Monday, August 30, 2010

Moorish Science 1 Plantation Science 0 • Advanced Plantation Negro Re-Education • DV University • Fall 2010 • Professor Hot Wax

28 comments:

DMG said...

Why does Mr. Adams have the Earth rotating in the wrong direction?

Details, dude. Details.

Denmark Vesey said...

LOL.

Yes Doc.

Details.

You are not a very good listener.

Mr. Adams says, explicitly, in the video that he shows the planet rotating in this manner to demonstrate the reconfiguration of the planet as One Land Mass as if GOING BACK IN TIME.

LOL.

Come on Doc!

Thought you were a man of science.

Why you playing the role of blue team vs. red team partisan scientific inquiry?

You accept nonsense science like the H1N1 Pandemic and endorse the unscientific Plantation Diet as if it were gospel but then pretend to turn your nose up at obvious demonstrable physical science like this.

You cats talk about being men of "science".

But at the end of the day you are fans wearing team colors.

Don't change the subject.

Hot Wax just educated your monkey ass and provided one hell of a possible explanation to some of the complex questions of the human diaspora.

This is a much more scientific explanation to the question of why black men are aboriginal to Australia ... then is the suggestion that they sailed there from Ghana a few thousand years ago.

Don't hate.

Give it up to Wax.

DMG said...

Um, about my listening comprehension, it's actually quite good.

Yours on the other hand is questionable, but...perhaps you didn't notice that the "Earth" continued rotating in the WRONG direction when he went "forward" in time.

Do you even WATCH the videos you post?

uglyblackjohn said...

This theory makes sense based on the outline of the continents.
But wouldn't we have (roughly) the same effect if a river tore through both parts of one large land mass?
Don't both sides of the Mississippi look roughly the same too?

Denmark Vesey said...

It does make sense doesn't it John?

It even makes more sense when you compare it to the Plantation explanation for the diaspora of man and the distribution of the continents.

People are not spread all around the globe because they wandered out of Africa ... across deserts, mountain ranges and vast oceans ... people were there before the continents divided as they are today.

All Plantation History is on the table.

From the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade to Darwin to The Food Pyramid,everything you've been taught in Plantation schools should be in doubt.

DMG said...

There's so much wrong with this, that it's painful to know that a grown man, seemingly intelligent is gullible enough to be taken in by this nonsense.

Two questions

1. How long ago do you believe the Earth was smaller?

2. How old do you believe our species to be?

PS, please don't help your kids with their homework.

KonWomyn said...

Neal Adams is a comic book artist with an interest in science, he's simplifying the work of others so his 3 minute explaination is not the gr8est. I wasn't getting it, so I looked it up and found there's a historical background to the expanded earth theory.

Here's another vid, it's part 3 of a lecture series - I've only watched 4 of the whole series, not the most exciting stuff, but this is a beta explaination. Not co-signing, jus' saying.

DMG said...

Many things make sense...when you have none.

Denmark Vesey said...

"Not co-signing, jus' saying." KW

LOL.

Kay Dub.

Come on Sis.

Them nerds got you intimidated.

Scared to give your boy Hot Wax a fist tap for expanding the discourse.

"Agree" or "Disagree" is irrelevant.

What is the alternative to the "Expanding Earth" theory?

Do you "co-sign" that?

DMG said...

Expanding Earth is not a Theory. It's the rantings of a comic book illustrator, and other pseudoscientists.

KAM, why are you such an idiot? How did you get through college? Actually, fuck that, how have you survived up to this point?

I would have thought anyone as foolish as you would have been a Darwin Award recipient by now.

Well, there's always tomorrow. Hope you don't mow your own lawn.

KonWomyn said...

LOL

DeeVee.

Come on Bra.

"Scared to give your boy Hot Wax a fist tap for expanding the discourse." DV

"Fistap" or "Not" is irrelevant. What's a grown man need a fistap for?

This is alternative to the plate tectonics theory.

Denmark Vesey said...

"What's a grown man need a fistap for?" KW

Cuz he deserves it.


"This is alternative to the plate tectonics theory." KW

Cool.

Do you co-sign that?

KonWomyn said...

