DMG said...
The statement was that god did not make mistakes.My reply was that if there was a god (and I don't believe there is) that he made mistakes often. [How do you know they are mistakes?] I'm not interested in sharing anything.
The fact is that life in most of the world is brutal and unforgiving. Instead of spending my time worrying how to please an absentee landlord, I choose to help alleviate some of the suffering. [Plantation medicine causes more suffering than it "alleviates". People are more sick and diseased and medicated than any time in history] If you all want to get on your knees and carry on talking to the air, fine. I'll be doing something constructive that gets far more results then your wishes on the wind.
The Making of A Plantation Negro Atheist
Atheism: A Philosophical Segue for Luciferianism
1) Ostensibly, this theocracy will be atheistic. However, atheism will only act as a catalyst for an enormous paradigm shift.
2) This begins with the realization of a significant philosophical paradox intrinsic to atheism. Authors Ron Carlson and Ed Decker explain this intrinsic paradox:
3) It is philosophically impossible to be an atheist, since to be an atheist you must have infinite knowledge in order to know absolutely that there is no God.
4) But to have infinite knowledge, you would have to be God yourself.
5) It’s hard to be God yourself and an atheist at the same time. (Carlson & Decker, p. 17, 1994).
6) In order to be philosophically consistent, the atheist must eventually conclude that he/she is a god.
7) This is also the mantra espoused by secular humanism, which remains closely aligned with atheism and Darwinism.
8) Simply stated, humanism is Luciferianism disseminated on the popular level.
Bra Ces Takes DMG To School (He will never forget this lesson for the rest of his life)
Cés said...Sure, I can believe in anything that suits me, so do you. Believing that there is a God is no different than believing there's none.
21 comments:
MOTI,
You are trying far too hard. You are hiking up your skirt, like your boy Scott, but look here black...don't nobody want to see your dirty stained draws, or smell the stink of cheese and moldy chia seeds.
Go do something constructive.
"I choose to help alleviate some of the suffering. "
LOL!!!!
Ahhhh man.
Give me a minute Bra.
The cliche is a bit too much.
Give me a minute man.
This Plantation Negro MD ACTUALLY said ... "I choose to help alleviate some of the suffering. "
Ahhhhhhhhhh mannnnnnnnn.
I couldn't have invented this muhfuggah any better.
Man,
Seriously, that fake "laughter" isn't a good look. Do you ever stop to think if you are embarrassing yourself? No, of course not, because you are truly a narcissist. You are the kind of dude who has problems flushing the toilet because you can't bear the thought of flushing your shit down the drain, you admire it so much.
You done? You don't have anything of importance to say. Nothing illuminating, just
the
same
old
stuff
Hey Doc.
You certainly "alleviated" some of my suffering tonight.
Come on Bra.
Admit that shit is hilarious.
I mean. You are a medical doctor.
Been here for months.
We discuss health, food and life everyday.
The most valuable contribution you made to the conversation on health was to warn brothers that they should come see you once a year so you can 'stick your finger up their asses to test their prostates for cancer'.
...
...
Think about that.
Your "solution" ... your way of "alleviating suffering" ... is to TEST men for prostrate cancer ... until they actually get it.
THEN ... prescribe drugs for your pharmaceutical bosses.
Not a word on how to AVOID cancer.
I'm sorry man.
You cats are idiots at best.
Evil if you have any idea what you are doing.
Wow DV! House actually gave me a lesson today. I actually learned something unexpected..... "how not to play yourself".
Some people thought that today's so call "rants " were entertaining and also got maybe some sort of educational value on when life begins etc. But, man how could dude go on from 10am to 10pm and not realize that he went from making some rational points to a just being outright crude, nasty and vulgar along with offending so many with classless statements. Dude must have had family on the line that he was trying to impress.
DV , I know a lot of Drs. in my lifetime...hippocratic oath- Do no harm. This MFer is all about harm. The quote, "What you are speaks so loudly, I cant hear a Damm thing you are saying" has to be explained to him..This brother (i think you might have to check that)-Dude must be faking, he seems to know a couple of something, something etc., etc.,- however no one can treat patients with that much hate in their body- excuse me self hate.
