“The people here, liberal people, will not vote for Obama because of his attitude towards Israel,” Ms. Weitz, 83, said, lingering over brunch.
“They’re going to vote for McCain,” she said.
Ms. Grossman, 80, agreed with her friend’s conclusion, but not her reasoning.
“They’ll pick on the minister thing, they’ll pick on the wife, but the major issue is color,” she said, quietly fingering a coffee cup. Ms. Grossman said she was thinking of voting for Mr. Obama, who is leading in the delegate count for the nomination, as was Ms. Weitz.
But Ms. Grossman does not tell the neighbors. “I keep my mouth shut,” she said.
Abe Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said in February: "Obama has gone much further than other black leaders in his denunciation of (Louis) Farrakhan, and has expressed stalwartly pro-Israel views."
On Thursday, Mr. Obama will court Jewish voters with an appearance at a synagogue in Boca Raton, Fla. A longtime Democratic constituency with a consistently high turnout rate, Jews are important to his general election hopes, particularly in New York, which he expects to win; in California and New Jersey, which he must keep out of Republican hands; and, most crucially, here in Florida, where Jews make up around 5 percent of voters.
This is the most haunted state on the electoral college map for Democrats, the one they lost by hundreds of votes and a Supreme Court decision in 2000, and again in 2004.
“The fate of the world for the next four years,” mused Rabbi Ruvi New as his Sunday morning Kabbalah & Coffee class dispersed in East Boca Raton.
“It’s all going to boil down to a few old Jews in Century Village,” NYTimesBut in recent presidential elections, Jews have drifted somewhat to the right. Because Mr. Obama is relatively new on the national stage, his résumé of Senate votes in support of Israel is short, as is his list of high-profile visits to synagogues and delis. So far, his overtures to Jews have been limited; aside from a few speeches and interviews, he has left most of it to surrogates.
8 comments:
As a Jew, what troubles me about Obama is his wide net of acceptability. Clearly he is pro-black. This makes me wonder whether he will be pro-palestinean as well? Israel's survival, at this point, can be guaranteed only by a total eradication and extermination of every arab in the region. Would Obama be willing to support this final solution? I suspect not.
Anon are you retarded?... or just ignorant?
Obama is totally a Jew or rather a Babylonian. That is where the Jews adopted their so called religion from... with some spin.
The election offers no choice. Obama is on the record supporting Israel 100%...
The NeoCon ignorants and born again so called Christians will not put up a candidate unless that candidate like Obama is a religious belief system clown.
Political system invented religion system to control the sheople.
Oh and Anon.... clearly you are pro idiot.
Skip,
1) Anonymous is not a Jew. He's a baiter.
2) Anyone who is not a member of your secular cult of Technocracy is a "Babylonian". Obama has soul. You don't. Your inability to appreciate his spiritual quality is hindered by your unwillingness to acknowledge anything you cannot comprehend.
That's one of the downfalls of Secular Fundamentalism - "Man Is All There Is".
"Your eyes will be open and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." (Genesis 3:5)
This means that man will define what is good and evil. God is Good. When man makes himself God, good becomes whatever the most powerful man or group wants. Good becomes evil and evil becomes good. This is happening today.
Came across this this morning DV. May be of interest as regards the underpinnings of the present world crises according to Makow and other commentators, may also be of interest as a depiction of the "spiritual" dimensions some of what Obama is up against.
Back down to earth....,
Thirty years ago, when the state of Israel had travelled only half its present journey since 1948, I interviewed General Matti Peled in New York. As an army general, Peled had been a notably tough administrator of the Occupied Territories, but in retirement had become a dove, publicly urging his country to negotiate seriously with the Palestinians. Abandon the illegal settlements, he said, return to the 1967 borders and resolve all the other issues obstructing a proper peace.
"What do you think will happen," I asked the former general, "if no Israeli government ever emerges strong enough to take such a path?"
"Oh, I think we'll end up like the Crusaders," he answered. "It might take some time, but just like them, in the end, we'll be gone."
Then there's always the disconnection from reality of the current administration;
Later, the talk turned to socializing. Mr Bush asked if Arabs and Jews dated one another, or went to dances.
"No dances?" he asked, sounding surprised.
There was a slight pause in the discussion, until the American ambassador, Richard H Jones, stepped in, politely telling the president that society was more conservative here.
A slight pause in the discussion? I should say so. Perhaps an unbelievably awkward pause in which the listeners' jaws dropped almost to the pavement?
Ah, yes. If only Jews and Arabs could share high school socials, then everything would turn out all right. I could understand if George Bush was an ordinary American citizen and held these hopelessly simplistic views of the Israeli-Arab conflict. But to think that an American president does is beyond heartbreaking and goes a long way to explaining the past seven barren years of Bush Administration policy.
Does Bush not have the least understanding of the social, political and cultural divide between Israeli Jews and Arabs? Of course that's only a rhetorical question.
Another pathetic note: the only reference in Bush's Knesset speech to the Palestinians was one in which he predicted a Palestinian state - sometime in the next 60 years! How telling. Need we wonder why the Palestinians (and just about everyone else) have given up on this administration? And need we wonder why Bush's popularity rating among Israelis is at 66%?
Sigh...
So the Zionist brainwashing has gone so deep in this country that the question is no longer why we're even supporting an occupational racist apartheid to begin with...but a BJ contest to see which candidate can DT neo-Pharisee kawk the deepest..
BTW, Obama used to rhetorically support Palestinians when he was still a nobody in Chi...but I guess as AIPAC started waving dollars in his face, he did an about-face.
All I want to see is ONE, JUST ONE POTUS who does NOT support this brutally-racist apartheid??? Is that so damn hard? When the hell will that be???
Byrdeye,
You alright with me, man.
Post a Comment