"Cuz he deserves it" DV

Yea he does, it's a change in topic.

Yep plate tectonics is a plausible theory. The size of the earth has relatively stayed the same over hundreds of millions of years, and the continents seperated through continental drift.

I don't think that the earth is expanding. If you do put forward a theory of what the catalyst for expansion might have been.

Denmark Vesey said...

Expansion or drift.

Um.

I'm not 100% sure either way.

I welcome the expansion theory because it forces us to revisit assumptions of "Scientific Consensus" ... which is that nonsense DMG reflexively defends.

However, Kay Dub,

When I look at Australian Aboriginals ... It appears self-evident that these people are from Australia.

They didn't have the technology to sail from Africa 100 years ago, let alone 100,000 years ago.

The indigenous black people of what we now call North America are the same people as the people we call West Africans ... but they are not "from" West Africa.

They weren't ALL brought to North America by white people.

Drift ... Or Expansion ... doesn't matter.

ALL MANKIND emerging FROM Africa ... is just a theory.

One that appears to be losing weight.

KonWomyn said...

DV

Here's the disconnect for me in your pattern of thought: if you believe Moors were technologically advanced enough to be building eathern mounds 100 million years ago, way, way before human beings existed, why do you doubt that humans could move from the horn of Africa to Yemen, Australasia or Malaysia in search of a better environment?

The expanded earth they does not account for multi-regional development of humans. That is a seperate argument all together which is currently being investigated.

As I understand it, there is nothing to suggest continental drift is oppositional to multi-regional development.

However, this idea requires you accept some form of evolution must have taken place - from neanderthal to human or homo erectus to human. Most neanderthal remains have been found among Europeans, not Africans...

IMO the multi-regional theory also requires you accept theories on common genetic ancestry - meaning that when you talk about Black Americans you acknowledge that the majority of Black Americans came from Africa whether pre or post Columbus because of that commonality.

KonWomyn said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
DMG said...

No, negro. It's because you present these "arguments" without so much as a scrap of evidence.

Same thing, every topic.

It's tired. This shit may work on your kids...but again, switch up your game.

Denmark Vesey said...

"if you believe Moors were technologically advanced enough to be building eathern mounds 100 million years ago" KW

Do I believe that?

I wasn't aware that I did.

"However, this idea requires you accept some form of evolution must have taken place - from neanderthal to human or homo erectus to human." KW

Does this idea really require you to accept humans "evolved"?

Please explain why it does.

I don't appreciate that requirement.


"IMO the multi-regional theory also requires you accept theories on common genetic ancestry - meaning that when you talk about Black Americans you acknowledge that the majority of Black Americans came from Africa whether pre or post Columbus because of that commonality." KW

My Most Benevolent & Gracious Sister I think that is a leap in logic.

How do we know Africans didn't "come from" what we now call North America?

Expansion or Tectonic shift ... doesn't matter.

For all we know The Garden of Eden could have been the Eastern Shore of Maryland.

If the Continents were once one large land mass EVERYTHING IS ON THE TABLE.

No theory is sacrosanct.

There is no scientific reason which requires one to "believe" human beings "evolved from" homo-erectus to human.

That "belief" is no more than faith. It is a religion. A cult.

Darwinian Theory is but a masonic hoax.

For all we know ancient man was more advanced than we are today.

KonWomyn said...

"Do I believe that?

I wasn't aware that I did"

Yep, you co-signed Wax on the thread he cited this video. And that's what the Washitaw video claims, 3:39.

"Does this idea really require you to accept humans "evolved"?

Please explain why it does.

I don't appreciate that requirement."

LOL. Nah it's not a strict thing, that was me jst speaking figuratively to explain that if you follow this particular theory on multi-regional development then this is what it says.

Nothing to stop you from exploring another more acceptable idea.

"How do we know Africans didn't "come from" what we now call North America?"

Because my Bible tells me the Garden of Eden is in Africa. To date, the oldest forms of human life are also found there.

"If the Continents were once one large land mass EVERYTHING IS ON THE TABLE"

But bruh the split happened before humans even existed...unless you believe that Washitaw stuff. @ 3:39 the sista claims the Washitaw were on the land at the time of Pangaea, but Pangaea was pre-humans.

