"Oh Shit! ... GMO Food Sterilizes People ... And It's Really A Form of Population Control?"
"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider - founder Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
GET A CHICK...
Were We All Kunta Kinte? Or Are We Also Mansa Musa?
Barry Goldwater 1909-1998
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. "
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad
"It Is Easier To Change A Man's Religion Than It Is To Change His Diet"
Private Prison Industry
2,000,000 human beings in American prisons and counting
IS THIS LITTLE GUY A PERSON?
The founders of the American state understood that the proper functioning of a democracy required an educated electorate. It is this understanding that justifies a system of public education and that led slaveholders to resist the spread of literacy among their chattels. But the meaning of "educated" has changed beyond recognition in two hundred years. Reading, writing, and arithmetic are no longer sufficient to decide on public policy. Now we need quantum mechanics and molecular biology. The knowledge required for political rationality, once available to the masses, is now in the possession of a specially educated elite, a situation that creates a series of tensions and contradictions in the operation of representative democracy.
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. P
"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
Louis Pasteur
"The Microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything."
Beverly Johnson. Beverly Hills. 1978
"Bra! Tell Me About It!"
"Most of the trouble I have had in advancing the cause of the race has come from Negroes."
Ted Turner - CNN founder and UN supporter - quoted in the The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June '
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Lord Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science On Society (Routledge Press: New York, 1951).
"At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars.. War has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. The state of affairs might be unpleasant, but what of it?"
Denmark Vesey For President 08
1. Troops Out Of Iraq Immediately. Like By Monday. 2. Money Owed To Haliburton and War Contractors Be Given Directly To The Iraqi People 3. Complete Electoral Reform 4. No Corporate Conglomerate Will Be Allowed To Control More Than 5% Of News Market 5. Federal Reserve Abolished 6. For-Profit Prison Industry Abolished
*George Orwell (1903-1950) English novelist, critic
Men can only be happy when they do not assume that the object of life is happiness... If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear... The great enemy of clear language is insincerity... The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it... To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle... For a creative writer possession of the truth is less important than emotional sincerity.
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society will be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” – Zbigniew Brzezinski
God Don't Make No Mistakes
Gordon Parks 1912-2006
"I suffered evils, but without allowing them to rob me of the freedom to expand."
Great Grandmother Harris
Subscribe
23 comments:
Lets do the Damm- thing !
5 long posts to let every one know the"Real Deal" that caused all the confusion between US Constitution, are we under UCC(Vatican law), Citizen -what kind, Slaves?, This Treaty, that corporation, and every other LAW meme out there in regards to what is applicable.
You got to go way back in History to get the oldest standing Con that is still affecting you right now!
BTW, you got played by your freemasonic "Founding Fathers".
The Treaty of 1213.
The Beginning of the Worlds Biggest Lie.
The Beginning of the Worlds Biggest Lie.
The Treaty of 1213.
Background:
Once upon a time before the year 1066 the people of England held Allodial title to their land. Not even the king could take the land for not paying a tithe. William the Conquer came in 1066 and stole the Kings Title and took the land of the people. From William I, 1066, to King John, 1199, England was in dire straits. It was bankrupt.
The King invoked the Law of Mortmain, the dead man's hand, so people couldn't pass their land on to the church or anyone else without the King's permission, (modern day probate?). Without Mortmain the King would lose the land he controlled. The Vatican didn't like that because the King owed a lot of pounds to the Vatican. This was because the Pope claimed all lands as the vicar of Christ and the king owed money from the Vatican that was to be collected by the Church of England. The church reduced their parishioners to mere serfdom. When they died the church got the property and the King, in order to preserve what property he had instituted the law of Mortmain. King John refused to accept The Vatican's representative, Stephen Langton, whom Pope Innocent III installed to rule England. In 1208 England was placed under Papal interdict( prohibition).This prevented the people from willing the land to the Pope. When the pope got wind of this he excommunicated the King.
King John could not handle being excommunicated and in trying to regain his stature he groveled before the Pope and returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope as vassals, and swore submission and loyalty to him. King John accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury, and offered the Pope a vassal's bond of fealty and homage. Two months later, in July of 1213, King John was absolved of excommunication, at Winchester, by the returned Archbishop of Canterbury, Langton. On October 3, 1213, by treaty, King John ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope, as Vicar of Christ who claimed ownership of everything and everyone on earth as tradition.
Question 1: Where in the Bible did Jesus give any man this kind of power over all men and land? He didn't. He did not create a religion nor did he create the office of Pope.
Question 2: Can you have a third party break a contract between you and another person under duress..? Don't those of you who are forced into a contract reserve all your rights under modern UCC 1-207 and claim UCC 1-103?
The contract (treaty of 1213) was between two parties. Now the Barons of England would not put up with being slaves anymore so they took to the sword and made King John sign the Magna Charta. So doesn't this act of the Barons violate the principle of natural law, when they created the Magna Charta, as having no force and effect upon a contract between two parties? Well Pope Innocent III, the other contracting party thought so, for he declared the Magna Charta to be: ". . .unlawful and unjust as it is base and shameful. . . whereby the Apostolic See is brought into contempt, the Royal Prerogative diminished, the English outraged, and the whole enterprise of the Crusade greatly imperiled." Quoted from G.R.C. Davis: Magna Charta. Trustee of the British Museum. London. 1965.
