Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Sex & The City? Or 3 Old Whores & A Dyke Who Need To Be Somewhere Raising Teenagers?

Did Sex & The City make the 20 summin' 30 summin generation of American women more promiscuous?

During the course of 94 episodes and six seasons, the women of "Sex and the City" boned 94 DIFFERENT men and 1 woman.

Carrie Bradshaw and her three cohorts picked up waiters, doormen, trainers, lawyers, yoga instructors, bartenders, writers, baseball players, ophthalmologists, Realtors, artists, architects, furniture designers and unemployed actors.

Of the four women, public relations exec Samantha racked up the most sexual partners. She bedded 41 men and one woman, while Carrie hooked up with 18, Charlotte 18 and Miranda 17.

Henry Makow said ...
Powerful political and economic forces are opposed to love, marriage and family. They prefer that people remain isolated and dysfunctional, amenable to sexual cues. They are imposing their immorality on us.

Although studies say married people are happier and get more sex, marriage is rarely portrayed in positive terms. Instead, the cultural message [Meme] is that relationships are based on sexual attraction. Bombarded with soft- core pornography, we are conditioned to be always "on the lookout", in a state of perpetual courtship.

Feminism promised to "empower" women [Meme]. In fact women have become public property. Economically, they are cogs in the machine. Young women are taught to eschew marriage, remain "independent" and to seek satisfaction in careers.

Sexually, they are a commodity on auction to the highest bidder. At a young age, in sex education classes, their dignity, privacy and natural modesty is stripped away. They are given role models like Britney Spears whose act is pure strip tease. When contraceptives fail, they and their babies become wards of the public services.

Heterosexuals are being encouraged to emulate the gay model. The "trend-setting" TV program "Sex and the City" is an example. The women are looking for love but the scope of their quest makes them unfit for it. The character Samantha has slept with hundreds of men. The other three women are not as ambitious. The program chronicles their relationships, and abounds in nudity and scatological references.
Michael Fisher
said...
Whores by definition are women who engage in sexual acts with other people in exchange for money or favors.

That applies to lots of people. Sex In The City is child's play compared to the hoish memes women, and particularly black women have been bombarded with in the last 30 years.

DV said ...

Mike, are you suggesting women, and black women in particular, are not responsible for their sexual behavior over the past 30 years? If Shaniqua bones 2 best friends in the same week is that also the fault of the "Global White Supremacy"?

25 comments:

G M said...

Lol, notice the over-aggressive "manly" stance that Sarah Jew Parker is in - VERY similar to the one Skyler "bulldyke" Cooper was here.

And even moreso...she is sporting a HUGE, erect phallic Empire State building pseudo-penis on her dress. Gee, can we get anymore Freudian here?

You are right, this show is PURE PROPAGANDA. 200 PROOF - BABY!

Problem is, most of the gullible viewers are being sorely misled. I've posted numerous articles on this on my site.

Anonymous said...

Why do you call them old whores? smh!

Anonymous said...

I can't believe I used to watch this show and I actually thought it was entertaining. That was B.M. (Before Makow). I know about 100 women like this, maybe just the hip hop version.

Denmark Vesey said...

"Anonymous said...
Why do you call them old whores? smh!


To distinguish them from women who value their sexuality and don't use it as a commodity to be auctioned to the highest bidder.

What do you call them?

Michael Fisher said...

Whores by definition are women who engage in sexual acts with other people in exchange for money or favors.

That applies to lots of people. Sex In The City is child's play compared to the hoish memes women, and particularly black women have been bombarded with in the last 30 years.

Anonymous said...

" what do you call them?"

I just call them women.

Denmark Vesey said...

"what do you call them?"
Anonymous said...

I just call them women.


Cool. Fair enough.

Michael Fisher said...

DV...

"Mike, are you suggesting women, and black women in particular, are not responsible for their sexual behavior over the past 30 years?

DV, I'm not talking about sexual behavior. I really don't care about that. Besides, promiscuous behavior has been around and, in fact, dominant, since whenever. Or are you on of the few black males in this country who was a virgin when he got married? No, DV. I'm talking about having economics determine the level of one's sexual relationship with another person.

THAT's whoredom.

Denmark Vesey said...

"I'm talking about having economics determine the level of one's sexual relationship with another person." MF

I don't know about that Mike.

"having economics determine" ...

"having"

"economics"

"determine"

Sounds like an excuse.

