Our beliefs are usually held tightly by us, but we should never let the truth get in the way.
That being said, Denmark, I'm fairly certain that you've read that the study showing a strong link between thimersol (mercury) and autism and other disorders was founded on lies. I haven't had a lot of time to read about this in-depth, but what have has blown away what I thought was true.
And I am sorely disappointed, because this brings us back to square one: what causes autism? At the same time, I am relieved, because this means all these pregnant women and babies won't be harmed by the H1N1 shots.
If you have good source information that leads you to believe the original researchers lied about lying, share it.
Some of your other posts about some guy saying germs don't cause disease is pure quackery, and God forbid it leads a young and uneducated reader down the wrong path. I remember that nuttiness from late '90s when some were still insisting that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, resulting in the spread of it.
It may uncomfortable and even painful, but in the end, it is the truth that will set us free.
This is an interesting post. We couldn't see things more differently.
A) I wasn't the least bit aware of a 'study' showing a link between mercury and autism nor was I aware that it was founded on lies.
I don't particularly need a 'study' to tell me injecting mercury into the human body is harmful to human beings.
I'm not aware of a study that says injecting aluminum into the human body is harmful to human beings either ... but I know that it is.
Vaccines are a multi-billion dollar business. If lies are being told either way Kit, I'd bet my money, the lies are being told by the side who stands to profit - Big Pharma.
B) The Germ Theory of Disease is As Big A Scam As The H1N1 "Pandemic".
C) The HIV AIDS Hypothesis Is 90% Propaganda 10% Science.
KIT, "Official" AIDS Policy has been an epic disaster. They've been WRONG about everything they've promoted concerning the syndrome.
The millions of dead corpses and billions in sold drugs are testament to that fact.
AIDS is caused by some type of trauma to the immune system. I suspect drugs and hard living are the main culprits.
The main drug used to treat AIDS was originally created to treat cancer and then banned because it was considered too toxic.
I'm not convinced AZT doesn't cause AIDS symptoms.
The fact that southern Africa has 10% of the world's population but 60% of the world's AIDS cases makes no sense what so ever.
After a career making Flicks my brother is HIV+. He takes no medications, has only changed his diet and slepp routine. After six years his white cell count is normal.
But why wouldn't AIDs be more common in Africa? If it's a rudimentary illness - why wouldn't it affect a more natural people first and worse?
After a career making Flicks my brother is HIV+. He takes no medications, has only changed his diet and slepp routine. After six years his white cell count is normal." UGJ
^^ So what does that teach us John?
But why wouldn't AIDs be more common in Africa?
OK. Good question.
#1 If a man infected with HIV has unprotected vaginal sex with a woman, the woman has a 0.1% chance (1 in 1000 chance) per exposure of contracting HIV. Women’s genitalia have a larger mucosal surface area than men. Overall, in vaginal sex, there is a greater risk that HIV will be transmitted to the woman than to the man. ([8] “HIV,” Wikipedia, accessed 21 March 08, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiv)
#2
If a man has unprotected insertive vaginal sex with a woman who is infected with HIV, he has a 0.05% chance (1 in 2000 chance) of contracting HIV each time.
(“HIV,” Wikipedia, accessed 21 March 08, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiv)
Nearly an entire generation of adults has dropped dead in southern Africa.
Homosexuality and intravenous drug use is much less prevalent in Africa than it is in the US.
So why is the rate of AIDS in southern Africa 10 times higher than San Francisco?
John, Again, I am sorry for your brother's HIV status, which you mentioned learning about this past Christmas, on your blog.
Just because he's been doing flicks for six years doesn't mean the infection has been present this long, unless of course, he was tested seven years ago and negative, then again six years ago and positive. I can't tell if you're assuming when he became HIV+ or know for a fact the approximate date. If you don't know, maybe it's because you don't want to know, or because he doesn't want you to know and worry about him.
That is T-cell count is in the normal range, if true, suggests to me he hasn't been infected that long. If true, that's good for him, because he has more time, and it's especially good if his doctor or clinic is checking it regularly. When it dips below a certain level, they'll suggest medications.
Kudos to him for changing his dietary lifestyle, and I'll assume he's also not using alcohol. Magic Johnson gave an interview, oh, in the past ten years or so, saying he did the same and also cut sugar out of his diet completely. We see he's still walking around and he was infected in 1991.
