Plantation Negro Deconstruction 706 - The Edification of A Negro MD Continues (Watch This Film. It Can Save Your Life)

Deconstructing The Myth Of AIDS (Gary Null)
2:09:49 - 2 years ago
In 1984 we were told that HIV was the cause of AIDS. In his provocative documentary film, “Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS,” Gary Null, Ph.D., challenges virtually every statement ever made by the American medical industrial complex on the virus - including those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute for Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). While presenting the findings of Nobel Prize-winning scientists and leading virologists, the film exposes the political maneuvering, conspiracies and cover-ups that have provided obstacles to the study of this human catastrophe from the start. While presenting the findings of Nobel Prize-winning scientists and leading virologists, the film exposes the political maneuvering, conspiracies and cover-ups that have provided obstacles to the study of this human catastrophe from the start. For example, there are experts who believe that AIDS is the result of multiple factors, including drug use, stress and nutritional deficiency, but that government agencies made a politically strategic decision to de-emphasize these hypotheses and thus discourage certain researchers and their funding. Meanwhile, AZT, an infamously failed treatment for cancer, and now the primary FDA-approved approach to treating AIDS, is highly toxic and can produce the very symptoms of the illness it is prescribed to treat. “Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS” goes beyond medicine and science to question the very foundation of our reliance on government bureaucracies [The Plantation] where it concerns matters of life and death.
DMG said...
"NOBEL PRIZE IN CHEMISTRY winner Kary B. Mullis"

Funny you should mention Kary Mullis. I met that cat.

Without Googling, do you know how he won his Nobel Prize?

Wanna guess what he spent his Nobel Prize winnings on...and the last time he actually published a paper?

Denmark Vesey said ...

Actually nah Doc. Don't know how Kary B. Mullis won his Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Don't know what he spent his prize money on nor do I know the last time he "published a paper".

I don't know what he had for dinner last Tuesday either. Because it doesn't matter. It has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

That's the problem with your Plantation cats. You NEED AUTHORITY to tell you what to think. You depend on sanctioned "experts" and published "peer approved" thought.

So ... Doc ... I am actually interested in what YOU THINK about the INFORMATION presented here. Not the people who delivered the information. Are you capable of telling us what YOU think? Not your HMO. Not your "peers". Not the pharmaceutical companies who ultimately pay your salary ... but YOU. Based on the information presented here, based on the debunking of Dr. Gallo's fraudulent research, do YOU still believe HIV is the virus that causes AIDS?"

Michael Fisher said...
DMG, I have to disagree with you on this one.

Actually Duesberg is an expert on retroviruses of which HIV is one. The problem with AIDS is that the definition of the disease has constantly evolved as circumstances required. The definition of AIDS today ain't what it was 25 years or even 10 years ago.

Basically it's like this: If one has, let's say pneumonia and HIV anti-bodies are present then its AIDS. If one has pneumonia and HIV anti-bodies are absent the one has pneumonia.

Beyond that, the whole thing about AIDS in Africa is highly suspect. Supposedly AIDS caused by HIV is mainly a heterosexual disease over there. Pretty much from inception. Supposedly it was passed from prostitutes to African men who, in turn gave it to their wives. Now it is EXTREMELY difficult for a woman to pass the virus on to a man. On the average it takes dozens and dozens of intercourse activity for a man to get the virus from a woman.

Now how is this supposed to work out mathematically?

Either these millions of men went mostly all screwed the same prostitutes, and dozens of times at that, or these men's wives liberally screwed other men besides their husbands. Dozens of times. Repeatedly. Many, many times.

Thing is, most African cultures frown upon women and extra-marital intercourse.

What is much more likely is that these people are victims of severe poverty, malnutrition, and, above all, environmental poisoning.

Unclean water, industrial waste, agricultural waste, unsafe and expired medications, etc. are much more likely than to stipulate that Africans basically "fuck too much". Which, of course, is the usual racist notion.