Thursday, November 13, 2008

Is General Motors Worth Saving?

For months, General Motors had been telling everyone who would listen that bankruptcy was not an option. It had a $30 billion cash pile and plans to restructure the company as the economy rebounded and 2007 U.S. auto sales topped 16 million units.

Then came October. Sales plummeted an astounding 45% over the same period last year, a result of a slowing economy and a dearth of financing for would-be car buyers. Total U.S. car and light-truck sales this year could come in at 13.5 million, 2.6 million fewer than last year. "That's in nobody's business plan," says Kimberly Rodriguez, an automotive specialist with Grant Thornton. "The best planning in the world cannot survive that fluctuation." It's now clear that GM can't survive as an ongoing entity without massive federal assistance. The company is burning through more than $2 billion each month. It has $16 billion left. As if they were aboard a dirigible losing altitude, GM's bosses have been frantically throwing all manner of stuff overboard — retiree health-care benefits, people, assets, new car design — to conserve $5 billion. That will get it through the year.

4 comments:

CNu said...

no...,

Anonymous said...

It would only enable:

1) Self-excessive unions killing US productivity
2) Detroit cranking out oversized, Freudian gas guzzlers when the rest of the world was evolving to greener designs

Why don't they take any "bailout" money and give it to more progressive car companies? Especially more progressive start-ups?

Intellectual Insurgent said...

The answer is: No.

But it doesn't matter what "Main Street" thinks. The Banksters have already set in motion the looting of the State and the "bailout" for the auto industry is part of the plan.

It's going to happen whether we like it or not.

Hawa Bond said...

Ya know... I ran across a quick blurb revealing that Ford actually sells a truck overseas that gets 60mpg. I can see sales recovering if such options were sold on our dang home soil (along with other greener approaches, as one commented above).

I also agree that more progressive innovative companies should get the money. As opposed to major job loss, we'd see a migration. Aren't we supposed to award good behavior? Bloated companies with sub par products don't fit that picture.

Hawa, author of
Fackin Truth Blog (Personal Blog)
and
Cleanse Master Remix (Health Blog)