Monday, May 21, 2007

BLACKS DON'T "OWN" HIP HOP? HELL, WE DIDN'T "OWN" THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT EITHER.

Jewish Dominance and Exploitation
of the Black Civil Rights Movement


Many observers argue that the presumed Jewish altruism and social activism in the American civil rights movement of the 1960's had baser motives. Benjamin Ginsberg argues that the multicultural coalitions spearheaded by Jews in the civil rights era "was a political tactic" to "undermine the power" of those establishment social forces that hindered further Jewish socio-economic advancement. [GINSBERG, p. 125]

In 1975 Hasia Dinner wrote a PhD thesis about the way that "Jewish support for black causes was a way for Jews to broaden their own rights without becoming conspicuous by advocating their group interests." [FEINGOLD, p. 130]

"Jewish leaders," wrote Diner, "representing different socio-economic classes, ideologies, and cultural experiences committed themselves to black betterment and gave time, money, and energy to black organizations. The spectrum was so wide and the involvement so extensive that one must conclude that these leaders acted out of peculiarly Jewish motives ... [My] book demonstrates that Jewish ends were secured by involvement with blacks." [DINER, p. xiv, xii]

(Similarly, Jewish author Peter Novick notes the changing Jewish strategy in using massive Jewish attack against generic prejudice as a tool in fending off specific anti-Jewish hostility:

"In recent decades, the leading Jewish organizations have invoked the Holocaust to argue that anti-Semitism is a distinctively virulent and murderous form of hatred. But in the first postwar decades their emphasis -- powerfully reinforced by contemporary scholarly opinion -- was on the common psychological roots of all forms of prejudice. Their research, educational, and political action programs consistently minimized diffrences between different targets of discrimination. If prejudice and discrimination were all of a piece, they reasoned that they could serve the cause of Jewish self-defense as well by attacking prejudice and discrimination against blacks as by tackling anti-Semitism directly.") [NOVICK., P., 1999, p. 116]

"The Jewish struggle for equality and fair treatment," says Jonathan Kaufman, "was linked to the struggles of Blacks for greater opportunity. It was not a struggle of equals; Jews did not consider their plight equal to that of Blacks. But they recognized in the Black struggle for civil rights elements that could benefit them and conditions with which they sympathized." [MARTIN, p. 131] Hence, perhaps three-quarters of the funding for the three major civil rights organizations -- the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, The Congress of Racial Equality, and Martin Luther King's Southern Christian Leadership Conference is attributed to Jewish sponsorship. [MARTIN, p. 132]

"Any support of human rights in general by Jews," says Israel Shahak, "which does not include the support of human rights of non-Jews whose rights are being violated by [Israel] is deceitful ... [Jewish] support of Blacks in the South was motivated only by consideration of Jewish self-interest." [SHAHAK, p. 103] "The major role [that Jews] once played in the civil rights movement," says Charles Liebman and Stephen Cohen, "[is a] myth ... [that] enhances the self-image of a Jew as a caring and sensitive minority selflessly contributing to improve the lot of other minorities." [LIEBMAN/COHEN, p. 17] "Among the many myths life and history have imposed on Negroes," wrote Black author Harold Cruse in 1967, "... is the myth that the Negroes' best friend is the Jew." [CRUSE, p. 476]

For years W.E.B. DuBois was the only Black officer in the NAACP, which was largely directed, funded, and controlled in its early decades by Jews like Henry Moskowitz and Joel Spingarn. [ARSON, p. 140] (In 1913 Spingarn announced a yearly award named after himself, the "Spingarn Medal," for the "highest and noblest achievement of an American Negro." [DINER, p. 138] ) In a later era, and another Black organization, the Southern Leadership Christian Conference, a Jew -- Stanley Levison -- even wrote Martin Luther King's speeches for him. [MARTIN, p. 132] Levison has been described as one of King's "closest personal advisers." [KAUFMAN, J., 1988, p. 66] This voice of "Christian Leadership," Levison, was also discovered by the FBI to have been a former Communist party member. [KAUFMAN, J., p. 66] Another Jew, Marvin Rich, was the "chief fundraiser and key speech writer for the Congress of Racial Equality -- CORE", [GINZBURG, p. 145] and his position was later filled by another Jewish attorney, Alan Gartner. In the 1960s, "in CORE, younger and more militant members blocked efforts by [James] Farmer to name one of his Jewish advisers president of CORE, insisting the post be filled with a black." [KAUFMAN, J., 1988, p. 76] In the same era, the Executive Director of the American Jewish Congress, Will Maslow, was also a CORE national board member. (He resigned in outrage when one African-American CORE official, Clifford Brown, angrily declared that Hitler hadn't "killed enough" Jews). [UROFSKY, M., 1978, p. 327]

20 comments:

Michael Fisher said...

Awriht.

Now we're getting somewhere.

BTW. What makes you think that your liberal Arab is any better?

Michael Fisher said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Michael Fisher said...

Note that DuBois worked furiously to discredit Booker T. and, once done with him did the same with Marcus Garvey.

DuBois, Robeson, even my old friend Harry Haywood, at the end of the day they all were but house negroes in a "revolutionary" guise.

