Bobby K said ...
Its interesting to see those true to the doctrine of philosophy try to explain what they are seeing in our current administration. Explaining the current administration and congress is quite simple. Read and understand Paul's interactions with those of philosophy starting in Acts 17:16 and his respective warnings in Colossians 2:8.This is not rocket science. Our current president is a believer in the doctrine of Hegel (which is bound in doctrine philosophy), which in turn is the same doctrine used to found Karl Marx theories on communism as well as James Cones theories on liberation theology. What we are experiencing is the implementation of those doctoral theories on a global scale.
Since the late 1960s the United States was forced away from majority rule to minority rule. With this came the complete removal of any and all Christian values from our school systems as well as government areas or organizations. Christian doctrine was replaced with the doctrine of philosophy, which has resulted in the theories of evolution, and personal entitlement which are so common place today.
Our children have grownup without the knowledge of Christian Doctrine and now except the idea that they evolved from the same class as apes. Therefore they have have no knowledge of their connection with their respective tribes of Israel and have no knowledge nor concern of the significance of their historical past, (re: first earth eon 2 peter ch3). They are left with the idea through the doctrine of philosophy that God is manifest in each person as an ideal of self control. That all understanding is bound in science and the scientific method.
Most all of europe and the middle east have fully implemented societies based on the doctrine of philosophy, the only hold out was the United States.
The idea of those of the doctrine of philosophy is to create a one world "globalized" government (state) which has the authority of the rule of law. It is conceivable in their mind that complete peace can be achieved if the entire world is of one government and one religious system. The term was coined one world order in the late 1800s however that has now been changed to globalization. It involves a single government rule from the United Nations, a single religion that folds into it the 4 major religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Taoism), which is proposed and enacted by the inter-religous council, and interfaith organizations which act through the United Nations.
So how does this effect Obama? Quite simple, he studied the Hegelian doctrine and the doctrine of philosophy while in college, His very religion is black theology of liberation (James Cone), which is completely founded in the doctrine of philosophy. Saul Alinsky's tactics, which he applies commonly, are all founded in the doctrine of Hegel as well as the doctrine of Marx. Obama’s own mother was a student of the doctrine of philosophy. Its the doctrine that he grew up on, its what he has been taught and believed in all his life. He has made it the foundation and basis for his very being. This is why he has such difficulty understanding Americans who are still of the doctrine of Christianity. He makes remarks about Christians like “clinging to their guns and religion”, as he attempts to demonize them through the methods of Saul Alinsky.
23 comments:
uh..., DV.
I hope you're at Cedars gettin your dome checked.
Right now.
Apparently you got hit so hard it left you posting double.
http://denmarkvesey.blogspot.com/2009/12/hegelian-head-fake-obama-repeats.html
http://denmarkvesey.blogspot.com/2009/10/hegelian-head-fake-obama-repeats.html
or maybe you just really, really love that picture of those two homely fellaz in bed?
{btw - it's featured so often hereabout, I've gotta ask, is that an intimate portrait of your two favorite peasants Josh and Jonathan boning up on a little lyndon larouche or somethin?}
Actually it's John Malthus boning Richard Dawkins while reading an original and unabridged copy of Grimm's Fairy Tales.
whatever it is nucca,
them pasty peasant perverts stay top of mind at Denmark Vesey....,
LOL. Y'all are funny.
But really tho' what's with the fringers? This dude yearns for the good ol' days in the 1960's when "American values" were good ol' Christian values - like all borderline fringers, he suffers from some serious historical aphasia. Amerikkka has never been good for all people. Not then and not now.
And again in typical borderline fringer fashion, bemoans the erasure of Christian values from the system - yet if one was to suggest the image of Yeshua was a dreaded Black Man fringers & borderliners what wld they say?
Dude has some pseudo understanding of Marx and Hegel based on an American fear of the commies - again typical of fringers. That they have no clue is an established fact but why don't you challenge some of these things DV?
...one
Instead of recognizing plantation peasants for the irredeemable enemies they are, DV pretends he can help these evolutionary throwbacks overcome their disabilities and cakewalk with him into the promised land.
What he fails to realize is that there would be no jes grew without the evolutionary warfare imposed on us by these beasts of burden who don't even comprehend the fact that they themselves have always been somebody else's prey.
DV sleeping and dreaming sweet baby dreams - while CNu stay vigilant wrt the enemy.
Craigee,
We understand why you lie down with males. One, because you fear their autonomy. It is, literally, effing radical. Second, because you worship these heirs to the original radical autonomist. The one who denied the Truth of heterosexuality and embraced the falsity of homosexuality. You simply mimic the same primitive inclination. You even go so far as to reaffirm the radical homosexual's "intellectual" argument for the notion of a human being NOT BEING created at conception. Even a nitwit like you can see the "benefit" of making such a claim.
In short, you're simply the radical homosexual's useful idiot. How far you will take your sycophancy for these most primitive radicals can only be gleaned by the homoerotic words that litter your responses.
Kaaaaay Duuub!
Thank God. A Sista. Excuse me, but between the nerds and the haters, it was gettin' a little dicky up in here ... if you know what I mean.
The spot needed a nice big dose of yin.
"This dude yearns for the good ol' days in the 1960's when "American values" were good ol' Christian values" KW
Ummm. What's wrong with Christian values?
As opposed to what other type of values?
