Joan Morgan said ...
On coming out as a feministFeminism claimed me long before I claimed it, The foundation was laid by women who had little use for the word. […] I did not know that feminism is what you called it when black warrior women moved mountains and walked on water. Growing up in their company, I considered these things ordinary.…
On white feminists
The spirits of these women were no where to be found in the feminism I discovered in college. Feminists on our New England campus came in two flavas - both variations of vanilla. The most visible were the braless, butch-cut, anti-babes, who seemed to think the solution to sexism was reviling all things male (except, oddly enough, their clothing and mannerisms) and sleeping with each other. They used made up words like “womyn,” “femynists,” and threw mad shade if you asked them directions to the “Ladies’ Room.” The others - straight and more femme - were all for the liberation of women as long as it did not infringe on their sense of entitlement. They felt that men should share the power to oppress. They were the spiritual descendants of the early suffragettes and absolutely not to be trusted.—When Chickenheads Come Home to Roost
17 comments:
American feminism is a Rockefeller-funded experiment that has succeeded well beyond their CIA pet Steinem's wildest dreams.
Sure, there were women who wanted to do more and get laws changed, but that's not what the "feminist movement" was about. It was and still is about dismantling family, religion and masculinity.
"It was and still is about dismantling family, religion and masculinity." Insurgent
Why Insurgent?
Why would the Rockefellers want to "dismantle family, religion and masculinity"?
ii - MAD points for you! You get it!
But go ahead and answer DV's questions for other readers who don't yet..
BTW - I've studied feMEnism for almost 2 years now. You can read through my blog to find all my eye-opening discoveries about it.
Here's 2 collector posts to start with:
Feminists Declared Victory!
Top 10 Feminist Lies!
But my final conclusion in a nutshell is that:
Feminists fight for the same RIGHTS, but never the same RESPONSIBILITIES as Men. And therein lies the real inequality.
Ideally, feminists are shooting for 100% of the POWER while leaving Men saddled with 100% of the RESPONSIBILITIES.
Which is about as unfair as you can possibly get...
Why would the Rockefellers want to "dismantle family, religion and masculinity"?
Control.
Family, religion, tribe, etc. have been the historic sources of authority for the individual. One lived by the code of whichever group to which they belonged. That's what anthropologists academically refer to as "culture".
Probably throughout history, but certainly since the birth of the modern nation-state, the State has assumed great primacy in the individual's life. And the State is a jealous mistress. It doesn't like to compete with authority, so its machinations have been set out to destroy the competition - religion, family and masculinity.
Without those pillars, individuals are unanchored to anything. They are easy to manipulate and control.
Alan Watts has a lecture called "Return to the Forest" in which he describes the shaman who is able to survive in the forest, within him lying all that is needed to know to survive. In the nation-state, we divide people into such specialized roles that people damn near need to hire someone to tie their shoelaces. And once you require others to do for you, YOU ARE A SLAVE.
Feminism and homosexual "rights" are two weapons in the war on family, religion and masculinity as the former cannot coexist in the world of the latter.
You all retards sure hate women.
skip sievert said...
"You all retards sure hate women."
One of us is a woman. The other two have women.
You are a chickless cleric for "The Technate".
If anyone "hates women" Skip, it's the cat who aint got one.
-
oh snap!!!
You all sure hateful
It's interesting how the feminists have conditioned the masses to associate any challenge to their agenda as the product of "hatred".
The fact is no one hates women more than the people who try to change them into men.
DV
Visit Byrdeye's website... he does hate women- not feminists (just read some of the posts and his comments). Also I betcha he has no woman/ wife... thereby making him half gay according to your opinion.
Anonymous,
Help me out. What in particular about Byrds site leads you to believe he "hates women"?
DV I guess you wouldn't be able to see it even if it were right in your face, kinda like his support of race based "IQ" .
From his blogspot Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Race & IQ: An Inconvenient Truth
Also refer to the links on his homepage
Genes & Memes
• J. Philippe Rushton's "Race, Evolution & Behavior"
• Steve Sailer's iSteve Blog
• Urban Thoughts
For one thing we can definitely agree that Byrdeye is half gay (ask him whether he has a wife).
...Honestly I can't stand these sissy- assed men always blaming women and/ or feminist for their inability to bond with the opposite sex...
No sense in gay bashing.
They are just looking for love.
That is not a crime except if interpreted by a redneck.
Why begrudge people a little happiness.
Really what has that got to do with treating women like shit and then thinking they ''like it that way''.
If anon is a women then she is a redneck anti human also.
But I do agree with the part about race and I.Q. being a red flag.
Any one who equates race with intelligence is a quasi nazi or just intellectually ignorant.
All humans came from a breeding stock of about 2.000 people as recently as about 70.000 years ago in Africa.
The genetic difference between groups of humans is almost zilch no matter what part of earth they are on.
To pimp for one group or another is rascism.
Everyone brings cool stuff to the table.
In fact DV what's more interesting is Byrdeye's views about blacks. Much of the website is a bunch of whining about how white males are victims of the so-called reverse racism.
Tuesday, October 02, 2007
Anglo Guilt + Vanity = Our Negro Problem?
