Wednesday, August 26, 2009

U•Gen•Ics 401


How American corporate philanthropies launched a national campaign of ethnic cleansing in the United States, helped found and fund the Nazi eugenics of Hitler and Mengele — and then created the modern movement of "human genetics."

In the first three decades of the 20th Century, American corporate philanthropy combined with prestigious academic fraud to create the pseudoscience eugenics that institutionalized race politics as national policy. The goal: create a superior, white, Nordic race and obliterate the viability of everyone else.

How? By identifying so-called "defective" family trees and subjecting them to legislated segregation and sterilization programs. The victims: poor people, brown-haired white people, African Americans, immigrants, Indians, Eastern European Jews, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the superior genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists. The main culprits were the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune, in league with America's most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Harvard, Yale and Princeton, operating out of a complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. The eugenic network worked in tandem with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the State Department and numerous state governmental bodies and legislatures throughout the country, and even the U.S. Supreme Court. They were all bent on breeding a eugenically superior race, just as agronomists would breed better strains of corn. The plan was to wipe away the reproductive capability of the weak and inferior.

Ultimately, 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized — legally and extra-legally. Many never discovered the truth until decades later. Those who actively supported eugenics include America's most progressive figures: Woodrow Wilson, Margaret Sanger and Oliver Wendell Holmes.

9 comments:

CNu said...

Population is growing at a rapid pace in many economically developing countries and there is a continuing need of an alternate method for regulation of fertility. We proposed several years back a birth control vaccine which induces the formation of antibodies against the human pregnancy hormone, the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These inventions are described in patents issued in India, U.S.A. and several other countries. (Ref. EP 204566, JP 62286928, CA 1239346, U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,312, CN 8603854). We describe now another invention which generates antibody response of a long duration against hCG after a single or a limited number of injections.

Whereas the possibility of controlling fertility by raising antibodies against hCG is known from our previous studies and those of others, the vaccines utilized earlier were conjugates of two or more peptides such as the natural beta hCG peptide of 145 amino acids linked to tetanus toxoid or other carriers. In another modality, the beta hCG peptide was associated with alpha oLH and then linked to carriers (Talwar et al 1988; U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,312). These vaccines demand purification and preparation of the constituent proteins from natural sources. The cost of some of these is at present very high which will be restrictive to their large scale use in family planning programs of economically developing countries. Moreover these vaccines demand three injections for primary immunization followed by a fourth as booster. A major advantage of the present embodiment is the possibility of getting satisfactory and sustained antibody response with one primary injection and at most one booster. Another interesting feature is the low cost at which this vaccine can be prepared and made available for large scale use.

Vaccinia virus is well known as a versatile tool for molecular biologists. In the New Scientist dated 3 Dec., 1988 (Anon, p.38) an article refers to a new vaccine for rinderpest virus in cattle and states that the vaccine is a genetically engineered version of the vaccinia virus, researchers having transformed two genes coding for the coating of rinderpest virus into the vaccinia virus.


Talwar, Gursaran Prasad (c/o National Institute of Immunology, Shadid Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi, IN)
Srinivasan, Jay (Dept. of Biology, Washington University Campus, Box No:1137, One Brookings, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899)
Chakrabarti, Sekhar (c/o The National Institutes of Health, (Room 237, Building 4), Bethesda, MD, 20892)

So these Indian cats have been co-opted into the dastardly plot by the fiendish NWO-Amero-Nazi cabal - and given the Blavatskian crypto-Luciferian illuminati connect from over a century ago out of India, it all makes perfect sense?

Right?

No need to guess.

The patent on the means to this end allows you to connect dots, name names, and handle your anti-NWO bidnis.

So, what's next on your anti-eugenics, anti-Illuminati agenda DV now that I've done your investigative legwork for you?

Denmark Vesey said...

CNu,

Obviously you are channeling Matt Damon's bar scene in Good Will Hunting...

And I don't want to interrupt your little mastubatory fantasy where CNu shows up the good looking rich know-it-all, and walks away with the fine woman who is turned on by smart tough nerds.

But you aint Matt Damon, and I damn sure aint no white boy in a Cambridge bar.

Now before you cut and paste any more egg head scientists with their Dooms Day Apocalyptic Population Prophesies that insist the key to man's salvation is population reduction via global genocide, remind yourself that that shit is Science, not science.

CNu said...

Obviously you are channeling Matt Damon's bar scene in Good Will Hunting...

lol...,

this the third time I've heard this movie referenced hereabouts.

I'm not hip to all the homoerotic signposts DV, help a brother out.

what exactly you kneegrow matt damon fanboys talkin about?

And I don't want to interrupt your little mastubatory fantasy where CNu shows up the good looking rich know-it-all

Where he at dood?

You gone make introductions?

This somebody you meet through UBM?

What?

I need to school him too?

Now before you cut and paste any more egg head scientists

Why Denmark Vesey, you madcap....,

that was the patent for the VACCINE by which women will be made to have a lethal immune response to their own reproductive processes.

the shit works.

works very well in fact...,

now that you know the names and locations of the principle actors involved in bringing this insidious luciferian illuminati plan into realization NOW

in the modern era...,

using state of the art technology

and your personal favorite whipping-boy transmission vector

VACCINATION

all I want to know is when you'll being organizing the drop squads to handle bidnis?

I know discretion is the better part..,

but there must clearly also be a memetic marketing and political sales and propaganda angle to this operation as well

I'm eager to see how you take it on - now that I've cracked the case for you and named specific contemporary names magne!!!

what now DV?

I mean,

surely you haven't just been woofin at the big gate?

have you?

Denmark Vesey said...

"This somebody you meet through UBM?" CNu

LOL.

Good one. That's funny.

Denmark Vesey said...

