PSYCHOLOGICAL STERILIZATION
A 2007 Book "Unhooked" by Laura Stepp documents how young women have been re-engineered dysfunctional. They seek love by giving sex unconditionally which doesn't work. (In the past, they demanded love/ marriage first as the criterion for sex. Thus a proper foundation was created for family.) Stepp interviewed hundreds of young women and men, and her findings were confirmed by readers at Amazon.com:"This generation is confusing sex with love. And hooking up with random partners without any interest in long-term relationships seems to be the norm... It sounds like these young women give permission to be used by men without getting anything in return."
One girl said "Love is an old person's emotion." Two out of every three young men said it was better to get married than go through life single, but fewer than half the young women felt that way.
Another reader commented: "most women are totally UNPREPARED and shocked when they do meet someone who shows chivalry and is old fashioned in their values and wants to actually get to know them. It is almost always assumed that to want to know someone is to "tie them down" and prevent them from being emotionally free from you at any time."
The younger generation has been conditioned to behave like homosexuals, who confuse sex with love: "The pressure is to BE overtly sexual and treat men disposably while at the same time really desiring a deeper emotional connection."
A mother of three sons writes: " Young MEN need to be protected from these young females! To be "used" as nothing more than a tool for someone else's sexual gratification is deeply damaging to one's self esteem irrespective of gender. I feel deep compassion for any female "hooking up" because it's clear they are engaged in self-destructive behavior with long-term, perhaps lifelong, consequences to their self esteem and sense of self worth."
Obviously a woman who consecrates herself for husband and children is more likely to have a successful marriage and family than one who has dozens of lovers. A nation concerned with its own survival would not turn women into sluts. More than anything, this proves that the world has been subverted by an alien Satanic cult, Illuminati bankers who control government, education and media.
Marianne said...
This kind of behavior has always been a male thing, and it was taken as natural that men fear commitment and like to saw their wild oats.But now that women do it too, it's suddenly a big deal, and it's threatening the fiber of the nation.
How come having dozens of lovers doesn't damage a man's self-esteem and sense of self-worth? Could it be because there's no equivalent as hurtful as "slut" or "whore" for men?
Could it be because society handed men the right to do whatever they want with their bodies, while policing women's bodies? Really, no one sees how sexist this study is?
Really?
Sasha said...
@ Marianne: Because women aren't supposed to behave like men. Just like men aren't supposed to be bitches.I was having drinks with one of my best friends a few weeks ago. We are the same age, same profession. During our chat, she was literally shocked and appauled when I told her that I'd never had a one night stand. Ever. Whereas, she still, routinely, meets men out and engages in wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am encounters. She looked at me and said, in all seriousness, "why not?!" I found myself in the very unusual position of having to explain/justify something that, to me, was so incredibly obvious. I kind of felt like I was being punk'd.....
95 comments:
The first question to be asked is why are females becoming increasingly sexually indiscriminate?
The simple answer is that they are following the liberal first principle of nondiscrimination. They are being indiscriminate, i.e., not being discriminatory.
Of course one recognizes INSTANTLY that being indiscriminate is almost never advantageous and almost always deleterious.
The question is why are these "empowered" females so ignorant as to not see that their indiscriminate sexual behavior IS MAKING THEM LESS FREE by the mere fact that being sexually discriminate MAKES YOU MORE FREE.
This kind of behavior has always been a male thing, and it was taken as natural that men fear commitment and like to saw their wild oats. But now that women do it too, it's suddenly a big deal, and it's threatening the fiber of the nation. How come having dozens of lovers doesn't damage a man's self-esteem and sense of self-worth? Could it be because there's no equivalent as hurtful as "slut" or "whore" for men? Could it be because society handed men the right to do whatever they want with their bodies, while policing women's bodies? Really, no one sees how sexist this study is? Really?
Marianne is truth.
these forced-birth gorilla-pimps are strictly medieval...,
@ Marianne: Because women aren't supposed to behave like men. Just like men aren't supposed to be bitches.
I was having drinks with one of my best friends a few weeks ago. We are the same age, same profession. During our chat, she was literally shocked and appauled when I told her that I'd never had a one night stand. Ever. Whereas, she still, routinely, meets men out and engages in wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am encounters. She looked at me and said, in all seriousness, "why not?!" I found myself in the very unusual position of having to explain/justify something that, to me, was so incredibly obvious. I kind of felt like I was being punk'd.....
Who is entitled to dictate what women are "supposed" to act like? I agree that it's not ladylike to make your sex life a public thing, but guess what... it's not gentlemanly either, yet men seem to be lauded the more partners they have, for "tapping all that ass". As if they have monopoly over sexual pleasure. These are the guys for whom women are supposed to keep their body a pure sanctuary? If I hear that about a guy, all I can think of is his STD history, and the fact that half the town has seen him naked. If there is an increase in promiscuous women, maybe it's just the inequality thing backfiring. Until not too long ago, it was considered unacceptable for a woman to break a marriage because her husband cheated, because that's what men do. I have friends who got STDs from their straying long-term boyfriends, and they were still considering forgiveness and "working through things", because that's what women are supposed to do. But, then again, looking at the comment about homosexuals, I'm probably on the wrong blog. Nevermind.
@ Marianne
"How come having dozens of lovers doesn't damage a man's self-esteem and sense of self-worth? Could it be because there's no equivalent as hurtful as "slut" or "whore" for men?"
Really M?
We are different... wired differently. The masculine and the feminine are not EQUALS! Your question above reeks of the feminization agenda which has already destroyed most black male/ female relationship and family agenda. Please disregard, Cnu, blaming this on people who don't want you to have abortion is misleading at best. That was well ...just very weak!
Don't get me wrong, excess multiple partners is not a good thing either way and I am not trying to excuse men for this dysfunctional behavior, but rather show you the agenda.
This is all a (homo) sexual social engineered plan and agenda to destroy families and relationships. You are not valuable or desirable to a man if you are a "sleep around woman" because that is not the role of the feminine that we truly want. Your desire for an equal playing field and obtain a replacement word for "whore" for a man will never be. (See -ex male(heroes and move on very well) vs ex female(suicidal) porno stars).
THE REAL DEAL is that we are just great victims of a well planned sophisticated social engineering model. With messianic fervor-
The PTB took its message of sexual freedom to the American male who, in the 1950's and 1960's, still consecrated sex for marriage.
But the freedom was illusory, its goal, was to hook men on the glossy fantasy.
To do this, they had to prevent them from finding true satisfaction in marriage.
The PTB preyed on mens fears of women and family commitment.
They knew how to by design ( media, porno mags and movies )make women who were not beautiful invisible.
