Lie #1 In Darfur in western Sudan, the situation is as bad as it has been at any time in the last four years. The Arab janjaweed, supported by the Arab government of Sudan, continue to use rape and sexual violence on a daily basis as weapons of war. Tens of thousands of people have been killed and the crisis has spread across two borders. World leaders have been called to add action to their words to stop the violence.
Darfur: The Genocide is Islamic Racism!
Lie #2 For many months now, most of us have heard the name Darfur, a western region of Sudan in North Africa. On December 12 members of the United Nations Human Rights Council are to once again attempt to tackle the ongoing "genocide" problem in Darfur.
The previous conflict in Sudan (ending in 2005 with a peace treaty) was primarily between Christian and Animist forces in the south and the Muslim north. More than 2 million Christians and non-Muslims were enslaved, raped, tortured and murdered from 1983 to 2005.
The Truth
Who You Callin' Arab? All sides of the conflict are black African Muslims.
1) Why is the American Jewish Council sponsoring countless groups, rallies, and news stories portraying the conflict in Sudan as an Arab Muslim ethnic cleansing of black Christians?
2) Why are they lying?
3) Why is the American media playing along?
4) Do "educated" African Americans have a clue to what is really happening in Sudan, or are they being led by the nose, once again, by liberal Jews?
[Sudan produces 455,000 barrels of sweet crude oil per day. Lobbyists are hyping the conflict in Sudan as a genocide to justify the occupation of yet another oil rich Muslim nation.]
Sunday, September 09, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
?
Scratching head...
hbl said
?
Scratching head...
Hello hbl,
Please, don't just scratch your head. Ask a question or offer some insight.
Diverse opinions are welcome.
So true. there are many hotspots in Africa. Dafur is one of them.
we Africans are just a tiny bit skeptical of all the media attention that Dafur is getting. Not that we don't believe that there are humanitarian problems there, but Afican history has shown us that, interest in Africa by the West, is usually motivated by more that humanitarian concerns.
Could it be that the overiding interest is " get rid of the hostile Muslim government in oil producing country( Sudan)," so we can put our puppet/stooge government there?
Maybe your right or maybe your wrong?
Actor Don Cheadle has a new mission in life: raising awareness about the atrocities being carried out in what the United Nations says is the world's worst humanitarian crisis.
Cheadle traveled throughout western Sudan's Darfur region in 2005, and the trip left him a changed man, so much so it was difficult to come back to "my comfortable life and take stock in all the privileges ... and do nothing," he said.
Don Cheadle would probably feel that same shock if he drives through some parts of any large city in Africa. Take your pick Lagos, Nairobi, Coutonu etc. etc.
The poverty and suffering can be mind boggling. Or perhaps a visit to the main teaching hospital in any of these cities, where new mothers sleep on the floor with their babies. No electricity for surgery.... the list goes on and on...
It doesn't take Darfur to know that there is poverty and suffering in many countries of Africa.
1.) It's Afro-Arabs Vs 100& Africans. Racism and race is a perception. The Northeners feel they are superior to the indigenous.
2.) It's a combination of both ethnic Arab racism and religious Islamic bigotry (the same 'motivation' that drives anti-Jewish genocide campaign since the 1920s by the Mufti).
3.) The very fact that you blame the joos... shows again Islamic bigotry.
--
Racism at root of Sudan's Darfur crisis / The Christian Science
csmonitor.com/2004/0714/p09s02-coop.html
Post a Comment