Making your way in the world today takes everything you've got.Taking a break from all your worries, sure would help a lot.
Wouldn't you like to get away?
Sometimes you want to go
Where everybody knows your name,
and they're always glad you came.
You wanna be where you can see,
our troubles are all the same
You wanna be where everybody knows
Your name.
You wanna go where people know,
people are all the same,
You wanna go where everybody knows
your name.
21 comments:
Lol...true dat
loved the show 'cheers'!
love this blog even more....
be blessed today everyone..
So...DV does this make you the ex-Baseball player, fast cars, fast women, serving 'black breakfasts' instead of mugs of brewski?
Thanks Sista Nurse, blessings be upon you too.
DV,
Things get crazy-heated sometimes, but it's all love, thanks.
Ahhhhhhhhhh. True. True.
Hey everyone. Al Gores just invented the internet!!
LOL anonymous
Blogger Gee-Chee said...
So...DV does this make you the ex-Baseball player, fast cars, fast women, serving 'black breakfasts' instead of mugs of brewski?
Hey bra.
Hey bra.
Hey.
LOL. That's some funny shit.
"ex-Baseball player, fast cars, fast women, serving 'black breakfasts' instead of mugs of brewski?"
Ahhhh ...
I'm the cat behind the bar selling spirulina smoothies and raw cacao brownies with a Beretta in the waist of his grey flannels.
There would be art on the wall. The sistas wold be beautiful. Biggie, Miles and Rachmoninov would dominate the playlist.
Instead of "Normmmm", you would hear "CNuuuuuuuuu".
Nobody can sit in his chair.
DMG would play Cliff, the mailman. Hit you off with "Little Known Facts": "It's a little known fact that smartest animal is a pig. Scientists say if pigs had thumbs and a language, they could be trained to do simple manual labor."
bwaahahaaaa!
hee-lar-ee-ous.
DV
What's with the poll? Crack is wack and pork is for dorks ; )
LOL
...maintain composure...
I swear, ONLY DV can put 'spirulina smoothies' and 'Beretta' in the same sentence. LOL.
Bra. That's too loaded. The 'period' ain't designed to handle that much in one sentence. You got to type shyt like that in Sanskrit.
Man...LOL
Norm/Cliff
See there...you keep at DMG...just wait. You end up under his scalpel one day...you coming out that joint with a pig heart and chitterlings intestines.
That might just be true one day.
Interestingly KonWomyn, in Christian and Islamic traditions the pig and the ape were vessels for those who rejected obedience to revelation.
What is it about Western thinking that is so fascinated with making a pig/ape/human connection?
@ Gee-Chee
"What is it about Western thinking that is so fascinated with making a pig/ape/human connection?"
Wax has been trying to tell you that the man has been at this a "Alchemy game" for a long long time...These sick mugga fuggas has being hoaxing you into that evolutionary shit for a long time. Darwin was a punk moe foe and was just dis info to get you to believe that you came from this shit. Have you ever heard of Piltdown and Nebraska man?
http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php
What do you think about carbon dating Wax, is there any reliability in it?
Have you ever heard of Piltdown and Nebraska man?
I haven't...I'll check it out.
Hell No, Gee-Chee,
We got to remember the Agenda. Science was and is still being manipulated by the elite priest class. They gave you a bunch of fancy theories and say sallow this evolution shit and we always do.. I am so anti evolution that a picture of Darwin makes me puke. He was not even that sharp and had a ghost write (aka Shakespeare- is Sir Francis Bacon). Someone needs you to buy into it for various reasons including to reject your creator or worst the true story of history. With that said here are some of my reason to Carbon dating is for amateurs.
First, HISTORICAL DATES ONLY GO BACK A FEW THOUSAND YEARS
The earliest are 3000 B.C., the authenticated ones go back to 1600 B.C.
"Well authenticated dates are known only back as far as about 1600 B.C. in Egyptian history, according to John G. Read—H.M. Morris, W.W. Boardman, and R.F. Koontz, Science and Creation (1971), p. 85.
"The first shock Dr. Arnold and I had was that our advisors informed us that history extended back only 5,000 years . . You read books and find statements that such and such a society or archaeological site is [said to be] 20,000 years old.
We learned rather abruptly that these numbers, these ancient ages, are not known; in fact, it is about the time of the first dynasty in Egypt that the last [earliest] historical date of any real certainty has been established."—*W.F. Libby, "Radiocarbon Dating," in American Scientist, January 1956, p. 107. [Libby was the one who pioneered the discovery of Carbon !4 dating.]
MOST CARBON-14 DATES DO NOT AGREE WITH THE THEORY
So the evolutionists throw them away.
"It may come as a shock to some, but fewer than 50 percent of the radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples in northeastern North America have been adopted as `acceptable' by investigators."—*J. Ogden III, "The Use and Abuse of Radiocarbon," in Annals of the New York Academy of Science, Vol. 288, 1977, pp. 167-173.