Who gave the brother a steroid(Assa-testosterone) shot this week?- "Hey Scott, you new here...Fuck you, Hey, Wax you got no battle scars ...fuck you, Hey Thorddday...fuck you....Hey DV, underwear..blah, blah.. fuck you."
Man why don't one of his friends pull the brother's coat and say hey man, you are way over the line. " You playing yourself. "
How could someone be so unaware of how he is coming across. The ego kicked in and bamm-Like one of those fucked up Toyota accelerators-no brakes ! I bet that you feel that you are being stalked by him right now DV. The humor of this brother words is like " a 5 year child behavior" and should have been tossed out the window 7 hours ago. I guess just like seeing someone choking in public everyone would rather walk by and just not get involved. No one wanted no part of that shit today DV. Maybe I am wrong, maybe this is a "dirty dozen" arena of" your mama so fat jokes", and this could be the way a " battle works", in bra mind, but Doc shit is not even that clever (kind of crude and corny) so it is painful to watch. However in his mind he thinks that he is going toe to toe.
But thankfully, I left his "diatribe" today a better person because I promised myself , that I would not want anyone who comes into contact with my vibe and/or spirit to ever think that I am that much of cartoonish a-hole. Don't get me wrong, a spirited debate is fun, and every now and then we all lose our temper, but this was again painful to watch. A brother getting his ass whooped and have not a clue. unflippin believable. I am now so much more aware how toxic one individual could be to a group discussion, that I can't help to use from now on The 552 DTIRR -DMG to T Daddy Inappropriate Response Rule (You are now embarrassing yourself now bra , card).
Finally, Bra, I am kind of Glad he is spending most of his time "ranting" and " stalking " you, -can you imagine if he was working on people- human beings-the cute baby in the pic? .DV- you are saving lives and don't even know it.
Wax,
Both of you motherfuckers are dumber than a bag of hammers. You have nothing to add, so why don't you be a good little retard and fuck off? What? Was that too crude nasty and vulgar? That has nothing to do with a Hippocratic Oath (but of course you wouldn't know that). By the way, you forgot a couple of fuck you's.
You cats want to attempt to play hardball, but you get all soft when someone plays hardball back at you. I'm wasn't trained to pull punches. I was trained to go in for the kill and make sure my opponent doesn't get up again. But if you all are too soft...
And the way to avoid prostate cancer?
Step 1: Don't listen to morons like MOTI, or his new sycophantic side kick waxy. If both of you are so far in the closet that a finger up the ass turns you on enough to jump ship, than thats between you and your wives...although they probably already suspect you two are on the down low batting lefty on the regular.
Step 2: Don't be old, black, or have relatives with prostate cancer...and if you are fat, get checked earlier than usual, because fatty's tend to have more advanced disease.
Step 3: Eat a normal healthy diet, avoid supplements, exercise and maintain a normal healthy weight.
Step 4: If you ARE high risk, get checked early and often. Black men are AT HIGH RISK.
Step 5: Ask yourself who you trust with your life, some idiot blogger who is often and usually wrong. Or someone who actually knows where, what, and how a prostate works?
If you are stupid enough to listen to the blogger, you deserve what you get. I'm not going to sugar coat it the information is out there, there have been plenty of campaigns in barbershops and on TV. You've been warned. The rest is on you.
How could someone be so unaware of how he is coming across." HW
I feel you Wax. Thank you brother.
But I'm going to tell you man.
DMG is a valuable contributor to the spot.
One of the ways Plantation Medicine has been able to pull the wool over so many people's eyes for so long has been by maintaining the illusion of infallibility.
Behind the pretense of science the AMA and allopathy in general, with the collusion of the government, has been able to create a near priest like status for doctors they license.
They have achieved something of a 'monopoly on knowledge'.
