Saturday, June 21, 2008

Is Participation In Mass Vaccinations Evidence of Mass Mind Control?

It should be pointed out that today's children receive 22 or more vaccines before school age, whereas today's senior citizens received only one, the smallpox vaccine.

With growing public concerns about potential adverse reactions on the immature immune systems of children, is it reasonable to ask ourselves what is already known about such reactions? There is a school of thought that the so-called "minor childhood illnesses" of former times including: Measles Mumps, Rubella (German measles) and Chicken pox, that entered the body through the mucous membranes, served a necessary and positive purpose in challenging and strengthening the immune system of these membranes.

In contrast, so the theory goes, the respective vaccines of these diseases are injected by needle directly into the system of the child, thereby bypassing the mucosal immune system. As a result, mucosal immunity remains relatively weak and stunted in many children, complications of which may be the rapid increase in asthma and eczema now being seen, both in terms of frequency and severity.

This concept tends to be confirmed by four controlled studies, widely separated geographically, in which vaccinated children were found to have significantly more atopic disorders than controls.

In commenting on the increased incidence of asthma and other atopic disorders in the United Kingdom in the article, "Measles and atopy in Guinea-Bissau," the authors made the following comment:

"The rise of allergic disease among children in the UK over the past 30 years remains unexplained. One hypothesis is that infections in early childhood prevent allergic sensitization, and that successive generations of children have lost this protection as their exposure to infectious disease in early life has declined. Consequently the prevalence of atopy and concomitant allergic disease has risen."

It is true that in former times there were occasional serious complications from these childhood diseases, but this is an area in which nutritional approaches and homeopathy traditionally have been at their best. If these approaches were made widely available, it is probable that most of these complications could be eliminated. No one wants to see serious complications in our children, but the vaccine route may in time prove to be the worst possible choice that could have been made, as concerns the minor childhood diseases.

3 comments:

Intellectual Insurgent said...

If it's not mass mind control, what else could it be? It seems the only plausible explanation for the phenomenon of delivering one's child, without objection, into the hands of strangers to inject the following into their bloodstreams:

human diploid cells from aborted fetal tissue
formaldehyde
aluminum hydroxide
aluminum phosphate
mercury
chick embryonic fluid
ammonium sulfate
monosodium L-glutamate (MSG)
potassium chloride
bovine serum

http://www.informedchoice.info/cocktail.html

All in the name of "immunity".

paul said...

You're an educated, informed man whos opinion I respect. Did you vaccinate your children?

Denmark Vesey said...

P,

Oldest child about half the recommended injections.

Middle kid ... I remember 1, two at the most.

Baby girl ... None.

If anyone get sick in the family (allergy, rashes, head cold), it's my oldest.

His immune system was the one under the greatest onslaught of chemical cocktails.

Daughter can run around barefoot in the cold rain with her collar open in January and not get a sniffle.

If I knew then what I know now - I wouldn't even have the children in a state run hospital and I would never feed them government food.

P. You marry your girl yet?