Monday, August 22, 2011

The Slaves of The Modern Era Will Be Bound Not With Chains But With Pills & Debt (Redux)


Denmark Vesey said ...
After the Emancipation Proclamation, only a handful of freed slaves immediately separated themselves from their former masters. Lacking either the resources or will to be free, the vast majority elected not to leave the security and safety of the plantation.

These partially emancipated slaves (sharecroppers) transitioned to a new economic and political reality, that bound them to the land, made them politically impotent, and kept them in perpetual debt. Stuck in the matrix of a simultaneously adversarial yet completely dependent relationship with the Plantation, these people became the first Plantation Negros.

The Plantation Negro reasoned, at least he could eat, even though he was not free. They were fed a diet designed to keep them alive, while costing the plantation as little as possible. However, early plantation negros were resilient and resourceful. They were able to supplement their diets with organic vegetables and naturally raised animals.

As the summer of the agrarian era evolved into a cold industrial winter, Plantation Negros developed relationships with the Factory. In exchange for safety and security, the Factory ensured the Plantation Negro a home. However, he remained politically impotent and as he was integrated into the culture of consumption, he became increasingly in debt.

Again, the Plantation Negro reasoned even though he was not free, at least he could eat. Tragically, now living in urban areas, the Plantation Negro was not able to supplement his diet by working the earth. The Factory filled this void by manufacturing cheap processed food which destroyed the organs of Plantation Negros and made disease inevitable. Now, added to the cost of housing and food, the Plantation Negro suddenly found himself saddled by something called Health Care costs.

What promised to be the spring of the Digital era witnessed a change in the relationship between the Plantation Negro and the Factory. It became a relationship between the Plantation Negro and the Corporation. In exchange for safety and security, the Plantation Negro was able to get multiple mortgages, credit cards, and school loans so the Plantation could educate his children.

Although he remained politically impotent and in insurmountable debt the Plantation Negro reasoned he could at least get Health Care.

As the bubble of the Digital era pops, the Plantation Negro finds himself wading in the tumultuous waters of economic upheaval, social collapse and an impending tsunami of disease. The Plantation that became the Factory which became the Corporation is now masquerading as the Government.

In exchange for safety and security, the Government provides housing by insuring mortgages, it finances debt and educates children. As an extension of its patronage, the Corpaorate / Government will continue to feed Plantation Negros an increasingly toxic diet of genetically modified food and prescription drugs, that not only makes them sick, but appears to sterilize the Plantation Population as well.

This year the Plantation / Factory / Corporate / Government is introducing a new product. It is called National (Plantation) Health Care. Sadly Plantation Negros think the same people who poisoned them are actually offering an antidote.

KonWomyn said...
Re-reading at the first half of this post there are deep differences between the past revisioned by Denmark Vesey the Blogger and the reality lived by Telemaque "Denmark" Vesey. One would hope you'd have revised this before re-posting. Not only bec the flaws were pointed out by Fish, Sub, Mahndisa and Makheru, but more importantly as homage to and recognition of the life and times of your ideological ancestor.

It's not the 'resourcefulness or resilience' of Black folk that lead them to grow organic food - it was the condition of the times that food was grown naturally. As for the origins of the "Plantation Negro" - has one not always existed prior to the Emancipation Era? Hence the house/field "negro" complex.

Finally, I Black people did not 'suddenly find themselves burdened with Health Care.' I think an historical analysis of Black Health and Uncle Sam would give more intellectual merit to your argument DV. The contradictions of simultaneous health debt/care, racial segregation, brutal denial of treatment as well as subjection to medical experimentation would be worth exploring. At least it would be the starting point of a discussion on health today for African Americans.

Denmark Vesey said ...
"has one not always existed prior to the Emancipation Era? Hence the house/field 'negro' complex.KW


The Plantation Negro has nothing to do with the field negro / house negro cliche oft repeated by those still channeling Malcolm. The Plantation Negro of today is not the historical descendant of his biological ancestors. His history is not a product of his ancestors reality. His history is as refined and processed a product of the Plantation as is his food.

As indicated in the comments, the more imaginative and creative minds on this thread recognized my treatise not as an exercise in historical revisionism, but in memetic deconstruction.

The Plantation Negro is the direct memetic descendant of the sharecropper. He is at war with an enemy he is completely dependent upon. He eats what his enemy feeds him. He teaches his children what his enemy wants him to teach. He injects toxic chemicals into his bloodstream. He has mortgaged his neurological system and his reproductive potential to the Plantation.

