Friday, January 04, 2008

Audacity of Hope My Ass - This Is What I'm Talking About. Ron Paul 08


13 comments:

Anonymous said...

DV you need an email address or something I found this on youtube last night I thought you might be interested.

Ron Paul on Meet The Press with Tim Russert(12-23-07)

Part 1
http://youtube.com/watch?v=saDw03JXigA
Part 2
http://youtube.com/watch?v=77wW1_VrHhA&feature=related
Part 3
http://youtube.com/watch?v=7R_VuvWLARo&feature=related
Part 4
http://youtube.com/watch?v=YQTaKoFNBUU&feature=related

Anonymous said...

The great thing about Russert is that he that he really asking these people difficult questions. I'm watching the Obama interview now.

Denmark Vesey said...

Thanks TG,

I'm watching your youtube links now.

Send a link to your recommended reading: "Bill Still's Money Masters".

That sounds interesting.

Anonymous said...

Money Master's

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936&q=Money+Masters&total=1984&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

It's 3.5 hours long..so make sure you have some time...


Have you seen
The Trap
The Power of Nightmares
or The Century of Self?

Anonymous said...

Ron Paul- 1992

"Regardless of what the media tell us, most white Americans are not going to believe that they are at fault for what blacks have done to cities across America. The professional blacks may have cowed the elites, but good sense survives at the grass roots. Many more are going to have difficultly avoiding the belief that our country is being destroyed by a group of actual and potential terrorists -- and they can be identified by the color of their skin. This conclusion may not be entirely fair, but it is, for many, entirely unavoidable.

Indeed, it is shocking to consider the uniformity of opinion among blacks in this country. Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, individual liberty, and the end of welfare and affirmative action.... Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the "criminal justice system," I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.

If similar in-depth studies were conducted in other major cities, who doubts that similar results would be produced? We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, but it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings, and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers.

Perhaps the L.A. experience should not be surprising. The riots, burning, looting, and murders are only a continuation of 30 years of racial politics.The looting in L.A. was the welfare state without the voting booth. The elite have sent one message to black America for 30 years: you are entitled to something for nothing. That's what blacks got on the streets of L.A. for three days in April. Only they didn't ask their Congressmen to arrange the transfer."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/15/124912/740/584/335036

Anonymous said...

Texas congressional candidate Ron Paul's 1992 political newsletter highlighted portrayals of blacks as inclined toward crime and lacking sense about top political issues.

Under the headline of "Terrorist Update," for instance, Paul reported on gang crime in Los Angeles and commented, "If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be."

Paul, a Republican obstetrician from Surfside, said Wednesday he opposes racism and that his written commentaries about blacks came in the context of "current events and statistical reports of the time."

... [I]n the same 1992 edition ... [Paul wrote], "We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man of 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be treated as such."

Paul also asserted that "complex embezzling" is conducted exclusively by non-blacks.

"What else do we need to know about the political establishment than that it refuses to discuss the crimes that terrify Americans on grounds that doing so is racist? Why isn't that true of complex embezzling, which is 100 percent white and Asian?" he wrote.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/15/124912/740/584/335036

Denmark Vesey said...

And Casper,

With which part of these cherry picked words of Mr. Paul's do you disagree?

Plantation Negros would rather have a Good Massa Bill Clinton, who says all the right things, while incarcerating black men by the millions and bombing Africans in Somalia -

than a cat like Ron Paul, who says what he thinks, yet repeals insane drug laws that punish black men disproportionately and dismantles a foreign policy that kills black Africans.

Anonymous said...

DV
With which part of these cherry picked words of Mr. Paul's do you disagree?

Where did I ever say that I disagree? I just believe in full disclosure.

SimonGreedwell said...

The best Ron Paul rap on the net: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bCRc2ub8hU

I had to put it on the front page.

Anonymous said...

Is this the true feelings of Republicans???

Today, January 3, a committee of the New Jersey Assembly will begin considering a bill that would make Jersey the first northern U.S. state to issue a formal apology for the state's historic role in slavery.

This measure would be purely symbolic.

According to an article by the Associated Press, Assemblyman Michael Patrick Carroll, a Republican, is not in favor of the bill. He said, "If slavery was the price that a modern American's ancestors had to pay in order to make one an American, one should get down on one's knees every single day and thank the Lord that such price was paid."

In other words, according to Assemblyman Carroll, the blacks should be thanking the Lord for the fact that their ancestors were slaves, because that's how they came to be Americans. If not for slavery, they'd still be in Africa. Praise Jeeeeeesus!

Denmark Vesey said...

Casper,

Sounds like it is the opinion of the "Republican" who said it.

a) What's your point?

b) Do you want a "state" to apologize to "you" for slavery?

Are you a slave?

Wesley Gibson said...

Though I find him incredibly entertaining and, indeed, in principal I agree with many of the domestic policy viewpoints of the Texas congressman (his foreign policy is a disaster), "Ron Paul is dangerous for black people."

Despite his libertarian viewpoint, he remains at base a constitutionalist. If you listen to the subtext of his commentary, essentially what he is saying is that he believes that government shouldn't have a hand in regulating and criminalizing drug use and traffic (good for blacks), and therefore as president he would abolish such laws for the federal government. Problem with that? Well we live in a federalist system. There are two agencies of punishment and dual systems of criminal law: federal and state. The consequence of his federalist viewpoint would be to eliminate federal laws that regulate drugs, LEAVING SUCH PROHIBITION TO THE STATES. This may be fine and dandy for liberal states like killa california (what up oakland), but do you really think the other 49 states in the union with their pervasive fear of black criminality will do anything other than impose just as harsh or harsher penalties for the same crimes (although as a practical matter you'll only do 50% of the time in State Prison).

My point is, what he's advocating isn't so much the elimination of the foot on black folks neck, but the localizing of it. Instead of GWB shitting on your rights, you'd have every governor of every state. The libertarian correlary is basically to say "good then an individual can avail themselves of a state based on their preference of law." But I don't have to get into how naive that viewpoint is (attachments to land and place, home as more than a matter of choice of law, etc.). Thus, while I feel ron paul on a government shouldn't regulate morality standpoint. What he's really saying is the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT shouldn't regulate morality. Which is an entirely different platform from one that I can get behind.

Also, his foreign policy is a disaster.

What up DV. Happy New Year

Anonymous said...

What about this?

http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2008/01/is-zionist-media-against-ron-paul.html

Posted elsewhere by a favorite fellow conspiracy theorist.