Well ... when a cat like DMG comes to the spot, and over time reveals, that aside from a few obscure latin words for sickness ... he really doesn't understand a damn thing about making people healthy.
He has been trained to make money off of people's sickness.
Now, I'm sure on a cognitive level the brother 'thinks' he is doing good.
But he doesn't really know anything else.
Remember what Upton Sinclair said about cats like this: "It is difficult for a man to understand something which his salary is dependent upon him not understanding".
So Bra Wax ... imagine the tremendous cognitive dissonance this dude DMG must suffer when he encounters a collection of smart people ... most of whom are black no less ... who are engaged in a discourse about health far above and beyond anything he borrowed money to learn at Medical School.
Dude is fugged up.
He needs to tear down.
He needs to minimize.
If not, his fragile self-esteem, which is completely built upon the cliched status of his title as physician would completely crumble.
Think about it.
When sista Mahndisa's son came down with a case of chicken pox ... she didn't ask DMG his opinion.
She knew it. It is the same "opinion" distributed by the Plantation.
Vaccinate & Drug.
She asked DV.
About NOT vaccinating and treating her beautiful little man with natural coconut oil.
That type of paradigm shift is a threat to Plantation Negros.
CNu ... Don't mind him. He's an incredible brother. Just got a little hater streak in him.
He's threatened by shit he didn't think of first.
Glad you here though man.
Let's get this revolution poppin'.
Send me an email when you can.
We gotta get together.
So I'm waiting for one of you simple minded fools to attempt a tear down. Please. Try it.
Not you Wax, you talk too goddamn much, and I'll just skip over your post and ignore you anyway.
@ Satan's Doctor
"Step 2: Don't be old, black, or have relatives with prostate cancer...and if you are fat, get checked earlier than usual, because fatty's tend to have more advanced disease."-DMG
LOL!
Hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
From: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.(His people)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Embargoed for Release
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
12:00 p.m. EDT
U.S. Cancer Screening Trial Shows No Early Mortality Benefit from Annual Prostate Cancer Screening
Six annual screenings for prostate cancer led to more diagnoses of the disease, but no fewer prostate cancer deaths, according to a major new report from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, a 17-year project of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health. The PLCO was designed to provide answers about the effectiveness of prostate cancer screening.
"What this report tells us is that there may be some men who are diagnosed with prostate cancer and have the side-effects of treatment, such as impotence and incontinence, with little chance of benefit," said John E. Niederhuber, M.D., director of the NCI. "Clearly, we need a better way of detecting prostate cancer."
"Many of the molecular studies we’re currently sponsoring will hopefully yield new, better ways of definitively classifying which men need treatment and which can consider watchful waiting. "
NCI does not have a recommendation about prostate cancer screening
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, whose recommendations are considered the gold standard for clinical preventive services, recently concluded that there is insufficient evidence to assess the balance of benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening in men younger than age 75 and recommended against prostate cancer screening in men age 75 and older."
" The difference between the numbers of deaths in the two groups was not statistically significant."
Thus there was no detectable mortality benefit for screening vs. usual-care.
Given the uncertainties about the mortality benefits of PSA testing, NCI has been pursuing many avenues to find new ways of screening for prostate cancer."
"Another report in this same online publication of the NEJM is from the large European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), which shows a 20 percent reduction in the rate of death from prostate cancer but with a high risk of overdiagnosis. "
"The PLCO data are being made public now because the study’s Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), an independent review committee that meets every six months, saw a continuing lack of evidence that screening reduces death due to prostate cancer as well as the suggestion that screening may cause men to be treated unnecessarily. "
Would yall make up your mind!
^^ Um Um Um.
U.S. Cancer Screening Trial Shows No Early Mortality Benefit from Annual Prostate Cancer Screening
Um Um Um
I knew them muhfuggas just made up an excuse to stick their fingers up dudes butts.
Think about it?
Stick a FINGER up your ass to CHECK for Cancer?
That's like lighting a match to CHECK for gas.
How Stuuuuuupid is Plantation Medicine?
Ummm...