Now, invested and dependent upon the plantation, the Plantation Negro eventually defends the memetic interests of the plantation as if his very life depended upon the hegemony and perpetuation of plantation myth. (The Vaccine Myth for example)

There is a legend about Denmark Vesey that suggests he was quite a character during his years in Charleston. I imagine being free wealthy and black in Charleston South Carolina at the turn of the 19th Century would make any man a character. Denmark is remembered to have once chastised a group of black men for shucking and jiving when in the presence of white men.

Denmark Vesey challenged:

"Why do you bow and scrape so when in the presence of these white men?!"

One of the negros responded and then basked in the approving laughter of his companions:

"why we slaves ... aint we!"

Denmark responded:  
"Yes... And you deserve to be".

Now as Denmark Vesey's ideological, spiritual, possibly biological and certainly digital descendant I take that to mean a man deserves what he accepts.

Slavery is 80% Mental. The Plantation Negro meme refers to the voluntary nature of mental slavery. Even among those who pretend to resist on the surface, ultimately choose to be slaves.

The more articulate Plantation Negro expresses this phenomenon by engaging in quixotic, circular and self-defeating conspiracy theories like a Global System of White Supremacy. In an attempt to rationalize the voluntary aspects of his slavery. He pretends he has no choice.

So despite what Fish, Sub, Mahndisa and Makheru say, the fact that some black people left the physical plantation ... 100 years later than others... speaks for itself.

Unless those millions of sharecroppers were really Mexicans.

23 comments:

the good nurse said...

AMEN.

Smile said...

Yeah, aaamen!

submariner said...

For the sake of honesty and thoroughness you should include the pertinent comments of Makheru Bradley and Michael Fisher.

Denmark Vesey said...

Feel free to copy paste and paraphrase .

For the sake of honesty and thoroughness.

makheru bradley said...

Doc, what we have here is a clear case of cognitive dissonance.

[if someone is called upon to learn something which contradicts what they already think they know —particularly if they are committed to that prior knowledge —they are likely to resist the new learning.]

submariner said...

Amen to that, Makheru! One of the more curious phenomena encountered in medical practice is the stroke victim with neglect of one side of their body or a visual defect in which they can see only half of an object. In this case our host is quite capable of bringing forth select comments from the previous posts but curiously reluctant or unable to bring up your cogent appraisal.

Conservative Black Woman said...

Brilliant!!!!! I've gotta copy and paste for my blog.

KonWomyn said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
KonWomyn said...

Re-reading at the first half of this post there are deep differences between the past revisioned by Denmark Vesey the Blogger and the reality lived by Telemaque "Denmark" Vesey. One would hope you'd have revised this before re-posting. Not only bec the flaws were pointed out by Fish, Sub, Mahndisa and Makheru, but more importantly as homage to and recognition of the life and times of your ideological ancestor.

It's not the 'resourcefulness or resilience' of Black folk that lead them to grow organic food - it was the condition of the times that food was grown naturally. As for the origins of the "Plantation Negro" - has one not always existed prior to the Emancipation Era? Hence the house/field "negro" complex.

Finally, I Black people did not 'suddenly find themselves burdened with Health Care.' I think an historical analysis of Black Health and Uncle Sam would give more intellectual merit to your argument DV. The contradictions of simultaneous health debt/care, racial segregation, brutal denial of treatment as well as subjection to medical experimentation would be worth exploring. At least it would be the starting point of a discussion on health today for African Americans.

...one

Michael Fisher said...

^Dang...

submariner said...

Second that, Michael. You see Good Nurse, KonWomyn has brilliantly demonstrated the best use of history: not merely to provide facile analogies and promote advocacy in the form of cliche but to think more deeply and introduce complexity in ostensibly easy decisions.

KonWomyn did not merely accept the likenesses of the plantation reference to the present but also noted the distinctions and inserted even more considerations - "contradictions of simultaneous health debt/care, racial segregation, brutal denial of treatment as well as subjection to medical experimentation" - into the discussion. The result is that one may very well choose to reject a national health insurance program but that shouldn't be an arthroscopically reconstructed knee-jerk reaction like our forum's host but should be a thorough and prolonge deliberation which examines the underbelly of the carapace.

Thordaddy said...

