Denmark Vesey

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Gee Chee Vision said...

Trayvon didn't have any rights taken from him, he had his life taken from him. He was murdered.

Zimmerman already declared a turf war on any life he devalued. Trayvon didn't have territorial markings to identify any potential threat. The intent behind his murder is just as bad if he were murdered for faith or finance.

We should not be alarmed that there exist individuals that are willing to kill because of race, religion or resources, we should be alarmed about government willing to kill because of race, religion or resources.

2 comments:

Eric said...: Trayvon didn't have any rights taken from him? Huh? His right to life and liberty were snatched away.; Mar 29, 2012, 6:15:00 AM
Gee Chee Vision said...: Some one robs me in the street...

...along with my wallet he took off with my liberties.

He took my right to be protected from seizure of property without a warrant or probable cause?

He took my freedom of speech (cuz he told me to shut the eff up);

my pursuit of happiness cause he told me "stop smiling don't let noth'n move but the money"?

I'm not making a joke of Trayvon's death but trying to understand how these add-ons will assist the events as oppose to constructing a narrative serving some other purpose? How does it get worse than Trayvon being murdered?

If a hate crime takes place, is that really fair to multiply that crime into a crime of hate.

Not only did you commit the crime you hated while you did it.

Not only did you get caught selling 5 grams of crack but you assisted Al-Qaeda while doing so (as this one commercial suggested). More time nigger.

Protesting is beginning to be categorized as a threat to national security. The pendulum doesn't hold to one side for long.; Mar 29, 2012, 11:46:00 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."

The founders of the American state understood that the proper functioning of a democracy required an educated electorate. It is this understanding that justifies a system of public education and that led slaveholders to resist the spread of literacy among their chattels. But the meaning of "educated" has changed beyond recognition in two hundred years. Reading, writing, and arithmetic are no longer sufficient to decide on public policy. Now we need quantum mechanics and molecular biology. The knowledge required for political rationality, once available to the masses, is now in the possession of a specially educated elite, a situation that creates a series of tensions and contradictions in the operation of representative democracy.

Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. P

Lord Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science On Society (Routledge Press: New York, 1951).

"At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars.. War has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. The state of affairs might be unpleasant, but what of it?"