"I'm eager to see how you take it on - now that I've cracked the case for you and named specific contemporary names magne!!!

what now DV?

I mean, surely you haven't just been woofin at the big gate?" CNu


Ohhhhh.

That's what you talkin' 'bout Riddler?


Maaaaan shit.

You think this is about proof? Bra. Please.

You've always misunderstood the process Grasshopper.

LOL.

You making the same mistake my man Gray Con made. You assume I am presenting an "argument", an "appeal", an attempt to "persuade".

I'm not.

Hell. I'm not even telling people shit they don't already know.

CNu. Plantation Negros KNOW the vaccines are malicious. They KNOW the oral polio vaccine is the cause of AIDS.

Just like they KNOW GMO damages their immune systems.

Just like smokers KNOW cigarettes cause cancer.

Just like obese people KNOW processed food cannot be digested.

Just like diabetics who KNOW starch turns to sugar and causes diabetes ... continue to eat starch.

Plantation Negros KNOW the vaccine programs are part of eugenecist program designed to eliminate them ... WILL CONTINUE TO GET THE VACCINES.

I'm not trying to INFORM them.

I'm TAUNTING them.

For wanting to be slaves.

You can't turn a ho into a housewife and you cannot turn a Plantation Negro into a Free Man.

Any muhfuggah roll up his sleeve and offers a vein to the Plantation don't really need to be saved.

He might as well go 'head.

SimonGreedwell said...

You making the same mistake my man Gray Con made. You assume I am presenting an "argument", an "appeal", an attempt to "persuade".

I'm not.


Nonsense. You make arguments. You make appeals. And you for damn-sure try to persuade, it's just that you're spread so thin across so many subjects that it's impossible for you to cover all the bases at once. So of course you're going to say that you're not trying to convince anyone of anything. How could it be otherwise? You opine on everything from foreign policy, eugenics, sexuality, domestic policy, who the Baddest Bitch is, hip hop's relation to masculinity; and on and on and on.

If it was all about you putting your entries out there without the slightest inclination towards interacting with anyone you wouldn't have the comments enabled. You wouldn't make six entries in a row talking about abortion while cutting and pasting different quotes from the comment threads. How is it that someone who facilitates so much debate on such a wide range of issues can reach the conclusion that he isn't arguing or trying to persuade anyone—as if he's above it all?

If you were serious about your non-argumentation, non-appeal-making, and ambivalence towards persuasion, then you'd pull a Cobb and disable the comments—which I don't see you doing any time soon.

Denmark Vesey said...

Nah.

GC.

You missin' it Bra.

For example.

Name a point you disagree with me on:

1) Vaccines -

If you had a son tonight, would you allow him to be vaccinated tomorrow?

2) Plantation Medicine -

Other than triage, does allopathic medicine heal people? Are corporate pharmaceuticals of any value at all?

3) Eugenics -

Does our National Health Care policy at all reflect the agenda of Eugenecists to reduce the reproductive capacity of certain groups of people?

Is suspicion of mass vaccinations as a vehicle to sterilize the population warranted?

4) Foreign Policy

Has our nation's Foreign Policy been hijacked by people operating not in our national interests?

5) Abortion

Is there an Abortion Apparatus in this country? Is the issue of "Choice" a meme meant to change the subject, and distract people from the real issue of terminating an unborn human life?

Tell you what. Name a position I've taken that you disagree with or summarily reject.

I don't think you can.

Even DMG can't.

He just puts up the front of rejecting my positions because the way I present them causes cognitive dissonance and discredits other core aspects of his world-view.

So Brother Gray - How can I "convince" muhfuggas of things they already believe?

I simply encourage them to act upon what they already know.

People will not be lining up tomorrow to be injected with the H1N1 Vaccine not because they "believe" in it or they've been "convinced" of its value.

They will be lining up because they are afraid of taking responsibility for themselves.

I'm not trying to convince people of anything. I'm encouraging them to have the courage of the convictions they already have.

CNu said...

You think this is about proof? Bra. Please.

nah son...,

proof is a job for nerds and mentats.

exceptional cats who can focus their attention and memory for extended periods of time

psychological athletes

You've always misunderstood the process Grasshopper.

There is no process.

Only a methodology for doing this;

I'm TAUNTING them.

that whole frisson of intemperateness schtick....,

but in order to play this role

your own steez gots to be hella shiny

and not just in your own mirror

or in your own imagination

You making the same mistake my man Gray Con made. You assume I am presenting an "argument", an "appeal", an attempt to "persuade".

I'm not.


nah.

I have NEVER made any such assumption.

I did, however, hope you were connecting dots

as much as you've shown yourself collecting memes...,

connecting dots evinces a desire to understand

taunting dubs, OTOH.....,

CNu said...

Is suspicion of mass vaccinations as a vehicle to sterilize the population warranted?

You would not have known this fact if I hadn't told you.

It's why you've imprudently flailed away at medical abortion - taking the stance of a murderous, violent, primitive, and stupid, fundamentalist conformist bibtard - rather than sussing out the actual and factual modus operandi for massive, technically-implemented population control.

Having told you the specific facts of the matter, for the third time now, you didn't even recognize what you were looking at.

This comment of yours is the first indication you've given that you finally "get it".

Name a position I've taken that you disagree with or summarily reject.

1. Modern medical abortion - as and where currently practiced - is a eugenic enterprise.

2. Homosexuality is a "lifestyle choice"

3. A Luciferian Illuminati cabal rules or seeks to rule the world

4. Catastrophic climate change is a hoax.

But I don't want to get sidetracked from the fundamental breakthrough issue at hand.

Now that you KNOW, and have seen to patent(s) for, and know at least the operative identities of some of the players involved with developing sterilization vaccines - is taunting muhphuggas the full extent of what you intend to say or do about it?