In the Proceedings of the Symposium on Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute Chronology held at Uppsala in 1969, T. Säve-Söderbergh and I. U. Olsson introduce their report with these words:
"C-14 dating was being discussed at a symposium on the prehistory of the Nile Valley. A famous American colleague, Professor Brew, briefly summarized a common attitude among archaeologists towards it, as follows: If a C-14 date supports our theories, we put it in the main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in a footnote. And if it is completely out of date we just drop it. Few archaeologists who have concerned themselves with absolute chronology are innocent of having sometimes applied this method. . ."
I
cont
INNACURATE AS IT IS, C-14 DATING RARELY PRODUCES VERY OLD DATES
In spite of its flaws, it is far more accurate than radiodating.
"At 600 B.C., the C-14 activity level is about -10%. Before this, the atmospheric activity is observed to decrease in such a way that, by about 2000 B.C., it is of the order of +50%. Clearly, the trend for older samples to have progressively lower delta % levels is observed. In other words, the whole picture is now consistent with the non-equilibrium model. Before 2160 B.C., there are no suitable [historically dateable] materials for calibration purposes, and so it is not possible to trace the curve back further in time . .
"Conventional C-14 calibration has the effect of `stretching out' radiocarbon time and slowing down, for example, the rate of man's cultural development. By contrast, this revised approach has the effect of `compressing' radiocarbon time,' and speeding up the rate of man's cultural development."—Erich A. von Fange, "Time Upside Down," in Creation Research Society Quarterly, June 1974, p. 22.
"Although it was hailed as the answer to the prehistorian's prayer when it was first announced, there has been increasing disillusion with the [radiocarbon] method because of the chronological uncertainties—in some cases absurdities—that would follow a strict adherence to published C-14 dates . . What bids to become a classic example of `C-14 irresponsibility' is the 6,000 year spread of 11 determinations for Jarmo, a prehistoric village in northeastern Iraq which, on the basis of all archeological evidence, was not occupied for more than 500 consecutive years."—*C.A. Reed, "Animal Domestication in the Prehistoric Near East," in Science, 130 (1959), p. 1630.
"A survey of the 15,000 radiocarbon dates published through the year 1969 in the publication, Radiocarbon, revealed the following significant facts:
"[a] Of the dates of 9,671 specimens of trees, animals, and man, only 1,146 or about 12 percent have radiocarbon ages greater than 12,530 years.
"[b] Only three of the 15,000 reported ages are listed as `infinite.'
"[c] Some samples of coal, oil, and natural gas, all supposedly many millions of years old have radiocarbon ages of less than 50,000 years.
"[d] Deep ocean deposits supposed to contain remains of most primitive life forms are dated within 40,000 years.
"If the earth and life on earth are really as ancient as the theory of evolution requires, a great proportion of radiocarbon ages should be infinite. This is because, with a half-life of only 5,730 years, initial radiocarbon in a fossil decreases in about ten half-lives to a level too low to be measured."—Robert E. Lee, "Radiocarbon: Ages in Error," in Creation Research Society Quarterly, September 1982, pp. 116-117.
final
UNFORTUNATELY, RADIOCARBON DATING LENGTHENS DATES TOO FAR INTO THE PAST
But only the scientific community is told that fact.
"There are two basic assumptions in the radiocarbon method. One is that the carbon 14 concentration in the carbon dioxide cycle is constant. The other is that the cosmic ray flux has been essentially constant—at least on a scale of centuries."—*J.L. Kulp, "The Carbon 14 Method of Age Determination," in Scientific Monthly, November 1952, p. 261.
"Hair from the Chekurovka mammoth that was found in the Lena River delta region of Russia has a radiocarbon age of 26,000 [years] while the radiocarbon age of peat only eighteen inches above the carcass is 5,610. At normal [present] growth rates, between 500-2,000 solar years would be required for the development of an eighteen-inch peat layer.
"Muscle tissue from beneath the scalp of a mummified musk ox found in frozen muck at Fairbanks Creek, Alaska, has a radiocarbon age of 24,000, while the radiocarbon age of hair from a hind limb of the carcass is 17,200. A life span exceeding 7,000 years for a specimen of this species is doubtful.
"In a gravel deposit at the Union Pacific Mammoth Site near Rawlins, Wyoming, a mammoth skeleton was found together with artifacts that indicate the animal was killed by man. Radiocarbon dating of ivory from the center of the tusks establishes the kill date at approximately 11,300 radiocarbon years ago. Wood fragments from the gravel in which the remains were buried have a radiocarbon age of approximately 5,000 years. The bones would not have survived 6,000 solar years of exposure, nor could they be expected to remain in an articulate relationship during erosion and reburial by natural processes.
"A mastodon skeleton, found at Ferguson Farm near Tupperville, Ontario, provided a radiocarbon age of 8,900 for the collagen fraction of bones and a radiocarbon age of 6,200 for high organic-content mud from within the skull cavities. It is unlikely that this skeleton could have survived exposure for 2,700 solar years before emplacement in peat."—Robert H. Brown, "Radiocarbon Age Measurements Re-
http://dawkinswatch.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/technocrati/
Post a Comment