The fixation on physical beauty was psychologically emasculating. Attractive women remained mystical goddesses. Put them on a pedestal. Men then had to difficulty to relating to women as human beings.
I doubt if women were always seen as sex objects.
They PTB had to sexualize women.
Now they are sexualizing children.
Next it will be animals. And finally fence posts.
The idea is to get us thinking of nothing but our genitals and short term relationships resulting in sexual chaos and broken families.
We some how lost touch with masculine identity, feelings and critical faculties. Men wanted love but didn't know how to get it.
The eternal model of masculinity, a man leads and looks after the woman and children he loves.
Unconsciously, most men and women are still looking for this kind of relationship. But with feminism(EQUALITY), a lesbian philosophy, teaching women to be men, and vice-versa, both sexes are lost. Now , we have no identity, goal, or motivation in this arena.
The PTB has also made us all sex addicts.
In normal heterosexuality, sex is reserved for the courtship and procreation stage. With parenthood, sex becomes less important, and eventually becomes pretty irrelevant. Thanks know to porn etc., , we are being re-engineered to behave like homosexuals, never to marry or have children. Instead of families, we have sex. Sex from cradle to grave with multiple partners. Sex. Everywhere you look. All the time. We suffer from arrested development with an adolescent fixation on our appearance and genitals. We remain stuck in courtship mode, never maturing and developing as intended.
Marianne:
The problem is that for years, women's battle cry for promiscuity has been "if men can do it, we can do it" all the while failing to realize, as you said, that promiscuity isn't a good look either way. While trying to "be like men" women have sacrificed that which makes us inherently feminine: the ability to nurture and tend to those we love. Of course women have the right to sexual pleasure. No doubt about that! But the consequence of radical feminism has been that many women believe sexual freedom and pleasure means having sex with every Tom, Dick, and Rahim. Real feminism and sexual freedom comes from knowing what you like and being confident enough to communicate that to just Rahim.
Marianne,
Peeling away the thick crap coating on this waxy trix bar - we can see its nutty nuggat;
1. You are not valuable or desirable to a man if you are a "sleep around woman".
2. That is not the role of the feminine that we truly want.
3. Your desire for an equal playing field and obtain a replacement word for "whore" for a man will never be.
pause.
breathe..,
then say "kneegrow puhleeze!!!"
and simply disregard all further nonsense emanating from that quarter.
don't let any.of.these.carefully.programmed.lyndon.h.larouche.
niggabots deter you from expressing yourself hereabouts.
you on the right blog. kick a little silly rhetorical ass, you may find yourself enjoying it!
Yeah, if the analysis was really sound it would say that both men and women who engage in promiscuous sex are irresponsible. Marianne, the doublestandard that some of these posters are holding up is utterly ridiculous. So what that men and woman are wired differently. It doesn't make him sleeping around any less of a moral breach than a woman doing the same thing. Seriously.
There are serious prohibitions on sexual conduct in all the major religions for a reason. It isn't just to tell people how to live their lives for the sake of despotism; there also could be a strong PUBLIC HEALTH component there.
I don't encourage anybody of any sex to be promiscuous because it is not good for public health.
There is a rational explanation for my belief. There is no rationality for the double standard you aptly noted here.
Yes Marianne,
Take it from a Cloned Pork Eating Sci-Fi Freemasonic Negro with Titties.
When you get pregnant in your quest to ... "Do It Because Men Do It" ... He will remind you that it is Your Right to dispose of that 7 month old "biological glob" growing in your womb.
He'll even provide you a footnote to yet another Freemasoninc Technocrat who also SAYS a child is "not a person" ... until he completes the second grade and can pass a state administered standardized exam.
For the umpteenth time; equality does not mean sameness...Arguing against the Plantation while stuck in a Plantation discourse machine is defeatist and straight suicide.
Victim status claims like "the Plantation made us sex addicts" is the same as "Mickey Dees made me a foodie"; those are simply chauvanist hysterics in full play trying to rationalise weakness and lack of discipline.
iDoubt all men share that view and iDoubt you speak for all men so that should read "me" or "some" not, "we" or "us".
The sexualisation of women has very long historical roots and has changed over time as cultures have changed; another blogpost, another discussion, but before that crack. a. book.
Now, folks what y'all think's the word you'd use to describe what Winston Bennet or The Big Dipper did with as much as meaning as slut or whore for a man?
@ Rig,
you said:
Yeah, if the analysis was really sound it would say that both men and women who engage in promiscuous sex are irresponsible.
I said earlier:
"Don't get me wrong, excess multiple partners is not a good thing either way and I am not trying to excuse men for this dysfunctional behavior, but rather show you the agenda."
What part of my statement did not say it was foul for a man also? I thought "either way" and "dysfunctional behavior" was strong enough language.
Namaste-
"The sexualisation of women has very long historical roots and has changed over time" Kay Dub
Doesn't that presuppose a time when women were not "sexualized"?
Doesn't that presuppose they are "sexualized" now?
Doesn't that presuppose that if there is any "sexualization" ... it is inappropriate?
We are a reproductively successful species. Should not we assume our sexual impulses and subconscious taboos are useful?
Must we bend all that is innate, like sex roles, to the nerdish whims of lame technocrats who never really got no pussy?
Well yes, but that was in response to our boy Wax's claims. But regarding your comments well it depends on what you define as sexualisation, taboo and appropriate/inappropriate and in what context.
Because iCan't hold you up for all brothas I wanna know from you: should the cultural taboos on infidelity apply to you, as a man as they apply to me, as a woman and to what varying degree?
@ KW
"Now, folks what y'all think's the word you'd use to describe what Winston Bennet or The Big Dipper did with as much as meaning as slut or whore for a man?"
As I was trying to state above with the Makow story that I had linked to (I attacked the males), Winston Bennet or Tiger Woods are not normal males - they are homosexuals in hiding. I have met many Winston's and they all fit under this explanation from Markow below:
"Heterosexuality involves bonding permanently with a member of the opposite sex for love and usually procreation. It is participating in the natural life cycle, in the intrinsic meaning of life. Personal and societal health depend on heterosexuality.
Homosexuality is a form of arrested development caused by an inability to form a heterosexual bond. As a result, homosexuals compensate using sex as a surrogate for love.
In these terms, society has become more homosexual because, due to social engineering (i.e. the "sexual revolution," feminism) many heterosexuals now fail to permanently bond. Normally, happily married heterosexuals can put sex in perspective and move on to more important things.
A perceptive reader recently wrote me: "If heterosexual sex outside of marriage is acceptable, if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to the sexual activity?"
