skip to main |
skip to sidebar
David said ...
"Freedom" and "Liberty", both terms originally devised by the Illuminati, are sham slogans, that have been used time and again to rally the masses of the Western world against some contrived foe. "Freedom" is a relative term. By itself it does not have any meaning. Human relationships, whether they be between one individual and another, or between the state and the individual, are defined by limitations. Man may be entitled to certain freedoms, but these must have defined limits, so that he can be prevented from encroaching on others, and others against he. Therefore, man cannot be "free". - Ultimately, the principles of "freedom" and "liberty" are rooted in the occult. "Liberty", along with "equality", and "fraternity", were concepts originally promulgated by the Freemasons. In turn, the dogma of the Freemasons is derived from the Gnostic tradition. Gnosticism is a heresy of Christianity that belonged to the first centuries AD. It derived its influence from the Jewish Kabbalah, and reversed the interpretation of the Bible.
-
- Therefore, God became the evil one, while the devil was he who sought to "liberate" man by teaching him the forbidden knowledge, or magic. According to Gnostics then, all the laws proclaimed by the creator God of the Bible were to suppress man. Instead, he believed, man would only become free by indulging in as many vices as he could. Therefore, proponents of "liberty" offer an alternative principle to counter what they regard as the repression meted out by religion. They claim that we ought to be allowed to do as we please, as long as we do not harm anybody else. This is the same principle as that touted by modern-day witches, or Wiccans, as stated by the godfather of modern Satanism, Aleister Crowley: "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law". CONTINUE>
6 comments:
So DV. You're a devout Christian. Tell me, if the Canaanits whose land (Canaan) of milk and honey Jehova gave to the Israelites and who brought down the walls of Jericho for the Israelites, were to argue that the God Of Israel surely must be Satan, would they (the Canaanites) be justified in making such an argument?
"So DV. You're a devout Christian." MF
I am?
Not sure what that means.
But I bet what ever I am is quite different from your idea of a "devout Christian".
However, the concept of Christianity to which I am sure you are familiar, is as hi-jacked an institution as is the United States government.
To me Christianity has little to do with "believing" and more to do with practicing.
I believe in Yoga.
But I don't practice it.
Ergo: I receive little of the benefit.
I appreciate what you said, that doesn't answer my question, though:
If the Canaanits whose land (Canaan) of milk and honey God gave to the Israelites and who brought down the walls of Jericho for the Israelites, were to argue that the God Of Israel surely must be Satan, would they (the Canaanites) be justified in making such an argument?
Yes
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
Benjamin Franklin
I believe that promises of Free Health Care should be added to this list of that which can make people do anything.
Post a Comment