The New York Times has lifted the lid on how Al Gore stands to benefit to the tune of billions of dollars if the carbon tax proposals he is pushing come to fruition in the United States, while documenting how he has already lined his pockets on the back of exaggerated fearmongering about global warming. As is to be expected, the article is largely a whitewash and takes an apologist stance in defense of Gore.
However, the NY Times‘ John M. Broder does reveal how one of the companies Gore invested in, Silver Spring Networks, recently received a contract worth $560 million dollars from the Energy Department to install “smart meters” in people’s homes that record (and critics fear could eventually regulate) energy usage.
First they convince you warming is due to "CO2". Then they convince you man is the biggest cause of "CO2". Which means each human being is born with a Carbon "Impact" ... a deficit. See where this is going? Since we all agree that our mere existence is ... a "pollution". This is the Scientific Dictatorship's equivalent to Original Sin. Instead of owing the church .... you know owe a ... nice ... liberal ... smart ... "scientific" ... semi-private government what amounts to an existence tax.
Get it yet? Be careful because they give this extortion cute names to trick the Plantation Negros and the Plantation Crackas. They call it a "carbon tax". A "green house" tax. The pharmaceutical equivalent of this mind fuck and extortion is to call neurologically toxic chemicals "vaccines" that "save lives".
Just like the Aztec King ... they predict something that was scheduled to happen anyway (a momentary fluctuation in earth's temperature that threatens Armageddon ... unless White Scientist Man... can save the Earth ... for a fee.
Hell .... I don't know. Shit. I guess it takes game to recognize game.
2 comments:
Yeah, "game."
The man finds it so crucial that...that...it's just not so crucial for him to give up that burger.
Now, I don't care how many burgers he eats. It's just that it's so...makes him look so...you say it for me, DV. I don't like calling people hypocrites. But cow farts are definitely the problem, by his theory.
They should have picked different trees for the study, too.
Just a few hundred thousand years ago the land that we now call New York City was covered by a sheet of ice that was 1 mile thick.
It is clear that certain people are attempting to highjack a phenomenon that is a fact of life on Earth for their own agendized purposes.
Post a Comment