Sunday, June 28, 2009

Manufactured Homosexuality?

NyTimes.com
Some of the first eerie signs of a potential health catastrophe came as bizarre deformities in water animals, often in their sexual organs.

Frogs, salamanders and other amphibians began to sprout extra legs. In heavily polluted Lake Apopka, one of the largest lakes in Florida, male alligators developed stunted genitals.

In the Potomac watershed near Washington, male smallmouth bass have rapidly transformed into “intersex fish” that display female characteristics. This was discovered only in 2003, but the latest survey found that more than 80 percent of the male smallmouth bass in the Potomac are producing eggs.

Now scientists are connecting the dots with evidence of increasing abnormalities among humans, particularly large increases in numbers of genital deformities among newborn boys. For example, up to 7 percent of boys are now born with undescended testicles, although this often self-corrects over time. And up to 1 percent of boys in the United States are now born with hypospadias, in which the urethra exits the penis improperly, such as at the base rather than the tip.

Apprehension is growing among many scientists that the cause of all this may be a class of chemicals called endocrine disruptors. They are very widely used in agriculture, industry and consumer products. Some also enter the water supply when estrogens in human urine — compounded when a woman is on the pill — pass through sewage systems and then through water treatment plants.

These endocrine disruptors have complex effects on the human body, particularly during fetal development of males.

14 comments:

Intellectual Insurgent said...

Folks been saying this for years, but maybe now that the NYT runs a story on it, Plantation conformists won't immediately froth at the mouth about "conspiracy theories".

CNu said...

wait..,

what have folks been saying?

"not having a woman is 80% of being a homosexual, and porn is 50% of not having a woman?"

or,

the rockefeller/monsanto eugenic slow genocide has engineered this mass endocrine disruption - taking out pesky frogs as well as ALL consumers of contaminated water and foodstuffs (the shotgun phase of the slow genocide conspiracy, right?)

or,

that there are endocrine disruptors emanating from multiple sources and pervading the water and food supplies with all manner of unintended consequences?

CNu said...

nicholas kristoff made only moderate and supportable claims....,

Denmark Vesey said...

I don't about all that.

I'm saying grown ass men aint bonin' each other in the ass just because "it's their preference".

CNu said...

All along you've been claiming that it's an immoral "choice" and a thought control effort put forth by its choosers.

Now you're asserting that it's a chemically and biologically imposed abnormality, an "error in the matrix" that conduces to the "preference" you've heretofore roundly condemned?

What to do DV, what to do?

Is it time for torches and pitchforks and massing on the village square to go and round up and eliminate these "defectives"?

Denmark Vesey said...

morality?

LOL

Where you get that from Festas?

You must have gotten that from one of those Quixotic conversations you had with your imaginary Bibtard nemesis.

I don't think two dudes bonin' each other in the ass is any less moral than two dudes eating each others ass.

It's just nasty. It's not healthy and it is not in their self-interest.

I find the fabricated and fashionable notions of "Group Identity" recently attached to homosexual behavior suspiciously consistent with the stated goals and plans of the same eugenicists pushing Vaccine / AIDS & marketing abortions.

Anonymous said...

The Pill "empowered" women to become wanton sluts with the added benefit of chemically castrating all males (human and animal) through the water supply. It was the feminist atomic bomb & Weapon of Male Destruction.

Big Man said...

DV

I'm curious why you find homosexual sex nasty if your objections aren't based in an argument about its immorality.

I can see unhealthy. I can see it being against their self interest, if you believe that the self interest of all humans is reproduction.

But, the "nasty" doesn't make sense to me without the connection to morality and immorality.

I'd like to hear your argument.

Denmark Vesey said...

Big Man please understand my contention.

I feel no differently about the reality of the homosexual sex act between men any differently than you, CNu, Submariner, MF or 90% of the rest of the planet.

We all find it repugnant.

Don't believe me, google 'gay porn' and show someone.

You will hear a special "yuck" that's different from anything else.

Why? Hate? No. That's silly.

