fist tap Constructive Feedback
Archonis MSNBC Edits around the fact the cat carrying gun was black. Why? Why did they want America to perceive the resistance to National Health Care and a totalitarian government operating outside the constitution was a White v. Black issue?
This SOROS PROPAGANDA WOULD MAKE GOEBELLS SMILE! Contact ALL OF MSNBC's SPONSORS AND BOYCOTT THEM.
I am so tired of these idiots playing the race card. I was taught you can't feel racism unless you allow yourself to. I think bringing a gun is stupid but they do it to make a statement of right to bare arms. It has nothing to do with race. This is exactly why I don't watch msnbc they are muckrakers.
Fuck you. White liberal racist bitch. Or Non White 3rd world liberal racist bitch.
This is a despicable new low for Msnbc. They talk about racial overtones and "white people showing up with guns". Yet they edit the video to conceal the man with the AR15's face so you can't tell that he is Afro-American. Then they have the nerve to call him a racist white man. These people are not journalists. They are whores with no honor.
9 comments:
Per the conversation we had this week:
CNu said:
"BT brings the applicable reading;
What is being missed here, is several Laws which have to do with the President. The first is – wherever the President is, is Federal Land temporarily during his presence. This is done such that the Federal Protective Services and the Secret Service have jurisdiction, and the authority to operate in the State. It also gives them precedence over State authorities in a protective zone around the President.
As such, the applicable law here is Federal… Not State.
The Secret Service is perfectly within the Law to arrest and lock up the bozos, and try them for violations of Federal Law."
White House Backs Right to Arms Outside Obama Events
But Some Fear Health Talks Will Spark Violence
"Armed men seen mixing with protesters outside recent events held by President Obama acted within the law, the White House said Tuesday, attempting to allay fears of a security threat.
Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, said people are entitled to carry weapons outside such events if local laws allow it. "There are laws that govern firearms that are done state or locally," he said. "Those laws don't change when the president comes to your state or locality."
Anti-gun campaigners disagreed with Gibbs's comments, voicing fears that volatile debates over health-care reform are more likely to turn violent if gun control is not enforced.
"What Gibbs said is wrong," said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "Individuals carrying loaded weapons at these events require constant attention from police and Secret Service officers. It's crazy to bring a gun to these events. It endangers everybody."
...
Ed Donovan, a spokesman for the Secret Service, said incidents of firearms being carried outside presidential events are a "relatively new phenomenon." But he said the president's safety is not being jeopardized.
"We're well aware of the subjects that are showing up at these events with firearms," he said. "We work closely with local law enforcement to make sure that their very strict laws on gun permits are administered. These people weren't ticketed for events and wouldn't have been allowed inside and weren't in a position outside to offer a threat." The immediate area occupied by Obama on such trips is considered a federal site where weapons are not permitted, Donovan said."
We've got some conflicting statements here. Is Gibbs wrong?
Gibbs is wrong and the administration has lost all semblance of the baseline testicular fortitude appropriate to (required of) the office.
FAIL
damn similar to God's Son backpeddling on the obvious false arrest of skip gates a month or so ago, and earlier, during the campaign, opting for a Bobby Kennedy tactic of spineless accomodation instead of an MLK call to moral confrontation
By painting all the patriotic strapped protesters as "racist KKK gun nuts," it's much easier to discredit them.
When facts don't conveniently fit this mold, it is easier to omit those facts than to change the mold.
PHUCK THE JEWISH MEDIA!
DV:
You have to admit that this video edit is some "Greg Palast/KCNulan" level of propagandist skulduggery.
In the studio they SPECIFICALLY focus on WHITE RACISTS. How could they ever show the face of a Black man with a gun IF doing so took away their argument so dramatically.
Black Man With A Gun
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/412K2A44NKL._SL500_AA240_.jpg
This has been a problem from the days of Bishop Henry McNeal Turner through to Robert Williams
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Williams
I'm not sure I follow Gray.
Are you arguing the particulars of jurisdiction and statutory law ... or the larger implications and symbolism of the protest?
I'm not particularly interested in the Fed v State jurisdictional squabbles.
I'm more interested in the Constitutional implications of a government poised to submit Americans to mandatory vaccinations, unlawful searches and seizures and routinely detains people indefinitely without charges or probable cause.
At a time when the government has been funneling black people towards For-Profit Prisons like the Pied Piper, I respect a cat reminding Americans we are citizens and not subjects.
You have to admit that this video edit is some "Greg Palast/KCNulan" level of propagandist skulduggery.
How do you get your thong pulled so far up your backside over an MSNBC edit of this video, when the raw video feed has been in circulation online for days?
Do you GOP porche monkays get a stipend for parroting idiotic tit-for-tat talking points as if they were substantive, much as kneegrow with an AR-15 received a stipend for his signification in that carefully staged viper militia event?
the battle for memetic supremacy will be won by quality, not quantity and repitition....,
KCNulan:
I documented this video just for you.
http://www.viddler.com/explore/ConstructiveFee/videos/603/
Can we inspect your argument a bit?
You seek to "Put ME on trial" as to why I bothered pointing out MSNBCs FRAUDULENT attempt at engineering the news. Using the "this is OLD NEWS" blow off.
Yet most logical people would be PUTTING MSNBC ON TRIAL. They would ask "IF MSNBC KNEW THAT THE RAW VIDEO WAS ON THE WEB READY FOR ACCESS BY ALL.......WHY WOULD THEY BE SO STUPID to run the doctored clip as a means of making the case that WHITE RACISTS WHO HATE OBAMA ARE TAKING GUNS TO THE RALLIES"?
One must ask you seriously KCNulan - FROM WHO'S PERSPECTIVE DO YOU SPEAK?
Clearly you are not speaking from the perspective of a man who SEEKS TO ENFORCE INTEGRITY ON ALL SIDES.
It makes me wonder - If MSNBC is so fraudulent with their RACISM ENGINEERING as shown here.....what other engineering of racism are they doing?
You are too sold out to be intellectually curious as such.
Yet most logical people
you realize this disqualifies you?
Mr.
ALL
CAPS
MSNBC
CONSPIRACY
THEORIZING
porche monkay....,
You are too sold out to be intellectually curious as such
ok curious ronald...,
whatever
you
say.
all it's lacking is a spark.....,
Post a Comment