Exactly. I know these definitions are not "politically correct." PC is propaganda, social engineering and mind control. PC is an old Communist Party (i.e. Illuminati) term.
I do not disparage gays. According to my definitions, the vast majority of homosexuals are really "heterosexuals" like Hugh Hefner. And a small minority of homosexuals are monogamous and partake in some heterosexual values."
"HOW SEX BECAME AN ACT OF HATE - There is nothing so destructive to human society as the separation of sex and love. It reduces men to dogs, and women to fire hydrants."
Substitute the word homosexual with mysogynist and ironically Makow has alot in common with some radical feminists...lol.
I don't know about all that homo talk Wax, it seems as though the definition of sexuality is now being co-opted to mean addiction but what's the basis? And what of homosexuals who do form lifelong partnerships - are they heterosexual homos? But Makow says the function of heterosexuality is to pro-create...???
What's the male equivalent of nymphomaniac?
Actually HW I was more or less responding to Sasha, but I didn't see the sentence you left about multiple partners not being good either way. Obviously I agree. I also agree that sex is an extremely intimate act that is now so casually tossed around that you could just as soon screw someone as they might have a gun to your back. The intimacy seems to be gone!
KW the male equivalent of a nyphomaniac is a manwhore. Seriously. We use the word manwhore all the time. Wilt Chamberlin bless his heart was a manwhore. Christian Troys' character from Nip Tuck is a manwhore.
A manwhoere does not know nor care about intimacy; he just likes to get his nuts off.
"What's the male equivalent of nymphomaniac?"
A "success".
“In “Myth America”, Carol Wald and Judith Papachristou detail a history of the images of women from 1865 to 1945, as presented in print media. They argue that the images, created exclusively by men, formed the operative visual myths about women in America and that as the images spread and entered people’s minds, they became mirrors of reality. Men wanted their women to be that way; women, seeing only those images, attempted to and eventually did become like the images. It was a kind of alchemy in which the image finally produced the reality.”
-Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television
Women are being duped into proving their significance or equality through sexuality, when in actuality they are submitting to and fulfilling men’s primal instinctive desires.
I had a homie that was from the NY and was attending college in Houston. This was the 90's. He told me that when he returned home to visit he noticed that New Yorkers became even more New Yorkish since he was last there. He found the source to be the tv show New York Undercover. He noticed that people were using the show as a measuring stick for themselves and where they were suppose to be at culturally.
The same goes for Houston. Niggas went crazy in this joint when the Ghetto Boys put out "My Mind's Playing Tricks on Me." Even when my boy visited the Trigga Tre' (Third Ward, he was looking over his shoulder every 2 minutes.
The ones that benefit from women's sexual liberation are most likely men be it physically or through business.
Torches of Freedom
http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/1999/torches.html
It's about CNu's favorite magician.
"The ones that benefit from women's sexual liberation are most likely men be it physically or through business."
This is sadly true.
Ultimately works to the benefit of the men more than the women.
Notice how none of the autonomists EVEN TOUCHED the substantive issue.
Females WHO HAVE INDISCRIMINATE SEX, by and large, DESTROY themselves and any chance for a committed relationship.
Instead, these radical autonomists WHINE about how these deleterious effects DON'T EQUALLY apply to men.
In short, these extreme liberals CAN ONLY SEE THROUGH liberal lenses. First through nondiscriminatory sex and then by equalizing the deleterious effects of indiscriminate sex between male and females, these liberals ARE UTTERLY UNCONCERNED WITH THE WHOLESALE DESTRUCTION OF MODERN WOMEN AND HER EQUALLY INDISCRIMINATE WAYS.
That, TD, is what happens to people who fall for the Hegelian Head Fake.
They sucker Plantation Negros & Plantation Crackas into "choosing sides" ... as opposed to choosing outcomes. (Think Submariner's treatise "I tend to identify with the outsider.")
Busy playing "Women vs. Men" or "Black vs White" or "Gay vs Straight" or "Red State vs Blue State" or "Conservative vs Liberal" or "Factory Meat vs. Vegan" or "Secular vs. Religious" or "Malthus vs. Larouche" or "Pro-Abortion vs Anti-Abortion" ... Plantation enthusiasts become less concerned with discovering truth and become fixated on a win for whichever IDENTITY they find themselves attached.
Thus our electoral process is now indistinguishable from a pro football season.
And otherwise intelligent people argue that a fully developed child, sleeping in its mother's womb, does not yet qualify as a person and thus is subject to be discarded by the mother in a manner no different than when one removes a cyst.
It's not that they really believe that shit or that they could personally terminate a 6 month old fOetus without pause ... it is that they will say or do anything to keep the thesis, to their anti-thesis, from "winning".
For example. It's not that they really believe eating cloned factory meat is without consequence ... they just can't let these fuggin vegans win. They'll continue to eat food that causes men to grow titties ... simply not to lose a point.
ergo ...
The feminist'autonomists' don't really desire a world where their sexual yin is expressed as masculine yang.
They just want to score a point in the Women v Men game by identifying a difference and passing it off as an injustice.
Gee Chee,
Thanks for the link. Haven't finished it yet, but it gives an interesting historical background and makes a bit more sense to me.
DV
"What's the male equivalent of nymphomaniac?" KW
A "success".
Why?
Don't tell me its the 'success' of the 'myth of equality', obviously there is no 'equality' in a woman sleeping with over a 1000 men in a lifetime.
Manwhore that Mahndisa said doesn't really seem as effective as slut; maybe the language doesn't cater or society's conditioned not to give as much moral repulsion in meaning to a word like manwhore?
Does a male sex maniac really hate women - and vice versa for a female sex addict as Makow and some radical feminists seem to suggest?
Hey KW, if you were interested in a guy and asked about his reputation and somebody told you he was a manwhore, you wouldn't be disturbed by that? Sheeeit I am utterly repulsed thinking about a manwhore screwing women and passing around parasites and other nasties, just as I think it is nasty for a woman to do that too. Wilt the stilt is a tale of pussy addiction to the extreme.
I dont' think he hated women at all; but he liked pussy more than the prospect of forming a meaningful relationship with one. I think at the core of many manwhores psychology is a fear of commitment but a lust for sex.
Mahndisa
Don't get me wrong, I would be repulsed by somebody who's a manwhore and would feel grossed out at the thought of me ever being interested. My point is I want a stronger word to aptly describe a manwhore - it just isn't as impactful as if I said a woman was a slut (a word I use when appropriate & has the full meaning) - or is it just me?
Well, I understand what you are saying. I don't even use the sl word myself; it pisses me off so damned much! How about manslut? Will that do the trick? It's sort of like Black people trying to find a crafty way to insult white people. All attempts at crafting a word as offensive as NIGGER seem to be laughable.
