Where the phenomenon of death may convince some to be an undeniable manifestation of God's Law, with another it's simply another component of our transient world.
The story of Shaytan or Satan or the Devil is
that he has an unwavering belief in God's Existence. The challenge is
understanding the purpose of that belief. Does that belief have a
function or is it believing in His Existence merely for the sake of
believing He exists?Both supporters & nemesis believe Bro. Malcolm X existed. But only one group can understand his purpose and function. Only one group is willing to transmit the benefits of that legacy whereas the other would impede that legacy.
I can prove that
Malcolm existed to a non-English speaking Korean child with a gelatin
silver print. Knowing he existed is important, but knowing he existed
serves to understand the point of origin in which his message derived.
The FBI reject his message but they accept his existence. From Pac's perspective, to reject the message, it's function and purpose is to reject the point of origin in which it was forged.
8 comments:
Well, like death, if you consider the involuntary functions of our bodies i.e. things we do not control, it's a sensory observation of an immutable reality shared by both believers and atheists.
To the polar opposites of "believers" and "atheists" must be added the vastly more important category of "doers". For "doers" - involuntary and immutable don't apply, as they work very diligently to perfect their knowledge, awareness, and control over functions that are involuntary and thus immutable to non-doing "believers" and "unbelievers".
If those doers think they'll eventually alter the immutable reality of death, they can find an assortment of believer badges at the front registration desk.
Straw man argument GCV.
Those doers have acquired, preserved, and transmitted a capability set with which you seem to be personally unfamiliar.
Those doers have documented their findings, knowledge, and experience in plain sight.
As a student of "religious" matters, I'm more than a little perplexed by your unfamiliarity with their Work?
Bruddah CNu, the "doers" of the pre-modern world were "magical thinkers" you speak of at times. Religion did not impede science and vice versa. They coexisted in these religious societies of doers. The Chinese, Muslims, Chaco people, Egyptians, Dogon historical achievements still stand regardless of photoshop history. This entire debate put forward by some Darwinists and/or Evolutionists is nothing more than Greco-Roman culture's attempts to subvert the history of their own inability to negotiate theology and science. Ancient civilization with their "magical thinking" simple does not fit into the modernist cosmologies that they wish the world would adopt as the new "lingua franca." A few hundred years does not compete with hundreds of centuries of achievements via religion.
If some of these doers choose to believe religion disrupts their "objectivity" they should hold to their belief. To separate and categorize the vitamin C pill from the orange is cool but the orange is only nutrient deficient if your only frame of reference is Pascow's "sour soul."
I mean "sour soil" not "sour soul."
Actually it's sour ground.
No.
Doers know what that set of practices that believers call "religious" are used for. Believers do not.
At a very rudimentary level, we could distinguish between the former and the latter the way we distinguish between an advanced and sophisticated cell phone user (believer) and an advanced and sophisticated cell phone technical architect (doer).
Both know how to use a cell phone, in addition, the latter knows how to make a cell phone...,
and no, your notion of "purpose" doesn't begin to scratch the surface of the distinction I'm drawing. El Hajj Malik and Pac were simply charismatic believers.
I don't know the distinction you're drawing.
Actually I'm starting to feel like doers on 1st, believers on 2nd, i'dunno is on 3rd...
I don't know the distinction you're drawing.
lol, I know.
To your credit GCV, at least you don't call what's unknown to you "Luciferian"...,
Post a Comment