If the average Plantation Negro consumer of porn, were to walk into a doctor’s office and receive a virility exam, the results would be devastating.Due to the toxicity of the Plantation Diet, pharmaceutical drugs and the prevalence of untested chemicals in the social environment, African American men have entered into rapid physiological and genetic decline.
In the industrialized Plantation System, the birth of males has dropped every year for the past 30 years. Genital defects, learning disabilities, autism, ADD and a variety of other afflictions have all skyrocketed in males while remaining comparatively low in females.
Perhaps the most telling indicator of the male plight comes down to that which is essentially synonymous with the pornographic: Sperm count.
In the last 15 years the production of Hard Core porn exploded 700%. Since porn shot up, sperm count shot down. The average Plantation Negro has a sperm count 50 percent lower than his father’s and, of the little sperm he does have, 85 percent of it is genetically damaged.
Dr. Fernando Marina, fertility expert at Barcelona’s CEFER Reproduction Institute, says that if this trend continues, all men will be infertile within 60 years.
The homosexualization and porning of men is a soft kill eugenics weapon. Get A Chick.
24 comments:
do you know what your problem is?
brilliant dv!
Disagree Sub.
I think our buddy's got a cause, symptom, solution conflation problem going on here once again.
DV, this one might be worth looking at more deeply before you campaign now that they're beginning to advertise swine-based topical testosterone gels on teevee.
Any minute now, old nuccas will be running around amped up on hog T and cialis and skrate ackin a fool......,
Uh… Plato ol’ chum, the pot can’t really call the kettle black now can it? You post pornographic pictures on the regular. How can you condemn pornography?
80% of the men with women have watched pornography, and 40% of them have had anal sex with a woman. So merely having a woman is no solution to sodomy. Or is anal sex between men and women permitted in the school of Plato Vesey?
Bitchy / Anon / Casper ...
Link to any "pornographic" picture I've ever posted.
DV, what exactly you got against porn? Plus, how is the depiction of a penis up a vagina in any way negatively comparable to the depiction of a gun being stuck in someone's face?
And all along I figured that it was the hormones put into the KFC Grilled Chicken that was lowering the sperm count as a means of population control in targeted populations.
Or was that Church's Fried Chicken?
Or is anal sex between men and women permitted in the school of Plato Vesey?
How about answering Anon's question?
Bitchy / Anon / Casper ...
what a stupid question.
"DV, what exactly you got against porn?" MF
I don't have anything against porn Mike. I'm just bringing attention to the fact that the quantity of Hard Core porn produced and distributed in this country has increased 700% in recent years and corresponded with a dramatic drop in the virility of American men.
"Plus, how is the depiction of a penis up a vagina in any way negatively comparable to the depiction of a gun being stuck in someone's face?"
One is art.
The other is vacuous depiction of sex that actually subdues rather than provokes.
Pornography does not lead to more sex. Pornography leads to more pornography.
Now, tell me Mike.
Why do you reflexively defend porn?
I know that was cute back in the '70's when it was still somewhat cutting edge.
But now every lame with an internet connection is beating off over a keypad and slowly losing his desire for real women all together.
Funny thing.
Porn is as effective a eugenicist tool as vaccines and GMO food.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc. But I'm sure you are already aware of what you are doing.
Submariner,
By the way, good point up top. I always wondered why in the Bible Jesus said "be not drunk with wine" (I said don't be a drunk, I didn't say don't drink wine), and the preacher said "don't drink at all".
The message is self control, not prohibition.
Since pornography reduces sperm count, how quickly can we force-feed pornography into the Hispanic community?
In 2005, Hispanic women had the highest fertility rates, followed by non-Hispanic black women, Asian women, Native American women, and non-Hispanic white women.
Fertility rates for Hispanic women were over 45 percent higher than those for non-Hispanic black women and Asian women (99 births per 1,000 for Hispanic women versus 67 births per 1,000 for non-Hispanic black and Asian women), and more than 65 percent higher than those for Native American women and non-Hispanic white women (60 and 58 births per 1,000 women, respectively).
Bring Vanessa Del Rio out of retirement. Find a Hispanic Long John Holmes. Do anything possible to get Hispanics hooked on pornography. This is an urgent matter of national security.
Meanwhile, ban pornography amongst white people. We need to desperately increase our birth rates. And we need to make pornography more effects amongst the blacks.
Fertility rates -- the total number of babies born each year per 1,000 women ages 15-44 declined steeply among all women from 1960 to 1985, then rose somewhat until 1990, when about 4.16 million babies were born in the United States. This number was the highest reported since 1962 (4.17 million) near the end of the Baby Boom. Fertility rates then declined again. From 1960 to 1999, fertility fell 54.3% among black women (from 153.5 live births per 1,000 to 70.1 in 1999) and 42.5% among white women (from 113.2 to 65.1 births). Fertility rates were 36% higher among black women than white women in 1960, but were only about 7.1% higher in 1999.
Murder, prison, and especially pornography contributed to a tremendous reduction in the black birth rate between 1960 and 1999.