HOWEVER, it's exceedingly dangerous, in my opinion, to minimize the danger of this disease from a health and safety standpoint by telling people if they're infected - or cause an infection - that person need only change their lifestyle.
If it were that easy, few people would overweight, smoke, drink coffee, alcohol to excess, or use drugs. Most people do not change until they have a clear diagnosis, and even then many don't or don't for long, because habits are exceedingly difficult to break.
If every Type II diabetic simply followed the guidelines to diet and weight, most would be cured, but they don't because they can't.
Back to you, DV. I hope you get involved with your local HIV clinic as a volunteer as I did in the mid-late 1980s, and also read the book, And The Band Played On, written during that time or early '90. It's full of stories of when they think HIV entered the country (ironically, on July 4, 1976), and about healthy young gay men who did all the things John's brother is doing, but got sicker and sicker because there were no medications.
While I appreciate your hypervigilence to the many real conspiracies to decimate blacks and other peoples, and your views of being a purest when it comes to putting unnatural products in our bodies, including medicines and vaccines, to wave them away as destructive when many are life saving and to encourage these beliefs is encouraging so what? behavior, ie, the youth who no longer feels any need to care about spreading disease "since it can be controlled".
I have seen this behavior first hand, and it is as hellish as any plot drummed up by the haters in charge. Let them not deceive you.
@ KIT - No, he was diagnosed six years ago and I just found out this past Christmas. Since he found out - he changed his lifestyle and began to focus more on safer and better behaviors.
Medications are for emergencies - not for a lifetime. They are meant to trigger a responce to a problem that the body may be having trouble fixing on it's own.
Ok Class school is in! First word of the the day iatrogenocide -" to be killed by the cure" Most of modern medicine is base in Pharmakia: Alchemy, Sorcery, Witchcraft. HIV/AIDs was the perfect bio weapon that used iatrogenocide. Just ask and follow along in the little story of AZT:
In 1964, a chemist called Jerome Horwitz synthesised a sophisticated experimental cell poison for the treatment of cancerous tumour cells (1). It was called Suramin, or Compound S. Its formal title is 3’-azido-3’-deoxythymidine - zidovudine for short - but everyone knows it by its nickname, AZT.
It works like this. Thymidine is one of the four nucleotides (building blocks) of DNA, the basic molecule of life. AZT is an artificial fake, a dead ringer for thymidine. As a cell synthesises new DNA while preparing to divide in order to spawn another, AZT either steals in to take the place of the real thing, or else disrupts the delicate process by interfering with the cell’s regulation of the relative concentrations of nucleotide pools present during DNA synthesis. That’s the end of the cell line. Cell division and replication, wrecked by the presence of the plastic imposter, comes to a halt.
Chemotherapeutic drugs such as AZT are described as DNA chain terminators accordingly (2). Their effect is wholesale cell death of every type, particularly the rapidly dividing cells of the immune system and those lining our guts. Horwitz found that the sick immune cells went, but with so many others that his poison was plainly useless as a medicine. It was akin to napalm-bombing a school to kill some roof-rats. AZT was abandoned. It wasn’t even patented. For two decades it collected dust, forgotten - until the advent of the AIDS era.
As soon as Dr Robert Gallo made his famous announcement at a press conference on 23 April 1984 that his virus was the probable cause of AIDS, the race was on to find a pharmaceutical weapon against it. The stratospheric profit potential (since borne out) of being the first past the post was on everybody’s mind. Obviously, if an already synthesised drug could be applied to the malady, it would short-cut most of the road-race there. AZT was fished off the shelf, along with numerous other abandoned brews, and put to some in vitro tests. It demonstrated a bright alchemical sparkle. On the basis of a reassuring but fallacious assertion that AZT was specifically antagonistic to HIV, and a thousand times more toxic to the latter than human cells generally, the drug went to clinical trials. The chaos into which the trials degenerated is a tale too long to tell here. It wouldn’t be extravagant to call them fraudulent (3). (Subsequent trials consistently turned in opposite results.) At best, they were so incompetently staged that the data gathered under them were useless, save to note that one in five of its subjects taking AZT needed repeated blood transfusions to keep going. Small surprise, since the label on bottles of AZT supplied to laboratories bears a skull and cross-bones and cautions, “Toxic by inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed. Target organ(s): Blood, bone marrow…Wear suitable protective clothing.”