The Pope, in order to introduce strife in England and Ireland that would help him, used Jesus teachings to his advantage that is verified in the Gospels by two of His Apostles.
Cont-
Question 3. What did the contract of 1213 A.D. create? A TRUST or CONTRACT. Only the two parties, the King's heirs and the Pope, can break the contract. For the Trust /Contract cannot be broken as long as there are heirs to both sides of the contract.
At this time in history we now know who controlled the Kings of England and the land of the world. For Now we have the Pope claiming the whole Western Hemisphere besides Europe. The Holy See of Antioch ruled all the easterly side and the Holy See of Alexandria ruled the western side, so there was a conflict.
The Story:
5 centuries later
The King's explorers had come to America to claim dominion over land by deceiving and murdering the natives, the American Indians. The King operated under the treaty of 1213 and everything was going along okay until the 1770's when the bunch of rogues called the "Founding Fathers" decided they wanted the benefits but not pay the taxes to the King. They, being lawyers, and professional educated men, didn't know they were still under the Pope's control? Their lies and fraud now would affect the American colonies and the people who lived on the land.
Those common people who fought in the American Revolution were unaware that the 1213 treaty still ruled despite the fact they THOUGHT the Magna Charta was a viable piece of work.
Why does the Magna Charta hold more force and effect than a later contract between the king and the Pope? Because the Pope decreed it null and void as it would break the contract he had initiated with the King. The Magna Charta was a contract breaker by third parties and that was a no-no in any law. Besides the Pope owned England and how could the Barons take the land that the King pledged let alone all the surfs that the Pope still controlled through the church of England? He can't and so the Magna Charta was declared Void. Now the Pope, through the front man, The King, could create the other contracts called treaties and no one is the wiser. Remember, the Pope was being controlled by the creditor, The Rothschilds to whom the Pope was indebted.
BTW, remember the Declaration of Rights in 1689 declared the Rights of the British subjects in England. At the end of the English Declaration it stated at Section III " ...that should any of the Rights just mentioned be in violation of the HOLY ALLIANCE (1213 Treaty), ...it is as if this Declaration was never written".
So we know that the English Declaration didn't fly, so what makes you think the 1774 Declaration of Rights in this British Colony would work. Weren't these people doing the same thing as the Barons did in 1215 A.D. to King John? A contract is a contract. Look at Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Can anyone obligate a contract? Were the "founding fathers" trying to obligate a contract between two parties that still have heirs living today?
Question 4: How important is the "ultimate benefactor", the Pope, The HOLY SEE, in the scheme of things? Move through history till modern times and pull Public Law 88-244, which follows Public Law 88-243 - the institution of the law- merchants Uniform Commercial Code. Are you shocked that the Pope is listed in this Public Law?
Doesn't the United States have an ambassador in the Vatican? Why? Is it a government like all other nations such as France, Japan, Spain or Brazil? The Vatican runs the world, it controls the British Crown. Is it any wonder they separate man's Church and government?
Cont-
They don't talk about the Lord Almighty's Church (government). "Organized churches" are given special tax privileges because the Vatican dictates to the sixty United States trustees through the trust document, the U.S. Constitution created by the 1783 treaty between the King, frontman for the Vatican, and Adams, Hartly, Laurens, & Franklin who were operating for the King and not the people of America. Look at Article VI of the Constitution for the United States for your answer as stated in the "New History of America".
You see we are still under the Pope who rules over all nations as he declared he did back in 1213. The 1783 Treaty did say in the opening statement quoted exactly as it appears in olde English; "It having pleafed the Divine Providence to difpofe the hearts of the Moft Serene and Moft Porent Prince, George the Third, by the grace of God, King of the Great Britain, France and Ireland, Defender, of the Faith , Duke of Brunfwick and Laurenberg, Arch-Treafurer and PRINCE ELECTOR OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE, & C. AND OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, . . .."
Did you catch the last few words?
This is from a King (man) who can supposedly make no claim over the United States of America because he was defeated? The King claims God gave him the almighty power to say that no man can ever own property because it, "goes against the tenets of his church, the Vatican/Holy Roman Empire, because the King is the "Elector of the Holy Roman Empire’"
What about the secret Treaty of Verona, made the 22nd of November, 1822, which shows the power of the Pope and the Vatican's interest in the US Republic.
Here is part of The Secret Treaty of Verona. "The undersigned specially authorized to make some additions to the treaty of the Holy Alliance, after having exchanged their respective credentials, have agreed as follows:
ARTICLE I. The high contracting powers being convinced that the system of representative government is equally as incompatible with the monarchial principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of the people with the divine right, engage mutually, in the most solemn manner to use all their efforts to put an end to the system of representative governments, in what ever country it may exist in Europe, and to prevent its being introduced in those countries where it is not yet known.
ARTICLE 2. As it cannot be doubted that the liberty of the press is the most powerful means used by the pretended supporters of the rights of nations to the detriment of those of princes, the high contracting parties promise reciprocally to adopt all proper measures to suppress it, not only in their own state but also in the rest of Europe.
ARTICLE 3. Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their own interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations."
Did the Lord make a covenant with Adam and Eve to subdue the earth and reign over the animals and to populate the earth? Doesn't that contract still exist? And doesn't it exist with you also? And we, the true believers in that contract, can we take all the nations (mans) laws in the world and dump them in the ocean to regain our rightful place on this earth under the Lord's Natural Law to thwart the contract between King John and the Pope that appears to defeat the original contract the Lord made with man?
