DV- I have a friend who was "diagnosed" with "HIV" in 1982. He took AZT like they tole him to and got extremely ill. After a few months, he stopped talking medication, and used diet, exercise and vitamins to maintain his health. He is is perfect health, and rarely gets ill. He was told he would die within 5 years from "AIDS". All of the people he knew who got the same diagnoses as him took AZT, and ended up dead. He was told he could never have a child because he would transmit this "disease" on to his partner and his child. He has a 2 year old girl now. I asked him if he vaccinated her. Of course not!! This is a smart man to not allow the doctor's to bully him into taking medications, and recognizing that the MEDICATIONS do nothing but weaken the body and cause the problems they call "AIDS"
How is my timeline off?? I just spoke to this man a few days ago, and he related all of this information to me. I have know for five years that he was "HIV positive" and that he does not take medication. He just told me a few days ago that he was diagnosed in 1982 and at one point doctors tried to give him AZT (not sure when that was, but it was when AZT first came out). He took it for a few months and got sicker, so he stopped taking it.
That's for you to figure out. Your timeline is WAY off. And it makes me doubt your story. But, I'm giving you the benefit of doubt, and I'll let you correct yourself before I embarrass you.
johanna, AZT was not approved for use until 1987. most folk who had the sx associated with HIV/AIDS back in 1982 died shortly after dx as it was still not determined what exactly the dis-ease was or how it was to be treated. just fyi...
anon... stop fucking with her...it is obvious she did not know...let's continue to enlighten, not embarrass. and, if possible it would be nice if u could adopt an online name so we may differentiate u from the other online stalkers...no beef, just a suggestion... have a good day... tgn
You know as well as I do that people who make statements like that have already made up what little mind they have to believe in some stupid conspiracy. Look what happened in South Africa because of the same willingness to believe misinformation. I gave her a chance to correct herself, then you jumped in. Let folks jump over the cliff if they want to.
If you read my comment, I said he took AZT AT SOME POINT, not immediately after he was diagnosed. So,if my time line is off, it is because my friend is lying (which I highly doubt) or remembering wrong (although I do not know how you can not remember when you are diagnosed with a supposedly deadly disease) because he told me just the other day he was diagnosed in 1982 and was given 5 years to live, and have been healthy since, except for the time he was on AZT.
I have only known him for 5 years. He told me from Day 1 his was "HIV positive" and did not take medication. I myself was shocked when he had his daughter, because I believed that his fiancee was endangering her life by having sex with him without a condom. I had no idea about this all until recently.
tgn- thanks for the clarification, btw. I guess he meant he took AZT when it came out, not when he was first diagnosed.
But, still, isn't it true that AIDS was not really a new disease, it was an amalgamation of already existing diseases? And that although most say it is caused by a virus, it is entirely possible that lifestyle factors could be the real cause?
I heard that in Africa and India they diagnose sick people with AIDS without doing any tests, and that these are mainly people who are dying from diseases that were formerly attributed to living in conditions of poverty.
I don't claim my view is based on any expertise on my part, it is just my opinion based on recent research I have done.
Nice try Joanna. Your friend could not have been diagnosed with "HIV" in 1982 because it hadn't been discovered until 1983, and was named later, with a test much later. If your friend had anything it was full blown AIDS, and as the good nurse stated these patients DIED soon after. Why you ask? The soon to be discovered retrovirus attacks, reproduces in and then destroys T-Cells (those immune cells that fight off disease). Without them, your body has little defense against things a person with a competent immune system could fight off easily. Thanks for sharing though. Reading websites does not constitute research.
Why are you being so picky about the exact time line? The point is, he was diagnosed more than 25 years ago,does not take medication and is still healthy. Whether he was diagnosed with "HIV" or "AIDS" I do not know. But, he is NOT SICK, even though when he DOES see a regular doctor, they are amazed.
You know what? Don't even answer that question. This is standard operating procedure. You cannot find an explanation for the fact that my friend (and others like him) ARE NOT SICK, so you have to use ONE DETAIL to try to negate the entire situation. Nah, not gonna work. I may capitulate on the exact date of diagnoses, but as for the veracity of the story in general? It is all true.
Why? To be perfectly blunt it's because I think you are full of shit, and just want to jump on the bandwagon. Let's say your friend was diagnosed with GRID or AIDS back in 82. And got on an early clinical trial, or was given AZT when it was available. The man came to the attention of physicians because he exhibited signs of immunodeficiency syndrome and was likely plagued with opportunistic infections.
There wasn't a test back in 82 that detected HIV before someone got sick, like there is today. Either way, your friend wasn't made sick by AZT. You feel me?
...and by the way, have you clinically examined your friend, looked at blood samples, chest X-rays and medical records to confirm that he ever WAS "sick".
Sure Anon, because a lab test is so much a better gauge then HOW HE ACTUALLY FEELS, right?? And the fact that traditional doctor's have been telling his for YEARS that he was SICK and on the verge of death, while he is still here, still strong, still asymptomatic, makes THEM the "experts"??? Really?? That is funny!
