested as a net result of the competing electric contracting force and the magnetic repulsing force.
Gravity is a relatively weak force, and the observable effects in the universe cannot be explained by gravitational theory.
The blackness of space is the polar opposite of all observable matter. So the spherical observable matter and the cubic space surrounding each sphere represent opposite ends of the see-saw cycle.
The wave cycles just alternate between the two opposites, though the time scales involved vary enormously.
Space is NO VACUUM. It is the SOURCE of all energy. It is the expanding cycle, disintregrating form.
The galaxies display ELECTRIC filements, analogous to the common plasma ball toy.
As plasma doesn't exist in a natural state on the Earth, it was ignored as a 'state' of matter.
So while here on Earth solids, liquids and gases are readily observed, plasma is responsible for over 90% of the observable universe!
Yet plasma was not considered during the formulation of Einstein's theories.
Because electric fields only, can give rise to magnetic fields, the charged particles of the plasma are held in the filement structure by those magnetic fields.....a gravational field is not adequate to explain this OBSERVED effect.
These plasma filements also have spiral structures. Spirals are natures trademark efficient structures.
Einstein ignored any suggestion that the universe was electrical in nature when developing his gravational theories.
Modern science is almost entirely based on Einstein's ideas.
Now Einstein was a clever guy, but even he wasn't happy that his gravational theory fully explained the observable effects in the Cosmos.
Spherical bodies are electrically CHARGED through the poles and magnetically DISCHARGED via the equator. This is why the Sun continues to burn. It is not a nuclear reactor..it is fed directly via it's poles directly from space. It's the blackness of space that holds all the energy.
Drop it like its hot:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7oPdXN_gt4
Wax,
Don't you think it's kind of rude to cut and paste verbatim from somebody else's website and NOT give them so much as a hat tip?
The site you "lifted" your post from was discussing Walter Russell, whose ideas (you guessed it) have "generally been refuted by modern physics". From what I'm reading about him, his ideas are kind of the homeopathy of physics.
Whatever, Wax.
Challenge yourself, your peers, your teachers. Participate in a revolution in science and human evolution. Watch this film and in an hour know more than most NASA scientists about the fundamental force that forms and sustains the universe :
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&ei=4-cQSabkGofIqALnltmDAQ&q=thunderbolt%20gods&hl=en#
You'd probably get more correct information from Battlestar Galactica or Dr. Who....and at least you'd be entertained.
Space is the Place, after all.
DMG. Given that DV does the cut 'n paste of weirdos all the time, I venture to guess that HotfmWax is DV's other pseudonym.
DMG said...
"It' just that our host can't figure out what I'm talking about."
Actually Doc, I am certain I know exactly what you are talking about.
You are talking about reading the "work" of "Piaget".
You reference Piaget as if his thoughts on the nature of space and awareness should serve as cause for UBJ to abandon his own thoughts on the nature of space and awareness.
why?
Why do you assume Piaget's thoughts are better developed or more insightful than UBJ's?
Are 'Developmental Psychologists' infallible?
Your FAITH in his "works" is no different than the faith of a Catholic priest in the "works" of Thomas Aquinas.
You are not engaged in "the scientific method". You are practicing a religion called "Scientism".
You are like a priest in the Catholic church, so busy defending church dogma he fails to follow Christ.
Monsignor DMG says it is so because Cardinal Piaget says it is so.
"Gravity is not a unique force of it's own right. Rather it is an electric effect manifested as a net result of the competing electric contracting force and the magnetic repulsing force.
Gravity is a relatively weak force, and the observable effects in the universe cannot be explained by gravitational theory."
Wow.
Interesting Wax.
"DV. Thanks for pointing out that dark-skinned men with African features and nappy hair are ugly as a mofo."
Pure Faggotry.
Negro tryin' too hard.
Pussy ass Projection of The Day.
What makes this cat a representative of "dark-skinned man with African features"?
Where do you even come up with some silly ass ... punnnnnk shit ... like that?
Who put that in your head?
See.
See.
That's what I mean by "Jigaboo".
Deep deeeeeep ... deep ... down inside ... YOU believe black and African is ugly.
So much so that you equate black with ugly and light with beauty.
I put a beautiful sister on the blog ... "She Ekwul Lyte Skinnded Dee Vee!"
I put an ugly black rapist on the page and he suddenly becomes the embodiment of "dark skinned and African".
lol
I wish Piaget did some "work" on the developmental psychology of Plantation Negros and Jigaboos.
Self-hatin muhfuggas
MOTI,
You can't figure it out can you?
Light-skinned is wonderful.
^^ yes indeed it is!
@ DMG - Well... not yet.
Isn't this whole discussion ALL just theory?
Can we really prove laws which ALWAYS work below the Planck Scale or for all of the unlimited possibilities of the Universe?
It seems that the more we 'know' the more we find out that we really didn't know that much.
From wondering what's beyond some enchanted forest, to thinking that the world was flat, to a heliocentric universe, to new discoveries by Hubble - our concept of the Universe is always growing.
And then there is the stuff below the Planck scale in the other (but still the same) direction.
@ LightskinnedWonder - To steal a line from SeeNew directed @ Mills, "Octoroon Please"
"Black" is a state of mind or a state of being (not a race BTW)- what does ones melanin have to do with looks?
WTF ARE 'African Features'?
Africans from Egypt or Somalia or Ghana?
I'm asking this as a lightskinned dude (My mom is half Native American/half Hispanic - my dad is Louisiana Creole (Black & French))
My hair is more wavy than nappy.
My features are more Nothern African than southern or central.
Which features are the 'African' ones?
While DeeVee is school for many (although sometimes more from a recess aspect than that of a difficult class), talking about trivial pigmentocracy issues on this post is ridiculous.
It seems that the more we 'know' the more we find out that we really didn't know that much.
Uncle John is truth.
There are some very simple things that everyone ought to know, that most folk either don't know or never take into consideration.
Consequently, they're just lost, ignorant, but posing like a MUHPHUKKA - because for whatever reason - they're desperately afraid of being found out.
Bearden's 4th law of logic is a perfect example, simply explained - and thus easily understood by most, that can serve to illustrate the very specific Uncle John makes on this thread.
oops, meant to write "the very specific "point" Uncle John makes on this thread."
UBJ,
I'll let you in what I was talking about later on. It's really not that complicated. I'm going to watch the regulars try to out "I'm-deeper-than-you" for awhile.
Post a Comment