Cont-
Yes, let us go back to the original contract and destroy the Vatican's control over everybody. Before 1066 the Pope did not claim all the land as the people claimed the land and didn't pay taxes on it to anybody. Didn't the Lord say to the people after coming out of Egypt, "why do you want a king when you have me and my contract?" Which Lord do you want to live under, a Pope, a King, President, Governors, Senators, Representatives, or a real Lord called Jesus Christ. "Christians," are ridiculed and put down because they read the Word of the Lord correctly and could defeat even the best the Pope has to throw at them.
The King James version of the Bible is just that. A version concocted by the King under the guidance of the Pope so as to hide the real truth. I was taught by the church I went to, which is government controlled as it has to be by the treaty of 1213 and reiterated in the 1783 Treaty between The Pope's Elector, King John and the First President of the United States, Sam Huntington and Charles Thompson, Secretary. I read the passage, when Jesus was on the cross, from a very old manuscript that said, "Forgive them NOT, for they know what they do." This is different than what most people believe he said, "Forgive them for they know not what they do." Bottom line is that when men write, transcribe, translate, update, and copy over thousands of years they always alter the interpretation, words and insert their own meanings. You can see this in just the 200 years that our country became separated from England, but still remains a colony under different compact and use of clever wording. But that is another whole subject that you do not know about.
Eminent domain and Allodial title:
Why and where did "eminent domain" rear its ugly head? Right after the King's government was formed here in America. Eminent domain replaced the Law of Mortmain of England and when government wanted your land they claimed eminent domain thereby destroying that to what people think they have allodial title. Allodial title only existed in America when the King granted the use of the land to the likes of William Penn, .........
But it could be taken at any time. Are you or were your great, great, great grandfathers ever free to hold land that could never be taken away? Ask some of today's farmers and see how many lost their farms to the government that belonged to their past family and I'll bet none of the land goes back to the 1789 era.
Does the Vatican come close with a mortal calling himself the "vicar" of Christ?
Here is the definition of vicar in Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language.
Vicar: "In a general sense, a person deputed or authorized to perform the functions of another; a substitute in office."
The Pope PRETENDS to be vicar of Jesus Christ on earth.
Pretend; To hold out as a false appearance; to offer something feigned instead of that which is real; To exhibit as a cover for something hidden."
You bet your life the Pope has something to hide. He is no more powerful than You. The King is no more powerful than You. The American President and Governor's are no more powerful than You. You allow THEM run your lives ...WHY.?
Thinkers, you cannot fight the Pope or the King on their contract even though you are affected by the contract. You must go elsewhere for relief. Remember the first contract in history, God with Adam and Eve? You had better because you were a part of it as an heir and it is your saving grace. Why do you think the "courts of common law" are despised and Government and States are taking action to stop them? See where the power lies when this happens? The Governors, and Congress of the United States and the Legislatures of the several states are only following orders and delegate to the 60 U.S. Trustees, who always show up in bankruptcy generated mostly by IRS actions. Isn't that a starting point?
Final-
What do Trustees administer?
A trust?
The Constitution is a trust, correct?
It was created by the 1783 Treaty, correct?
It is not the private man's trust contract, correct?
Only those entering into the contract are UNDER the constitution and are bound by it, correct?
Look up the definition of "under" in words and phrases and a good dictionary such as Webster's 1828 at Vol. II, 101. I,you are not "under" some damn corporate trust (constitution) drafted in secrecy by the King and corporate lawyer esquires (you call them the "Founding Fathers") whom were controlled by the Treaty of 1213, wherein the Vatican still ruled over all.
It was never "my constitution" and never will be.
The Constitution does not apply to me nor will it ever.
However, some of the states' representatives in 1776 realized that the Constitution was a commercial contract among the Founding Fathers to protect their financial interests in the Americas and in Europe.
The Articles of the Bill of Rights is designed to keep those United States citizens whom are bound by the Constitution (contract) from encroaching upon my natural Law Rights, (With this hint in mind you may discover where the IRS gets its purported power that makes you liable, because you claim to be UNDER the constitution, but they will never admit it because only a few know the real reason and they are not about to tell their agents.
The same goes for any license issued to you by the corporate States.
I hope you have read the Supreme Court cases of State and United States that prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that I am correct in my previous two sentences. Yet you always fall back into the trap by claiming citizenship of the United States AND THE STATES.
No! You are not a citizen of the corporate or organic State if you want to be free. You cannot claim it is your constitution and remain free.
You cannot claim representatives in the legislatures and remain free. How about your estate? State and Estate come from the same contract.
Webster's 1828 Dictionary defines it;
"ESTA'TE, n. 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a condition; now generally written and pronounced state. (6) The general interest of business or government; hence a political body; a commonwealth; a republic.
But in this sense, we now use State." Get the picture?
We are the ryots tenure holding the "estate" of the King called your estate. Belong to a body politic and you are a slave.
A "republic" is a fraud, for then you belong to the estate of the King which makes you a law-merchant holding as a trustee the King's land that he is holding in trust for the Vatican.
The States are the "estate " of the Vatican/King cabal with the money changers along for the ride are a full blown consortium which includes the Congress/President/ Governors et al.