continue- Four months after the trials started, they were called off prematurely, on an interpretation of provisional results deemed positive for the drug by the trial overseer. Which is odd for a drug claimed to be on double-blind test, with neither doctor nor patient supposed to know who was on what, but there we are. Next, it went before the FDA, to be approved in record time under huge political pressure from the gay lobby. Strong reservations were expressed at the hearing about its dreadful toxicity. The chairman’s vote against it was defeated. As the most poisonous drug ever licensed by the FDA for indefinite use, and with the conviction apparently that the terrible new disease needed a terrible medicine, AZT was approved for use in extreme AIDS cases only - for which you might want to read, in cases of people very ill with their presenting AIDS indicator disease, fungal pneumonia or what have you. Scarcely a year later, in the orgy of stupidity that characterises the AIDS age, AZT was officially recommended for administration to entirely healthy people, whose misfortune it was to register positive to an HIV antibody test. Since the drug destroys the very immune cells allegedly attacked by HIV, the introduction of AZT as a treatment regimen for asymptomatic HIV-positive people saw the AIDS mortality rate among the previously well take off like a rocket. Five years and countless deaths later, and only after the disastrous results of the European Concorde and St Mary trials, was this murderous treatment recommendation reversed. AZT, it was found, did no good. Of course not. On any intelligent consideration of its pharmacological action, AZT could never be ‘antiviral’, any more so than arsenic could have cured the scurvy for which it was administered to sailors, and later, to troops in the trenches in the First World War.
In Europe and the US, HIV-positive ‘long term survivors’ quietly gather to form groups, having sloughed off the terror of the death sentences imposed on them by their doctors. Here’s the strangest thing. Without exception, what they find they all have in common is that they all eschewed (or quickly gave up) AZT, related nucleoside analogues like 3TC, and protease inhibitors. Some have pondered the unthinkable: that nearly all medically managed AIDS cases, always terminal, represent that balefully familiar phenomenon in the history of medicine, iatrogenocide - to be killed by the cure. Their reasoning becomes less obscure when one reads the AZT package insert. To do so might tempt one to wonder impertinently whether AZT isn’t AIDS by prescription. Indeed, such perverse conjecture is actually confirmed in capitals: AZT use “MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY INCLUDING GRANULOCYTOPENIA AND SEVERE ANEMIA” (destruction of white and red blood cells respectively), and “PROLONGED USE OF RETROVIR HAS BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH SYMPTOMATIC MYOPATHY (gross atrophy of muscle tissue) SIMILAR TO THAT PRODUCED BY HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS”. As to the latter claim, history will judge whether the thousands of healthy HIV-positive people who embarked on their metabolic poison treatment and wasted away (just as the AZT insert predicted) would have died had they ignored doctor’s orders and thrown their pills away. Here the syphilis story is instructive.
Before the introduction of mercury and arsenic salts as a treatment for this clap, the organic brain damage and dementia that signalled ‘tertiary-’ or ‘neuro-syphilis’ was quite unknown to medicine. When penicillin replaced the older decoctions, it then disappeared. The moral is hard to miss.
By edict of the WHO (World Health Organization) you will have large fines and/or jail time if you use anything other than -AZT for treatment and the Gallo fake ass test for investigating if you have HIV.
What you and I both are pointing out here regarding 'HIV / AIDS Myth' or even 'The Germ Theory of Disease' is not particularly novel.
This information has existed for awhile.
Presenting this information to people ... no matter how clear and "falsifiable" that information is ... does not seem to actually change their perceptions nor does it change their behavior.
For example ...
80% of people will read this very clear explanation about the dangers of AZT and the death sentence that is its prescription ... will simply shrug their shoulders ... parrot some dismissive 'attack the messenger' meme ... and continue on thinking HIV is "the" cause of AIDS and 'Safe Sex' protects them from it.
The HIV / AIDS Propaganda and the Germ Theory of Disease are so programmed into people, that they function more like religious tenets than scientific fact.
Presenting people with the TRUTH ... is not enough to get them to change their behavior.
For example ...
80% of the people who submitted to the H1N1 "vaccine" suspected it was bullshit, but did it anyway.
What is it going to take to get our people to conjure up enough courage to acknowledge and deal with truth?
UBJ, That's pretty incredible - good for your bro! I did a search online for diet controlled HIV and found this. In contrast was this which says to eat all the things the natural remedy site prohibits. The latter is also the most emphasized diet plan for HIV+ people, but I'd def like to know a bit more abt natural eating, it cld help some sick members of my extended fam.
