fist tap Intellectual InsurgentChemicals used in plastics feminize the brains of little boys 'so that they avoid rough and tumble games' and behave like little girls.
By David Derbyshire
DailyMail
Chemicals used in plastics are 'feminising' the brains of baby boys, a disturbing study shows.
Those exposed to high doses in the womb are less likely to play with 'male' toys such as cars. They are also less willing to join 'rough and tumble' games.
The research adds to growing evidence that hormone-disrupting chemicals in thousands of household-products are interfering with the development of children.
Environmental campaigners called the study 'extremely worrying' and called for a crackdown.
The study looked at phthalates, chemicals which can mimic the female sex hormone estrogen.
Some experts believe they are partly to blame for the increase in genital defects in boys and lower sperm counts in men over recent decades.
But the new research is the first to link hormone-mimicking chemicals to behaviour.
There are fears of further effects as the young children in the study grow up.
Although the plastics industry insists phthalates are safe, the EU has banned many of them from cosmetics, teething rings and children's toys.
But pregnant women are still exposed to phthalates, which are used to soften plastics in household items such as plastic furniture, shoes, PVC flooring and shower curtains.
They can also be transferred to food and drink from plastic packaging. The new study, published in the International Journal of Andrology, was led by Dr Shanna Swan, professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at the University of Rochester in New York State.
Her team tested urine samples from mothers in the 28th week of pregnancy for traces of phthalates.
The women, who gave birth to 74 boys and 71 girls, were contacted again when their children were aged four to seven and asked about the toys the youngsters played with, the activities they liked and their personalities.
The researchers found that higher concentrations of two types of common phthalate - DEHP and DBP - were strongly linked with more feminine play in the boys but had no impact on girls.
The higher-phthalate boys were less likely than other boys to play with cars, trains and guns or engage in rough-and-tumble games such as playfighting.
21 comments:
Please tell me you do not believe this. If a boy is effeminate it is because of either a dominate woman and a weak man or a parent failing to make sure that their child understand the difference between the sexes. All boys are not rough and tuft. Some are more creative.
I believe that God is more powerful than substances and ballet classes. A boy wanting to do ballet doesn't mean he is feminine. Isn't that a social construct? Like all boys should be in blue?
chemicals can not only change the sexuality of organism, chemicals can change the actual sex of an organism.
Now, if that is the case, why is it difficult to believe the right combinations of chemicals can make boys more prone to behavior most often associated with girls?
And hey. Some social constructs are right on the money.
In 1860, Pierre Berthelot first created synthetic ethanol. This substance was marketed as being just as good as the real thing, a claim which tended to obscure the fact that it was the real thing, in every respect.
Chemical engineering soon began to create chemicals which did not occur in nature. In many cases, these synthetic chemicals were used as substitutes for naturally-occurring chemicals, often being superior for the application, or at least cheaper. Thus Novocain™ replaced cocaine in medicine, bakelite was used instead of glass or ceramics, and nylon replaced silk.
Africa
Though often ignored or suppressed by European explorers and colonialists, homosexual expression in native Africa was also present and took a variety of forms. Anthropologists Stephen Murray and Will Roscoe reported that women in Lesotho engaged in socially sanctioned "long term, erotic relationships" called motsoalle.[127] E. E. Evans-Pritchard also recorded that male Azande warriors in the northern Congo routinely took on young male lovers between the ages of twelve and twenty, who helped with household tasks and participated in intercrural sex with their older husbands. The practice had died out by the early 20th century, after Europeans had gained control of African countries, but was recounted to Evans-Pritchard by the elders to whom he spoke.[128]
The first recorded homosexual couple in history is commonly regarded as Khnumhotep and Niankhkhnum, an Egyptian male couple, who lived around the 2400 BCE. The pair are portrayed in a nose-kissing position, the most intimate pose in Egyptian art, surrounded by what appear to be their heirs.
Homosexual Historical Revisionism
The relevance of the existence and historical expression of homosexuality only serves to evidence an inherent homosexual nature. This nature has manifested as political liberalism and spiritually, radical autonomy. The tactics of nondiscrimination and tolerance (liberal first principles) simply serve as the offensive and defensive weapons of radical autonomy, i.e., the homosexual nature.
It's self-evident that any collective, system or institution that adopts the homosexual=radical autonomy=liberal first principles will perish.
First BPA and the side effects and now this?
