Monday, June 28, 2010

Intro To Agent Provocateurs - Why Are The Police Setting Fires To Police Vehicles?

Paul Watson - An eyebrow-raising photograph of one of the anarchists who set fire to a Toronto police car during anti-G20 protests this past weekend shows him wearing Nike clothing, a potential indication that provocateurs dressed up as black-bloc “anarchists” were again employed by authorities to cause mayhem in order to justify a brutal police crackdown and crush free speech, as peaceful protesters were attacked and arrested while the anarchists who torched the cars were left alone.

The picture shows the two culprits who set fire to the police car congratulating each other and looking remarkably relaxed about potentially being caught by police considering what they had just done. One of the men is wearing Nike pants – the distinctive logo of the company can be seen above his left pocket.

The authorities certainly wasted no time in responding to the mayhem the anarchists helpfully generated for them with brute force. After anarchists torched four police cars, reporters and other peaceful protesters were targeted with rubber bullets, with another Guardian journalist being repeatedly punched and elbowed by cops.

5 comments:

Seven Half Store said...

That's raw!!!

Seven Half Store said...

Definately not your old school peaceful, flower child, philosophical protest.

There is organization, military tactic and strategic planning...

Much like the work of the groups they're up against.

Constructive Feedback said...

DV:

Here is how I am stumped over this gathering in Toronto.

So many leftwing operatives have their HOPE vested in President Obama yet HE was inside of the place that was protected by a perimeter wall.

Were they protesting AGAINST Obama as well or did they consider "the beast" as all of the others and Obama was in their fighting against it?

I speak in jest on the surface but I am telling the straight up truth. Many individuals have put aside their permanent interests to protect their permanent friend. Thus they can't be ideologically or intellectually consistent.

Denmark Vesey said...

Brother CF,

I think you may be confused because you are trafficking in a fictional dichotomy like Left v Right.

"Leftwing"?

"Radical"?

I think you've sadly missed the point of the piece.

If the police are setting fire to their own vehicles .... who are the real 'radicals'?

Who is truly "Leftwing"?

Those exercising their constitutionally guaranteed right to Free Speech or the modern day Bolsheviks masquerading as "environmentalists"?

Could the Hegelians simply be up to their old tricks and false flag operations designed to play competing factions against one another?

Regarding Obama ...

One does not have to hate the person of Barack Obama to resist the genocidal manipulations of global bankers, Malthusian Technocrats and the Scientific Dictatorship.

cadeveo said...

It should be assumed that these so-called "black block" anarchists are police. The police tried to foment this same thing several years ago, also in Canada. The peaceful protesters took pictures and were not suckered into the violence that the supposed anarchist in black was trying to encourage them to do. When the pictures came out, they noticed that the "anarchist" had on the exact same shoes as the police wear in that area. It's straight up COINTELPRO stuff. The police need violence to justify a clampdown and the media will edit things to suggest that the people were to blame. This justifies increased police budgets and decreased rights for the people and brings more money to the military-industrial-entertainment complex, AKA the global fascist Spectacle.