Sounds like some bitch shit to me actually.

The externalization of control over one's self = bitchy.

Which is one of the reasons I don't jump on the .. uh ... "omnipresent" ... all powerful ...God substitute you call the Global System of White Supremacy, bandwagon.

It requires a certain amount of individual capitulation.

Any cat got the least bit of pimp in him knows a chick that sells some pussy for a $1,000,000 will sell it for $100 and she won't respect you unless you take $90 of it.

Nah. Fish.

It aint "economics" that makes ho's ... ho's.

It's not financial bankruptcy that will prompt a woman to forfeit something more valuable than her sexuality.

Spiritual bankruptcy is what prompts a woman to forfeit her most prized possession - her innocence.

J.C. said...

D.V. have you thought about becoming a full time priest?
Give me my women free, liberated, and in charge of what they care to do.

Patriarchal society rose with the Hebrews in particular..
Are you a member of that religion?
Of course the Christians believe the same bull as do all the offshoots of Babylonian devil worship.

Denmark Vesey said...

Ahhhhh ... Skip

You aint got no woman. How would you know?

If you haven't noticed ... women dig men with soul.

J.C. said...

How would you know ass hole. Ha.

Anonymous said...

Besides all that is being debated,
THE MOVIE WAS OUTSTANDING.

And get this Denmark Vesey, ALL OF THE WOMEN get a grip on true love and what it means to be in a real relationship with a real man.

You should check out the film. I think you'd be surprised.

J.C. said...

Right... like D.V. can get around his bigotry, prejudices and religious paternalism.
Sectarian groups like religious crank members prefer railing about morals ethics and so forth.
Their versions of course that were told them in a fairy tale that was meant to scare and inculcate them.
Ha.

Denmark Vesey said...

RJesq ...

Allow me to ask ...

What does it look like ... when a woman ... "gets a grip on true love and what it means TO BE IN A REAL RELATIONSHIP"?

How does her life change?

Is she now married?

Does she now have what she wants?

Is her life essentially the same, but her attitude different?

The "Sex and The City" mythos is a formula for grown ass women to end up with neither a man nor a child.

Not negating the entertaining quality of the film. I am interested in the redeeming social value of celebrating (movies, TV Shows etc.) 40+ year old women who have spent their most reproductively viable years engaging in reproductively inviable behavior... den ... realizing the errors of their ways and NOW seek "REAL RELATIONSHIPS".

To me, it's like making movies and TV shows about 4 women spending their 20's, 30's and early 40's taking drugs and partying ... and THEN realizing life is better enjoyed sober.

It's like making a movie about 4 men, in their 20's, 30's and 40's who spend their time clubbing, buying cars, screwing women, contemplating their navels and ... den ... in their 40's engaging in intellectual masturbation like ... "Getting a Grip" on "Real Relationships."

Ass still aint got no women and they have used up their reproductive prime fucking around.

Formula for sadness and unfulfillment.

Day late. Dollar Short.

I submit the corporate media celebrates this model because it is what they want the masses to imitate.

5,000 people showing up to see a film in a theater with 3,000 seats is a religious spectacle.

Help me out Robyn. What am I missing?

J.C. said...

You are not missing a thing junior ranger for the Priest/King.

You represent perfectly all the bull shit of patriarchal religion. Bully for you.

You are the Illuminis D.V. and you do not even guess at that.

Your standard is their standard. Ha.

Denmark Vesey said...

Yes, Skip. Of course.

Oh Ye Without A Chick.


If you knew a damn thing about women - you would realize how contrary 4 women fucking 96 men in 6 years is - to what really makes them fulfilled.

But you don't. So continue your support of the illuminist mind control movies that model unhappiness dressed in Manolo Blahnik shoes.

J.C. said...

Who said I support the movie?

You are also confused about me as a person with or without a chick.

Women can be full filled in any way they care to be including getting gang banged if that is what they want to do.
Mr. paternal control freak.

You are the Illuminate D.V.
A soldier of religion upholding the tenants of religion.

Denmark Vesey said...

"Women can be full filled in any way they care to be including getting gang banged" Skip

Skip ... try to cut back on the internet porn.

It's starting to show.

LOL. A "gang" "bang", is by definition illuminist.

Wake up Skip.

Your "No religion" ... is very much a religion.

The religion of evil.

J.C. said...