@ DV - What if you'd invested countless hours, a couple hundred thousand dollars and most of your education to a concept? If someone said your investments were bad - would you believe them or try to find a way to make your way the right way? Sometimes people are so invested in a system that they can't let it go because they would lose their social status and earnings potential.
Dems do it when defending Democrat's platforms. Repulicans do it when defending Republican platforms. AMericans do it when defending The American Way. And Doctors do it when defending their huge investments in their system. Why is this at all odd?
"Oh Shit! ... GMO Food Sterilizes People ... And It's Really A Form of Population Control?"
"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."
INTELLECTUAL INSURRECTIONISTS
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider - founder Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
Were We All Kunta Kinte? Or Are We Also Mansa Musa?
Plantation Negros & The New World Order
Illuminati Want My Mind Soul & My Body - A DV Joint
Barry Goldwater 1909-1998
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. "
Robert Mugabe Speaks To Thunderous Approval At Harlem's Mount Olive Baptist Church
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad
"It Is Easier To Change A Man's Religion Than It Is To Change His Diet"
Private Prison Industry
2,000,000 human beings in American prisons and counting
IS THIS LITTLE GUY A PERSON?
The founders of the American state understood that the proper functioning of a democracy required an educated electorate. It is this understanding that justifies a system of public education and that led slaveholders to resist the spread of literacy among their chattels. But the meaning of "educated" has changed beyond recognition in two hundred years. Reading, writing, and arithmetic are no longer sufficient to decide on public policy. Now we need quantum mechanics and molecular biology. The knowledge required for political rationality, once available to the masses, is now in the possession of a specially educated elite, a situation that creates a series of tensions and contradictions in the operation of representative democracy.
Greater Display of Conspicuous Consumption?
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. P
"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
Louis Pasteur
"The Microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything."
A DV JOINT
Ask Denmark Vesey
DenmarkVesey1822@hotmail.com
Chris Hedges Warns of The Dangers of The "New Atheists" and "Secular Fundamentalists"
Beverly Johnson. Beverly Hills. 1978
Do You Consider Yourself:
"Bra! Tell Me About It!"
"Most of the trouble I have had in advancing the cause of the race has come from Negroes."
Is President Barack Hussein Obama The Driving Force Behind US Policy?
Ted Turner - CNN founder and UN supporter - quoted in the The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June '
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Lord Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science On Society (Routledge Press: New York, 1951).
"At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars.. War has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. The state of affairs might be unpleasant, but what of it?"
Denmark Vesey For President 08
1. Troops Out Of Iraq Immediately. Like By Monday. 2. Money Owed To Haliburton and War Contractors Be Given Directly To The Iraqi People 3. Complete Electoral Reform 4. No Corporate Conglomerate Will Be Allowed To Control More Than 5% Of News Market 5. Federal Reserve Abolished 6. For-Profit Prison Industry Abolished
*George Orwell (1903-1950) English novelist, critic
Men can only be happy when they do not assume that the object of life is happiness... If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear... The great enemy of clear language is insincerity... The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it... To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle... For a creative writer possession of the truth is less important than emotional sincerity.
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society will be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” – Zbigniew Brzezinski
God Don't Make No Mistakes
Subscribe Via eMail
Gordon Parks 1912-2006
"I suffered evils, but without allowing them to rob me of the freedom to expand."
16 comments:
Our beliefs are usually held tightly by us, but we should never let the truth get in the way.
That being said, Denmark, I'm fairly certain that you've read that the study showing a strong link between thimersol (mercury) and autism and other disorders was founded on lies. I haven't had a lot of time to read about this in-depth, but what have has blown away what I thought was true.
And I am sorely disappointed, because this brings us back to square one: what causes autism? At the same time, I am relieved, because this means all these pregnant women and babies won't be harmed by the H1N1 shots.
If you have good source information that leads you to believe the original researchers lied about lying, share it.
Some of your other posts about some guy saying germs don't cause disease is pure quackery, and God forbid it leads a young and uneducated reader down the wrong path. I remember that nuttiness from late '90s when some were still insisting that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, resulting in the spread of it.
It may uncomfortable and even painful, but in the end, it is the truth that will set us free.
"Educated" or "Smart"?
Sista Kit!
Good to see you back. How you been?
This is an interesting post. We couldn't see things more differently.
A) I wasn't the least bit aware of a 'study' showing a link between mercury and autism nor was I aware that it was founded on lies.