Without these "revolutionary" house negroes, massa of the jewish variety would never have been able to retard our struggle.

DV, make sure you don't go there yourself.

Intellectual Insurgent said...

More whining about me? Geez. Don't you have a check to write Fisher?

Anonymous said...

DV
BLACKS DON'T "OWN" HIP HOP? HELL, WE DIDN'T "OWN" THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT EITHER.

So the question mark after Hip Hop means you believe or do not believe the statement? If you do then I say OK so lets understand that this influence was present and still is. Jews are opportunist too. Even with our Hip Hop. Chuck "D"'s message was way more effective than Snoop's. Now where have those messages disappeared to. You may say kid's don't feel it old school. I disagree... I think the Jew killed it because it was powerful in a constructive way for us. Rapper's come and go. Fiddy is hot now but he too will run his course in music become another Will Smith or LL Cool J. which I see coming. So in closing no matter who is out front be sure who is behind the scenes. There is one constant over all these years of music. The Jewish/white producers/financier my clan. Hell if 50 wanted to change his image/position tomorrow like Master P. did recently. Would his new image/position really get out? No one hates 50 here... We just think there is a better way to communicate so that his messages are not mis-understood or taken out of context. Like in 6th grade when you had to read Shakespear then write an essay about what read. Most in my class had no clue. Which I think under some circumstances is the case with some explicit lyrics. I have alway's wondered why no vulgar lyrics with explicit meaning/instructions about respecting your brotha's and sista's like Malcom promoted. Otherwise, there open for interpretation and I think they were planned that way. So thoughtfully devised that multi brotha's and sista's like on this blog can't agree if they are good or bad for our community. That's all nothing more nothing less.

Denmark Vesey said...

Casper said...
DV
BLACKS DON'T "OWN" HIP HOP? HELL, WE DIDN'T "OWN" THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT EITHER.

"So the question mark after Hip Hop means you believe or do not believe the statement?"

Believe it? LOL. Man you don't give up.

Listen bra, Hip Hop can no more "be owned" than Jazz can "be owned".

Hip Hop can no more "be owned" than comedy can "be owned".

Hip Hop can no more "be owned" than expressionist painting can "be owned".

At risk of being charged with - calling names - I find the mere suggestion that "Blacks don't own Hip Hop" stupid, short-sighted, confused and in need of a reality check.

Now please list a plethora of white distributors as your small minded "proof" that blacks "don't own Hip Hop".

Now list ANYTHING blacks "do own" according to your ownership criteria.

-

Michael Fisher said...

"Now please list a plethora of white distributors as your small minded "proof" that blacks "don't own Hip Hop"."

Hmmm...

So, DV,

Since it was yours truly who did the piece on white distribution, I guess the "small minded" comment is meant for me?

Denmark Vesey said...

"Since it was yours truly who did the piece on white distribution, I guess the "small minded" comment is meant for me?" M Fish

Nah man.

You cool. I don't find you in the least bit small minded. A bit stubborn. From time to time cantankerous. A little acerbic on certain issues.

But so am I.

I'm short with your boy Casper / Anon / Bulletproof because I find him intellectually dishonest and lacking in any real interest in expanding the discourse.

He has latched onto the rather droll idea that Hip Hop is the pathogen causing societal illness in the black community and Rappers are the pied pipers of of dysfunction.

When confronted with comparative analysis which shows Hip Hop is no more coopeted than any other black institution be it political, educational, corporate or legal he resorts to boring cut and paste campaigns that lead to nowhere -

ergo: "small minded".

That kind of one-dimensional thinking is abundant in the mass media, therefor I have little tolerance for it in media we control.

If he can't keep up intellectually, step off and let grown folks talk.

Fish, we have never had any problem saying to each other what's on our minds. When I lob something your way, there won't be any doubt to whom I am speaking.

Hip me a little bit more to Dubois' attempts to discredit Booker T.

As a young man (12 or 13) I was a fierce supporter of DuBois. Later, as my education matured, I became a Booker T. man as I saw the method to his madness.

Michael Fisher said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Michael Fisher said...

really don't agree with your assessment of Casp. But... hey. It's your blog.

"Hip me a little bit more to Dubois' attempts to discredit Booker T."

Check out my latest post.

It's got a very brief summary of what happened.

DuBois was the ultimate "radical" house negro.

Its the one thing I used to disagree with Dr. Clarke with. But then again he was our Elder, so I just shut up an listened.

J.C. said...