The reason there is no equivalent word for "slut" pertaining to men IS BECAUSE male promiscuity ISN'T worthy of a concerted effort to conceive of such insignificant terminology (there are of course labels for promiscuous men and yet these labels are of unequal stature to "slut" or "whore").
But once again we see the desire to manipulate reality to one's preference. If promiscuous females have a pejorative label pertaining to them SO SHOULD promiscuous males and they should be EQUALLY disparaging.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE DESTRUCTIVE NATURE OF FEMALE PROMISCUITY?
What about the fundamental belief in female promiscuity and abortion BEING THE ESSENCE OF FEMALE FREEDOM?
It's very simple. Male promiscuity ISN'T AS DELETERIOUS for society as female promiscuity.
And so I agree DV
'Bout theez mass spectators
And the "he versus she..."
Maybe that k-dub
Really can't see???
She b up n the nose bleed seats...
But mo' savy radical autonomists
B runnin' theez streets
Tellin' chicks to fugg indiscriminately
Tellin' lil momma kill ya baby
Tellin' ole lady
Dump ya man, he shady!!!
Theez things HER essence
Theez things make HER free
She immersed in radical autonomy
Path tuh self-annihilation
She dead in the head
Indiscriminately, she make her bed
Its empty n cold
But the bed needs fed
He lay down n she led...
He just uh toy
And toys she won't wed
But she fade
N otha toys become best friend!!!
TD All of us seem to agree that promiscuity is not a good lifestyle to live regardless of gender. Women don't need to be fucking round and neither do men because both present public health threats. Geesh. You just wanna rant about radical autonomy right now, that's it;)
"The reason there is no equivalent word for "slut" pertaining to men IS BECAUSE male promiscuity ISN'T worthy of a concerted effort to conceive of such insignificant terminology."
...The ever-shifting goal posts of radical autonomy. When occassion suits promiscous males like Tiger Woods are radical autonomists who disregard their legacy, but here we witness an about turn and convenient blindness to the impact of male promiscuity and shift of focus to women.
Hence,
"BUT WHAT ABOUT THE DESTRUCTIVE NATURE OF FEMALE PROMISCUITY?"
Under different conditions I might consider that a valid qsn, but seems to me that's as divisive and as Hegelian headfake as a radical feminist who only wants to talk about male promiscuity.
iGuess you'd say that's the root cause of the breakdown of the modern family and Plantation disillusionment with marriage: all them women slept around and chased the men away, rite?
And all them defacto homos and manwhores are..."not worthy of a concerted effort."
iGuess all them single parent homes really are caused by those who bought into the illusion of women's lib; all them promiscous women talkin' 'bout freedom, just sexin' and birthin' babies to no end.
Anything else is a non-event and insignificant i.e. "not worthy of a concerted effort".
Mmm okaaay, iSee u Thor, like totally, iTotally get you dude.
KW speaks truth!
The ever-shifting goal posts of radical autonomy.
lol,
it's hard out here for a wannabe gorilla-pimp...,
If you want women to stop giving it up...stop offering.
It's contradictory that you feel entirely comfortable with a young rich professional, like say Tiger Woods spreading his seed like corporate farmer (and personally I don't have a problem with that...), but out of the other side of your mouth you want women to be chaste. So which is it? Is there a "whore" class of women that these sperm farmers are supposed to frequent?
rotflmbao@sperm farmers....,
DenmarkVesey is school for forced-birth gorilla-pimps and sperm-farmers!
I respect your ambition but you got to have vision!!!
Accept no substitutes.
OMG that looked like Gordon from Sesame Street!
Em, I don't understand what you define as a man whore. You seem to honor the history of you and your husband sowing your wild oats. I know you wasn't talk'n 'steel cut', more like Steely Dan.
Man slut, man whore...you can't win with terminologies. Black President is a terminology. Fighting with the wrong artillery. Put a lock on your panties then call him a man slut or man whore. Set conditions. Negroes revive 'Tulsa/Black Wall Streets' around the country then you can call the candle stick maker down the block the 'Black President' if you want.
That's going right back to the movie Super Fly teaching revolutionary minded people to fight 'the man' through dope or through street life hustl'n. Black people trying to fight inequality through Western constructs. Civil Rights was a government approved struggle considering the alternative.
CNu the pimp game is about reinforcing womens sexual expression. You can't see Super Fly as reinforcing new identity for the black power movement then loose the principle when it's where women are concerned. Then again you never actually spelled that out, you only mentioned that the end of the black power struggle coincided with Super Fly so I'm not sure what you think about that.
Mahndisa, that WAS Gordon from Sesame Street..., lol.
It took me a while to figure out that women were more interested in me if they conjectured that I was either a player or possessed some sort of fan base. It was as if then my value was confirmed. Like the diamond game.
I could have never have reasoned that (without witnessing it) or excepted that if I were only told. Either one allows men like pimps, porn producers, Edward Bernays and CNu's to set the conditions of women's equality through sexual expression or explore other alternatives.
But Brother Gee ... to appreciate your insight regarding the heightened interest of women, one would have had to have actually experienced a sort of fan base and have had one's value confirmed ... like a diamond.
Which is a completely foreign concept to Sci-Fi Negro nerds who aint get no punany in high school.
Which is why they are haters today.
Mad.
They rationalized their marginal appeal to women as the product of 'corrupted' social engineering that needed to be 'corrected'.
Which is why today they give lip service to lame manufactured colloquialisms like "man whore".
I learned early on that women choose men.
And what they say they want ... and who they actually choose are very often two different things.
The would be "Man Whore" is able to do what other men can't do because he has something women want.
The De Facto Monogamous muhfuggas aint really have much of a choice anyway. So it doesn't necessarily strike me as a virtue.
But when a man of ... means ... goes without ... it is truly a religious experience.
Did you know scientists have discovered there exists an inverse relationship between the quantity of pork a man eats and his appeal to women?
Then again you never actually spelled that out, you only mentioned that the end of the black power struggle coincided with Super Fly so I'm not sure what you think about that.
Correct.
Either one allows men like pimps, porn producers, Edward Bernays and CNu's to set the conditions of women's equality through sexual expression or explore other alternatives.
{SMH}
You hit these mean streets as GeeCheeVision, and in less than a month, DeeVee turned your monkey-ass out as just another $2.00 three-way imp in his little broke-back stable.
You hit these mean streets as GeeCheeVision, and in less than a month, DeeVee turned your monkey-ass out as just another $2.00 three-way imp in his little broke-back stable.-CNu
CNu, that rabbit out the hat trick-guilt trip/set tripp'n ysh didn't work on me in middle school when I was most insecure...it ain't going to work on me now when I'm at my height of self worth. I ain't mad at chu CNu for what you preach, I'll just throw it back in your face. Feel free to throw what I believe back in my face.
