Between 1932 and 1972 the U.S. Public Health Service conducted an experiment on 399 black men, all in the late stages of syphilis. This experiment was done during a time when there was an effective cure (found in 1947) for the disease but medical doctors working for the service still permitted the experiment in order to see the effects in blacks.Rather than offering to cure the men of their affliction, or even telling the men that they were in fact infected with syphilis, the doctors told them they suffered from “bad blood” and intentionally let them endure the later symptoms of the disease (heart disease, paralysis, blindness, insanity and eventually death.)
The results of the experiment were 28 dying from syphilis, 100 dying from related complications, 40 of the wives becoming infected and 19 of their children being born with syphilis. This was all sanctioned by the U.S. government.
What have Plantation Negros learned from this little precursor to genocide? Not much. Most still blindly allow their children to be injected with any and all dangerous concoctions labeled "vaccines". International Organizations and private eugenicists groups are "vaccinating" Africans around the clock. Today, southern Africa, with 10% of the world's population has 66% of the worlds AIDS victims.Are black physicians on top of this issue by vetting the growing list of drugs and chemicals injected into the veins of African-Americans? Or are they acting as mere ushers parroting the hypnotic mantra of the New World Order which enslaves people by hijacking their immune systems?
16 comments:
DV, um not feeling you on the vaccine tip. I mean you must be a darwinist because unless one is strong or has a genetic predilection for the protection, or you 're outta here. Oh yes I beleive in herad immunity but...... you got to be sensible with this tricky shit. Ask the American Indians. Oh wait, they had to deal with small pox and other sundry infections from europeans, and have gone from a strong 24 million to 1.5 million.
While it's on my mind some examples of genetic protections from infections: Hmmm? poetic!)
HIV and Northern Europeans. Some Europeans ( upwards to 20%) a have a genetic defect on the surface of their WBCs that prevents the entry of HIV into the WBCs, thereby making them, these "afflicted" Europeans, resistance to the HIV.
Sickle cell and Africans and some southern Europeans have in their red blood/hemoglobulin "mis-shaped" structures prevents infection by malaria bug.
Outside of the vaccine issue DV, do every address the issue of the multi-nationals trying to steal our water rights and the pending shortage of drinkable water supply?
GDawg - Vaccinations are a hoax.
LP! Where you been man?
Expand on your thoughts regarding water rights. What are your concerns?
Personally, I don't trust municipal water supplies at all. Flouride is poison and the chlorine is causing cancer.
I'm looking at some long term alternatives to supply water for the fam.
CNu is up on this big time.
"GDawg - Vaccinations are a hoax."
I duuno bro. Ain't buyig it. Don't leave the kids unprotected.
There is some shit we have to just believe that is good and the right thing to do.
I'M NOT INTO SOCIAL DARWINISM. IN LIGHT OD SOCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES HERE AND BROAD TOO MUCH AT STAKE TO SIMPLY BLOW-OFF VACCINES TO DATE!
There is some shit we have to just believe that is good and the right thing to do.
Faith.
Religion.
Secular Fundamentalism.
Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God.
~ G. K. Chesterton
DV
Several multinationals stand to profit and control the worlds drinking supply. GE Water, Coca Cola, Halliburton are a few, In 2005 GE Water, acquired Ionics and three other market-leading water services companies. GE Water is a 2bn business unit, employing 78,000 people in 43 countries.
This is getting pass most folks unnoticed!
"..Faith.
Religion.
Secular Fundamentalism.
Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God."
Maybe I missed something here, but I did not say anything about god.
And, I don't have anything against good governance. You'd be a fool and 'toast' to have it any other way IMHO.
Maybe I missed something here, but I did not say anything about god.
You didn't need to.
Worshipping something blindly is the act of making them your God.
"GDawg - Vaccinations are a hoax."
I duuno bro. Ain't buyig it.
Actually GD, you are buying it.
You are buying into the myth that "Man can fight diseases, one virus at a time".
The fact is there are countless viruses. They become extinct and new ones born every day. Man aint got a damn thing to do with it.
Modern medicine has made a fortune by introducing, miracle vaccines on the tail end of the virus' life-cylce, and then taking credit for it.
(Polio disappeared in Europe at the same time as it did in the US WITHOUT the Jonas Salk vaccine. Why? Because Europe improved the sanitation in its overcrowded cities at the same time the US improved it's sanitation.
Shitty water causes polio. Avoiding shitty water decreases the chances of polio.
Injecting polio viruses taken from monkeys into the veins of children is more religion than science.
God gave us the ultimate vaccination. It's called "The Immune System".
Keeping one's immune system as strong as possible is the most intelligent thing one can do.