I don't want to drive you crazy, since you might not comprehend all that is here. Once you know the truth and let go of all you were taught by the government and the preachers you don't become the drowning man grasping at the lies to stay afloat.
Have you ever wondered why you were sinking while pleading case law and their constitution to protect you?
When you finish trying to rationalize the Gobellian propaganda in this video, can you please explain, w/o writing an epistle, how a family-owned investment bank-- NM Rothschild & Sons Limited, which is dwarfed by its competitors like Goldman Sachs, controls both the central bank of the United States and the central bank of the United Kingdom.
"can you please explain .... controls both the central bank of the United States and the central bank of the United Kingdom." Mak B.
Damn.
You really need to catch up with the rest of the class Mak.
If you don't understand the Rothschilds ... and apparently you don't ... it explains why you still are clinging to that outdated "Civil Rights" hoax.
Come on Bra. Do your homework.
Mak,
No wonder when you made that statement before and I did not get what you were saying(Joe Montana).
NM Rothschild ain't even a real solid business. Just a small front. You got to learn the game!
Check this:
When Glodman needs money they borrow it from the Rothschilds. When any body, any business, any corporation or government in the entire world need money or capital, they borrow it from the Red Shield(Rothschild).
It has been so for the last 200 years. These boys are the creditors for every currency that exist. They finance everything in existence. They own every central bank in the world including our Fed Reserve.
The only people who were not playing are the "axis of evil" and they are getting their ass kicked right now.
They have financed ever war over the last 200 years and both the winners and losers have to pay them. matter of fact they determine the winner. Old man JP Morgan worked for them until his last day on earth. So does George Soros.So does Zignew. Bill Gates will crap his pants if he got a phone call from the family. They own almost everything, media, stock market, U.S. ,YOU!
Nugga please....What planet you been on?
The family and bloodline is the closest incarnation of Satan that we have on earth.No Sh%t!!!!
They wipe out the entire Czar if Russia for not borrowing from them and then got rid of the czars entire bloodline for not following along(story of Anastatia)
They practice judaic saturnali cult. I got 10 years of material on these mother fuggas. david the youngest now has made himself in the image of the European Jesus.
Bra say the word...I will send you anything you need.
They are the NWO....end of story.
quick question mak.
What, who and where is the largest company in the world?
ps- brothers will spend 10 years researching fiddy and how many tats he has but yet can't tell me nothing about their enslaver?
WOW
Get 'em Wax!
But come on Bra.
Both you and I need to stop.
After awhile this shit is like teaching calculus to 5th graders.
Did dude really just question the reach of the Rothschilds?
Damn.
I thought cats were past that by now.
No wonder muhfuggas still eating pork.
DV,
This blows my mind dude. I am here seeking knowledge like the good stuff that everyone especially yourself, TD and Gee Chee puts out and ain't really here to get into no freaky deaky " "battles" Bra. i have actually like some things Mak drops on for example hip hop and rap.
But man all I was trying to do is expand on your 1783 treaty and I get called out for writing an "epistle".
If I send Mak every think I got on the Red Shield family it might take 2 months. Does he really want to know about RC?
It ain't a Jewish thing or black thing either ..Hilter was their Kin and Kofi Annan married into the RC family. These boys are Bad.
DV, Why do brothers hate stuff beyond "just the surface level". I am here to learn and also I got archives of 10 years of stuff to share. Why not get away from the ego and seek to understand first...Then be understood later.
Like I said you got the patience of a saint to do this blog. Omo on here learning, then turns around and hurl a lame out of date "Larouchian" insult.
This stuff can't be that hard to figure out Bra.
Reminds me of the 5 stages of five stages that a dying patient experiences when informed of their terminal prognosis.
Change it up some :).
The 5 stages of Vesey-Thordaddy(formerly Kubler-Ross) plantation Death model identified are:
Denial (this shit ain't true you all lying and dumb)
Anger (fu#k-you DV-you suck!!)
Bargaining (I will believe you if you believe h1n1 vaccine is good...)
Depression (I don't care anymore if I get flu)
Acceptance (I don't want no more pork)
I LOVE READING More than anything in the world. NOT BATTLING. THEREFORE JUST KEEP ON PUTTING IT OUT THERE...They COULD SKIP IT IF THEY DON'T LIKE IT OR DON'T BELIEVE IT. Gain knowledge.
BUT AS YOU SAID DV..KNOWLEDGE MAY NOT NECESSARILY BE POWER, BUT IGNORANCE IS SURELY WEAKNESS.
Namaste- from the shaman
Hot Wax.
My man.
That's good stuff.
I can understand why these cats who when confronted with the observable, falsifiable truth ... still cling to anachronistic backwards memes.
That's exactly why I coined the term: "Plantation Negro".
They are invested in a system of ideas not invested in them.
The truth became a casualty long ago.
But.
I've learned a few things.
Notice Plantation Negros talk shit ... make little bitchy drive by comments ... play sarcastic ... bend over backwards to come off "dismissive" ... and then bring their asses right back.
Why?
It takes courage to be truthful and truth is attractive.
I give you credit Wax.
YOU ARE ON TO THIS SHIT BRA.
AND YOU AINT SCARED!
I'm more impressed with you than I am with myself.
And when a cat's got an overinflated ego like mine ... that's sayin' something.
;-]
lol.
Keep doing what you doing.
The Brothers will come around when it appears safe to do so.