"like all borderline fringers, he suffers from some serious historical aphasia. Amerikkka has never been good for all people. Not then and not now." KW
Which nation has ever been good for all people then or now?
"And again in typical borderline fringer fashion, bemoans the erasure of Christian values from the system" KW
ummm .... Shouldn't that be exactly what a Christian bemoans?
If Gays can bemoan the removal of homosexuals from the military why cannot a Christian bemoan the removal of Christianity from American institutions?
"yet if one was to suggest the image of Yeshua was a dreaded Black Man fringers & borderliners what wld they say?" KW
I don't know. Let's produce that image and find out. I do it quite often.
"Dude has some pseudo understanding of Marx and Hegel based on an American fear of the commies" -
A fear of communism is warranted. Both communism and fascism are the offspring of Freemasonry which aint nothing but organized Luciferianism. A Christian has as much reason to fear communism as a black person has to fear the KKK.
"again typical of fringers. That they have no clue is an established fact but why don't you challenge some of these things DV?" KW
I challenge everybody Kay Duuub. Fringers, nerds, haters and beautiful sistas.
I don't see the Jonathan's and the Thordaddy's and the Bobby K's as any more a threat to black people than I see DMG The Plantation Negro MD as a threat to black people.
These cats aren't helping the Plantation shoot black children up with toxic cancer causing vaccines and sterilizing adjuvants.
I find all that bug-eyed "OH MY GOD HOW CAN I WHITE MAN COME TO A BLACK BLOG" shit kinda punkish.
Konwomyn,
Because your autonomy is maximized by others becoming autonomous then it is hardly surprising that you would have no relation to Americans wishing to preserve America. As an autonomist, creating and preserving are impediments. This is equal to the ideal "sista." She can exists, but not in a radically autonomous manner. But if she can't be radically autonomous, this means she has to embrace the Truth of a "sista." Your autonomy just reeks of alienation.
I find all that bug-eyed "OH MY GOD HOW CAN I WHITE MAN COME TO A BLACK BLOG" shit kinda punkish.
perhaps eventually you'll get an intelligent white cat or two around here in addition to Dorcas Daddy.
even my resident racist troll was an aerospace engineer who manages to keep a civil tongue in his head despite some rather profound differences in our respective world views.
reading the useless idiot scribblings you encourage from trash like the two peasant grease monkey regulars you got here now - is just tedious as hell.
not to mention that you uncritically repping their ignant shit last night got you knocked straight tha phuk out...,
Thordaddy,
The freedom of all people is never a bad thing - it becomes bad for you when it threatens what you believe and hold sacred. For example, on your terms Hawaii cannot be a sovereign state because that would signify the radical deconstruction of the united states as you know them.
The preservation of the states is more important to you than the rights of an indigenous people - by that token you impose your own autonomy on others.
You talk of "Americans wishing to preserve America" but which Americans? And what Americanness do they hope to preserve?
Is an illegal immigrant or a homeless guy part of this vision? What about the stolen territories of America, like Diego Garcia an island whose inhabitants were displaced in the name of "preserving America"?
On the subject of sista; what is Truth? Can we ever imagine Truth in a non-subjective lens when our judgements are always prescribed by the people we are and the social reality prevailing at any given time? That's not alienation; its called contextualisation - a fundamental in any conversation.
by that token you impose your own autonomy on others.
lol..,
that peasant has no autonomy.
he's just an expendable tool serving and mindlessly parroting predatory others who don't - and never have - given two shits about his expendable monkey ass.
Denmark Vesey like a certain 1972 western.
DV like the madam.
I'm like Buck
DMG like the Preacher (sorry brah)
and these two crusty peasants like each one of Cameron Mitchell's ass-cheeks.
{the irony of ironies is that DV has shown himself silly and confused enough to call DMG a "slave-catcher"?!?!?!}
Dang Craigee,
You would never know that your were an Intelligent Design Capitalist with all that whining to DV you do? Radical autonomists can gain CAPITAL by crying, of course!!! And it's all by intelligent design... No... I get it!
Punk!
lol..,
what do you rate your odds of surviving 30 seconds in actual proximity to this "punk" peasant?
Craigee,
How immoral are you?
When it comes to other humans, I'm shiningly upright Farst. God's right-hand man, as it were.
However, as I admitted to the lovely Jasai Madden hereabouts a couple years ago - I'm a stoned apostate when it comes to the virtues of mercy, compassion, sympathy, and forgiveness.
Given your diligent and protracted efforts to offend me and put yourself outside my moral bounds - it should come as no surprise to you that that morality doesn't apply in your case.
Does that answer your question?
Would you be bringing anything other than your fat neck and dried knuckles?
My big rompin-stompin, steel-toed tanker boots Farst.
Got dozens of slave-catching peasant notches marked in the drop plates on those joints.
Adding one for you would be deeply satisfying.
Lol... I'm sure it would. I'm your worst stereotype.
I'm surprised he could even form his mouth to say those words. "Just as admirable . . ." He cannot honestly believe that.
IWAsIW,
Because he pays allegiance to the most primitive of radical autonomists. The homosexual's original foray into social engineering is lauded thousands of years later.
TPTB knew precisely what they were doing when they sat Barack H. Obama on their throne. The Perfect Proxy is a pure political animal--no core ethical beliefs. He will say anything to anybody to achieve his objectives. A Warlock par excellence.
Post a Comment