What's The Chances Of This Poster Being Distributed By The Government?
Bet You'll Never See This:
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
The Deconstruction of Government Sponsored Feminist & Gay Propaganda Designed To Divide Americans Into Competing Controllable Identity Groups 003
What's The Chances Of This Poster Being Distributed By The Government?Bet You'll Never See This:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
So what's the problem with respecting women DV?
What's the problem with respecting men Casper?
DV
What's the problem with respecting men Casper?
What man ... other than yourself is not getting respect!... sounds like a personal problem you have! You should go down to the playground and start there! BTW.. Your slip and complex are both showing!
Casper.
Pump your brakes. You are trying too hard.
My wife doesn't have any problem garnering the respect she deserves.
My daughter is universally treated like royalty.
Why is $300 Million of our tax dollars being spent to pay the salaries of Feminist Propaganda writers to promote division?
(If you don't have anything fruitful to add, feel free to not add anything)
DV
"Why is $300 Million of our tax dollars being spent to pay the salaries of Feminist Propaganda writers to promote division?"
DV good question. Peep this you and Byrdeye. Every special interest group in this country ... even men! ... have buckets of lobbyied for funds appropriated for them to line their pockets. Now in the grand scheme of the nations budget 300MM is peanuts. Shit!... the bridge to nowhere was 320MM alone and that's just one of thousands of pork projects that disproportionately benefit rich white MEN! Thus I suggest that you and Byrd are over compensating. Your focus is misguided unless of course you two have a different agenda?!
"bridge to nowhere was 320MM alone and that's just one of thousands of pork projects that disproportionately benefit rich white MEN!"
Nice try, Casper - but no cigar.
That pork would have benefitted everyone in the region, not just "rich White men," and got cancelled anyways.
And at the very least it would have at least built something that EVERYONE could use.
Unlike VAWA anti-male propagandists, professional agitators and women-only shelters...
"bridge to nowhere was 320MM alone and that's just one of thousands of pork projects that disproportionately benefit rich white MEN!"
Nice try, Casper - but no cigar.
That pork would have benefitted everyone in the region, not just "rich White men," and got cancelled anyways.
And at the very least it would have at least built something that EVERYONE could use.
Unlike VAWA anti-male propagandists, professional agitators and women-only shelters...
Byrdeye
"And at the very least it would have at least built something that EVERYONE could use."
Your cred is zero as well:
Dubbed the “Bridge to Nowhere,” the bridge in Alaska would connect the town of Ketchikan (population 8,900) with its airport on the Island of Gravina (population 50) at a cost to federal taxpayers of $320 million.
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm889.cfm
^ Please, just stop and quit flossing your ignorance and political illiteracy publically.
That article was written in 2005.
Palin canned the project in 2007.
There is no "bridge to nowhere" as it was never built. Just like your whole argument now. :D
Bird
"Please, just stop and quit flossing your ignorance and political illiteracy publically."
"Palin canned the project in 2007."
Once again your cred is zero:
Her office canceled work on the span in 2007 after it became a symbol of congressional "pork-barrel" excess, but kept money that Congress had appropriated for the project.
My mom always told me to take care of and respect women.
Funny thing tho is, girls are generally never told to do the same for men now...
"Her office canceled work on the span in 2007 after it became a symbol of congressional "pork-barrel" excess, but kept money that Congress had appropriated for the project."
Actually, she kept 2/3 of the money, and spent it on other projects.
Anyhow, point is it was not earmarked for "rich White males" or any other ID group - just Alaskans or any other people going there. Nor was it anti-anyone.
Wasteful? Yes.
Discriminatory? No.
The same is not true for VAWA.
Post a Comment