In the mean time, maybe we can save a few young brothers and sisters from the vaccines, factory meat and sterilization by GMO.
@mak
"can you please explain, w/o writing an epistle, how a family-owned investment bank-- NM Rothschild & Sons Limited, which is dwarfed by its competitors like Goldman Sachs."
Because I believe that you are sincere.
In 1750, 26 years before the American Declaration of Independence the Rothschild family began their journey to become the most powerful financial family in world history and though to this day the vast majority of their holdings are privately held, estimates of their family holdings are as much as $167 trillion dollars. Strategic actions over the 258 year continuous evolvement of the Rothschilds has led to control of much of the world supply of gold, oil, diamonds and many other assets.
As for Goldman Sachs, they were founded in 1869, shortly after the end of the US Civil War and at the dawning of the industrial revolution in America joining yet another family firm still around today, J.P. Morgan whose work to save the Union during the Civil War earned it many privileges during the explosion of growth in America including theopportunity to finance the Rockefeller Standard Oil empire with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.with Rothschild money.
In time the three factions(Goldman, Rockefeller and Morgan ) would "appear" "appear" "appear" "appear" "appear" "appear" "appear" "appear" to undertake the most intense "competition" between them for control of the global financial system ever seen but in the end, only the three groups remain as the sole survivors today in terms of American influence, it also became known that Morgan, Rockefeller and Goldman was serving as a front for the Rothschilds in order for the Rothschilds to maintain a low profile in America. But low profile or not they dominated what happened and how it will happen.
@mak
There are now only 5 nations on the world left without a Rothschild controlled central bank: Iran; North Korea; Sudan; Cuba; and Libya.
Use to be six before we gave it to them 2003 with a little diddy called Iraq.
Get a little history of the Red Shield Time line and jewish history
Click here
Nice excerpt:
"1811: The charter for the Rothschilds Bank of the United States runs out and Congress votes against its renewal. At the time Andrew Jackson (who would become the 7th President of the United States from 1829 to 1837) says, “If Congress has a right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given them to use by themselves, not to be delegated to individuals or corporations.”
Nathan Mayer Rothschild is not amused and he stated, “Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.”
Andrew Jackson’s response to this is to say, “You are a den of thieves vipers, and I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out.”
Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s reply to that being, “Teach those impudent Americans a lesson. Bring them back to colonial status.”
1812: Backed by Rothschild money, the British declare war on the United States. The Rothschilds plan was to cause the United States to build up such a debt in fighting this war that they would have to surrender to the Rothschilds and allow the charter for the Rothschild owned Bank of the United States to be renewed."
Mak, these moe foes started every war.
Mom said this: "If my sons did not want wars, there would be no wars." – Madame Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Think how demonic that is after 2 centuries of 100 of millions dead.
DV, when you, Thor, and your tunnel-vision twin finish your ménage a trios, take some time and get Jew off the brain, and your noses out of Thor’s azz.
All of that Wax, and you didn’t answer the “Central Banks” question. Why, because you can’t cite any documentation; you can’t produce a paper trail, beyond the rants of other conspiracy theorists, to validate your polemical statements.
Your tunnel vision is so deep that two legitimate NWO conspiracy nuts have completely failed to even mention the Bank for International Settlements in any of your posts. I assume you guys have kicked Alex Jones to the curb, for Thor.
It’s the central banks, stupid! People who are into polemics are obviously not interested in facts, details or documentation.
Neither have you mentioned the antics of the Shadow Banks which have wrecked havoc upon the global economy, financially ruining millions of lives in the process.
"Between 2002 and early 2008, roughly $1.4 trillion worth of sub-prime loans were originated by now-fallen lenders like New Century Financial. If such loans were our only problem, the theoretical solution would have involved the government subsidizing these mortgages for the maximum cost of $1.4 trillion. However, according to Thomson Reuters, nearly $14 trillion worth of complex-securitized products were created, predominantly on top of them, precisely because leveraged funds abetted every step of their production and dispersion. Thus, at the height of federal payouts in July 2009, the government had put up $17.5 trillion to support Wall Street's pyramid Ponzi system, not $1.4 trillion. The destruction in the commercial lending market could spur the next implosion." ("Shadow Banking", Nomi Prins, The American Prospect)
Rothschild dogs keep on chasing your Rothschild tails. I’ll keep separating facts from fiction and pointing people towards information that can be beneficial.
"It’s the central banks, stupid!" Makheru Bradley
Central of what?
@Mak,
Dude, tunnel vision?
You are the most myopic guy I see out here. Forrest or Trees Bra?
I can't spend all night addressing your Homework.
I gave you a History because I really thought that you did not know the whole timeline.
You can't go from A-Z without learning bcde....
You get my point - I am really trying to help you.
The world is just playing out a script here.
Central Banks Bra? Little unknown secret bra,THEY ARE ALL PRIVATE!!!!!!!WHO OWNS THEM? 165 OF THEM.
IS THE US FED PRIVATE?
WHY ARE WE TRYING TO GET AN AUDIT THE FED BILL PASSED?
YOU WANT TO TALK CENTRAL BANKS ?
LETS DO THE DAMM THING:
Can't ignore History (even thought i see that you like to)
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) was established by Charles G. Dawes in 1930 - (Rothschild agent and Vice President under President Calvin Coolidge from 1925-1929), Owen D. Young , and Hjalmar Schacht of Germany (President of the Reichsbank). -33 years after RC first World Finance meeting there.nice.