HotmfWax said...

Ask the Question,


Is this something new?



Doc, kw, try to smear Neal Adams...



Neal is a very bright guy however to chalk all this up to a "comic book " guy is the height of insincerity.

You just not trying to learn.

Never heard of “Ottland” after Ott C. Hilgenberg?

This ain't new.

http://lastblogonearth.com/2010/03/24/forget-pangaea-local-scientist-says-its-all-about-ottland/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-maass/report-suggests-plate-tec_b_512358.html

Otto came up with major studies in 1933 to prove expanding earth. The Expanding earth theory exposes Abiotic oil (unlimited oil) and shows that "techno's peak oil is a scam. Main reason why no discussions.

http://oilismastery.blogspot.com/2008/09/myth-of-subduction.html

If you truly read anything below....the discussion would be over.

http://www.michaelnetzer.com/gu/

DMG said...

When are you going to present some proof of ANYTHING that you have written? When Wax, when?

Blogs, 80 year old disproven hypotheses, and your Master KAM saying so does not constitute proof.

What you want is company. You want someone to say that they are as chock full of nuts as you.

Insanity is lonely, I'm sure.

I'll catch you fools on the other side of the Atlantic, I've got a trip to pack for. KW, I'll shoot you an email this weekend. I'm heading straight to Leicester after I land, and then I'll be in Sweden until middle of next week. You around on the 9th or 10th?

HotmfWax said...

@KW-

"Plate tectonics is a plausible theory.

The size of the earth has relatively stayed the same over hundreds of millions of years, and the continents seperated through continental drift. "


Nothing is static. Lie.



Approximately 200 million years ago ALL of today’s continents were joined together as a single planetary landmass on a much smaller planet (slightly larger than Mars is today) when NONE OF TODAY’S OCEANS EXISTED!

This unequivocal evidence suggests Earth’s diameter has increased at an accelerating velocity. Today’s oceans cover ~71% of Earth’s surface, which equates to a ~40% increase in Earth’s diameter in just ~200 Ma, an incredibly short period in geologic time. Earth’s diameter then, without oceans, would have been only (~4747 mi) or about ~60% of its current average diameter of 7913.46 mi. [North American Datum of 1983, NOAA, 1989]

The Earth ~200 Ma was different from Wegener’s 1912 concept of a single continental landmass (Pangaea) that covered one hemisphere, surrounded by a single hemispheric ocean (Panthalassa) on a planet of today’s diameter because WEGENER’S PANTHALASSA NEVER EXISTED!

That then evidence also nullifies the Kant-Laplace (1796) nebular hypothesis of creation of the Earth ~4.5 billion years ago, which requires replacement by an entirely new cosmological theory for creation of the Earth and other bodies in our Solar System.

This evidence also verifies Carey’s Earth Expansion hypothesis [1956, 1976] that was rejected by the world’s scientific community three decades ago after the subduction concept was introduced by Oliver and Isacks [1967].

Subduction is not only illogical, it is not supported by geological or physical evidence, and violates fundamental laws of physics. Had the scientific community been less hasty in adopting subduction they might have realized subduction’s fatal flaw that shows WHY subduction is totally false.

This evidence also eliminates subduction from current plate tectonics dogma because it was adopted on the basis of a constant-diameter Earth and EARTH’S DIAMETER HAS NEVER BEEN CONSTANT.

The supreme irony of subduction and the conclusive argument that subduction is false can be summarized quite simply by the following illustration.

IF EARTH'S DIAMETER IS FIXED AND UNCHANGING, the Atlantic Ocean basin MUST continue to EXPAND, pushing North and South America westward until they collide with Asia and Australia AFTER ELIMINATING THE PACIFIC OCEAN.

This means North and South America would have been pushed from the west side of Pangaea to the east side of Pangaea—half way around the planet and eliminating the entire Pacific Ocean basin in the process. This would happen despite the massive growth of new seafloor along the East Pacific Rise, which today is actually expanding the Pacific Ocean basin—not decreasing it!


Nothing is static. Lie.

The entire universe is expanding. uh....Duh!

