Undercover Black Man said ...
Their fight is just?What fight?
To murder cartoonists, filmmakers and novelists for insulting their religion?
Or to spread Islam by force of arms?"
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
The Things Plantation Negros Say To Keep A Job ... Ft. UndercoverBlackMan
Undercover Black Man said ...Their fight is just?What fight?
To murder cartoonists, filmmakers and novelists for insulting their religion?
Or to spread Islam by force of arms?"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
34 comments:
"DV", you being so courageous, and Muslim "fundamentalists" being so harmless, let's do a test. You, "DV", do what these Danish newspapers did. In addition, publish your real name and address. And, of course, place a few links to your blog on a few Muslim web sites. Let's see how willing you are in exercising your "off-the-plantation" courage under these circumstances.
Whaaaaaa?
"Michael Fisher" you really need to get back on your medication pops.
You back on that Andrew Cunanan faggot stalker shit.
You pussy ass Plantation Negros talking about a "Global System of White Supremacy" and shit that happened to black people a hundred years ago.
Yet while Arab children are being burned to death with missiles fired from drones... TODAY ... you punk muhfaggas are scared to even ACKNOWLEDGE it.
Why?
Because you are scared some Jews don't like it.
(And quit kissin' up to UBM. He still don't like your ass)
Yo DV... are you familiar with "The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam"?
Are you aware of why Muslim nations created that document, after rejecting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
Yo DV... are you familiar with "The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam"?
UBM.
Nah man. I'm not hip.
I'll look up now.
^ Pay particular attention to Article 10 of the Cairo Declaration.
And Article 18 of the UDHR.
Here's what I've seen so far:
"Predominantly Muslim countries, such as Sudan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, frequently criticized the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for its perceived failure to take into account the cultural and religious context of non-Western countries.
In 1981, the post-revolutionary Iranian representative to the United Nations Said Rajaie-Khorassani articulated the position of his country regarding the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, by saying that the UDHR was "a secular understanding of the Judeo-Christian tradition", which could not be implemented by Muslims without trespassing the Islamic law.[1] "
Here's what I found regarding Article 10 & 18:
"Article 10, which prohibits “any form of compulsion on man in order to convert him to another religion or to atheism.”
*77 The language of this Article resembles that of Article 18(2) of the ICCPR, which provides, “No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief of his choice.”
*78 Where Article 18(2) prohibits compulsion as it relates to basic religious freedoms for minorities, Article 10 of the Cairo Declaration merely prohibits compulsion as it relates to conversion to a religion other than Islam or to atheism. In other words, the Cairo Declaration does little to advance international customary human rights law in the Muslim world."
What am I missing?
DV...
"faggot stalker shit"
Homosexuality still on your mind, "DV"? Can't shake it loose?
Point is, that anti-Semitic shit about "Jews" (as opposed to Zionists) "burning Arab children" has nothing whatsoever to do with so-called "fundamentalist" Muslims coming after folks like Salman Rushdie or the Danish. It's got to do with insanity produced by religious cultist dogma. Fact is, that you are a loud mouth who is too cowardly to put his money where his mouth is. You're scared of them mofos. As you well should be.
Don't just cut & paste, DV. Absorb & analyze.
"DV"...
"What am I missing?"
What you are missing, Mind-Of-A-Gnat, is that the this whole Declaration is subject to Sharia "law". Which not only punishes with death those who make fun of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) or write stuff critical of the Quran, but, which, for example, specifically permits the existence of human slavery as a legal institution.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights specifically outlaws slavery and all that other vile bullshit.
"faggot stalker shit"
Homosexuality still on your mind, "DV"? Can't shake it loose?"
Nah MF.
Just describing your habit of lurking around waiting for something negative to say. Comes off kind of bitchy.
ergo: "faggot stalker".
"Point is, that anti-Semitic shit about "Jews" (as opposed to Zionists) "burning Arab children""MF"
Wow.
Has it come it come to that Michael?
Bald faced lies.
You hate "DV" so much ... that you will manufacture lies.
Judas.
I never said anything about "Jews burning Arab children".
You. Did.
Snitch. Hater. Informer.
You are a snake.
In "Black Militant from Yale" clothing.
"Anti-Semitic"?
LOL.
Even acknowledging the deaths of Muslims is now considered "anti-Semitic".
The Jews got you porch monkey Plantation Negros trained!
Damn.
Say anything remotely critical of Israel and these Jiggaboos fall all over each other to be the first to respond with the ADL Soundbite.
They got you cats on commission?
"We Sick Boss?" Negros will say anything.
