You are utilizing a very "scientific" notion of empirical evidence.When I speak of empirical evidence, I am using the most fundamental and universal definition. You on the other hand seem to be saying that because a resurrection has never occured with a "dead time" of several hundred years then there is no empirical evidence for resurrection. And the meme that "talks" of such resurrection is therefore without empirical evidence.
The reality though is that there is empirical evidence for coming back to life (resurrection) and time lapse. One could easily draw upon this empirical evidence to create your meme because at the end of the day conceiving of a unique and unprecedented idea must be done through inference.
Conceptualization without inference (appeal to the empirical evidence) has never been demonstrated by ANY scientist.
Or you can go the way of Nulance and assert that the quantum-evolutionary mechanics did it and try to explain why it would do such an unnecessary thing, mechanistically-speaking?
No comments:
Post a Comment