Any species or group of people that has survived throughout evolution developed an aversion for homosexuality.

(The inverse is also true: People targeted by Eugenicists are encouraged to adopt homosexuality and any other sexually aberrant behavior that will have a negative impact on their reproductive capacity)

I object to the Plantation politics and mind control that has elevated aberrant behavior and mental illness to Group Identity status on par with other groups like African-Americans, Catholics, or Married Couples.

There is no such thing as a "Homosexual Community".

It's a Hegelian head fake.

Intentionally creating fake groups and pitting them in perpetual conflict that weakens them all.

Just as you peep the disproportionate efforts of the Plantation Media to portray the fake revolution in Iran as a romantic "uprising against tyranny" ... you should be able to see the Plantation promotion of homosexuality as a Political Movement and noble quest for human rights.

Our rights should be based on our citizenship. Not our race. Not our ethnicity. Not our sexual aberrations.

Anything else is the HOV lane to a Police State.

Big Man said...

DV

Oh, I understand all those other problems you have with homosexuality.

However, I thought that you viewed homosexuality the same way you seem to view promiscuity and pornography. I guess I thought all three acts ran counter to a moral code you held based on your belief system.

I mean, I have a problem with all three things based on my belief system, but since we don't share the same total belief system, I wanted to better understand your objection.

I agree with you on the way homosexuality has been presented by the media and other groups. I disagree with some of your methods for questioning these practices, but I do understand your aim. I just wanted to get a better grasp on why you found the behavior repugnant.

CNu said...

rotflmbao...,

big man, as regularly, graphically and zealously as brohammanage writes on and depicts this.particular.subject, do you REALLY have any question concerning his motive and aim?

Seriously?

If some white dude contemplated Black folks online with the regularity, zeal, and graphical bent that my man expresses toward male homosexuals, what would you conclude concerning that cat's perspective on Black folks?

Big Man said...

Cnu

Well, I'm trying to give homie the benefit of the doubt, but I see where you are going.

Denmark Vesey said...

"I mean, I have a problem with all three things based on my belief system, but since we don't share the same total belief system, I wanted to better understand your objection."

I don't believe in anything Big Man.

I simply accept the best available explanation.

I view pornography the same way I view processed salt and Plantation Medicine. It damages the user.

Don't believe me?

Look at a hardcore porn user.

Look at a hardcore consumer of processed salt.

Look at any consumer of prescription drugs.

I don't eat animals raised on steroids and hormones, not for moral objections, but because there is a health consequence to eating steroids and hormones.

Look at the people in the Drive-Thru at a Carls Jr.

When there is so much estrogen in our environment and in genetically modified food, that MALE FISH TURN INTO FEMALE FISH, it makes me wonder if the estrogen and GMO is making black men turn into black women.

Plantation Negros have been conditioned to think of homosexuality not as an illness, but as human progress and an exercise in emancipation.

Score 1 for Margaret Sanger.

If you want to get rid of a race of people, turning its men into homosexuals is more effective than gas chambers.

So Big Man.

These posts are less about homosexuals, than they are about getting Plantation Negros to think for themselves.

As you can see, it is not easy.

SHE said...

The water that goes
Straight down our drains
Is running though us
Like red rivulet veins.

What you swallow
You later become.
Feed ocean poison
Blue Dolphins the same—

There’s no separation
Between The Mother Earth
And I.
Her womb is our
Mountain and sky.

Outside my window
Traffic, cars and people
Polluting the nectar
Flowing from Her nipple.

Birth control in me
Flushes out to sea.
Her fish are sterile
Can’t grow their seeds.
Unable to produce
No children to lead-

The water that goes,
Straight down our drains
Is running though us
Like red rivulet veins.

Our Mother Ocean
Is roaring in pain.

Man made chemicals
In what we eat.
Feeding fish estrogen
Comes back to me.
It’s all a cycle
It’s time to be wiser.

Mother Nature suffering
From corporation greed.
Our Luxury and Jewelry
Leaves her out to bleed.

Time to travel
Back to Her again
And find out
What it is She needs.