Founded in Basel, Switzerland, in 1930, the BIS has been called “the most exclusive, secretive, and powerful supranational club in the world.”
The BIS is central bank to all major central banks in the world. It is privately owned by central banks themselves, all of whom are also private. It was founded under questionable circumstances by questionable people. It is accountable to no one, especially government bodies. It operates in complete secrecy and is inviolable Movement of money is obscured and hidden when routed through the BIS. The BIS is targeting regional currency blocks and ultimately, a global currency.
It has been hugely successful at building the New International Economic Order, along with its attendant initiatives on global governance.
Proverbs 22:7 provides a useful compass: "The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender".
And if the vision of a global currency outside government control does not set you off , putting the BIS in charge of it surely will.
The BIS has been scandal-ridden ever since it was branded with pro-Nazi leanings in the 1930s. Charles Higham wrote in his book Trading with the Enemy that by the late 1930s, the BIS had assumed an openly pro-Nazi bias, a theme that was expanded on in a BBC Timewatch film titled “Banking with Hitler” broadcast in 1998.
In 1944, the American government backed a resolution at the Bretton-Woods Conference calling for the liquidation of the BIS, following Czech accusations that it was laundering gold stolen by the Nazis from occupied Europe; but the central bankers succeeded in quietly snuffing out the American resolution.
All the Central Banks report to the BIS.They are 165 different Central Banks Homie that are under this Rothschilds Cartel .
Each Central Bank is a separate and distinct central bank, located in a separate and distinct part of the world. These central banks cover the globe and know absolutely no boundaries, effectively erasing borders between even sworn enemies.
Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.
Therefore making the BIS is the Rothschild’s piggy bank, a veritable deep-pit mine, the equivalent of quadrillions of dollars.
Central banks are illegally created PRIVATE banks that are owned( if you go through the mounds of paper work) by the Rothschild(got to keep a low profile) banking family. The family has slithered its way into each country on this planet, threatened every world leader and their governments and cabinets with physical and economic death and destruction, and then emplaced their own people in these central banks to control and manage each country’s pocketbook. God Damm Bra!- 2001 on -Did you see what happen to Argentina and Brazil?
PART 2-
Worse, the Rothschilds also control the machinations of each government at the macro level, not concerning themselves with the daily vicissitudes of our individual personal lives. Except when we get too far out of line.
The grand plan of RC is to create a global mononation. Please do not confuse this with the term globalization. Mononation and globalization couldn’t be more different in concept, scope and purpose. Mononation is one state. It has one government. One set of laws for all ordinary citizens, no laws for the elite. Globalization refers to communicating, trading, interacting, etc. among separate, different, independent, sovereign countries.
Our own Federal Reserve(we cant even audit them) is an illegally emplaced private bank that is directly responsible for creating all the US’s depressions, recessions, and the inflation and deflation of our dollar. The Fed controls the printing of our own currency, and then charges the US government interest on those loans. The interest is growing each year, making it difficult if not impossible for our government to pay it.
How do we pay this interest?
By the US Personal Income Tax.
This tax has always gone to the Rothschild family.
"The powers of this "PRIVATELY SET UP" financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences."-CARROL QUIGLEY
The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements.
GAME ON MAK:
On March 10, 2003, the BIS abandoned the Swiss gold franc as the bank’s unit of account since 1930, and replaced it with the Special Drawing Rights of the IMF.
There is no doubt that the BIS is moving the world toward regional currencies and ultimately, a global currency. The global currency could well be an evolution of the SDR.
Global Research 18 April 2009 (excerpt): In an April 7 article in The London Telegraph titled “The G20 Moves the World a Step Closer to a Global Currency,” Ambrose Evans-Pritchard wrote: “In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF’s power to create money and begin global ‘quantitative easing’. In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.”
Indeed they will. The article is subtitled, “The world is a step closer to a global currency, backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all humanity.” Which naturally raises the question, who or what will serve as this global central bank, cloaked with the power to issue the global currency and police monetary policy for all humanity?
When the world’s central bankers met in Washington last September, they discussed what body might be in a position to serve in that awesome and fearful role. A former governor of the Bank of England stated:“The answer might already be staring us in the face, in the form of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). . . . The IMF tends to couch its warnings about economic problems in very diplomatic language, but the BIS is more independent and much better placed to deal with this if it is given the power to do so.”
MAK, GOOGLE all one hundred sixty-five Banks. You can click on each bank and visit its website. I got the list if you want it. They’re real. And they’re one of the reasons why each country is in such deep debt to this insidious family, the Rothschilds.
Mak, what is the US debt to the BIS?
The latest statistical results provided by the Joint External Debt Hub(Google it), which receives data from the BIS, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Then call me and say "you are right the RC has got us".
Final
Andrew Hitchcock author : "The BIS (Bank for International Settlement – proposed to be the regulator of world finance) is a Rothschild Bank. In his "History of the Money Changers" he describes the names of the Rothschild agents founding the BIS in 1930."
AS THE GREEK RIOTS CONTINUE, many financial experts contend that the Greek government can do little to fix the nation’s economy. Arguing that Greece’s fate was sealed when it joined the European Union in 2001 and adopted the Euro, analysts say that a Greek boom and bust leading to social unrest was “designed from the beginning.”
