DMG said...
Your point
again is what?
Denmark Vesey said...
1) You are ignorant of synthetic viruses.
2) You are unwilling to acknowledge the implications of the man-made nature of the H1N1 virus and the subsequently manufactured pandemic because to do so would beg the questions:
a) WHO ENGINEERED IT?
b) WHY DID THEY ENGINEER IT?
3) Even addressing issues of this nature is anathema to an establishment physician because to do so reveals the completely compromised nature of orthodox corporate medical doctors.
4) You cannot take a position not predetermined by the epistemological cartel which employs you. Your opinion is not your own. It belongs to the institutional conglomerate which provides you accreditation and employment. You are not your own man. Your opinion & position belongs to the Plantation. Egro: Plantation Negro.
5) Little of what you have to say regarding vaccines and health care in general can be taken seriously because you are simply an agent, regurgitating the official position of a medical cartel that has virtually declared war on humanity and black people in particular.
19 comments:
Your point again is what?
Come awn, Icke's little negro step chirren...., cut to the chase already and propose something actionable for all the folks you been tryin to stir up!!!
Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety
I (Physician's name, degree)_________________________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of ________________. My State license number is _______________ , and my DEA number is _______________. My medical specialty is ________________________
I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient's name) ___________________________ , age _________ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
Risk Factor ____________________________________________
Vaccination ___________________________________________
I am aware that vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:
* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sorbitol
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood
and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosol causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.
I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)
I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient's name) _______________ _______________________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as "fetuses").
In order to protect my patient's well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.
STEPS TAKEN: ______________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.
The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, -- "Physician's Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety." (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)
The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, -- "Scientific Articles in Support of Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety."
The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, -- "Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician's Opinion of Vaccine Safety"
The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, -- "Physician's Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions."
Hepatitis B
I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.
I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.
I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, "Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors" I am issuing this Physician's Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient's name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
__________________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
__________________________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _______________________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public:
Meant to say "pink salt" vegan negro stepchirren.....,
http://www.davidicke.com/content/blogcategory/30/48/
Damn, Icke is a BEAST!!!
No comment DMG?
Damn ....
Icke is a Beast!
And CNu is like a sprained ankle - Nuttin' To Play Wit!
Good shit Bra.
Damnnnnnn
I saw that on David Icke's site a few days ago. I wonder how many doctors will actually sign that before they tell you to take a hike.
It makes no difference to me if you take the vaccine or not. It isn't worth my time to convince you, or to sign whatever it is that "Mr. Snakepeople" is paranoid about now. So again, feel free to puff your chest out with the "chin dribble" of conspiracy theorists or get a vaccine that might save your life. Your choice. Makes absolutely NO difference to me.
Oh, sorry MOTI...I didn't see your answer to my original question.
1) You are ignorant of synthetic viruses.
NO, I ACTUALLY KNOW QUITE A BIT ABOUT THE SUBJECT. I'M JUST NOT ASSUMING THAT H1N1 IS SYNTHETIC, AS YOU ARE SUGGESTING.
2) You are unwilling to acknowledge the implications of the man-made nature of the H1N1 virus and the subsequently manufactured pandemic because to do so would beg the questions:
a) WHO ENGINEERED IT?
b) WHY DID THEY ENGINEER IT?
SEE ABOVE ANSWER...
3) Even addressing issues of this nature is anathema to an establishment physician because to do so reveals the completely compromised nature of orthodox corporate medical doctors.
SEE ABOVE ANSWER
4) You cannot take a position not predetermined by the epistemological cartel which employs you. Your opinion is not your own. It belongs to the institutional conglomerate which provides you accreditation and employment. You are not your own man. Your opinion & position belongs to the Plantation. Egro: Plantation Negro.
SEE ABOVE (I GUESS YOU GOT YOUR SAT VOCABULARY PREP BOOK OUT...)
5) Little of what you have to say regarding vaccines and health care in general can be taken seriously because you are simply an agent, regurgitating the official position of a medical cartel that has virtually declared war on humanity and black people in particular.
SIMPLY AN AGENT. HMM. YOU ARE JUST SIMPLE. I'VE SAID IT BEFORE, YOU LIKE TO HEAR YOURSELF TALK, AND YOU IGNORE FACTS STARING YOU IN THE FACE. INSTEAD YOU LATCH ONTO ANY CONSPIRACY THEORY, HERESAY, RUMOR, OR WIVES TAIL THAT ENTERS YOUR EMAIL BOX. SERIOUSLY...YOUR GAME IS TIRED.
Okay, I have to say something here. Dmg thanks for the condolences the other day btw.
Even if you think that DV's thoughts on vaccines are irrational, why not look at it from a rational perspective in terms of time frames? How long have they been working on the vaccine? How many human trials have they had? Do we know what, if any, long term affects exist from vaccine? Does vaccine affect fertility? These are legitimate questions that any reasonable human being ought to think about.