Gee
Cuz I'm straight butta
Chee
Cuz I got that Yin Yang balance all up in my ysh
Vision
Pull'n bleach out try'n to through it in my eyesight-Raekwon
I mean "throw"
I always said "I am the greatest" I never said I was the smartest.
-Muhammad Ali (after failing the US army aptitude test in 1964)
The Master holds forth on "DenmarkVesey" {and the tragic little Otis Tilson type imps who idolize him....,}
A player's handle is like a coded message of his élan, skills and aspirations- be he pimp, con man , or gambler. In a word, where style is more important than content, the absence of a picturesque nom de guerre is equivalent to a pimp losing his righteous swagger and affecting the walk of a bank clerk.
No, both style and content are important.
"That's why you fail, sucka"
-(That's why you fail-Yoda) (sucka-B.A.Baracus)
"In a word, where style is more important than content, the absence of a picturesque nom de guerre is equivalent to a pimp losing his righteous swagger and affecting the walk of a bank clerk." CNu
[Rationalizing why aint nobody talking about "Dopamine Hegemony" or "2,000 Watts Per Day".]
Polysyllabic hater.
"that's 6 Billion plus that's gotta go, gotta go, gotta go"-CNu
That's the content you talk'n 'bout.
[Rationalizing why aint nobody talking about "Dopamine Hegemony" or "2,000 Watts Per Day".]
lol..,
as much as you and ALL-a-yo lil'$2.00'imps keep my name in your mouths -
- each.and.e.v.e.r.y.day -
- why -
y'all silly sally's don't even have to brush your teeth anymore...,
CNu ...
What the fuck is your point man?
Other than a Nipsy Russell routine of bitchy wise cracks & Ru Paulish sarcasm, you haven't made a point or presented a counter argument.
Fact is you've been rolling your eyes and sucking your teeth ever since the debate ending reality of Man Boobs percolated to the surface.
Now, you going to play the drunk pork eating heckler sitting in the cheap seats or are you gong to step on stage and make a case for killing babies in the 3rd trimester and the health benefits of eating cloned factory meat?
Because right now man, you on some bitch shit.
as much as you and ALL-a-yo
"I say nigga 100 times every morning when I wake up, it makes my teeth white"-Paul Mooney
lil'$2.00'imps keep my name in your mouths -
- each.and.e.v.e.r.y.day -
- why -
y'all silly sally's don't even have to brush your teeth anymore...,"-CNu
Uh oh, my man Cnu dabbling in "style." Doing like my man DMG, when cornered, get all cultural. That's what I'm talk'n 'bout CNu, I knew it was in U.
CNu: Naw, naw Gee Chee I was already on that. You a ho a$$ nigga GeeChee...you a ho a$$ nigga. I was already on that ysh!
lol,
Now now DeeVee...,
pause.
breathe.
tap-ya-brakes.
fed just the barest little taste of your own content-free medicine - with deeper knowledge and more panache than you and a whole army of imps could ever hope to muster - all your content-free style just up-an-flew out the window - din't it?
didn't take much to reduce you to an angry __________ stompin your foot with your lip poked out...,
CNu is choich for DenmarkVesey.
"fed just the barest little taste of your own content-free medicine - with deeper knowledge and"
Ahhhh Shut Up Jigga Boo.
Negro you eat cloned pork.
lol
How smart can you really be?
Bettah lissen to yo new imp GeeChee DeeVee.....,
^^ Now, you going to play the drunk pork eating heckler sitting in the cheap seats or are you gong to step on stage and make a case for killing babies in the 3rd trimester and the health benefits of eating cloned factory meat?
Because right now man, you on some bitch shit.
one day someone's gon' cry, f'real. you boys play too ruff.
I know Kay. CNu just needed a little time to get his equilibrium back when he left off explaining how women fight inequality with sex. He was about to explain how the 'doggy style' is a an effect technique of liberation against 'the man.'
The very thing he was looking down his nose at Negroes for doing (having indiscriminate sex) when presenting the case for women to abort.
"...ruh-tarded muhphuggahs having promiscuous out of wedlock intercourse long after they'd reached the age of moral reason."-CNu
CNu: "Gee Chee...you always gots sumth'n to quote. Well quote this! Yous a HO-A$$, monkey-a$$, $2.00 imp."
uh.., $2.00 imp.
quote me advocating promiscuity.
anywhere.
going forward son, best remember to let yo Da-Dee Larooshifer hisself try and hold up the grown folks end of the discussion.
{sloppy, wannabe, junior apprentice ponces - always running the phuk up just to git set the phuk back down}
always running the phuk up just to git set the phuk back down.-CNu
Slow down old school. That pig heart can only take so much. This is virtual. You ain't really smack'n nobody. It's make believe CNu. Now stay on topic CNu. You shift'n. Tuck Brer Rabbit neatly back in your magic hat Uncle Remus.
quote me advocating promiscuity.-CNu
That's just it Professor Etymology. You speaking against it when it's an abortion thread, when it's about women and their sexual expression, promiscuity seems to be lost from your vocabulary.
Aintobody a 'ruh-tarded muhphuggah having promiscuous out of wedlock intercourse' anymore because your own words don't fit. It's all you CNu, I'm only eliminating the space between threads.
You ain't slick. All you do is cosign those who say what you want to say cuz you think nobody can peep the contradiction.
"Slow down old school. That pig heart can only take so much. This is virtual. You ain't really smack'n nobody. It's make believe CNu."
LOL!! "Ol' School"
Come on now.
That's some funny shit.
Tuck Brer Rabbit neatly back in your magic hat Uncle Remus.
ahhhhh!!!!
Allot of crews sound like a violent mob
They all need to shut the fugh up like 'Silent Bob"
-Doom
Gee-Chee,
It's like this, G...
CNu is in to radical autonomy!
NOT FOR HIM..
But for you and me...
Well, not really TD
I've been CNuttin'
Butta copy/paste king
This dood down witha abortion,
Homos and GMO's...
Who knows???
But me,
Dood be maximizin' his autonomy...
Not cuz he act indiscriminately,
Cuz he crack on those WHO SAY ACT discriminately
This mode of thinkin' run contraire
Tuh radical autonomy...
This uh war against God...
CNu just cullin', fixin' tuh b uh real OG...
@DV and Gee-Chee
"Other than a Nipsy Russell routine of bitchy wise cracks & Ru Paulish sarcasm, you haven't made a point or presented a counter argument.
with deeper knowledge and more panache than you and a whole army of imps could ever hope to muster
CNu ...