The larger planets expanded from a smaller solid mass into their current larger gaseous state ... Then at sometime into the future... kaboom. Check the science. All Planets grow. Nothing new. Nothing to fear.

Denmark Vesey said...

"Because my Bible tells me the Garden of Eden is in Africa." KW

Oh yeah.

I didn't know that.

Where does it say that?

I didn't even realize the word "Africa" was in existence during Biblical times.


"But bruh the split happened before humans even existed" KW

How do you know that?

Indigenous Australians hadn't built a house with a window 100 years ago. How did they build vessels that sailed from Africa 40,000 years ago?

Petit bourgeois thinkers like DMG have been programmed like Pavlov's dog to chip away at theories contrary to what they have been told to think.

But when challenged to consider the assumptions of their own convictions they get frustrated and angry.

To suggest North America was populated exclusively by natives who WALKED across the Bering Strait is no less fantastic than the Expanding Earth theory.

Denmark Vesey said...

"The size of the earth has relatively stayed the same over hundreds of millions of years, and the continents seperated through continental drift. " KW

Says who?

How do they know?

What other natural phenomenon do we know that "stays the same" for hundreds of millions of years?

I thought change was the only constant.

Denmark Vesey said...

"IF EARTH'S DIAMETER IS FIXED AND UNCHANGING, the Atlantic Ocean basin MUST continue to EXPAND, pushing North and South America westward until they collide with Asia and Australia AFTER ELIMINATING THE PACIFIC OCEAN.

This means North and South America would have been pushed from the west side of Pangaea to the east side of Pangaea—half way around the planet and eliminating the entire Pacific Ocean basin in the process. This would happen despite the massive growth of new seafloor along the East Pacific Rise, which today is actually expanding the Pacific Ocean basin—not decreasing it!


Nothing is static. Lie.

The entire universe is expanding. uh....Duh!

The larger planets expanded from a smaller solid mass into their current larger gaseous state ... Then at sometime into the future... kaboom. Check the science. All Planets grow. Nothing new. Nothing to fear." HW


Haaaaaaa!


Kick Ass Hot Wax Kick Ass!!

My man!

Bra.

You MURDER more Plantation Memes than your boy DV.

Denmark Vesey said...

"IF EARTH'S DIAMETER IS FIXED AND UNCHANGING, the Atlantic Ocean basin MUST continue to EXPAND, pushing North and South America westward until they collide with Asia and Australia AFTER ELIMINATING THE PACIFIC OCEAN.

This means North and South America would have been pushed from the west side of Pangaea to the east side of Pangaea—half way around the planet and eliminating the entire Pacific Ocean basin in the process. This would happen despite the massive growth of new seafloor along the East Pacific Rise, which today is actually expanding the Pacific Ocean basin—not decreasing it!


Nothing is static. Lie.

The entire universe is expanding. uh....Duh!

The larger planets expanded from a smaller solid mass into their current larger gaseous state ... Then at sometime into the future... kaboom. Check the science. All Planets grow. Nothing new. Nothing to fear." HW


Haaaaaaa!


Kick Ass Hot Wax Kick Ass!!

My man!

Bra.

You MURDER more Plantation Memes than your boy DV.

HotmfWax said...

DV,

The Game Bra,

Just put your blind faith in science just because the majority NOW believes in an unproven theory (pangea) (a theory which itself was scoffed at by the likes of the sheeps for many many years before it was finaly accepted)?

Not only that but the plantation have a penchant for dogma automatically makes them exclude any other theory, even though said theories are also unproven.

Is the Grand Canyon 5.4 million years old?

Or is it as some now think 17 million years old.

If the scientific community started to believe it was 50 million years old would you stick to your wiki article or would your opinion change as soon as someone updated it?

Don't question anything, accept everything you were told, promote ignorance.


How many strong Scientific theories that were believed 'fact' at the time for decades, have now been found out to be incorrect over the years?

Just because a group of esteemed Technos says something is' true' doesn't mean it is. That is why they call it a theory. Most of them have never been proven. Remember that.

The expanding planet theory is feasible.