I don't particularly need a 'study' to tell me injecting mercury into the human body is harmful to human beings.
I'm not aware of a study that says injecting aluminum into the human body is harmful to human beings either ... but I know that it is.
Vaccines are a multi-billion dollar business. If lies are being told either way Kit, I'd bet my money, the lies are being told by the side who stands to profit - Big Pharma.
B) The Germ Theory of Disease is As Big A Scam As The H1N1 "Pandemic".
C) The HIV AIDS Hypothesis Is 90% Propaganda 10% Science.
KIT, "Official" AIDS Policy has been an epic disaster. They've been WRONG about everything they've promoted concerning the syndrome.
The millions of dead corpses and billions in sold drugs are testament to that fact.
AIDS is caused by some type of trauma to the immune system. I suspect drugs and hard living are the main culprits.
The main drug used to treat AIDS was originally created to treat cancer and then banned because it was considered too toxic.
I'm not convinced AZT doesn't cause AIDS symptoms.
The fact that southern Africa has 10% of the world's population but 60% of the world's AIDS cases makes no sense what so ever.
I beg you to revisit that issue.
After a career making Flicks my brother is HIV+.
He takes no medications, has only changed his diet and slepp routine. After six years his white cell count is normal.
But why wouldn't AIDs be more common in Africa?
If it's a rudimentary illness - why wouldn't it affect a more natural people first and worse?
After a career making Flicks my brother is HIV+.
He takes no medications, has only changed his diet and slepp routine. After six years his white cell count is normal." UGJ
^^
So what does that teach us John?
But why wouldn't AIDs be more common in Africa?
OK. Good question.
#1
If a man infected with HIV has unprotected vaginal sex with a woman, the woman has a 0.1% chance (1 in 1000 chance) per exposure of contracting HIV. Women’s genitalia have a larger mucosal surface area than men. Overall, in vaginal sex, there is a greater risk that HIV will be transmitted to the woman than to the man. ([8] “HIV,” Wikipedia, accessed 21 March 08, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiv)
#2
If a man has unprotected insertive vaginal sex with a woman who is infected with HIV, he has a 0.05% chance (1 in 2000 chance) of contracting HIV each time.
(“HIV,” Wikipedia, accessed 21 March 08, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiv)
Nearly an entire generation of adults has dropped dead in southern Africa.
Homosexuality and intravenous drug use is much less prevalent in Africa than it is in the US.
So why is the rate of AIDS in southern Africa 10 times higher than San Francisco?
UBJ
What kinda dietary and lifestyle changes did your brother make?
@ KonWoman - I really don't know.
He just swears by breathing exercises, natural foods, stress relieving workout programs and lots of water.
DV, Hi. You responded to my comment, so here's the link for you and others:
Vaccine Study Retracted, and Causes of Autism Remain Elusive
John, Again, I am sorry for your brother's HIV status, which you mentioned learning about this past Christmas, on your blog.
Just because he's been doing flicks for six years doesn't mean the infection has been present this long, unless of course, he was tested seven years ago and negative, then again six years ago and positive. I can't tell if you're assuming when he became HIV+ or know for a fact the approximate date. If you don't know, maybe it's because you don't want to know, or because he doesn't want you to know and worry about him.
That is T-cell count is in the normal range, if true, suggests to me he hasn't been infected that long. If true, that's good for him, because he has more time, and it's especially good if his doctor or clinic is checking it regularly. When it dips below a certain level, they'll suggest medications.
Kudos to him for changing his dietary lifestyle, and I'll assume he's also not using alcohol. Magic Johnson gave an interview, oh, in the past ten years or so, saying he did the same and also cut sugar out of his diet completely. We see he's still walking around and he was infected in 1991.
HOWEVER, it's exceedingly dangerous, in my opinion, to minimize the danger of this disease from a health and safety standpoint by telling people if they're infected - or cause an infection - that person need only change their lifestyle.
If it were that easy, few people would overweight, smoke, drink coffee, alcohol to excess, or use drugs. Most people do not change until they have a clear diagnosis, and even then many don't or don't for long, because habits are exceedingly difficult to break.
If every Type II diabetic simply followed the guidelines to diet and weight, most would be cured, but they don't because they can't.
Back to you, DV. I hope you get involved with your local HIV clinic as a volunteer as I did in the mid-late 1980s, and also read the book, And The Band Played On, written during that time or early '90. It's full of stories of when they think HIV entered the country (ironically, on July 4, 1976), and about healthy young gay men who did all the things John's brother is doing, but got sicker and sicker because there were no medications.
