They Came Before Columbus & Pocahontas • Introduction To The Indigenous People Of The Planet 001 • DV University 2011

"The Aboriginal Indigenous Peoples of North America are the Ancient ‘people’ or Amu of the Planet Earth which was once called Muu. After Great cataclysmic destructions took place over various periods the land masses separated slowly into the seven continents we have today our Ancient Aboriginal Indigenous Black Ancestors migrated to safe locations on the planet after these great destructions took place. Those ancient empires have been called Lemuuria and Atlan or Atlantis. The oldest empire since those ancient empires is the Empire of Tawi also called Taa Muuray. We sometimes refer to the empire as Nubia, Egypt, Ethiopia, and sometimes Asia. Taa Murray is the name we will find in variation in some of the oldest glyphs. Some of the various forms are Amurru, Amaru, Ta Mr, Maori. Amu, Ummah, Amo are some of the Ancient names for the Original People. Our Ancestors added the Glyph of the circle and dot as a symbol of the Originator of life. That symbol also was associated with an important Star [stargate] as the Symbol of life. We called the Originator Ray [Re/Ra]. So we were the People [Amu] of Ray or AMuRay which general meant the People of God. This is why we are called Muurs/Muurs today, although we do have many other Aboriginal Tribal names. It is our most ancient name and signifies something about our cosmic nature as the Original Indigenous People of the Planet Earth." Dr. Ali Muhammad

PLATE TECTONICS "DISPROVEN"

Don Findlay, Geologist said ...
"Consensus in science is a contradiction in terms.   Yet in the Earth Sciences the theory of plate tectonics is monolithic.  Why? 

Advocates will reply "Because it works'.  Yet it is childishly simple to show that it doesn't.   In fact it flounders on every one of its three key points - moving plates that don't move but grow,  transform faults that don't transform but are simply growth fractures in the brittle growing mantle, and so-called subduction zones that plate tectonics itself acknowledges are primarily a "convenient assumption"  and that do not 'subduct' (due to convection), but override (due to crust - mantle decoupling symmetrical with  the Earth's spin).   

And this does not take into account all the other points that it founders on consequent on ignoring the first order structure of the ocean floors) .  There are no dissenting  mainstream views.   Why?   How can this be?   Is it not strange that so much of what is written in the Earth sciences is framed in the context of a model that is so manifestly deficient, and deficient on grounds that directly and patently derive from the crux of those "convenient assumptions"?    

Is it not strange that these three simple points of deficit are not even acknowledged by a worldful of scientists, if not exactly focussed on?   How is it possible that Earth scientists not only resolutely ignore them, but present plate tectonics ("the best model we have") as a "pinnacle of achievement"?    Well, the answer is simple:-  

CONSENSUS

From the Latin,  consentire (to feel together), agree. 1a.      Harmony co-operation or sympathy
1b.     Group solidarity in sentiment and belief
2a.     General agreement; unanimity accord.
2b.     Collective opinion.
3.       Formal statement of religious belief
3-1.    To be in harmony or concord, especially in opinion, statement or sentiment.
3-2.    To express a willingness (to accept a proposition or carry out a particular action); give assent or approval "

"♩ ♪ ♫ ♬ ... Let's get toge..e ..ther  an' feel .. all right ...♩ ♪ ♫ ♬ "