Friday, December 23, 2011

If Gaddafi Was Such An Oppressive Dictator ... How Did The Libyan Rebels Get Armed So Fast?

President Col Qaddafi Reclaims Libya from the  CIA insurgency
Dr. Abdul Ruff
__________________

Yes, President Col Qaddafi has managed to reassert his position in Libya by pushing away the CIA ignited insurgency which had taken illegally several oil field.s Reclaims Libya from the  CIA insurgency. In doing so, Col Qaddafi has upheld  the sovereignty of Libya against the drunken  ill-formed insurgency and intruders against Libyan freedom .

USA and UK clams they alone can create history. CIA’s networks very much wanted to enslave the Mideast too and they thought history could be made to be on the march in North Africa to let the Western terrocracies to control energy resources on a permanent basis. After making full use of their energy and other resources and using them against Islam, the western terrocracies have all of a sudden discovered “tyranny and tyrants” in Mideast and want to ignite “regime change” by terror attacks. After Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Tunisia and Egypt, the western anti-Islamic regimes now focus on Iran and Libya.

[Can DV Call 'em Or Can DV Call 'em?  Remember where you heard it first.  Remember where you heard it best. DenmarkVesey.Net]

16 comments:

Big Mark 243 said...

That is why I thought it smelled like 1953 to me and it was Iran then like it is Libya now... poorly planned and executed overthrow... another Rothschild-like effort done like Iraq on the cheap...

Sharif Ali ☪ ✡ said...

Like Arsenio Hall said, "Things that make you go hmmmm"

Oh well, people beLIEve the propaganda they see on tv.

Sharif Ali
http://144000Gz.blogspot.com
www.mooraboutbahia.com

JH said...

I don't see the connection between the "if" and the "then" in the post's title.

Abeed said...

So these Arab racists are killing each other. What of it?

Anonymous said...

what of it? I don't want to pay for it. That's what of it.

Constructive Feedback said...

Brother DV:

Please answer this question UNAMBIGUOUSLY as you possibly can (I don't do "Yes or No" questions so I won't impose this upon you)

DO YOU think that those who have taken up arms against the government of Libya - HAVE ANY JUST CAUSE of doing so based upon their perceptions of being oppressed by the government of 40 years?

JH said...

Anonymous,
The whole "my tax dollars" thing is kinda mythical. There's no actual link between your paycheck and our ability to wage war.
If you pay "high" taxes, or if you pay "low" taxes, our country is going to find a way to impose its will....who pays for it (is it China?) aint got nothin' to do with it. Aren't we "trillions" in debt?

The better question for this analysis is....what do you think this country's "will" actually is? What the F are we doing?
I just think the budget debate is a laugher.

JH said...

CF,
I know you didn't ask me....BUT....if one accepts the premise of your question (that the Libyans percieve oppression), then, ovbviously, yes, they have some sort of just cause.
The question you're asking isn't about "just casuse", it is whether or not they are actually oppressed.

So, may I suggest a rephrase or an additional question??? Do you beleive that the Libyan people are oppressed or is that just a false picture being painted by the West to unseat an enemy?

I've seen people on this blog tout Castro as "misrepresented" and Cuba as some haven....and I toss that shit out with the trash. I'm ignorant to Libya, though...but same sort of thing is going on here. Quadafi okay...people happy...west trippin.

sakredkow said...

JH - The "mainstream" thinking is Qadaffi made promises of economic reform for the last several years - Saif was in charge of carrying them out. Every year nothing came of it. Additionally they have over 20% unemployment, all the while Fearless Leader lives the life of, well you know how Fearless Leader lives, right?

Qadaffi was brought somewhat to heal by the west in recent years. It doesn't seem reasonable to believe (without evidence) that the CIA would have the means or motive to create a revolt like this, esp. without being certain someone WORSE than Qadaffi would end up on top (this is MENA after all).

That's a lot of peeps taking the CIA's hallucinogenic drugs.

No doubt the CIA is on the street making contacts and trying to influence people, spreading $. That's their job, right? I really doubt they control sh*t. I want to see evidence or at least a real argument.

makheru bradley said...

It appears to me that Colonel Qaddafi has been trying to contain this rebellion without unleashing the full force of his military. Otherwise the casualties amongst the insurgents would have been much higher. But, according to Saif Qaddafi that’s about to change.

[President Barack Obama said the U.S. and the rest of the world are outraged by the “appalling violence” in Libya.]