While I appreciate your hypervigilence to the many real conspiracies to decimate blacks and other peoples, and your views of being a purest when it comes to putting unnatural products in our bodies, including medicines and vaccines, to wave them away as destructive when many are life saving and to encourage these beliefs is encouraging so what? behavior, ie, the youth who no longer feels any need to care about spreading disease "since it can be controlled".
I have seen this behavior first hand, and it is as hellish as any plot drummed up by the haters in charge. Let them not deceive you.
@ KIT - No, he was diagnosed six years ago and I just found out this past Christmas.
Since he found out - he changed his lifestyle and began to focus more on safer and better behaviors.
Medications are for emergencies - not for a lifetime.
They are meant to trigger a responce to a problem that the body may be having trouble fixing on it's own.
John, then he is blessed. So many become very ill and die long before six years. I wish you both well.
~Kit
Ok Class school is in!
First word of the the day iatrogenocide -" to be killed by the cure"
Most of modern medicine is base in Pharmakia: Alchemy, Sorcery, Witchcraft. HIV/AIDs was the perfect bio weapon that used iatrogenocide. Just ask and follow along in the little story of AZT:
In 1964, a chemist called Jerome Horwitz synthesised a sophisticated experimental cell poison for the treatment of cancerous tumour cells (1). It was called Suramin, or Compound S. Its formal title is 3’-azido-3’-deoxythymidine - zidovudine for short - but everyone knows it by its nickname, AZT.
It works like this. Thymidine is one of the four nucleotides (building blocks) of DNA, the basic molecule of life. AZT is an artificial fake, a dead ringer for thymidine. As a cell synthesises new DNA while preparing to divide in order to spawn another, AZT either steals in to take the place of the real thing, or else disrupts the delicate process by interfering with the cell’s regulation of the relative concentrations of nucleotide pools present during DNA synthesis. That’s the end of the cell line. Cell division and replication, wrecked by the presence of the plastic imposter, comes to a halt.
Chemotherapeutic drugs such as AZT are described as DNA chain terminators accordingly (2). Their effect is wholesale cell death of every type, particularly the rapidly dividing cells of the immune system and those lining our guts. Horwitz found that the sick immune cells went, but with so many others that his poison was plainly useless as a medicine. It was akin to napalm-bombing a school to kill some roof-rats. AZT was abandoned. It wasn’t even patented. For two decades it collected dust, forgotten - until the advent of the AIDS era.
As soon as Dr Robert Gallo made his famous announcement at a press conference on 23 April 1984 that his virus was the probable cause of AIDS, the race was on to find a pharmaceutical weapon against it. The stratospheric profit potential (since borne out) of being the first past the post was on everybody’s mind. Obviously, if an already synthesised drug could be applied to the malady, it would short-cut most of the road-race there. AZT was fished off the shelf, along with numerous other abandoned brews, and put to some in vitro tests. It demonstrated a bright alchemical sparkle. On the basis of a reassuring but fallacious assertion that AZT was specifically antagonistic to HIV, and a thousand times more toxic to the latter than human cells generally, the drug went to clinical trials. The chaos into which the trials degenerated is a tale too long to tell here. It wouldn’t be extravagant to call them fraudulent (3). (Subsequent trials consistently turned in opposite results.) At best, they were so incompetently staged that the data gathered under them were useless, save to note that one in five of its subjects taking AZT needed repeated blood transfusions to keep going. Small surprise, since the label on bottles of AZT supplied to laboratories bears a skull and cross-bones and cautions, “Toxic by inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed. Target organ(s): Blood, bone marrow…Wear suitable protective clothing.”