What the fuck is your point man? "
How come a brother with a "gift" and seems so bright only objectives is for us to accept the blame for being shitty humans (and it does not matter if you even say cool, "I will look at that", that we are damm loorishians for even trying to improve our way of life and morals)?
Come on guys, - are we the blame for doing everything and anything ? We used up the resources, We propagated to much, We are too dumb etc., etc., and God help us- to stupid for even agreeing with anything DV says (WTF- I even eat eat meat) -
"you are his imp."
Nothing intellectual being discussed any more in any detail, just the local insults. I swear I get the Ru Paul reference( co-signing) because I spent 1 month reading some of his stuff before I got on and I swear CNu was female. The brother hates the responsible masculine view point and admires a more chaotic and androgynous way of reasoning.
Na Bra, for Real. Not trying to be dis-respectable.
I really have grow to respect Craig's knowledge, but lately every thing is a comedic riff of insult instead of sound principles. It reminds me of when you liked a girl in the first grade but at all you knew how to do is pull her ponytail.
Is CNu in love with your blog DV?
The only goal or objective I get from my man is to hate yourself and/or get prepared for a life of limited resources etc., you evil sack of shit.
However, to be so bright, I would expect someone like him to know that fossil fuel is a hoax and truly know about abiotic oil and the endless supply or at least debate it, but rather his agenda(the patent ) may have blinded him so much he just hits you with a short "neck rolling like", witty statement. CNu use to at least drop some knowledge,but he doesn't look at anything like that any more- all I currently see now is the "NFL" like back and forth and the true Hegelian Dialectic co-opt of deep conversations of this blog.
Like , I said before, anything going down the road of true masculine realization is sideswipe by "Childlike" banter. Go back and read most of the threads-hell, read this one! It is becoming as Old as DMG's profanity was last week. Hey man this is not personal, I am just trying to examine my introspection of CNu. I used to could not wait for some of Craig's links because it forced me to look at it from a different perspective, but lately......man.
This is my week to try really hard to accept people as they are, so I hope the Bra ain't taking this wrong (probably jab me with his usually imp statement and comments), and just give me his TRUE POINT OF VIEW.
Does he really believe that EVERYTHING Makow stands for IS wrong? Is it truly consistent to say CNu = Self Hate?
CNu , Prove me wrong Bra- I want to hear as black men, what do you think we should advocate RIGHT NOW to make our lives better for our family? Wide open Bra, I don't have the long history of you and DV, therefore I AM honestly trying to learn your REAL (non comedic) perspective- I THINK IT MAY BE VALUABLE TO ME. Can you just be humble and answer?
That's just it Professor Etymology.
Precisely.
That's.just.it
I didn't and you can't.
So instead - you put words in my mouth,
Grasshopper -
you realize you both talkin to;
Then again you never actually spelled that out, you only mentioned that the end of the black power struggle coincided with Super Fly so I'm not sure what you think about that.
and answering - yourself;
Either one allows men like pimps, porn producers, Edward Bernays and CNu's to set the conditions of women's equality through sexual expression or explore other alternatives.
priceless......,
Can you just be humble and answer?
uh..,
lemme see..,
lemme see..,
NO.
OF COURSE NOT.
you nutty.as.phuk
ruh-tard!!!
Larooshifer,
you done gassed this current stable of broke-backs to unprecedented levels of absurdity.
They're yours.
You're responsible for them.
Don't you think it's about time to stop clowning these hos and start getting them to prepare themselves for a life of chaos and severely limited resources?
That's just it Professor Etymology.
Precisely.-CNu
CNu. I know you don't understand Latin. I know linguists. I could tell by your entry point into that conversation that you had no idea that what you contributed was remedial. I understood though, for you to know that much that it wasn’t by osmosis…that you took a deeper step on your own at sometime in your life.
There were points where you had the opportunity to accelerate the conversation. You didnt and consequently I had to slow my role to ‘step by step’ you up to my speed CNu. I suppose you read that as some insult or something thereby provoking you to suddenly puff up and dismiss the entire conversation as if it was old information to you. But your arguments were remedial from the beginning. I could have long since dismissed your attempts as going nowhere. So drop the performance about that CNu. Yes there are things out in the universe you don’t understand…things in the universe you don’t have the awareness to not understand. You are not interested in any conversation that limits your input.
That's.just.it
I didn't and you can't.
So instead - you put words in my mouth,
Grasshopper -
you realize you both talkin to;
Then again you never actually spelled that out, you only mentioned that the end of the black power struggle coincided with Super Fly so I'm not sure what you think about that.
and answering - yourself;-CNu
Knots Landing drama continued. Skip.
Either one allows men like pimps, porn producers, Edward Bernays and CNu's to set the conditions of women's equality through sexual expression or explore other alternatives.
priceless......,-CNu
Well, you said, “The Century of the Self and the concept of dopamine hegemony are cornerstones of my perspective on this.”
"The first time someone shows you who they are, believe them." — Maya Angelou
"Don't you think it's about time to stop clowning these hos and start getting them to prepare themselves for a life of chaos and severely limited resources?"-CNu
When Alex Jones says it, you say he's a liar.
You just say limited resources because of population.
He says limited resources because of tyrants.
The fault is on the existence of human kind. That is suppose to be logical. But it's totally illogical to believe powerful people are abusing their power and will kill to forward their agendas. That makes no since to you. But the sky is falling because the Earth is so over populated that a few billion people bumped into the sky's support beams.
"Larooshifer,
you done gassed this current stable of broke-backs to unprecedented levels of absurdity.
They're yours.
You're responsible for them."-CNu
Ain't no big fan of J. Edgard Hoover, but give the man his props. Don't straight plagiarize and act like you don't know. Cointel is way more sophisticated than anything you can conjure.
Ol School, you come here to vent or to discuss ysh? Your life ain't over. You can still fulfill your dreams. Channel that ysh into boxing or something. I'm sure you got them thick a$$ Hoss hands all up in your 50's. Lay some haymakers on these young fools that can't pull their pants up like yall be ranting about. They can't pull no pistol on you in the ring.
Well, you said, “The Century of the Self and the concept of dopamine hegemony are cornerstones of my perspective on this.”
"The first time someone shows you who they are, believe them." — Maya Angelou
My interests and opinions and the scope of my knowledge are a matter of public record...,
When Alex Jones says it, you say he's a liar.
Alex Jones is a liar - but even a broken clock appears to be right twice a day.
You just say limited resources because of population.
He says limited resources because of tyrants.
I say limited resources because of addictive patterns of behavior craved by the bottom and exploited by the top - ergo dopamine hegemony.
