Preoccupied with aliens, the occult, and secular apocalyptic doomsday scenarios, Sci-Fi Negros overlook the dangers of their polysyllabic rationalizations of anti-democratic totalitarian paradigms. Democratic elections are no longer necessary. Smart people will appoint each other.
Technocrats inundate peasants with apocalypse scenarios that necessitate the construction of authoritarian rule in order to save humanity from itself.
8 comments:
Preoccupied with aliens, the occult, and secular apocalyptic doomsday scenarios,
Describes the following LaRooshian front operations;
Alex Jones
David Icke
David Livingstone
Henry Makow
Red Ice Creations
Phillip Collins
All gettin they grind on in the pasty pink salt mines of new-age, alternative media celebrity.....,
Exclusive information suppliers to DenmarkVesey.Net - the place where pasty hustlers from a right-wing populist fringe cult get repackaged in the runny and streaking sprayed-on patina of memetic and mimetic Black swagger.
When have you or anyone you know of ever participated in a "Democratic election", so why would you pretend like Technocracy is a radical departure from such a cherished ideal? Christianity inundates it's faithful with apocalyptic scenarios that necessitate the construction of a fairy tale salvation reserved for the true believers. The "anointed" seem to appoint themselves. Does that make your faith in God rather plantation-ish?
Is it fair to say that almost every creation of the human mind will have areas where it fails to achieve the pinnacle of perfection? Do you honestly believe that there can be a society where there is literally no decision making authority vested in anyone? Are the personal peccadilloes of any one adherent to a particular philosophy sufficient to completely invalidate the entire theoretical basis underlying the philosophy?
You begin to sound more and more like a tool of the status quo. Simply antagonistic towards any potential for change, and imbuing all call for change with the same exact negative nomenclature of the currently extant paradigm. Trying to scare us from running off this plantation to any other one makes you little more than the overseer's handmaiden.
"When have you or anyone you know of ever participated in a "Democratic election", EM
When I was elected Class President in 5th Grade. When I was elected Treasurer of the student body while in college.
Why should I pretend "Technocracy" is a democratic election when I don't even pretend this media charade we have now is a democratic election? Peep my archives.
"so why would you pretend like Technocracy is a radical departure from such a cherished ideal?"
1) I wouldn't. I don't. I haven't.
2) If Technocracy is supposed to be "the Solution for us" ... why is simply acknowledging what Technocracy "is" ... a problem?
3) Should we pretend it is something different?
4) What should we pretend Technocracy is?
5) Hell. We have Technocracy now.
"Christianity inundates it's faithful with apocalyptic scenarios that necessitate the construction of a fairy tale salvation reserved for the true believers." EM
Yup. So does "Climate Change". So does Secularism. So does Technocracy. (You gotta do better than this EM)
"The "anointed" seem to appoint themselves. Does that make your faith in God rather plantation-ish?" Exodus Mentality
If your Faith-in-God is a mere "belief".
"Belief" in and of itself is Plantation Negro shit. I've told you that before.
One doesn't "Believe" in God anymore than one "Believes" in breathing.
You just breathe.
"Is it fair to say that almost every creation of the human mind will have areas where it fails to achieve the pinnacle of perfection? Do you honestly believe that there can be a society where there is literally no decision making authority vested in anyone?" Exodus Mentality
Exodus Plantation Negros need Decision. Making. Authority.
Free men need Decision. Making. Employees.
Disclaimer - {I'm not into Technocracy, nor am I an advocate for Technocracy because I lack faith in the rational self-interest or evolutionary potential of highly suggestible masses} that said...,
LaRooshifer,
How come all the serial misrepresentations of things?
You've misrepresented me, esoterism, Christianity, Kemetic Science, Science in general {which you conflate with Scientism} and now you're on to misrepresenting Technocracy too?!?!?
Why should I pretend "Technocracy" is a democratic election when I don't even pretend this media charade we have now is a democratic election? Peep my archives.
Technocracy, Inc. has always said that it would be up to the people to demand Technocracy - in other words it would have to be democratically chosen. Technocracy, Inc. has no assumption to power theory - there is no group that wants to install this program for you. The program has been written and is ready to be installed when the people demand it.
Technocracy defines the common interest as guaranteeing every person as much of whatever they can physically consume that they desire, while conserving our resources and environment so that future generations have the ability to do the same - in this case the common interest also includes the interests of future generations.
Disclaimer - {I haven't heard anything about or read anything by Lyndon Larouche since he ran for President 25 years ago.}
LeVarrrrrrr ...
Got your lips poked out about "misrepresentations".
LOL. If that aint snow calling teeth white.
You are not a member of Technocracy because you are ... cruel.
Yes. Yes. Get that. You eagerly look forward to the ... "cull".
You are simply a Malthusian flavored member of the Technocracy cult.
aka Sci Fi Negro.
In the interest of precision, Malthus gets an undeservedly bad rap too.
Malthus is only culpable for pointing out the geometric growth tendencies of populations vs. the linear growth tendencies of food production.
Much more up-to-date on that exact same tip is M. King Hubbert - whose more contemporary and energy focused work brings Malthus original insight - up to the "terror" of the present situation.
Since the "Green Revolution" in 20th century food production was made possible by the direct application of petrochemicals and petrochemical energy to farming at a cost of 10 calories of petro-energy for every 1 calorie of food energy yield.
Peak oil production and declining net available energy, precipitated in large measure by sheer American wastefulness, is what's going to drive the 6.6 Billion through the ELE and down to either minimal regret population levels or extinction.
Malthus was a white supremacist. Period. His theory was based on the idea that the teeming masses (a.k.a. the poor and the non-white) didn't really deserve to be taking up all that space. So-called progressives have tried to "green" it up and leave behind the roots of what they preach, but it's there.
Here's a link for ya:
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/reviewofbooks_article/8346/
Mussolini also came in on an election. I'm not impressed by the claims of Technocracy, Inc. that people would have to "elect" their program. Marketing, as Gee-Chee keeps pointing out, takes care of that "they'll have to choose us" thing. Sides, we've already got Technocracy. Have had it for some time, now.
What's happening Cadeveo.
The misanthropic impulses among all of these Sci-Fi Nerds is a product of an occult tradition that extends way beyond Malthus and Darwin.
Each generation produces a new wave of Technocrats coming up with pseudo-scientific conspiracy theories about why human beings must be eliminated ... 'to save humanity'.
If it aint the "Population Bomb" it's "Peak Oil" if it aint Peak Oil it's "Global Warming", if it aint Global Warming it's "Climate Change".
Always these Dooms Day scenarios that require a bunch of soulless nerds to form a dictatorship and to control who lives or dies.
Ergo the fanatical foaming at the mouth, bulging eye insistence that 115,000 abortions per day is in the "interest" of women.
Post a Comment