International Journal of Modern Physics B (IJMPB)
Condensed Matter Physics; Statistical Physics; Applied Physics
Volume: 23, Issue: 3(2009)
pp. 275-364 DOI: 10.1142/S021797920904984X
Title: FALSIFICATION OF THE ATMOSPHERIC CO2 GREENHOUSE EFFECTS WITHIN THE FRAME OF PHYSICS
|
According to the second law of thermodynamics, such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature, it is taken for granted that such a mechanism is real and stands on a firm scientific foundation.
In this paper, the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are clarified. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33° is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified.
7 comments:
Your "proof" has left much to be desired. One random paper in an obscure low impact journal (which probably wasn't even peer reviewed) hardly "proves" anything.
Where'd you find this? A reference in some blog?
lol ... ahh boy.
The Plantation Negro ... is trained only to accept information from the Plantation (MSM) ... much like some dogs are trained to only accept food from their masters.
Deal with the "What" not the "Where".
You took a few "science" courses Doc.
Think.
Use YOUR brain.
Read the contention.
Dismiss because of what YOU think.
Or accept it because of what YOU think.
Don't be afraid.
What's your problem with:
"The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system.
According to the second law of thermodynamics, such a planetary machine can never exist."
Now, we both have sources grabbed randomly from the internet ether. Neither one of us are Physicists. Both papers are likely from low impact journals.
Tell me how you can know if one or both are bullshit? You are going with the one that fits your agenda, and stating emphatically that some obscure paper is FACT, when thousands of published articles say otherwise.
Go on. Walk me through the equations.
PROVE. YOUR. POINT.
Tell me about the Second Law of Thermodynamics and how it applies to this situation rather than repeat something you read on a blog.
dv have you seen this:
The Great Global Warming Hoax
1. The "Greenhouse Effect" is a natural and valuable phenomenon, without which, the planet would be uninhabitable. 2. Global Warming, at least in recent times, is real.
3. CO2 is not a significant greenhouse gas; 95% of the contribution is due to Water Vapor.
4. Man's contribution to Greenhouse Gasses is relatively insignificant. We didn't cause the recent Global Warming and we cannot stop it.
5. Solar Activity appears to be the principal driver for Climate Change.
6. CO2 is a useful trace gas in the atmosphere, and the planet would actually benefit by having more, not less of it, because it is not a driver for Global Warming and would enrich our vegetation, yielding better crops to feed the expanding population.
7. CO2 is not causing global warming, in fact, CO2 is lagging temperature change in all reliable datasets. The cart is not pulling the donkey.
Can you explain those points and provide references, or is this another blog cut and paste?
Still Googling the Second Law of Thermodynamics? While you are at it maybe you should also Google Planck's Law and Stefan-Boltzmann Law. That should keep you busy until next summer...or longer.
Post a Comment