"Let's face it - these bastard latch-key kids of the Civil Rights Era are quite a different breed from those idealized in the generation before...and yet, the mainstream Anglo consciousness has yet to catch up. When Anglos witness some buckwild thug raping and pillaging his way through life with absolute & careless abandon - all they still really see is 200 years of slavery and MLK Jr. giving a motivational speech.
In any case they very much disliked the emphasis I placed on black thuggery and aggression.
Bottom line is - Anglos created a VERY BAD problem when they imported and abused teams of slaves here to do their own gruntwork...but now are only compounding it by spoiling them like children purely out of guilt. Ain't it great? ":D
posted by byrdeye at 11:03 AM
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Welcome To Da Jungle!
"Lol, another naive Jew-washed White liberal who spent all her summers "saving negroes" in Ghana...but gets totally PWNED by them at home for her ATM card & cash!
Woops, I guess they never warned her about common street thugs in her whitewashed MLK Jr pep rallies and Black History month! Doh!
c) Africanization: Once a city reaches a "critical mass" of Blacks - Whites (and wealthy Blacks) flee to the burbs as the city melts down into Africatown. Coming soon to a highly-"diverse" inner-city near you!"
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Has White Guilt Given Black Men A Free Pass In The "Anglosphere?"
Certainly, the former "Pax Britannica"
"Has this abusive history created a massive White guilt complex today in the "Anglosphere?" With a particularly apologetic, permissive and excusive attitude towards Black men?
Recent cases do attest to such a double-standard when it comes to race-related crimes and punishment. Black crimes tend to get underpublicized and excused...while White-on-Black crimes get overexposed and rushed to judgement. Sort of a reversal from the old Jim Crow days..."
As much as Bird Eye thrives to tell the "truth" this is a LIE.
Oh this is where much of the information lies with Bird Eye's apparent hatred of women. In some the post speaks of the 101 reasons men are "better" than women- Thursday, December 14, 2006
Why MEN Kick Women's Azzes! by Bird Eye
Skip you're right the guy's an idiot. Likewise if MF called ByrdEye out for being a racist he's right too.
Yes right.
You can spot em a mile away.
People always reveal themselves by their actions and words.
It is always better to take people at face value.
Every front .. has a back.
First,
Jewish people are the most intelligent. They win almost 40% of the Nobel Prize's and they have a small population of only 14 million. So by far they exceed the other races in intelligence. The other races having huge numbers and such small contributions.
Second,
IQ tests, test intellectual conformity, not creativity and originality. This would explain the Asian high IQ's. They as a people are the ultimate conformists.
In IQ tests there is typically only one answer to the problem. That problem being a social conformity to reason. But everyone knows that Genius's and all of the greatest developments in the world are not the product of conformity. Conformity never breeds creativity. We can see this in the lack of influence the Asian population has had on Science. China used to be called the "sick man" of Asia. Their population is massive and their contribution to innovation is almost nil. We can see this lack of originality in their adoptation of European philosophies, I.e. Communism.
Friedrich Nietzsche and other Philosophers have critized Asians. Nietsche used the words "Pallid osification" to describe Orientals.
Pallid: lacking sparkle or liveliness.
Osification: The process of becoming set and inflexible in behavior, attitudes, and actions. Inflexible conformity, rigid unthinking acceptance of social conventions.
The reality is Asian people have yet to understand that laws and rules are arbitrary. Europeans make the rules and Asian's follow them.
It also doesn't make sense that Asian's are considered smart because of the fact that they have destroyed their own countries. This is due to over-population and their basic lack of enviromental understanding.
It is also common scientific fact that women who have many children are ignorant, and those who have less children are more intelligent. This has already been proven in studies. So it seems strange to say that Asians are smart when the obviousness of their backwards countries, and medieval lifestyle makes them contrary to that premise.
Europeans have the most advanced civilizations and every other race has yet to meet these levels other than the Japanese. The Japanese only being good at copying other people's inventions and making them better. Other than that their original creativity is lacking as well. They took American cars and made them better. They took the German camera and made it better. And they took German steel and made it better. Otherwise the greatest advances still come from Europeans and Jews. Other than that the Orientals have yet to produce an Einstein or a Thomas Edison.
When it comes to Black people. It makes sense that they have low intellectual comformity, I.e. IQ tests. They are far too creative to be trapped in this unoriginal form of conditioning. You can tell their creative capacity in their athletics, music, dance, and the way they talk. They by far exceed the Asiatic races in these areas. Being better singers, musicians ect. Blacks far exceed Asians in emotive expression. In all of North America there is only one or two famous high-paid Asian actors.
Reality, Europeans rule the world and they have allowed others to exist only out of desire for economic bennifet. They, (Europeans) are also the physically strongest, winning the Strongest Man competitions again and again.
The greater the conformity, the weaker the race. Thus we see the races as they are today. The wild animal being bred out of man, and the physically impotent, conformist thriving.
Otherwise "Group psychology" is the most destructive thing in the world. All these stereotypes are false when it comes to the individual. Individualism is the most important thing for this time. All countries, Religions, groups need to dissolve for man to live in peace.
www.truenewspaper.blogspot.com
Post a Comment