Depending on ala cart immunizations on a per virus basis at $105 per vaccination multiplied by the population of the herd is A STONE COLD DRUG DEALER HUSTLE that would put Nicky Barnes to shame.
"...blindly worshippings something? You seem to make quite few assumptions. We have a sayin down south about folks makin assumptions which I won't repeat here.
Hmmmm? But to put more forthrightly, my instinct or "gut feeling" have taken me a "long" and "successful" way in life. So then I guess my instinct, or me, especially, am my God. So I'm cool with that. I am a believer.
DV, your rationally in terms of hygiene is absolutely correct as stated by you. But you are a darwinist. And I ain't mad at cha.
I hear ya GDawg.
But fuck Darwin.
I'm a DVist.
Taking a virus from the diseased kidney of a monkey and injecting into the blood stream of a child - cannot possibly be your gut instinct.
You seem to attach some egalitarian notions to the administration of vaccines. As if these benign, altruistic white folks actually protect humanity from disease.
Based on the epidemic of degenerative disease and ubiquitous cancer - laugh at that notion.
Modern medicine is about as successful an institution is the subprime industry.
"...Based on the epidemic of degenerative disease and ubiquitous cancer - laugh at that notion..."
All of which are largely related to modernistic development and its byproducts. Considering today's standard of living in the"western world, US included, not many would chage the dynamic for say sub-sahara Africa. as such we try to mitigate or "cure"-- degenerative diseases and ubiquitous cancers.
As to Darwin, liked his explanations and observations. For me, he made the bio-world visible and understandable.
You DO realize that you are contradicting yourself here.
Aren't you the one advocating refusal of what you call "Plantation" medicine?
In the beginning of the Tuskegee experiments there was no good treatment for syphillis, and the study was essentially an observational study to chronicle the natural history of the disease. But the study became criminal because there was (among other things) no informed consent, and the fact that the study continued for a quarter century after a viable treatment was found for syphillis.
And the treatment (which strangely you probably would advocate NOT taking today) is an anti-biotic. Penicillin...what you might call "Plantation" medicine.
So what is your point regarding Tuskegee and vaccination (which you seem to bring up several times per month to have the same arguments again and again)? Why are you made at the Tuskegee Experiment authors? You advocate the same thing with your tired anti-vaccination soap-box.
Really, DMG, you can't seriously be putting refusing unproven, potentially dangerous vaccines on the same par with illegally infecting someone with a life-threatening disease and refusing to administer the cure. And unless i'm mistaken, penicillin is a lot less chemically tampered with before it is administered than, say, the polio vaccine.
"Why are you mad at the Tuskegee Experiment authors? "
Also, can't help but notice you refer to the conductors of the Tuskeegee experiment as "authors", implying that they'd created something of value. This is an insult to authors everywhere (*AHEM* myself included) The word you're searching for, I believe,(at least I hope) is perpetrators. Or, in a just world, "the defendants". At first I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but DV may be right, you are a bit too invested in proselytizing conventional medical theology as opposed to simply spreading real truth. Your medical orthodoxy has blinded you to the fact that sometimes one must needs question the presumed bastions of authority as readily as you do the "herbal remedy" practitioners and other "quacks" you belie.
Honestly-- your medical degree notwithstanding, there's something seriously wrong with any black man who can condone implicitly or explicitly the abomination that was Tuskeegee.
Doc,
A mind truly is a terrible thing to waste.
So why would you waste yours sitting at the foot of our host imbibing every bit of his snake-oil bromides?
I'm not condoning the Tuskegee Experiments. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of our host. The authors of the study sought to prevent these good people from receiving treatment by convincing them they didn't have a treatable disease or that they had no disease. Sound familiar? They prevented these men from joining the military and receiving treatment. I know it's summer break, but go crack a book and read about the Tuskegee Experiments. These men already HAD syphilis, they weren't "illegally infected" as you put it. They didn't have to be, as easily as syphilis runs rampant today (when there is an easily obtained treatment), do you really think the government were at a loss to find men who already had the disease prior to penicillin?
And by the way, just because you haven't read the original journal articles about vaccinations (nor understand how it works), doesn't mean I haven't. So your "unproven" remark doesn't stand.
The Tuskegee Experiments don't need any conspiracy theory embellishments. Those men in the study were failed because after "plantation" medicine Penicillin was introduced, these men were denied treatment by misinformation (I'm looking at you MOTI).
And yes, you are mistaken about making Penicillin.
People who run a study are often referred to as authors. Don't quibble.
Please Doc, get off the internet and open a book. Don't spew out easily refuted rumor and expect to be taken seriously. I say this in kindness.
Post a Comment