A scientist seeking funding to study the mating habits of the Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel will have a very difficult time.A scientist seeking funding to study the mating habits of the Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel and how those habits are impacted by Anthropogenic Global Warming will be drowned in cash.
Why? You get what you pay for:
So far the United Nations spent $200 Billion (your tax dollars) with scientists to PROVE that Man Made CO2 is causing the earth's climate to change. Scientists skeptical of AGW received bumble gum and hard tallywackers.
Are You Smarter Than A Plantation Negro, In The Fifth Grade?
FOR THE LAST DECADE,MAN-MADE CO2 HAS GONE UP EVERY DAY,
BUT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS GLOBAL TEMPS HAVE NOT.
IT DOESN'T MATTER IF ALL THE YEARS FROM 1998 TO 2009
ARE WARMER THAN THE YEARS 1989-1998, EITHER.
THE FACT THAT EACH YEAR IS NOT WARMER THAN THE PRECEDING YEAR DISPROVES THE THEORY THAT CO2 CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING.
THEN THERE'S THIS FACT:
9 comments:
So far the United Nations spent $200 Billion (your tax dollars) with scientists to PROVE that Man Made CO2 is causing the earth's climate to change.
AHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
whew.....!!!
Mariah!!!
Sit yo drunkazz down before you fall down!
The TOTAL annual budget of the U.N. is somewhat less than $2 Billion Dollars.....,
LMAO she was twisted!
LOL. Damn.
CNu. Mariah must be smokin' some of that Kansas whistle while you work.
Is there any chance, scientifically speaking" that the increase in CO2 emmissions caused the increase in temperatures prior to the past decade and that the past decade is not the determinative factor in the issue; or that the spike in your graph caused a condition that would manifest itself in a temporary reduction in average global temperatures that is indicative of a problem in and of itself; or that the information depicted in the graph for the 11th century may be incorrect as there was far less capability to measure an avg global temp at that time?
Or for that matter, couldn't there be any number of other scientifically valid rationales that could explain the phenomena that you are attempting to foist off as 100% proof of your position? Shoddy work son. Real shoddy. Even though I want to agree with you that there is quite a bit of uncertainty as to the near and far reaching effects of human activity on the climate and the environment as a whole, I wonder what is your agenda in pontificating that there is no truth whatsoever to even the possibility of negative consequences to our actions.
Craig, 200 Bil U.N. spending. I get it. Mariah is not capable of distracting ME that much.
Technocracy seeks to change the present exhausted, unsustainable model, because cosmetic attempts to provisionally reduce consumption while clinging to the same cultural and psychological modus operandi will only produce a slightly longer-lived, but still utterly unsustainable "way of life". A more efficient American sprawl is still a vast and unsustainable misallocation of resources.
Technocracy shares in common with LaRooshianism - recognition of the necessity of an authoritarian establishment to implement its goals.
For the life of me, however, at least given how you represent a memetic/mimetic dimension of the LaRooshian endeavor via your dedicated efforts to deceptively Blackify crypto-fascism - your goals have much more in common with the existing American elite establishment which has successfully advanced its psuedo-Blackification by applying a thin, rhetorical and visual coat of Obama....,
LaRoosh Noir is like an aspiring Amway diamond. Sadly, only the Amway founders ever had any chance of grinding their way into the elite establishment game on the backs of all their cultishly deluded ho's.
Diamonds are just expendable ho's too in the greater scheme of these MLM hustles...., bottom ladies - if you will.
"Technocracy shares in common with LaRooshianism - recognition of the necessity of an authoritarian establishment to implement its goals."
LOL.
Scientific Dictatorship.
"Pleeeeeze Masssa Pleeeeze! Make us all do da right ting!!!!"
"Technocracy shares in common with LaRooshianism - recognition of the necessity of an authoritarian establishment to implement its goals."
lol
UB was right.
One comic book too many.
LOL.
This is too good. This shit is really cracking me up.
CNu turns out to be a member of the "Technocracy" (Sci-Fi Plantation Crackas & Plantation Negros who think some sort of "Scientific technical authority should run the world". Because Science (big "S") knows best."
Yet them muhfuggas is WRONG about everything from H1N1 to Global Warming.
Wrong. Stupid. Lying. Poisoning. Cancer Causing. Warmongering. Malthusian. Masonic. Dumb Asses ... who cannot admit when they are wrong.
Other than that they are pretty cool.
Yet these Moronic Star Trek convention refugees think THEY should RUN THE WORLD.
GETTHEFUCKOUTTAHERE
You punch drunk again DeVil, I'm hitting you too hard on too many threads all-at-once.
Still reeling from that right cross thrown over in this corner of the ring, looks like I'll have to chase your stumbling monkey over here to this corner of the ring and tattoo you upside the head with it here too;
I knew it! A lil Negro Technocracy was the real culprit behind all the this LaRooshian obsession.
stop dancing DeVil...,
I'm not a Technocrat agitating on behalf of the the Technate.
Those cats are optimists.
Naive optimists.
I'm an esoterist.
Stern.
Cynical.
Realistic.
"Cruel".
Difference between me and them is real simple. I believe in the inevitability of a minimal regret human population shorn of its ecological overshoot.
I believe that cull will happen one way or another, no matter what I do.
The technate is all off on a capt-save-a-ho mission. They'd like to see the billions reconfigure to survive and go forward en masse, i.e., save the Titanic.
By comparison, LaRoosh off on a bishop-don-juan-pimp-a-ho mission just tryin to stack theirs on a lifeboat on the deck of the Titanic.
Post a Comment