That UDHR is a Luciferian, secular assault on traditional moral prerogatives....,
^Oh, ok, "DV". So when you said "Yet while Arab children are being burned to death with missiles fired from drones... TODAY ... you punk muhfaggas are scared to even ACKNOWLEDGE it.
Why?
Because you are scared some Jews don't like it."
You meant to say "Because you are scared some Zionists don't like it." My bad.
As to the rest of your ramblings. "DV", even if your "stalking in order to say something negative" claim were true, what's that got to do with homosexuality? If you think that I act like a female dog, just use the word for that. But no, "DV" got homosexuality on the brain.
Now, if you had something positive to say, that would be one thing, but you've truly degenerated in the last year or so. You've taken on all of the positions the most fervent reactionaries take, you plagiarize, your anti-helalth care for all persons, you're a homophobe (though you protesteh a bit too much, if you get my drift), you praise white racists, you make it look like you know things which you don't, you refuse to read (even about your favorite term "Hegelianism"). And as to "hater"? This coming from a dude who calls any black person who disagrees with him a "Plantation Negro"?
Not to forget that you are impressed with gobbledygook ("Johnathan" etc.) as long as it has big sounding names and some anti-homosexuality sentiment in it.
And let's not forget that you got a big mouth, but you are cowardly hiding behind an anonymous avatar.
Sheeet. As far as that is concerned, even your mentor Josh Farst got more courage than you.
Aight UB.
I've gone back. Observed. & Analyzed.
1) Did a Google Search for: "Article 10 of the Cairo Declaration."
2) 14,400 hits worldwide.
3) Your blog was number 4.
4) Read your piece titled "Human Rights Day".
5) Nearly lost my lunch. Are you serious? Do you get your editorial ideas directly from the ADL website or from the JDL blog?
UB.
You comb through 20 year old obscure meaningless Islamic Proclamations to say what?
What did you find so significant about this clause to dedicate an entire post?
This clause is to serve as evidence that "da Muuuuulzims" plan to take over the world?
LOL.
LOL!
HaHaaahaaaa Haaa Haaaa!!
The funny thing is this:
Were that game played both ways, and one dared submit declarations, proclamations and quotes **attributed to Jews** and Jewish global aspirations ... the same way you submit this obscure paragraph from a 20 year old document and attempt to **attribute it to Muslims** ... UndercoverBLACKman would have an online aneurysm exclaiming his utter disdain! You would dutifully hurl the "anti-Semite" epithetic and immediately go on record forever an enemy of that person.
Did it ever occur to you that the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" ... was the Secular Fundamentalist (Luciferian) equivalent to the Islamic Cairo Declaration?
LOL. Maybe that's too deep for you but ... Negro Don't Front.
If Hollywood were run by Muslims Undercover Black Man would be writing articles quoting The Protocols of Zion.
Admit it.
Just don't even PRETEND to operate on some higher ethical plane of journalistic integrity.
You write, feel and believe whatever you get paid to write, feel and believe.
Truth and justice are about as meaningful to you as is natural organic food.
Listen to your own Elanor Roosevelt audio post again. Listen to her quote of the Koran: ** "Those who can believe, shall believe. Those who cannot believe, won't believe. The only unforgivable sin is to be a hypocrite." **
Don't just read and hear that UB... ABSORB IT.
"So when you said "Yet while Arab children are being burned to death with missiles fired from drones... TODAY ... you punk muhfaggas are scared to even ACKNOWLEDGE it.
Why?
Because you are scared some Jews don't like it."
Does. Not. = "Jews burning Arab children"
You are a Liar "Michael Fisher".
A Snitch.
An Informer.
You want to inform so bad YOU MAKE THINGS UP.
Dude.
You are nothing more than a black slave catcher running after escaped slaves FASTER than the slave owner and his horse.
"DV", I fully understand that you may not have complete command of the English language. However, the phrase as you put it, states that "some" Jews like Arab children being burned to death by drones. Do these persons function in their capacity of "Jews" or in their capacity as "Zionists"? Why say that I am afraid of "Jews" in the first place? Why not claim that I am afraid of Israel? Or claim that I am afraid the US Military?
The problem indeed is, that you are anti-Jewish, period. Not anti-Zionist, but anti-Jewish.
That UDHR is a Luciferian, secular assault on traditional moral prerogatives....,
Wow, Craig.
If that's what you think of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights... how would you describe the Qur'an?
Craig Nulan...
"That UDHR is a Luciferian, secular assault on traditional moral prerogatives....,"
That may or may not be so. However, what would a truly religious (Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, etc.) "Human Rights" declaration look like? I'd hate to see any such declarations based on the pro-slavery, pro-"kill anyone who does not do God's Will", and/or racist-caste-system-advocating holy books.