continue-
Four months after the trials started, they were called off prematurely, on an interpretation of provisional results deemed positive for the drug by the trial overseer. Which is odd for a drug claimed to be on double-blind test, with neither doctor nor patient supposed to know who was on what, but there we are. Next, it went before the FDA, to be approved in record time under huge political pressure from the gay lobby. Strong reservations were expressed at the hearing about its dreadful toxicity. The chairman’s vote against it was defeated. As the most poisonous drug ever licensed by the FDA for indefinite use, and with the conviction apparently that the terrible new disease needed a terrible medicine, AZT was approved for use in extreme AIDS cases only - for which you might want to read, in cases of people very ill with their presenting AIDS indicator disease, fungal pneumonia or what have you. Scarcely a year later, in the orgy of stupidity that characterises the AIDS age, AZT was officially recommended for administration to entirely healthy people, whose misfortune it was to register positive to an HIV antibody test. Since the drug destroys the very immune cells allegedly attacked by HIV, the introduction of AZT as a treatment regimen for asymptomatic HIV-positive people saw the AIDS mortality rate among the previously well take off like a rocket. Five years and countless deaths later, and only after the disastrous results of the European Concorde and St Mary trials, was this murderous treatment recommendation reversed. AZT, it was found, did no good. Of course not. On any intelligent consideration of its pharmacological action, AZT could never be ‘antiviral’, any more so than arsenic could have cured the scurvy for which it was administered to sailors, and later, to troops in the trenches in the First World War.
In Europe and the US, HIV-positive ‘long term survivors’ quietly gather to form groups, having sloughed off the terror of the death sentences imposed on them by their doctors. Here’s the strangest thing. Without exception, what they find they all have in common is that they all eschewed (or quickly gave up) AZT, related nucleoside analogues like 3TC, and protease inhibitors. Some have pondered the unthinkable: that nearly all medically managed AIDS cases, always terminal, represent that balefully familiar phenomenon in the history of medicine, iatrogenocide - to be killed by the cure. Their reasoning becomes less obscure when one reads the AZT package insert. To do so might tempt one to wonder impertinently whether AZT isn’t AIDS by prescription. Indeed, such perverse conjecture is actually confirmed in capitals: AZT use “MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY INCLUDING GRANULOCYTOPENIA AND SEVERE ANEMIA” (destruction of white and red blood cells respectively), and “PROLONGED USE OF RETROVIR HAS BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH SYMPTOMATIC MYOPATHY (gross atrophy of muscle tissue) SIMILAR TO THAT PRODUCED BY HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS”. As to the latter claim, history will judge whether the thousands of healthy HIV-positive people who embarked on their metabolic poison treatment and wasted away (just as the AZT insert predicted) would have died had they ignored doctor’s orders and thrown their pills away. Here the syphilis story is instructive.
Before the introduction of mercury and arsenic salts as a treatment for this clap, the organic brain damage and dementia that signalled ‘tertiary-’ or ‘neuro-syphilis’ was quite unknown to medicine. When penicillin replaced the older decoctions, it then disappeared. The moral is hard to miss.
One last comment -
By edict of the WHO (World Health Organization) you will have large fines and/or jail time if you use anything other than -AZT for treatment and the Gallo fake ass test for investigating if you have HIV.
Goodnight.
Good stuff HW.
Good stuff.
But come on man.
Between me and you. Let's talk candidly.
What you and I both are pointing out here regarding 'HIV / AIDS Myth' or even 'The Germ Theory of Disease' is not particularly novel.
This information has existed for awhile.
Presenting this information to people ... no matter how clear and "falsifiable" that information is ... does not seem to actually change their perceptions nor does it change their behavior.
For example ...
80% of people will read this very clear explanation about the dangers of AZT and the death sentence that is its prescription ... will simply shrug their shoulders ... parrot some dismissive 'attack the messenger' meme ... and continue on thinking HIV is "the" cause of AIDS and 'Safe Sex' protects them from it.
The HIV / AIDS Propaganda and the Germ Theory of Disease are so programmed into people, that they function more like religious tenets than scientific fact.
Presenting people with the TRUTH ... is not enough to get them to change their behavior.
For example ...
80% of the people who submitted to the H1N1 "vaccine" suspected it was bullshit, but did it anyway.
What is it going to take to get our people to conjure up enough courage to acknowledge and deal with truth?
UBJ,
That's pretty incredible - good for your bro! I did a search online for diet controlled HIV and found this. In contrast was this which says to eat all the things the natural remedy site prohibits. The latter is also the most emphasized diet plan for HIV+ people, but I'd def like to know a bit more abt natural eating, it cld help some sick members of my extended fam.
...peace
@ DV - What if you'd invested countless hours, a couple hundred thousand dollars and most of your education to a concept?
If someone said your investments were bad - would you believe them or try to find a way to make your way the right way?
Sometimes people are so invested in a system that they can't let it go because they would lose their social status and earnings potential.
Dems do it when defending Democrat's platforms.
Repulicans do it when defending Republican platforms.
AMericans do it when defending The American Way.
And Doctors do it when defending their huge investments in their system.
Why is this at all odd?
Post a Comment