I didn’t know the blacks were watching porno back in the 60s, but I’m glad they were. That’s the kind of reduction white people were hoping for amongst the blacks, from 153 to 70.
But I’ll be damned if we can accept such a small reduction as the blacks had between 1999 and 2005. Damn, did you people stop watching porno movies?
Between murder, prison, AIDS, and pornography I would have expected a greater decline. I’m bitterly disappointed.
Maybe we can find an Obama look-alike to star in porno movies—Ba-Rock O-Booty Seeker. Maybe that will get our population reduction amongst the blacks back on track.
Thought you'd like to know the real cause and effect...
Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis, Jean-Pierre Bourguignon, Linda C. Giudice, Russ Hauser, Gail S. Prins, Ana M. Soto, R. Thomas Zoeller and Andrea C. Gore
Endocrine Section of First Department of Medicine (E.D.-K.), Laiko Hospital, Medical School University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; Department of Pediatrics (J.-P.B.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences (L.C.G.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94131; Department of Environmental Health (R.H.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; Department of Urology (G.S.P.), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612; Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology (A.M.S.), Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111; Biology Department (R.T.Z.), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003; and Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology (A.C.G.), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Andrea C. Gore, Ph.D., The University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, 1 University Station, A1915, Austin, Texas 78712. E-mail: andrea.gore@mail.utexas.edu.
There is growing interest in the possible health threat posed by endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), which are substances in our environment, food, and consumer products that interfere with hormone biosynthesis, metabolism, or action resulting in a deviation from normal homeostatic control or reproduction. In this first Scientific Statement of The Endocrine Society, we present the evidence that endocrine disruptors have effects on male and female reproduction, breast development and cancer, prostate cancer, neuroendocrinology, thyroid, metabolism and obesity, and cardiovascular endocrinology. Results from animal models, human clinical observations, and epidemiological studies converge to implicate EDCs as a significant concern to public health. The mechanisms of EDCs involve divergent pathways including (but not limited to) estrogenic, antiandrogenic, thyroid, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}, retinoid, and actions through other nuclear receptors; steroidogenic enzymes; neurotransmitter receptors and systems; and many other pathways that are highly conserved in wildlife and humans, and which can be modeled in laboratory in vitro and in vivo models. Furthermore, EDCs represent a broad class of molecules such as organochlorinated pesticides and industrial chemicals, plastics and plasticizers, fuels, and many other chemicals that are present in the environment or are in widespread use. We make a number of recommendations to increase understanding of effects of EDCs, including enhancing increased basic and clinical research, invoking the precautionary principle, and advocating involvement of individual and scientific society stakeholders in communicating and implementing changes in public policy and awareness.
Interesting Prom. Good stuff.
Thank you.
How do you interpret this statement?
what a stupid question.
Dude, there ain’t nothing stupid about that question. You rail constantly against homosexuality. What is it that you find detestable about homosexuality? If not sodomy, then what?
If you object to anal sex between two men, do you also object to anal sex between and man and a woman?
Are you going to man-up and answer the question or are you going to punk-out?
Prom,
I know one of the authors. Thanks I'll read that article today. Bottom line of the abstract is
"interfere with hormone biosynthesis, metabolism, or action resulting in a deviation from normal homeostatic control or reproduction".
I believe the article is stating that more research is needed rather than making a blanket statement.
Where have I "railed against homosexuality"?
I've rejected the normalization of the abnormal.
I've rejected the ridiculous political notion of homosexuality as a group identity.
I don't "object to anal sex between men".
Two men can bone each other in the ass until they turn blue in the face.
Why must we be forced to consider that relationship the same as a relationship between a husband and his wife?
It is by definition ... insane.
Everything else is the politics of mind control.
My interpretation of the abstract: the drop in sperm count seems to be caused by intrusions in our physical systems. Being a physical thing, that makes sense.
My interpretation of the statement that is your title here: pure rhetoric until more evidence comes in, which is to say if you actually believe that, I'd be seriously disappointed. So it's rhetoric or it's being advanced for a reason so alien to me that I can't even see it.
Two men can bone each other in the ass until they turn blue in the face.
Why must we be forced to consider that relationship the same as a relationship between a husband and his wife?
The proper comparison would be:
1- Two men boning each other in the ass until they turn blue in the face vs. A man boning a woman in the ass until they turn blue in the face, or
2- The relationship between two pair-bonded men vs. the relationship between a man pair-bonded to a woman.
You are entitled to your opinion on either of those comparisons, but only the second has legal repercussions and normal order is best served by treating the two cases in example 2 equally.
^Pornography does not lead to more sex. Pornography leads to more pornography.
How would you know?
Sticking a gun in someone's face is not art. Sticking a gun in someone's face leads to death.
“I've rejected the normalization of the abnormal. I don't "object to anal sex between men". Plato
So anal sex between men is normal? I always knew that you were straight outta Ancient Greece. Thanks for proving it.
Dude, you are toast on this subject—homosexuality. No credibility. No integrity. Total confusion. Give it up.
Bitchy / Anon / Casper ...
Your question is no where near as stupid as you are.
lol..,
Looks like P6 was school for Denmark Vesey too!
Post a Comment