Mills. Why confine yourself to the Quran? Why not, in addition, question the Bible, and the Torah etc.?
3) Your blog was number 4.
UBM got it goin' on like that, brah. Eyeballs by the hundreds come to my spot every day through Google searches.
I wish you could speak to a Persian Baha'i, Denmark. And hear first-hand about how the fundamentalist Muslim rulers of Iran tolerate other religions.
Mills. Why confine yourself to the Quran?
Because, Fish, out of all the world's religions, only the Muslims objected to the UDHR -- particularly the clauses on freedom of religion and freedom of speech -- on religious grounds.
^ok.
"Because, Fish, out of all the world's religions, only the Muslims objected to the UDHR" UB
silly.
"Religions" can no more "object to the UDHR" than Yoga can object to the UDHR.
There is a concept UB called apostasy.
....ABSORB It.
There are 2 Billion people who consider themselves Christian.
1.4 Billion people who consider themselves Muslim
There are 13 million Jews.
How does a mouse defeat 2 lions?
...
...
He gets them to fight each other.
Hegelian head fakes.
^There it is again.
13 million Jews allegedly manipulating more than half of humanity to fight each other. You love lapping up Nazi ideology? Don't ya, "DV"?
"The problem indeed is, that you are anti-Jewish, period. Not anti-Zionist, but anti-Jewish." MF
See. MF.
It is the lies, fabrications and inventions like ^that^ nonsense above why 75% of the people on this blog voted and agreed you were having a nervous break down.
Your blind hatred of everything "DV" is obviously causing you some mental problems.
You are so desperate to discredit ... you invent and project that which you want to see.
Creating a little Snitchy / Informer / Black Slave Catcher fantasy world.
"Michael Fisher", you say you don't like it here.
But you are here everyday.
The duplicity of your actions speak louder than the lies of your words.
8 Americans lost their lives fighting in Afghanistan today Mike.
Why?
If you loved America. If you loved our soldiers. If you were as loyal to this nation as you are to those whose ass you are attempting to kiss ... you would point out the illegal and unjust nature of this war. You would point out that it was not in the interest of the American people to spend our money and to place our troops in harms way while only agitating people and creating future enemies for our children.
^^Diversion again, "DV". Even if your claim of my supposed "mental problems" were true, the facts speak for themselves. Y.O.U. A.R.E. A.N.T.I. - J.E.W.I.S.H.
^ Now who said that i approve of the war in Afghanistan? Personally, i think they should've killed off the Al Quaida guys while they had them at Tora Bora and be done with it.
Look at these two liberal ideologues (UBM and Fisher) pretending as though they can articulate a defense AGAINST ANOTHER ALL-INCLUSIVE IDEOLOGY???
What are these cats going to do in the face of imperial jihad other than be NONDISCRIMINATORY AND TOLERANT?
Or maybe, these throwbacks will make their unprincipled exception?
These liberal fools think because they've co-opted and hollowed out Christianity in America that they can do the same thing to Islam. But these fools already laid the groundwork for unilateral mass submission with cats like me as collateral damage. Fugg these suicidal liberals!!!
When one tends towards extreme liberalism, i.e., radical autonomy, he is intellectually, ideologically, culturally and spiritually DEFENSELESS. He is left with knuckles, knives and nukes BUT HE WON'T USE THOSE EITHER OUT OF LIBERAL PRINCIPLE and so he is dead man.
I’ve studied Ancient KMT extensively and I’ve never read a single word in their writings which indicates that they possessed a consciousness of racial superiority. In fact that very notion represents the antithesis of their system of ethics—Ma’at.
I have not read “Nuk Au Neter” but I’m certain that it is consistent with the themes Amen has developed in his other books, e.g. —“the ultimate test of any system of beliefs is the practice of its adherents.”
People can claim to believe in anything. Is what they practice, consistent with what they claim to believe? The history of Ancient is proof of their consistency in the practice of Ma’at.
No one claims that their civilization was perfect. It was the dominant society of a specific geographical area for over 2,000 years. The civilization had a certain imperial character, but the society was clearly theocentric.
Of course KMT eventually fell, but its longevity is unmatched in history.
That UDHR is a Luciferian, secular assault on traditional moral prerogatives....,
AHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!
There's no such thing as "Luciferian".
It's just some ignant new-age crap made up by David Livingstone for the purpose of scamming twits out of the price of his books.
There are no "traditional moral perogatives".
Just arbitrary rules for submission made up by predatory people-ranchers to aid in the herding and control of highly suggestible, magical-thinking humanoid sheep.
Interesting.
Post a Comment