The PROBLEM in the field of Science today is that if you come with a new, radical idea, people like fake doc job is to try to make it fearful . Even the concept of releasing a paper--(even if the data looks perfect) most researcher not working for the plantation will shut it down, because his or her peers will also discredit him or ruin their career JUST because its different and can cancel all the falsehoods the plantation is invested in.

This holds back innovative thinking, and isn't just in the field of science...

Remember...

At one time, anyone saying the Earth isn't the center of the solar system was labeled a Heretic or pagan, and you could be executed!

Remember when doc's boys bled George washington to death in an attempt to treat his flu(body detoxing) and would swear to it like they swear to Chemo today.


And for KW's love of Pangea:


Plate tectonics was a relative new theory early last century. The Plate Tectonics theory was considered a joke when it was proposed in 1912, but wasn't generally accepted until 1956! Then it became the law. The DOGMA.

That is science for you. :) 40 year wait til brothers get hip to expanding earth.

HotmfWax said...

I don't think that the earth is expanding. If you do put forward a theory of what the catalyst for expansion might have been.-kw

Last one:

The catalyst?????

Positron-to-Proton Theory

watch video.

http://continuitystudios.net/prime.html

As I have said before Hydrogen the only element. :)

Get spiritual.

"Neal Adams developed a theory around a known Positron and a known Electron combining together to form a Prime Matter particle. http://continuitystudios.net/prime.html. The breakthrough brilliance of this idea was that all matter that we can sense is a form of electromagnetic force. But to make the Big Bang theory work we are missing 90-95% of the known matter.

Where is it?

In Prime Matter he theorizes that the matter is all around us but is cloaked into apparent invisibility. That the Positron and Electron are united by an electromagnetic force, but that this force is inward facing and thus not (yet) detectible with our current instruments.

Hydrogen is the visible foundation block of the Universe comprising perhaps 75% of the known matter. Understanding Hydrogen helps understand all other atomic interactions.

It is quite possible - even likely - that the core of the earth is made up of, or saturated with, hydrogen in its atomic or ionic form. If the earth is expanding or growing it is likely in relation to hydrogen as a foundation. http://eearthk.com/Articles03.html

The "mass increase" argument - is the most likely to explain the known anomalies within the GE/EE knowledge base. However, it is tossed aside and ridiculed, because it can't be explained or visualized by many. It should be recognized that the earlier (widely believed) cosmology theory of the Aether required small mundane undetectable particles to be streaming into the earth's core. The newer cosmology of Big Bang is premised on the widely held belief that there is 90-95% missing and undetectable Dark Energy and Dark Matter out there that we must find. http://eearthk.com/Articles01.html Notice how Neal's Prime Matter theory and Aether theory, and Big Bang theory are saying nearly the same thing about the missing matter. Neal's and Michael’s explanation gives an alternative pathway to research.

It is the core of the hydrogen atom that is most important. The hydrogen nucleus consists only of one Proton (no neutron) which contains virtually all of the atoms mass. The mass of the electron is negligible. The volume of this atom is defined, however, by the electrons orbit. The radius of a hydrogen atom (orbit of electron) is about 100,000 times bigger than its Proton's radius. The volume of the atom is, thus, mostly empty but is about 1,000,000,000,000,000 times larger than the Proton's volume. Ionic hydrogen loses its electron and can eventually regain it. Much can take place in these transformations.

The Electron to Proton Mass relationship can be seen at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron An excerpt: "An electron is a subatomic particle that carries a negative electric charge. It has no known substructure and is believed to be a point particle. An electron has a mass that is approximately 1836 times less than that of the proton." Consider that the number utilized in the following article is 918 which is ½ of 1836.

Hydrogen Absorbtion and Diffusion

The Earth expands over time (or has expanded) because it has a hydridic (Hydrogen-rich) core. It seems to me that this hypothesis has some real strengths which are worth considering for a number of reasons.

Hydrogen was super-abundant when the solar-system formed, and it may have been similarly abundant in the original materials from which comets formed. If the Earth accreted from that same reservoir of materials at a rate sufficiently fast to have trapped alot of hydrogen in the zone which became the core, then the Hydrogen may have been absorbed into the abundant metals at pressures and temperatures that would have allowed the diffusion of the Hydrogen as a naked proton.