In case ya didn't know temple prostitution was the happening thing in Babylon where codified religion came from.
There was no particular shame in it.

Your brand of civil society religion came from there.
The one YOU believe in.
The Jews modified it a bit.

Religion of evil?

All religion is based on lies.

Denmark Vesey said...

Skip ... you still don't get it.

What ever you get up and do everyday, in whatever you believe, whether it's the Talmud or the Technate - is your religion.

Science this, Babylon that is just mumbo jumbo.

It's all religion.

The only question is whether one seeks the religion of the higher self, or the religion of the lower ego.

So ... Mr. Gang Bang ... guess which one you've picked?

LOL.

Anonymous said...

At the risk of spoiling the movie...
Allow me to answer the questions you posed.

What does it look like ... when a woman ... "gets a grip on true love and what it means TO BE IN A REAL RELATIONSHIP"?

It looks like what 3 of the 4 women found. Go see the movie!

Is she now married?

Yes 3 of 4. Go see the movie!

Does she now have what she wants?

Yes finally. Go see the movie!

Is her life essentially the same, but her attitude different?

If one's attitude is different, life cant be the same. This is a running theme in the movie. Go see it!

40+ year old women who have spent their most reproductively viable years engaging in reproductively inviable behavior... den ... realizing the errors of their ways and NOW seek "REAL RELATIONSHIPS".

Better late than never right?!

To me, it's like making movies and TV shows about 4 women spending their 20's, 30's and early 40's taking drugs and partying ... and THEN realizing life is better enjoyed sober.

Happens everyday in real life and movies. And?!

It's like making a movie about 4 men, in their 20's, 30's and 40's who spend their time clubbing, buying cars, screwing women, contemplating their navels and ... den ... in their 40's engaging in intellectual masturbation like ... "Getting a Grip" on "Real Relationships."

This too happens everyday in life and in film. Better late than never.


Help me out Robyn. What am I missing?

See above. :-)

G M said...

What a joke.

Women only start "wising" up when they hit the 5 Fs - fat, 40s, frustrated, fugly, FVCKED - and their sexual value tanks like Bear Sterns..

Women's choices are only as good as their options - and once their short shelf-life has expired, THEN they magically become "enlightened" enough to find a committed relationship with a decent guy.

When they can no longer compete with the latest generation of young sluts, THEN they all of a sudden decide to settle down with a "good guy."

HA! That's not a conscious choice - but a quickly-evaporating set of options. Then throw in the biological timebomb clock and walah - she selfishly delays her spiritual role as mother as long as possible until the last hour. Great, must be nice for her kids and hubby to then have a used-up, wrinkly, 65-yo soccer mom.

No wonder guys don't want to marry another man's leftovers anymore! I mean, if women saving their V-cards for marriage is outdated...shouldn't marriage be too?

It's like paying full price for a used car with 100K miles now, right?

J.C. said...

Well birdie that was a clever post from you. Much more clever than D.V.'s silly religious blathering on this subject.

Inanna the famous goddess, first of the earliest known civilization Sumer, then of Babylonia had many other names over the centuries including Great Whore of Babylon, Heavenly Prostitute, and Mother of Harlots as well as Har and Hora, from which the words harlot and whore derive.

The Babylonians emulated the Sumerian custom. Prostitutes called ishtaritu inhabited the temples of Ishtar, offering themselves to any worshipper who paid the required contribution. Money in the form of silver or gold would have added to the coffers of any town from this practice... thus for residents and travelers who possessed a supply of money a supply of sex could be had. This trade no doubt made early money popular.

In the Epic of Gilgamesh a temple prostitute civilizes a wild man of the forest by sleeping with him.
The Epic of Gilgamesh recounts the exploits of a heroic ruler of Urik who lived about 2700 B.C.
One poetic theme of the epic is Gilgamesh's hope for everlasting life... which fails.
The ancient Mesopotamians seemed to believe that immortality was reserved for the gods or at least that was the poetic allusion they originally brought forth in their writing. Unlike the Egyptians, they did not develop a belief in an attractive life after death.
After death human beings simply became wisps within a house of dust which faded away in time.

Anonymous said...

You know what I just realized?

If this show was about men fucking new conquests every week...they'd be reviled as sexist, chauvinist pigs. But when women do it here...they are celebrated as liberated indy heroines.

Meanwhile, guys in TV-land are reduced to subservient, henpecked infantile dads being browbeaten into submission by their alpha wives...