This dood DV...
Disembowel his intellectual enemies!!!
Slice'm open
Pull they guts out fo' all 2C!!!
Corroded and clogged
With decades worth of smelly feces...
This dood found a new species...
"the plantation negro..."
Don't have no capital
But lika infection, he sure do grow!!!
A phenomenon particular tuh black America
TD let white folk n on tha know
This everybit 'bout
White man being controlled!!!
Burden with insatiable responsibility... 
These plantation negros
Part jay z, part hillbilly...
This game silly!!!
Got white folks turned out
Call'm uh racist
All they do is pout
Don't call uh nigel out!!!
Ask what he got against supremacy???
Watch'm shuck and jive
Realizin' he all 'bout plantation dependency!!!
He defend tha indefensible indefensively...
Tremblin'
This dood recognize he attemptin' 2 assert his supremacy!!!
He free like that
But he real scared of clemency...
C he real scared of prophecy...
He real scared of industry...
Real scared of biology
Forged with spirituality...
He fake tha front
Miss the dunk
And look lika punk!!!
Unwillin' tuh stand on his own two feet!!!
This particular creature
Waitin' tuh eat...
Waitin' tuh meet
Tha maker he don't even believe in...
This nigel on tha plantation
Workin' hard to enlarge his kin...
This plantation nigel embroiled n sin...
Boilin' with revenge!!!
He look fo' his edge
He make uh hedge
White man ready fo' tha sledge...
Nah, plantation nigel
This white boy ready t'fight tuh tha death... 

Thordaddy said...

This dood DV...
Disembowel his intellectual enemy!
while I diss my bowel all ova
Denmark Vesey.

See?

I'mma farting pup
DV's lappin' it up
I diss that Nigel
and he loves...

Me?

ROFLMWAO

Hey DV, who's your Daddee?

Thordaddy said...

First Law of Mental Slavery:
Must... include... Everybody!!!
Second Law:
Must deny supremacy!!!
Use any and all tactics
However unsavory...
Defeat the enemy
This lesson 101
Radical Autonomy!!!
See exhibit A:  Mike Fisher
Impersonatin' TD
Kinda wishin' he b me
Kinda wishin' he kill me
Cuz I free
Represent white supremacy...
He denies exists
'Cept as hegemony...
This system all pervasive
'Cept fo' mike fisher
He b evasive???
Escape tha oppression...
'Stead got otha nigels
Makin' concessions
TO AN ALL POWERFUL WHITE MAN
Y mikey collectin' commissions...

Thordaddy said...

Ole Mike Fisher
The black man WHO ain't black
But still lika Swisher???
Preacha' global system white supremacy
WHICH HE DON'T BELIEVE
Bcuz he believe n
Radical autonomy!!!
This means all them suckas
Live n Fish's periphery...
Unda tha spell of white supremacy
Yet this phenomenon
DOES NOT exist individually...
This a facet of mike's theory???
I have a query???
Does white supremacy exist
Or is it illusory???
An absolutely irrational mental cofabulation...
Still
Powerful
Enough
Tuh keepa nigel on tha plantation???

Mikey???????

dx said...

TD is school..........

Anonymous said...

Dv, you know you are going to upset those house negros with this.







stayinginformed

KonWomyn said...

Hey DV,
Ok I hear ya, but again Young Veezey your treatise is problematic. You speak of the origin of the “Plantation Negro” in metaphorical terms but by locating its premise in history; it becomes the subject of scrutiny. As a result, one evaluates the historical legitimacy of its suppositions, as is the order of things in the School of DV – no? So armed with knowledge as DV of the School of DV, why then does Denmark channelling Telemaque not consider the full context in which Lincoln proclaimed Emancipation? It was a war strategy (here, I’d imagine, Telemaque would channel his thoughts to his ideological digital young’un), it gave freedom to the enslaved but slavery was not illegal, meaning for a few more years till the 13th Amendment; the slave owners were not legally bound to grant freedom.

I’d like to imagine Denmark channelling the fierceness of Telemaque Vesey would note that it was only those under the Confederate States to whom the proclamation applied and to as evidence of Veseyean critical thinking as you are possibly kin, your cyber ancestor might guide you through the web to construct an analysis of what Emancipation for the Confederate States might mean for those enslaved under the Union. And in constructing your Veseyean analogy of the Plantation Negro of Confederate 1862/2009, y’all could think about who is ideologically descendent from those still enslaved under the Union in 2009?

And in terms of plantation owner/slave relations in Confederate States you might also consider what this wholesale freedom-on-paper might give rise to in reality – a Cracker Supremacy that was a brutally oppositional force to this, for example the rise of the KKK in 1865 in Tennessee by a bunch of veterans who’d fought under the Confederate Flag (!) DV, you my boy and all but c’mon Bra, your historical treatise is historically deficient and malnourished; feed it some facts please.

