Iranian Missile Test, 2008Many major newspapers ran this image, released by Sepah News, a media outlet associated with Iran's Revolutionary Guard, that shows the test firing of a Shahab-3 missile. The high-speed ballistic missile was said to be capable of traveling 2,000 km, thereby putting Iran within striking range of Israel.
The Original Image
In order to conceal that the second missile from the right had not fired, somewhere in the editorial process it was decided that it would be better to paste a successful launch in its place.
2 comments:
Someone has to stand up to these Zionist thugs.
How aggressive can Obama be in insisting to the Israelis that a military strike might be in America’s worst interest?—Daily Beast
We are not exactly impotent little babies. They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?—Zbig
What if they fly over anyway?--DB
Well, we have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a Liberty in reverse.—Zbig
I’m sure that AIPAC has already demanded that President Obama denounce these remarks by Brzezinski, and I’m sure that he will publically disagree with Zbig’s suggestion, just as he disagreed with Jimmy Carter assessment of racism being the catalyst for attacks on the POTUS.
However, Zbig is absolutely on target. The repercussions of an Israeli attack on Iran would be an international disaster as Russian President Dmitry Medvedev noted.
"This is the worst thing that one can imagine. What would happen afterwards? A humanitarian catastrophe, a huge number of refugees. And Iran would want revenge, and not only over Israel, but over other countries as well. The events in the region would become completely unpredictable. I think the scope of such a disaster would not be comparable to anything. Therefore, before taking the decision to launch any attacks, you need to think the situation through. It would be the most irrational way to deal with the situation.”
All of that, plus a stratospheric increase in the price of crude oil which would clearly send the “jobless” economic recovery in America and the global economy into a depression.
Unfortunately irrationality is the trademark of Zionism; therefore it is critical that Obama have the testicular fortitude to make it crystal clear that he will do exactly what Brzezinski proposes.
Good stuff Mak B.
However, the pretense that Obama is in ... opposition ... to the Zionists needs to be abandoned.
Obama is a hostage of the Zionists.
(Even calling the entity that holds Obama and this nation Zionist is participation in an intentional subterfuge. Zionism is yet another Trojan Horse)
Post a Comment