The fault is on the existence of human kind. That is suppose to be logical. But it's totally illogical to believe powerful people are abusing their power and will kill to forward their agendas. That makes no since to you. But the sky is falling because the Earth is so over populated that a few billion people bumped into the sky's support beams.
Is it standard practice among you "new media" LaRooshians to clumsily project your thoughts and beliefs onto critics of your status quo, crypto-fascist systematization?
Ol School, you come here to vent or to discuss ysh?
As you're well aware "GeeChee" - DenmarkVesey is Lyndon H. Larouche new media kneegrow school.
Ever since I figured out EXACTLY what it is, I've been systematically probing the limits of its knowledge, skill, abilities, and proficiencies.
I find the phenomenon of a crypto-fascist cult seeking to memetically co-opt "Blackness" and to recruit Black folk for its own purposes utterly fascinating.
^ Craig, have I told you lately that I love you?
When everything's said and done David, you know we braunschweiger -loving brothers gotta stick together.
DenmarkVesey is Lyndon H. Larouche new media kneegrow school.-CNu
Lyndon H. Larouche doesn't have a media campaign forwarding his ideas to the maximum scale that is suggested in your cultist inference. Most cats would know Farrakhan before Larouche.
How do you account for those that have arrived at some of these conclusions that for this blog is exclusively identified as "Larouchian" thought?
There isn't a word for men that means the same thing as "slut" for the same reason there isn't a word for women that means the same thing as "momma's boy."
Each group has an interest in defining a particular behavior as particularly abhorrent for a certain gender.
A man who won't cut the cord with his momma and strike out on his own is considered for more ridiculous than a woman who is still deeply connected to her father because many women find that behavior abhorrent and unnatural.
Likewise, many men find a women who engages in indiscriminate sex abhorrent and unnatural, particularly when it comes to contemplate future lifetime partnership.
Each group has the power to define the other group. True, men have more power by virture of history, but it's a mistake to assume that because we have more, that women have none.
Lyndon H. Larouche doesn't have a media campaign forwarding his ideas to the maximum scale that is suggested in your cultist inference.
Really?
Apart from information readily available in the public domain, like say about Makow, Livingstone, Alex Jones, RedIce, etc...., all LaRouche affiliated fronts - how would you know about the particulars of Lyndon LaRouche's media campaign(s)?
How do you account for those that have arrived at some of these conclusions that for this blog is exclusively identified as "Larouchian" thought?
Quite simply and directly from the sources they either quote without attribution, or, link (but seem pathologically incapable of tagging and hyperlinking) to the sundry Laroosh operated or Laroosh affiliated media organs.
It's not as though LaRooshifer or any of you imps draw upon a diverse assortment of sources for your hodge-podge of "deeply-held personal beliefs".
You read something else..
Lyndon H. Larouche doesn't have a media campaign forwarding his ideas to the maximum scale (rap music,CNN whatever) that is suggested in your cultist inference. MOST CATS ("over"population of people outside of this blog CNu) would know Farrakhan before Larouche.
How do you account for THOSE ("over"population outside this blog) that have arrived at some of these conclusions that FOR THIS BLOG (not the outside "over"population) is exclusively identified as "Larouchian" thought?
It's not as though LaRooshifer or any of you imps draw upon a diverse assortment of sources for your hodge-podge of "deeply-held personal beliefs".-CNu
Really? Quoting the exegesis of an African scholar/sociologist/warrior who fought Africans who sold slaves to the Europeans and works were found amongst the slaves of Bahia. That's the lack of diverse assortment of sources you talk'n bout?
CNu: "So."
LOL
CNu, Negroes in Third Ward don't know Larouche from Alex Jones...but they know Farakhan. They know Lil Wayne, T.I., Reverend Wright. They know Obama, the Tuskegee experiments they know Malcolm, Martin, Panthers, the Vietnam War.
Larouche ain't on the radar like you think CNu. How many times has he been featured on O'Reilly or Hanity or CNN?
HOW
DO
YOU
account for those that come to these conclusions that you identify as Larouchian?
Lyndon H. Larouche doesn't have a media campaign forwarding his ideas to the maximum scale (rap music,CNN whatever) that is suggested in your cultist inference. MOST CATS ("over"population of people outside of this blog CNu) would know Farrakhan before Larouche.
Sho's you right.
But that's also why the GOP put Michael Steele on to try and "add a little color" to the party of Lincoln. Identical reasoning (but smaller resources) put behind your man DeeVee to help LHL seek and recruit an enlarged melanic cybonic constituency - comprised of folks such as yourself.
I ain't mad at him for trying...,
How do you account for THOSE ("over"population outside this blog) that have arrived at some of these conclusions that FOR THIS BLOG (not the outside "over"population) is exclusively identified as "Larouchian" thought?
Which specific "conclusions" do you have in mind, and, why never no links to sources other than the LaRooshian?
To answer your question without the benefit of clarifying detail, however, I invoke my bete noir Cobb and borrow his coinage - the 50 page book man; (This one should be hella familiar to you GeeChee - you anywhere near a mirror?)
You know the 50 Page Book Man. He's on Venice Beach in LA telling fortunes, reading palms and speaking with a mystical tone of voice. He's on Amsterdam Avenue in NY with a table full of incense, Afrocentric paperbacks and Kente Cloth. He's at the Little Five Points Mall in Atlanta selling The Final Call and telling you that you don't know your *self*. He's in the 5th Ward of Houston sitting on a milk crate puffing herb telling you the whole system is corrupt and you cannot see that without the power of ganja. More often than not, he's painfully aware of his position as an outsider and thus sees society as a conspiracy against him. But sometimes the 50 Page Book Man grows up. He survives. At long last he has an actual lesson to pass on which is not complete anti-social mumbo jumbo.
Really? Quoting the exegesis of an African scholar/sociologist/warrior who fought Africans who sold slaves to the Europeans and works were found amongst the slaves of Bahia. That's the lack of diverse assortment of sources you talk'n bout?
Remind me again of what you were talking to yourself about back there? {I'm sorry GeeChee, after you struck your "fiddypage book man with his lip poked out" stance a few threads back, I pretty much stopped paying attention and put you Nipsey Muhammad autopilot.}
Larouche ain't on the radar like you think CNu. How many times has he been featured on O'Reilly or Hanity or CNN?
lol,
Rilly-Doh?!?!?!?!?!
Lyndon H. LaRouche is rightfully an object of derision among all but the fiddy-page book set - and- your boy Larooshifer and all-a-yall lil'imps.
HOW
DO
YOU
account for those that come to these conclusions that you identify as Larouchian?