Bernard Connolly, a British economist and former member of the European Commission, who authored, The Rotten Heart of Europe, exposed the truth about the European Union and its Rothschild-run, European Central Bank, headquartered in Frankfurt Germany:
He said-
“The mission of the European Central Bank is to provoke a financial crisis. The purpose of the crisis will be, as Prodi, then Commission president, said in 2002, to allow the EU to take more power for itself.
The sacrificial victims will be, in the first instance, local banks and investors in countries such as Ireland and Club Med. Subsequently, Germany and British taxpayers will bear the burden of bailouts that a newly empowered EU economic government will ordain.” (SOUNDS FAMILIAR?)
However, In a little known rusty colored building in Basle, Switzerland, a small sign by the steps leading to the front doors tells you it is private property. Other than that there is nothing specific which marks it as being the most important building in the world. For the unassuming building houses the Rothschild-run, Bank for International Settlements, also known as the BIS."
The Rothschild-run BIS dictates to all banks of EU member-states specific terms by which cross-border banking is to be transacted. The regulations dictated by the BIS are outlined in their BIS Quarterly by their subsidiary, The Basle Committee On Banking Supervision.
International control is what the Jewish bankers are all about. And that control is soon to intensify when the Rothschild-sponsored EU begins to put out the fires raging in Greece…
Coming to another town near you soon Mak.Focus Bra!
_________
I gave you a History because I really thought that you did not know the whole timeline.—Wax
Dood, I can read, copy and paste with the best of them. Beyond that I’m a master dot-connector, while you and your twin are trapped in a Jewish tunnel. The Rothschild’s aren’t Lucky Luciano dominating a group of criminal families. At the very best they are tiger sharks swimming in a sea of great whites, and that probably is a stretch The fact is if the M&A Adviser, NM Rothschild & Sons had been knee deep in derivatives, and they were designated for sacrifice like Lehman Brothers was, the central banks would drop them in a heartbeat.
All the Central Banks report to the BIS.They are 165 different Central Banks Homie that are under this Rothschilds Cartel.—Wax
Until 9:19 am you had never even heard of BIS. After copying and pasting, you’ve concluded that BIS is controlled by the Rothschild’s. (ROTFLMBAO)
Our own Federal Reserve (we can’t even audit them)—Wax
Dood, take a break from sniffing Thor’s farts. The Senate voted last week 96-0 to audit the Fed.
[Congress is on the verge of ordering an historically unprecedented audit of the nation's central bank. The White House and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke both oppose the plan, but proponents of the audit point out that the Fed distributed an astounding $2 trillion in bailout loans and taxpayers deserve to know where the money went. The audit of the Fed had astonishing bipartisan support. Not only did the Senate amendment pass unanimously, but the House version of the bill — which included an even stricter proposal mandating an ongoing audit of the Fed's activities — was a collaborative effort by arch-conservative Ron Paul (R-TX) and ultra-liberal Alan Grayson (D-FL).]—The Week
Central of what?—DV
Duh! Central of the banking industry! Central of the economy! Any bells and whistles going off yet? Uh, the Federal Reserve Bank! The Bank of England! Alan Greenspan, Benjamin Bernanke!
I know that people with tunnel-vision can’t see this, but the real economic issue is when will the next bubble burst, and how devastating will it be?
[Many people now believe that the financial crisis was not an accident. They think that the Bush administration and the Fed knew what Wall Street was up to and provided their support. This isn't as far fetched as it sounds. As we will show, it's clear that Bush, Greenspan and many other high-ranking officials understood the problem with subprime mortgages and knew that a huge asset bubble was emerging that threatened the economy. But while the housing bubble was more than just an innocent mistake, it doesn't rise to the level of "conspiracy" which Webster defines as "a secret agreement between two or more people to perform an unlawful act." It's actually worse than that, because bubblemaking is the dominant policy, and it's used to overcome structural problems in capitalism itself, mainly stagnation.]-- Mike Whitney
Of course, that’s barring something catastrophic like an Israeli attack on Iran which will surely plunge the global economy into a depression.
Mak,
I can tell that you are not interested in learning but instead just battling.
Tell me who co sponsored the Audit the Fed bill with Ron Paul.
Bra , I work with him down South. Just met with him -Brother -David -Who? Jeez
You don't think we had late night discussions about this shit.
If you accuse me of of being Alex fans, Dude how many times have Ron Paul been on the show. Do you not think that BiS and Central Banks have not been discussed the last 2 years ad nauseuum by Alex and Ron?.
Mak, I am 48 and been considered a conspiracy Theorist all my life. Don't you think I breath this stuff. You are trying to be arrogant and win some kind of prize for throwing insults.
This is what you think of other brothers-let it be.
Look at the Daily Paul see how many times he talked about the BIS. Could you have any discussions in the US about derivatives without knowing how the BIS comes into play?
Hey Mak, I don't have one of them evil hearts trying to Impress the crowd- Just an Avatar that don't mind sharing.
So go somewhere else with that- smelling Thor farts-meme.
That just childish.
Move away from your ego Bra. You are just projecting what you would do.Plain as day!
Namaste.
"Beyond that I’m a master dot-connector, while you and your twin are trapped in a Jewish tunnel"
makheru bradley
Mak.
That's about the 5th time you've mentioned "Jews" in 4 posts.
What?
Are you trying to get a job or something?