You clowns should REALLY know what you are reading before spouting off. You are neither physicians nor scientists so, it's fairly easy to see that the results of this study are wasted on you. This was a study of 55-74 year old men. The conclusion is that there was no statistically significant difference in the two groups (you should really take a look at what the control group got). One of the weaknesses of the study is that they never reached their threshold of men in the study group to get screening (85% vs the desired 90%) and there was more than expected screening in the control group. Over the course of the study, cancer treatment has improved which may account for fewer than expected deaths. The recommendation is that men over the age of 75 should not be offered screening.
The study says nothing about screening men under the age of 55. As I've stated previously age is a major risk factor in Prostate Cancer. Also this study does not distinguish high risk versus low risk groups, which also could skew the results. Maybe you should have a look at the entire paper...oh, but wait you two morons would not have a clue as to what you are reading.
Do you two intellectual "heavyweights" realize that the OTHER group in this study also got usual care which means...digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen tests? As a matter of fact DRE and PSA examination actually INCREASED in the usual care group.
Talking loud, saying nothing, and understanding even less.
Again you two buffoons have already been weighed, measured, and found wanting long ago.
Nothing to see here. Thank you for the AM attempt at reading about science and medicine. Although appreciated you should really try to understand what you are reading before commenting.
Let me save you two some keystrokes MOTI is gonna say something about squirting some juice something somewhere, and/or rhyme, and Waxy is going to...actually I'm not sure what he's going to say since I usually skip over his long winded sermons.
The other studying showing a 20% decrease in mortality had a younger population and different study design making the two studies similar but not directly comparable.
Bottom line the information is available and is being constantly refined, if you don't want to be screened. Fine. That's up to you. Prostate cancer runs rampant in the black community. It's a horrible death. Even your man Farrakhan recognizes this.
The pattern I see on this blog is this, our host wants:
1. More guns in the black community (if illegally obtained the better)
2. More thuggish behavior that will likely increase chances of getting locked up.
3. Only eating food that will require a second mortgage to obtain.
4. Encouraging older black men and women to NOT seek medical treatment.
The way the evidence appears MOTI seems to be the "eugenecist" he keeps talking about.
Doc ... Doc ... Doc.
Come on Bra.
85% vs. 90%?
Did he really say that?
The study "revealed" that men over 75 shouldn't bother with testing?
Who REALLY thought sticking their fingers up the butts of octogenarians, to test for cancer, was a good thing?
For example: A 76 year old man tests positive for cancer ... ok now what?
Chemotherapy? Radiation in the body of a man in his 70's? Silly.
Turns out it is a VERY PROFITABLE for Plantation Medicine practitioners to TEST as many men as possible.
PROFIT drives Plantation Medicine. Not Best Practices.
Secondly the Plantation Medicine emphasis on "Testing" instead of prevention is an evil bamboozle.
We don't wait to "Test" for diabetes. We reduce carbs, exercise and eat alkalinizing foods.
Doc. Stop. You are embarrassing yourself.
Oh, MOTI.
You'll continue with this fantasy that you are actually "winning" this discussion until I get bored of your inanity and go on to doing something constructive this morning.
You'll continue talking about doing things to your body that have no benefit or even foundation in physiology.
No, the only person embarrassing himself is you. It's really sad that you'll stick to a point even though you've been proven incorrect.
I just realized that I should go easy on you. You could be someones mentally ill loved one who is allowed an internet connection and blog to keep himself occupied (and perhaps the family pets from being injured).
Your intent is to waste as much of my time as possible. You are attempting to play a classic battle of contrition. You, much like the Viet Cong and other guerrilla , are willing to take heavy losses until I lose interest and go home. That's why you so easily toss your low ranking (and mindless) foot soldiers into the fray, knowing full well they aren't armed well enough to go into battle. Much like a pimp outside of a junior high dance, you'll entice the ugliest (here the dumbest) little fatty into your broke down Caddy by saying she's fine (or in the case of Thordaddy, Wax, Scott and the other flunky's that their contributions are those of a great intellect). Your ho's...cause thats what they are probably have never heard so adoration, and readily follow you...festering lip sores and all.