After all, the FDA told us Vioxx, Phen Phen and other drugs were safe and later their advice was shown to be inappropriate. With that in mind, as a doctor could you honestly answer those questions and allay someones' fears that the vaccines haven't been out long enough?
If we are to be reasonable in the discussion, then you should answer these questions given your medical knowledge. No insults or statements that the questions are stupid either, because I'm sure your patients might ask these questions.`
Unfortunately, time is of the essense. I can say this, I have seen a patient go from breathing normally to actively dying on a ventilator within a span of hours because of H1N1.
An interesting preview from Down Under:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=a74PVQloYnFc
I think we will be busy this flu season. I think people at high risk should be vaccinated...and that includes myself.
By the way, if someone presents me with that piece of paper, I'll move on to the next patient, rather than waste my time. All things come with risk. It just depends on the risk:benefit ratio.
Doc, Doc, Doc.
Come on man. This is getting sad.
Obviously you are embarrassed and are attempting to create a smoke screen of contempt to disguise the fact you have painted yourself into syllogistic corner.
Don't be embarrassed Bra.
We all friends here. We all make mistakes.
You shot off at the mouth about how you were a "doctor" and "understood" things us non-Medical Doctors couldn't possibly grasp... and how we would all be better off if we just took the word of you trained physicians.
Now we can all see that's laughable bullshit.
There exists a well documented diversity of opinion even among PLANTATION MEDICAL DOCTORS about the efficacy of the H1N1 vaccine. Yet you attempt to pretend anyone who questions the ingredients and testing history of this vaccine marketed by Baxter Pharmaceuticals and the Government is trafficking in "conspiracy theories".
Not once have you said: "Look. I have examined this vaccine and feel it is safe. There is NO DANGER FROM aluminum hydroxide or bovine serum or mercury thimerosol or VERO cells or human diploid cell."
Your entire argument is: "I'm a doctor. You're not. I've been sanctioned by The Plantation! You haven't! I know things you don't! You are crazy for asking these questions. The other doctors are crazy for saying they won't take the vaccine. DON'T TAKE IT YOU WANNA I DON'T CARE!"
Come on Bra. You a smart cat. A damn marine.
Don't you think your position is kind of punkish?
DMG said...
"By the way, if someone presents me with that piece of paper, I'll move on to the next patient"
OF COURSE YOU WILL!
LOL.
Because you can't represent that the vaccine is not MORE DANGEROUS THAN THE DAMN FLU!
Where is your integrity man?
You were running short on time, yet you had the time to author two insulting retorts to DV's comments. You could have easily answered my questions if you knew the answers, which is why you lack credibility.
M.,
Let us be realistic here.
Let's give the brother a break.
What's DMG going to say?
"Upon further review ... I must admit there are some very serious issues with this particular vaccine. I understand your concerns. There appears to be ingredients that are dangerous and the rush to get this vaccine to market has not allowed adequate testing. There is reason to believe this virus is engineered and the company offering the vaccine applied for the patent a year before the first case of H1N1 even appeared. I don't have all the answers, but I promise to look further into the safety of this vaccine before I recommend it."
Helllllllllll No.
Plantation Doctors MUST pretend corporate physicians are infallible in order to perpetuate their medical monopoly.
These guys are more like priests than scientists.
Note his reaction to celebrated neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock who says the H1N1 vaccine is extremely dangerous.
Instead of simply pointing out which issues he differs with the doctor - he attacked him personally and dismissed him as a heretic.
Why? Because Dr. Blaylock had the intellectual courage to oppose the medical orthodoxy that not 1 of these Negro MD's has had the balls to challenge.
Tuskegee all over again.
Mahndisa, I believe I answered your question. Our hosts comments were not even worth the short answer I gave.
Bottom line, if you don't want the vaccine don't take it. I don't care. Make the choice for yourself, nobody is forcing you to get a vaccination. Hopefully you'll be in the majority of people with mild disease if you contract H1N1. I'm in a hospital, I have more opportunities to get sick, I've made my choice. I don't see what the debate is all about.
MOTI, would you PLEASE actually read about Tuskeegee before you go shooting your mouth off? Again, you are just noise, without substance.
You didn't answer the questions I posed at all. I haven't really taken a position on this issue except to wonder about certain the efficacy of vaccinations. My questions posed above are below:
"Even if you think that DV's thoughts on vaccines are irrational, why not look at it from a rational perspective in terms of time frames? How long have they been working on the vaccine? How many human trials have they had? Do we know what, if any, long term affects exist from vaccine? Does vaccine affect fertility?"
You haven't answered these questions at all, at least not on this thread. I haven't mentioned adjuvants here, simply questions about long term effects of vaccination and how long they've been using it.
You've evaded responding because you simply don't know and are unwilling to admit your ignorance on these matters. The Godhonest truth is that you are no different than any one of us; you cannot see into the future so you cannot make any assurances about this vaccine, unless you are willing to lie- or have a time machine.
Post a Comment