"The Rothschild’s aren’t Lucky Luciano dominating a group of criminal families." Makeru Bradley
That's one of the most laughably ignorant and Plantation Negro statements I've ever read.
Are you serious?
LOL.
You can't be.
No.
I get it.
You really must be looking for a job.
Last one for Mak,
"Until 9:19 am you had never even heard of BIS. After copying and pasting, you’ve concluded that BIS is controlled by the Rothschild’s. (ROTFLMBAO)
Wrong-
Mak, I am not ashamed to say that I follow, Makow, Paul , Alex jones, Mish plus many more for the last 5 years hardcore(call me a conspiracy theorist) but I don't have a hero or God complex on any of the above. By the way Mish is pretty main stream but honest. I worship no one. i am just grateful that they are giving American another viewpoint to think about. I have been accuse of linking and quoting them from I have been posting on this blog. Have the aforementioned sites every discussed the BIS?
Look on any of these Websites
Alex (click here)
Daily Paul (click here)
Mish (click here)
Are you the only guy that read about Finance or follow different sites - is this your first blog or site?
As I said, projections Bra.
Second-
Our own Federal Reserve (we can’t even audit them)—Wax
Dood, take a break from sniffing Thor’s farts. The Senate voted last week 96-0 to audit the Fed.
[Congress is on the verge of ordering an historically unprecedented audit of the nation's central bank. The White House and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke both oppose the plan, but proponents of the audit point out that the Fed distributed an astounding $2 trillion in bailout loans and taxpayers deserve to know where the money went. The audit of the Fed had astonishing bipartisan support. Not only did the Senate amendment pass unanimously, but the House version of the bill — which included an even stricter proposal mandating an ongoing audit of the Fed's activities — was a collaborative effort by arch-conservative Ron Paul (R-TX) and ultra-liberal Alan Grayson (D-FL).]—The Week"
Wrong Mak!
Check again:
It will not be audited -if you were really up on your game , you would have understand that the Author of the Bill Ron Paul is pissed and here is What he had to say:
"Watered Down Audit the Fed Bill Passes, Ron Paul Says Senator Sanders is a Sell Out"
- May 11th, 2010
Ron Paul regarding the Senate Audit the Fed bill:
Bernie Sanders has sold out and sided with Chris Dodd to gut Audit the Fed in the Senate. His “compromise” is what the Adminstration and banking interests want: they’ll allow the TARP and TALF to be audited, but no transparency of the FOMC, discount window operations or agreement with foreign central banks. We need to take aciton and stop this!-Ron Paul
I am outraged. The Senate just voted down the Vitter Amendment and against a real audit of the Federal Reserve. My entire team and I are going to work very hard to make sure the American people know who voted right, and who voted with the banking special interests.- Ron Paul
Hey Mak, CNN and MSNBC is all you listen to?
THE FED WILL NEVER BE AUDITED.
David Scott(co sponsor) is a friend(I am maxed out in campaign contribution to him.) He was extremely involved with the bill.
He has heard an earful from me- I am a political animal. I got photos with myself and Obama, Bush , Kerry and all of the other demons. It was my job as a VP corp rep to these scum.
The reason why I do this is to scream out loud to everyone in an earshot is "Wake up to this Con."
You have no idea who I am.
You have not read my old posts...I was in the game.
The Darkside. Maybe I just am trying to make amends for it now , but DV said it: I AINT SCARED. THE TRUTH IS ALL THAT MATTERS-nothing to loose.
Therefore Mak, DEBATE THE TIMELINE -DEBATE THE CONTENT(anything I said valid about the Rothschild?). READ IT. Cut, paste, linked, retype, original? What does it matter? True or False, Is it valid or NOT?
Peace be with you.
I can tell that you are not interested in learning but instead just battling.—Wax
You are correct. I’m not interested in a slew of copy/pasted conspiracy theories. I am interested in documented history. Do I have any theories? Absolutely, but it is critically important to separate theory from facts.
I took issue with the Goebbelian propaganda in the original post, a mixture of historical facts (Dr. Welsing) with fiction—the Rothschild’s own the Bank of England, which is OBTW the Central Bank of the United Kingdom.
The issue could have been settled a long time ago if you had answered the question: “Can you please explain, w/o writing an epistle, how a family-owned investment bank-- NM Rothschild & Sons Limited, which is dwarfed by its competitors like Goldman Sachs, controls both the central bank of the United States and the central bank of the United Kingdom.”
You could not produce any corroborating evidence—only copy and pasted timelines and conspiracy theories which were derived in part from the Rothschild family history. Either you can answer a question or you can’t. Long-winded diatribes don’t prove anything.
This is what you think of other brothers-let it be.—Wax
You can’t be a flamethrower—“Red Rosa”—slandering out esteemed ancestors with right-wing propaganda, then beg for mercy behind the “brother line.” It doesn’t work like that.
Over the past four years I’ve had the pleasure of debating some truly brilliant brothers and sisters on the internet. If you think that you know something that no one else knows, you’re delusional.
AND YOU AINT SCARED!—DV
You are scared. If I came down to Jonesboro or Smyrna would anyone know HotMFWax? DV is also scared. That’s why both of you are hiding behind avatars.
That's about the 5th time you've mentioned "Jews" in 4 posts. Are you trying to get a job or something?—DV
Nope! I’m just proficient at using other people’s words against them.
Post a Comment