Leave it to Thordaddy to bring rigor and precision into the discussion.
Yeah Black John. But don't think for a moment the list stops there.
The Plantation has Plantation Negros & Plantation Crackas believing 40% of cats just pop out the womb craving penis.
UBJ,
Evolutionary theory has a major flaw. It can be manipulated. Homosexuals recogized a more primitive type of biological manipulation, i.e., a primitive eugenics of which they LIVED as guinea pigs in a radical experiment to seek total detachment... Radical autonomy... The ability to do anything at any time AND then DIE... This is the orthodoxy that we live within.
Individuals like CNu pay allegiance to homosexuals because he recognizes their invaluable contribution to the origins of eugenics. Eugenics representing an articulated manifestation of radical autonomy. Radical autonomists both assert and deny in order to maximize their autonomy. So a cat like CNu asserts the freedom to do as he pleases in this godless world, but you are nothing but an error-proned machine.
This desire for radical autonomy is rooted in the nature of homosexuality.
Biological transformation + spiritual isolation = radical autonomization...
@TD
took me a min...but i got the gist
TD is school
"The relevance of the existence and historical expression of homosexuality only serves to evidence an inherent homosexual nature." Now I undersand why you and DV are so obsessed with this subject.
When you understand why you wish to pretend the homosexualization of certain groups is not an issue ... let us know.
Subhumanist,
It is in the nature of the radical autonomist to deny both the influence of homosexuality and also attempt to straddle it's opposition with its perverted nature.
I believe every human being has a feminine and masculine side, obviously one is predominant over the other and should be naturally. But, when society & culture influence in someone's mind through sexual subliminal advertising (brainwashing), can you really call that natural?
Chemical substances can feck you up in every way, it does not surprise me at all.
Thordaddy and the solution to all of this is?
Embrace Truth... Reject false ideas like extreme liberalism, radical autonomy, absolute free will.
Embrace Truth... Reject false ideas like extreme liberalism, radical autonomy, absolute free will
smile-)
The first recorded homosexual couple in history is commonly regarded as Khnumhotep and Niankhkhnum, an Egyptian male couple, who lived around the 2400 BCE. -- Casper
Casper makes this statement as if he’s referring to J. Edgar Hoover and Clyde Tolson, when in reality he has no historical evidence to prove his statement.
I have no proof that homosexuality did or did not exist in Ancient KMT, and as far as I’m concerned it does not matter. Was it a major feature of Kemetic culture, as it was in Ancient Greece? Absolutely not! Clearly the architects of Kemetic spirituality identified the practice of homosexuality as undesirable which is indicated by their declarations of virtue.
The 27th of the “42 Confessions of Innocence” states: “Hail Maat, I have not done iniquity, neither have I lain with man.”
I am concerned with historical accuracy, because the character of Afrikan people is always under assault. In that context Casper is running the Greg Reeder line on this issue which is both a gross demonstration of fragmentation and a gross misunderstanding of the complexities of KMT culture.
First of all as regards the Reeder line, Professor John Baines points out, "The gay-couple idea is essentially derived from imposing modern preoccupations on ancient materials and not attending to the cultural context."
As regards fragmentation and understanding Kemetic culture Alan Winston points out: “However, others have speculated as to their relationship, even suggesting that they may have been gay companions, though this hardly seems likely given the depictions of their wives and family within the tomb.”
The fragmentizers and those with ulterior politico-cultural objectives conveniently ignore or dismiss the family scenes inside the burial tomb.
For the record Niankhkhnum and his wife Khentkaus had three sons and three daughters.
Khnumhotep and his wife Khenut had five sons and one daughter.
Alan Winston identifies some of the other scenes inside the tomb:
[On the north wall, the brothers are shown once again in a scene that argues against the two men having an alternate relationship. Here, we find Khnumhotep and a boy describes as his son, Ptahshepses on the right, and on the left, Niankhkhnum with his son.
On the inner lintel the owners are shown with men bringing cattle for their inspection. The wall on the left-hand side of the doorway (east) shows Khnumhotep with his wife, Khenut, who was 'Prophetess of Hathor, Mistress of the Sycamore'. On the right (west) Niankhkhnum is seen with his wife Khentkaus, of the same title. On the south wall we also find a depiction of the deceased standing with their sons.]
Casper if you think that you can refute any of this, have at it.
Post a Comment