Jews, Christians, or Muslims etc. it makes not a whit of difference. Religion and bigotry go hand in hand.
These groups are Special Interest groups, and that means they take away from the rights and benefits of people that do not share their belief systems.
Our society is run by Special Interests. Political special interest, or Belief special interest, it does not matter. Both are negative to a good society.
Democracy, (rule by special interest groups)has failed in America. ---------------
-- NO body owns anything, except maybe the space in their skull.
---------
Jews are a religious/tribal group with an agenda. The agenda is belief in their bigoted ideas of 'right' and 'wrong', and 'good' and evil'.
A good society is not served well by any Special Interest group, be they of any 'religion'.
The main chore of all these 'religions' is to brainwash more people in order to fill up more collection plates. In other words they are scam artists, that sell blue sky.
The oddly tragic thing about the Jews, that is also contemptible, is the fact that they have persistently brainwashed their own people with their grisly stories of murder and mayhem. Their 'old testament' is a collection of hate filled bigotry that is instilled into the heads of their children. Everything from killing all the Egyptian babies while 'god' spared theirs, to the first documented genocide in human history, if it is true. The total murder of all the Canaanites on 'god`s' orders.
----------
Only a science based society that is secular would be a good society now in the modern world.
Belief, will kill everyone and then itself.
No one 'owns' the blues, but I know where it came from, and it is cool.

Anonymous said...

DV

I see you couldn't leave it/me alone.
I provide alternative answers to your rhetoric because in your mind you beleive #1 I am alone in my opinion #2 That person within the industry who are more knowledgable than you are do not agree with you as well. See you attempt to take a rather simple issue and try to make it complex with romantic novel use of language. But that's the problem. You would find it difficult communicating with the common folk. You need to understand that you are obviously priviledged. However you can not allow yourself to become arrogant. If you are such the expert in the industry then I think you would have exploited it for your own benefit. You would have replaced the Jew so that Fiddy would be have a black voice controlling and guiding him. But you are not. So what is your claim to fame. Where is the evidence that your philosphy when implemented is produces productive results in our community. Or are you just full of talk and no action? Either way DV I am not your enemy. I am not the man who controls 90% of the media. I am not the gun manufacture who puts the guns on the street. I am not the drug lord who puts the drugs on the streets. I am not the policy maker who distributes billions to Iraq but thousands to urban schools. Why are you not critical of the people who have the control. Why do attack the black man who is the attorney for Universal but not the black man who is the music messenger for Universal. That's the hypocrisy in your position. You know it so you attack those on the blog who expose it. Not sure what your real agenda is. Maybe your friends with Interscope. Whatever the case each artist is a contract employee of an American Corporation. There not Malcom, not Martin, not Mandella. So when the fickle consumers in the community are done with them there will be another and another and Fiddy will be just like Cool Mo D. But that's ok... make his loot. But at what cost? So who is single minded really? I'd rather hear a Chuck D type message from Fiddy versus bitches and hoes. But it's obvious you rather hear about bitches and hoes. So who is the simple minded person here?????

Anonymous said...

This is why corporate america and govt. rather have fiddy spitting about bitches,hoes,chains & cars versus real messages like Chuck D and KRS One.
FEAR! Don't FEAR change DV!

The Influence of Marcus Garvey Pt. 1

http://youtube.com/watch?v=EAI_xHY6yWo&mode=related&search=

Anonymous said...

Kevin Frazier of E.T. (Rauchy Rap Lyrics)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-EztJONgGwU&mode=related&search=

Anonymous said...

Chuck D. talks of hype and hope

By Maya Dollarhide
Special to freedomforum.org

Chuck D.
NEW YORK — The driving force behind today's rap music is not the power of the word but the promise of a payoff, says one of the foremost rap artists of his time.

"There is a pirating of our culture. Record companies are saying, 'We can't sell songs that don't play into the role of gangsters.' Intelligence is being downplayed," said Public Enemy frontman Chuck D. at the First Amendment Center May 18 during a taping of the weekly television show "Speaking Freely."

Chuck D. believes rap artists today are being forced just to sell an image by the companies who control them. He cited Tupac Shakur as an example of a "brilliant artist" who played at being a thug and ultimately died as a result of that image. The gangsta rapper was shot and killed by unknown assailants in 1996 on his way to a charity event in Las Vegas.

"I'm really angry about his death," Chuck D. said. "Record companies are selling black existence that is unbalanced."

The rap star, who rose to prominence with political hip-hop that promoted the black consciousness, pointed out that Viacom, one of the largest distributors of rap videos and music, is controlled by a few white men.

"For the companies, it's about marketing of this music," he said.

And how does this play to the listeners?

"Young people are having a hard time with what's reality and what's fantasy these days," he said. "It's dangerous to the [black] community

Anonymous said...

CAM' RON CALLS OUT 50 CENT AKA CURTIS ON BEING A THUG
EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW IN HARLEM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69BwlFLOgJg&mode=related&search=

Anonymous said...

Notice the difference...

Tupac They Dont Give A Fuc about us

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAJi7aOg4QQ&mode=related&search=

That includes Fiddy

Anonymous said...

Love that pac youtube video above. Imagine the affect THAT would have if they played THAT on BET/MTV. They are too scared to play/approve a video like that. It's not destructive to the Black community...it's revolutionary to the Black community.

Anonymous said...

DV said, "He has latched onto the rather droll idea that Hip Hop is the pathogen causing societal illness in the black community and Rappers are the pied pipers of of dysfunction"

It's not the pathogen, but it damn near is adding fuel to the already raging fire.

Anonymous said...

Zionists loyal to Jews in Israel Kill Americans

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyLhdewpJs0

Can you say Jimmy Iovine...