You argue that the Plantation Negro’s, “history is not a product of his ancestors’ reality. His history is as refined and processed a product of the Plantation as is his food.” But how is he not a product of that ancestral reality yet by your standards those who remained enslaved were “lacking either the resources or will to be free, the vast majority elected not to leave the security and safety of the plantation” So would the sheeple of today not be following in the footsteps of what you imagine to be their ancestors reality? Methinks this is a serious contradiction in your theory.

I don’t take issue with some of what you say of present-day Plantation folks, I feel you Bra, but it’s this faulty historical treatise of yours I just can’t get down with.

Do you know why people left the Plantation “100 years later”? It had little or nothing to do with choice and a lot to do with power; White power over Black labour. Without power you lack choice; and I know you know acquiring power is never a simple process especially under conditions of violent oppression. Maybe you won’t admit it in this case is because it would mean admitting an almost fatal error in your theory of the origin of the “Plantation Negros” and their descendants.

You may feel Malcolm X’s analogy is cliché and seemingly ‘old’ – but that doesn’t diminish its validity and it continues to function as a rhetorical device because it is relevant and is to use Veseyan lingo, memetic truth. What has given it its staying power is also the imaginative ways in which many have re-appropriated the term through the decades.

IMO for Denmark Vesey's concept; as an implicit riff off of house/field, Matrix/Unplugged binaries; needs to revise it's historical groundings if it is to be treated as an intellectually insightful lens by which to critique the dynamics of the Plantation and its Black agents, inhabitants and rebels through the Ages to present day.

...one

KonWomyn said...

Hey Sub
Thanks for that, much appreciated. I think some people who read this re-post read the passion with which he wrote and maybe upon reflection wld think differently.

You're right tho'. A critical exhumation past is of little use to us if it does not critcally illuminate the present and if our exhumation is selective or our understanding of that which is exhumed is flawed then it is of very limited use, at best.

It needs critical revision if its to serve as a deconstruction of the Plantation's construction of the 'Plantation Negro' and dependence/exclusion on the Health System. A for-profit system that many folks for lack of economic power hence lack of choice (does not automatically mean they're willing slaves) have no option but to depend or in some cases be excluded from.

peace

Thordaddy said...

Konwomyn...
The individual black 
N uh state of mental slavery
Howzee REALLY tied to sum history???
Is it genetically...
Or is it spiritually???
Can he sever it???
Or does it exist eternally???
Yur rebuttal suggests
It's perpetual...
Unyielding
It wields inexplicable power
Think about it...
U r contolled by the last hour
It tells u things 
Up there frum that ivory tower
These things b so actionable
Says yur kin suffered so much
My kids b responsible...
Must pay with they lives
Become invisible
This is risible
Rubba redneck wrong
This is divisible...
God fearing white boy here
Black autonomist feminist n tha spotty...
I seek home and truth
U seek inclusion and equality...

How u attempt to get there is the real story, in the present, making history. 
 

KonWomyn said...

Thordaddy,

No I am not suggesting your children are responsible for the past, but have as great a duty to recognize the past as my children do because its a collective, shared history.

In questioning DV's analysis of the past to present day, I am by no means not suggesting that the contemporary economic and political Matrix singularly operates in term of race. In some cases poverty or police brutality or imprisonment disproportionately affects Blacks and Latinos.

However understand that this is not chiefly about race; pitting Black v White as Slave v Massa is no longer the functional binary of capitalism; its now a multiplexed continually shifting binary that is not always operant on racial difference. It is always operant on power; those with power versus the powerless. It is always People v The State; for example the unconstituted citizen - the illegal immigrant or the homeless as one without rights versus the State which simultaneously ensures and polices the rights of those who live above the poverty line or those who by violent history or economic migration have now naturalised citizenship and can claim health insurance as token of belonging to the State.

The system that profits from the powerlessness of the collective will do all it can to ensure the powerless remain so and if race, class, gender, sexuality or nationality are the means by which to do it, then so be it. You only have to look at how the Orwellian State continually polices and limits the civil liberties of the indivdiual to know that sheeple control is indiscriminate.

peace

Anonymous said...

IT IS SELF EVIDENT THE "SYSTEM" ARE "WHITE MEN"

THE "SYSTEM" IS NOT FACELESS

HaitianChick said...

I couldn't read this passage because the word "slave" kept blinding me. Attention black people, the term "slave" to describe a human being is both academically and socially unacceptable How can a human being be a "slave."

Black people were not slaves. We were enslaved. White people were not "masters" they were plantation owners. You cannot own another human being nor can you identify them as anything but a human being.

On that note, can you please make these necessary corrections in your post DV? I will then be able to read it.

Thanks!

HC