So, yeah. I'm bored now.
typing too fast attrition not contrition.
dayyum...,
cats shoulda studied up on they iceberg slim.
once the pimping "game" is transparent, game's over.
pimp risks losing everything.
mental control terminated - only thing left is violence.
a gorilla pimp is a pitiful muhphuggah indeed..
only thing sorrier is his dehumanized little hos...,
DMG,
The problem with you is that you're neck deep in the greatest conspiracy theory known to mankind, namely, atheism.
And Craig, you hot dog neck deep in the second greatest conspiracy theory known to mankind, namely, the "worshipping" of an unknowable and autonomous god.
per·sev·er·a·tion (pr-sv-rshn)
n.
1. Psychology
a. Uncontrollable repetition of a particular response, such as a word, phrase, or gesture, despite the absence or cessation of a stimulus, usually caused by brain injury or other organic disorder.
b. The tendency to continue or repeat an act or activity after the cessation of the original stimulus.
End of story: no cherry picking.
Growing Doubts Over Prostate Cancer Tests
By Jean-Louis Santini (AFP)
3-14-10
WASHINGTON (AFP) -- The most commonly used prostate cancer screening procedure, PSA, is at the center of a growing debate after its discoverer said it had become a "hugely expensive public health disaster."
In a commentary in The New York Times, Richard Ablin of the University of Arizona said the screening tool he discovered four decades ago now costs too much and is ineffective.
The American Cancer Society, which does not recommend the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test -- a standard screening for men since the 1990s -- has urged doctors to speak to their patients about its risks and its limits.
Prostate cancer, the second most common cancer in men worldwide after lung cancer, kills an estimated 254,000 men each year.
The new recommendations were based on preliminary results from two major studies -- one led in Europe and the other in the United States -- published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine journal.
The clinical trials found that the blood test could not be proved to save lives.
PSA does not allow to distinguish between aggressive cancers that require intervention and slow-developing tumors that, depending on the patient's age, likely will not be a primary cause of death, according to the American Cancer Society.
Furthermore, the test can also provide erroneous results.
As soon as they turn 50 years old, healthy men who bear no symptoms of cancer and are expected to live at least 10 more years should be informed by their doctors of the pros and cons of a PSA screening before deciding to undergo the test, the cancer society recommends.
"For them, the risks likely outweigh the benefits," it said in a statement.
According to Ablin, American men have a 16 percent chance of being diagnosed with prostate cancer but only a three percent chance of dying from it because most cancers develop slowly over time.
He deplored PSA screenings' annual cost of at least three billion dollars, much of that paid for by Medicare, the insurance program for the elderly, and the Veterans Administration.
"The test's popularity has led to a hugely expensive public health disaster," he wrote in his column.
"As I've been trying to make clear for many years now, PSA testing can't detect prostate cancer and, more important, it can't distinguish between the two types of prostate cancer -- the one that will kill you and the one that won't.
"Instead, the test simply reveals how much of the prostate antigen a man has in his blood," he added.
Levels of PSA, a protein produced only prostate cells, can jump when a prostate tumor grows in size. But they can also increase as the prostate enlarges naturally with a patient's age.
Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved.
DMG, Do you now concede?
Wax,
I'm not really in the mood to chat with you about science, as you are not a worthy opponent, and it takes too much effort to explain basic topics. You aren't equipped to talk about this.
You present to me a newspaper article that barely addresses the to scientific studies it quotes, instead leaning heavily on the creator of the PSA test.
But this wasn't your original assertion, now was it? You were worried about getting a finger in your ass. The article you sent is addressing the PSA exam. And the recommendation is say: Talk to your doctor so that he/she may way your risk factors and make a reasoned decision on which exams to recommend. INCLUDING DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND/OR PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN.
Maybe you just don't get it. Access to information doesn't put you on a level playing field with a physician.
I can do this all day, everyday. You'll eventually run out of gas.
Post a Comment