This war criminal is talking about being outraged by “appalling violence” in Libya. There are no limits to the hypocrisy of American politicians.

[The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, said he suspects Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi and some of his sons of crimes against humanity during the turmoil in the country and may request arrest warrants within months.]

Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered In US War And Occupation Of Iraq "1,421,933"—ICH

Where are those arrest warrants for George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama?

Constructive Feedback said...

[quote]Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered In US War And Occupation Of Iraq "1,421,933"—ICH;[/quote]

makheru bradley :

While listening to "Fight The Power" radio yesterday the host said the number was 500,000.

Which one is it?

As we saw the MUSLIM on MUSLIM bombings - are THEY included in this number?

makheru bradley said...

While listening to "Fight The Power" radio yesterday the host said the number was 500,000. Which one is it? – Feed

It’s a number which exponentially exceeds the number of people killed during this insurgency against Muammar al-Qaddafi. And it’s a number which exponentially exceeds 148.

Saddam Hussein was found guilty of crimes against humanity for the killing of 148 Shias in the Dujail Massacre in 1982. He was sentenced to death by hanging.

[On July 8, 1982, Saddam Hussein visited the town to make a speech praising local conscripts who had served Iraq in the fight against Iran. Saddam visited several households and after finishing his speech prepared for his return to Baghdad. As his motorcade proceeded down the main road, up to a dozen gunmen using the cover of the date palm orchards that lined both sides of the road opened fire killing two of Saddam’s bodyguards before fleeing on foot. In the ensuing four-hour fire-fight most of the attackers were killed and several were captured.] -- Wiki

Hussein exacted revenge for this very real assassination attempt.

If Hussein was guilty of crimes against humanity for his retaliation against the people allegedly involved in a real assassination attempt on his life, then what about the retaliation of George “he tried to kill by daddy” Bush for an alleged attempt on the life of his father which was never proven?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfmATUzBwxY&feature=related

A 2009 report stated that 320 civilians had been killed in Pakistan alone by drone attacks authorized by Barack Obama. Obama’s crimes against humanity already exceed the number for which Saddam Hussein was executed.

And yes the sectarian violence which has taken place within the context of America’s war of aggression and continuing occupation can definitely be blamed on America.

Anonymous said...

where's the icc arrest warrant for khadaffi? 1600 prisoners killed in a day. almost 2000 civilians killed in 18 days. him and his sons must go share a prison cell with blair and bush.

makheru bradley said...

While listening to "Fight The Power" radio yesterday the host said the number was 500,000. Which one is it? – Feed

It’s a number which exponentially exceeds the number of people killed during this insurgency against Muammar al-Qaddafi. And it’s a number which exponentially exceeds 148.

Saddam Hussein was found guilty of crimes against humanity for the killing of 148 Shias in the Dujail Massacre in 1982. He was sentenced to death by hanging.

[On July 8, 1982, Saddam Hussein visited the town to make a speech praising local conscripts who had served Iraq in the fight against Iran. Saddam visited several households and after finishing his speech prepared for his return to Baghdad. As his motorcade proceeded down the main road, up to a dozen gunmen using the cover of the date palm orchards that lined both sides of the road opened fire killing two of Saddam’s bodyguards before fleeing on foot. In the ensuing four-hour fire-fight most of the attackers were killed and several were captured.] – Wiki

Hussein exacted revenge for this very real assassination attempt.

If Hussein was guilty of crimes against humanity for his retaliation against the people allegedly involved in a real assassination attempt on his life, then what about the retaliation of George “he tried to kill by daddy” Bush for an alleged attempt on the life of his father which was never proven?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfmATUzBwxY&feature=related

A 2009 report stated that 320 civilians had been killed in Pakistan alone by drone attacks authorized by Barack Obama.

Obama’s crimes against humanity already exceed the number for which Saddam Hussein was executed.
And yes the sectarian violence which has taken place within the context of America’s war of aggression and continuing occupation can definitely be blamed on America.

makheru bradley said...

DV, any idea why my post stamped

"Mar 13, 2011 11:58:00 AM" disappeared? The same thing happened yesterday.

Denmark Vesey said...

"
Obama’s crimes against humanity already exceed the number for which Saddam Hussein was executed.
And yes the sectarian violence which has taken place within the context of America’s war of aggression and continuing occupation can definitely be blamed on America." MB

That's one hell of a statement Mak.

You don't see any differences in what Obama is doing and what Saddam was alleged to have done?