Ask most people who are the oldest civilization or where the oldest civilization lived and you'll here answers like Mesopotamia (Iraq), Egypt or Iran. While these cultures can be traced back to 4000 B.C., the mysterious ruins of Tiahuanaco, in Bolivia, could be 14,000 years old!
If you think the Great Pyramid in Egypt is a technological marvel, wait until you see what artists and engineers were doing in Tiahuanaco. This culture thrived at the breathless, oxygen deprived elevation of 13,000 feet. They managed to somehow move stones weighing up to 200 tons and invented modular building techniques that would even today, be cutting edge.
3 comments:
Come on DV, did you really expect to get away with presenting a fragment of the article? Even your source says:
How old is this site?
The age of Tiahuanaco is difficult to assess and very controversial. Polish-born Bolivian archaeologist Arturo Posnansky has concluded that the Tiahuanaco culture began in the region at about 1600 B.C. and flourished until at least 1200 A.D. His disciple, Professor Hans Schindler-Bellamy, believed Tiahuanaco to have reached back 12,000 years before the present era, although a more conservative Peruvian archaeologist. More recently, other archaeologists have pushed back the date to an amazing 14,000 years ago.
Your source copy/pasted that information from another source but conveniently omitted these sentences: “Professor Kaufmann-Doihg, dates the site's flourishing at about 300-900 A.D. What happened to the advanced ancient culture, however, has not yet been determined.”
So the date is all over the place because stone can’t be carbon-dated, and unlike the antiquarian Nile Valley Afrikans of KMT with numerous historical texts written on papyrus, there are no written records from Tiahuanaco. Thus, you have no documentation on which to base your conclusions. It’s just DV’s religion.
Bra Mak Bra Mak Bra Mak ...
If you were blindfolded, riding a unicycle and high on crack ... you could not have missed the point any more than you just did.
My argument is not predicated upon footnotes to a bunch of Plantation scholars' whose livelihoods are dependent upon NOT contradicting orthodox archaeological narratives.
My argument regarding Tiahuanaco is predicated upon the EXISTANCE of Tiahuanaco.
200 ton stones ...
13,000 feet above sea level ...
Cut to a precision that rivals modern stone cutting techniques ...
Now Mak.
Listen carefully.
There are only 2 cranes in the world today capable of lifting that much weight and they each take up to six weeks to set up.
14,000 years ago or 2,000 years ago ... The Official Plantation narrative does not explain Tiahuanaco.
Your theory that wandering African descendants of monkeys jumped in a canoo, paddled over to Bolivia ... built Tihuanaco and made it back to ancient KMT just in time for their descendants to be shipped back to the "New World" in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade is ludicrous.
ALL you have been taught about the ancient world is bullshit.
Why are you defending Darwinian nonsense?
Why does the "Out of Africa" myth comfort you so?
Do you feel somehow validated as a black person if the world believes all human life "originated" on this continent we currently call Africa?
I'm telling you it is a head-fake.
Limiting black people to "Africa" is a mind control technique.
Free yourself from mental slavery.
"THE GATE WAY OF THE SUN, TIAHUANACO, BOLIVIA
Archaeologists claim that Tiahuanaco was built as a port on Lake Titicaca about 2,000 years ago.
The lake is now twenty miles away, and geologists have confirmed that it would have taken at least 12,000 years for it to have receded so far.
THE GIZA PYRAMIDS, CAIRO, EGYPT
Egyptologists date the Great Pyramid to approximately 2,500 B.C.
But, new archaeo-astronomical research has incontrovertibly revealed that the pattern of the Pyramids on the ground matches the pattern of the constellation of Orion as it would have appeared over Cairo in 10,450 B.C."
My argument is not predicated upon footnotes to a bunch of Plantation scholars'—DV
Correct. Your argument is predicated on extrapolations of fantasy, because your knowledge of history is miniscule. You have not read anything.
Your theory that wandering African descendants of monkeys jumped in a canoo, paddled over to Bolivia ... built Tihuanaco – DV
Afrikans and monkeys! I hear your Devany Prioleau Count de Gobineau Tarzan. I have no such theory about Tihuanaco. An isolated stone structure without accompanying cultural/scientific contributions to civilization is interesting, but it does not compare to the Nile Valley of antiquity. Then again you wouldn’t know anything about the Papyrus of Ahmes.
Why are you defending Darwinian nonsense? – DV
You are limited by your lack of knowledge. In this arena I operate out of Cheikh Anta Diop’s multidisciplinary worldview.
Limiting black people to "Africa" is a mind control technique. – DV
Believing that human beings lived on what’s now called the North American continent from the break-up of Pangaea (approx 175 million years ago) and they have nothing to show for it, except for some earthen mounds is absolutely pathetic.
Post a Comment