Y'all Prophet Twelve Powers wannabe's crack me up with the funky fifth-hand recirculation of hoaxes and sundry errata gleaned on these Intertubes. LaRoosh is clearly quite popular with the "english as a second language set" on the hardcore imp-stroll up in here. Gives y'all something "interesting" but not too difficult to talk about with the authority and conviction of "deep personal belief".
Add a smidgeon of culturally tinged form and presentation, and voila - Laroosh noir.
Y'all cats have the most interesting digital fights, for real.
With the links to obscure works and cultural references well beyond my time, it is quite engaging up in here.
Just wanted to let y'all know that somebody is watching and being entertained.
Brer Rabbit trix CNu...
..and you still harboring feelings from Bubba, Grady, Skillet, Woody the Wino and all your other old school revolutionary runn'n partners. The world isnt ending because the mothership never came CNu.
50 page books. Aint no more 50 page books CNu. That's back when you all had wooden cassette players. You old schoolers got your children to explain e-mail and now every night is ripple night.
Gee-chee?
That's your comeback? That's it? I expected more from you than a retreat into a "...well your old!" defense.
Pack it in son, CNu's got this one (Sanford and Son references aside....)
DMG! Them boys down in lab still talk’n ‘bout that tire gauge you trying to pass off as an ear scope? I know they lying, rayon pockets ain’t even designed for that kind of perpetrate’n.
Naw but for real, in my opinion CNu’s conclusions on certain matters are generational. SOME of those conclusions drawn out of his experiences can antiquated/regional. I’m really using age to gesture that. I start tripp’n cuz sometimes he’s like, “You better tell your little friends to stop hang’n around my damn porch. The same blade I use to cut gooks with is certifiable for little theiv’n niggas too.”
Anyway, early movements and personality worship is subject that deserves discussion. I got a 4th grade science project to complete so all these chump parents at my boy’s school will be sick.
As for the Larouche action, to me CNu identifies Larouchian jargon withOUT the same “clarifying detail” that he believes about my questioning. That’s the reason I’m asking the question in the first place.
@Gee-Chee,
"Naw but for real, in my opinion CNu’s conclusions on certain matters are generational.
As for the Larouche action, to me CNu identifies Larouchian jargon withOUT the same “clarifying detail” that he believes about my questioning."
Let me get this right Gee, anytime there is orchestrated "crisis of resources" or shortages, etc., it is due to our un adulterated use and greed of the earth's limited resource. And if you disagree you are in some LHL cult. How much longer must this "con game" go on Gee?
You can follow up at anytime in history and realize that most of the crisis in modern history was a scam to make more money and establish total control by the elite priesthood class. But some how you get a genius award because you predicted the layout of the crime scene and refuse to use the word tyranny in regards to it.
Seen your boys article on Peak oil on his blog?
For example, Bro believes in peak oil and also needs your "buy in" in order to get paid via one of the world greatest "rationing" scam.
Guys like him are total "repeaters" and fails to look into
the following supporting evidence:
Oil being discovered at 30,000 feet, far below the 18,000 feet where organic matter is no longer found.
Wells pumped dry later replenished.
Volume of oil pumped thus far not accountable from organic material alone according to present models.
In Situ production of methane under the conditions that exist in the Earth's upper mantle. (PhysicsWeb; Sept. 14, 2004)
Russia Proves 'Peak Oil' is a Misleading Scam - In 1970 the Russians started drilling Kola SG-3, an exploration well which finally reached a staggering world record depth of 40,230 feet. Since then, Russian oil majors including Yukos have quietly drilled more than 310 successful super-deep oil wells, and put them into production. Last Year Russia overtook Saudi Arabia as the world's biggest single oil producer, and is now set to completely dominate global oil production and sales for the next century.
I think that LRL never wrote an article about abiotic oil. I guess he soon will :). And I also guess "OLD Skool" wants to continue to profit from a prediction that ain't that hard to make if you also know the con game plan.
I get you Wax. The generational thing was referring to CNu's 50 page/kente cloth comedy.
The 40’s-70’s was the time for all those speak easy spots, soap box sermons, huge followings into various nationalistic organizations. The landscape was extremely polarized. Black people reacted extreme to extreme conditions. That’s a generation that has dissolved away. One can youtube Malcolm/Ali/Stokley/Huey and look at the comments. You can tell the younger generation. Some things said then are so mind blowing and coming off as racists. That’s how they are reading this information. Even the NOI had to adjust their discourse. The last of influential 5%’ers (off shoot of the Nation) were in the 90’s with wrap music.
CNu is rounding off those narratives with 50 page/Kente cloth/Afrocentric cracks. I understand that jargon because I am surrounded by older cats that use to be involved in that stuff. From the Ansars (Zev Luv X use to be in, for Doom fans) to the Black Liberation Army. I’ve sat down with these cats and heard the cultish stories as well as Panther bank robberies. It ain’t new to me. I chase down Amiri Baraka, Emory Douglass, Kathleen Cleaver and the like to get perspective because I have to be on my game when I’m putting it down in museums and galleries. I don’t Amazon the latest book on Black Power and I’m done. The slick don’t work with me.
I get that all of that was a shot at the mention of African scholarship. What is up with that? Utham Dan Fodio’s education has a solid pedigree that extends to the theologian al-Ghazali who’s works penetrated Europe. Talking about this type of education passed down to warriors in captivity (not slaves, see Bridge Over the River Kwai). Now if I were sitting up here quoting Benjamin Franklin or someone there would not have even been an issue. It has to be certified pre-approved by Europe first? Negro quote Frederick Douglass he’s walking on eggshells, quote Nat Turner and you in some black cult. What kind of colonialist “we choose your heroes for you” thinking is that? That’s weird.
It’s my job to work with images. Ain’t nobody on this side locked into some speak easy Negroes eating crumbcake. Obscure websites with dudes that aren’t even PR savvy is no proof of some major movement taking place. Have you seen how many hits some random kids called Power Rangers have gotten on youtube? This is 2010. You have a blog you know better.
Focus on that apocalyptic catastrophe madness. That’s that whole 80’s trip. Mad Max, Red Dawn, Escape from New York, Terminator. The mid-late 30’s is around the age someone would arrive at some resolve in their thinking. That’s probably where some of these ideas come from.
DMG you instigating while still runn'n.
@Gee - "It has to be certified pre-approved by Europe first? Negro quote Frederick Douglass he’s walking on eggshells, quote Nat Turner and you in some black cult. What kind of colonialist “we choose your heroes for you” thinking is that? "
f-ing priceless !!!! That is stuff I come here for. :)
Thanks for the mental motivation. You a beast bra.
Post a Comment