So I guess my friend should have the attitude:
"I feel great, I am strong, I am happy, I have plenty of energy to play with my daughter and work at my job, but I am SICK, because the DOCTOR has been telling me for 20 years I am going to die! And of course, a doctor knows how I am doing so much better than my own feeelings"
Anony-Doogie Doc MG the Plantation MD...aka "you know who I be"
1. Tired of getting his name put on display in posts after getting beat up
2. OBVIOUSLY him with the "crack a book" and "stupid fucking moron" comments
3. Still shows up eighteen times a day, but is "above all this shit"...so he says anyway.
4. Has a secret crush on Hot MF Wax and DV...like a little kid in the second grade who likes a girl but acts like he doesn't, so he resorts to petty insults. Cut that pro-bono homo puppy love shit out cousin, it ain't a good look. And bring the DMG back with the scalpel! Sharp as a spoon, Lord have mercy...
If you'd put down your chip for 5 seconds, you'd understand that it's your boy who is pulling the wool over your eyes.
1. How did he get diagnosed in 82? It couldn't have been random, he had to be obviously SICK.
2. Being HIV+ only tells you that you have the virus. It says nothing about T-Cells being destroyed...or having an immunodeficiency (read no protection against bacteria and viruses).
DMG... oops, I mean Anonymous.... as I said, he could be incorrect about the exact date. He was tested when the first HIV test came out. If it was not 1982, it was whenever the test did come out. He only got tested because he was (at the time) having sex with other men, and he was told that all gay and bisexual men should get tested. He has had doctor's tell him at numerous times that he did not have much longer to live, even though he felt perfectly healthy, and none of their predictions came true. He is not in a relationship with a woman, he has a baby, and she did not become "infected" when they were attempting to have a child. He still avoids doctors because they all want to tell him he needs to go on medication, and they have been telling him for decades that he is going to die if he doesn't take their drugs.
And by the way, I don't eat chips. I try to stick to fruit and nuts if I want a snack.
How many anonymous' do you think you can attribute to a particular person on this blog? I really don't care who you think I am or am not.
I enjoy fucking with you and making you paranoid whenever you see the name "Anonymous". You will spend an inordinate amount of time trying to figure out to whom you are speaking.
You are here for my enjoyment. And so far, you've put on a fantastic show.
Chip as in chip on your shoulder...not the greasy kind that comes in a bag.
Now, your story is making a little more sense. 1982 timeline still doesn't.
I'm merely trying to get you to be more precise in your words, and to confirm the validity of "what people tell you". And how do you know this women and her baby aren't infected? Have you seen their medical records? How do you know if he's perfectly healthy.
THIS person felt "perfectly healthy" so much so that he was playing high school football. His feeling fine was no consolation after he dropped dead suddenly from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
"Feeling" fine has little to do with how healthy you actually are.
"You will spend an inordinate amount of time trying to figure out to whom you are speaking." -DMaybeG
HA! Nah buddy, YOU will spend an inordinate amount of time doing whatever it is you do here. It took all of 43 seconds to figure out it was you after the last time you "left".
So, you are merely being contrarian. Fair enough. Still doesn't make you correct, or shield you from ridicule when your statements demonstrate clear ignorance of the subject matter, and lack of critical thinking.
Weren't you always the first one jumping on other people about posting comments as anonymous? It is kinda obvious who you are, so please follow the advice you gave so many anonymous commenters over time... Get a name or stop talkin!
Wait, wait, wait.... reading over your comments, I can only conclude that many of those people who YOU INSULTED and DERIDED for not "having a name" were actually YOUR alter-egos, and their stances were just YOU trying to put on a good show??? That is rich!
We still haven't come to a conclusion who this anonymous is...or if there is one, two, or three or more different anonymous' taking turns writing to see what sort of response we can get from you.
But as always, your type assumes quite a bit, but we have to admit it does add to the flavor of the show.
Who cares!!! All assholes look/talk alike! Quit feedin' the stink hole people!
The point is, trusting the same people who run the prisons, the vaccinations and our institutions for education is...an amazing suspension of rational thought.
Not much sun out here right now, in fact, it is almost dark. But I have been taking 4000 IU of D3 for the past few weeks. After I heard Curtis Duncan talk about it on the radio, I bought enough for like a year. I take 2000IU with breakfast and 2000IU with dinner. When I am out of those, I will switch to taking 5000IU at dinner time!
I also got some herbs (valerian root, chaste tree, and dong quai) but so far I am only taking the valerian. But it really doesn't seem to be doing anything. I still need my anti-anxiety prescription pills, sad to say.
I don't and I tell myself all the time that I need too, it is just REALLY difficult for me. I tell myself to start out slow (walking even a few blocks at a time) but I only end up doing even that tiny amount once or twice a week. I tried joining a gym, but had no way of getting there. And I get really anxious when I do try to work out, because I have this fear that I will drop dead of a heart attack if I raise my heart rate. I know, I need to get over it, especially since I want a child.
Asshole as in jerk, not anus, D. SMITH (guess we know what's on your mind). Doesn't something smell a bit fishy about your article? 700% increase in miscarriages...but there's a "conspiracy" to hide it from "us" for nefarious reasons. Doesn't your bullshit alarm ring even the tiniest bit??
The cause of AIDS is AZT. Every symptom of AIDS was/is the side effect of this deadly drug. End of story.
Worse Failed Cancer Drug every created. Held, then used as an insecticide against black folks worldwide later , Master eugenicist Bill Gates and his Dad could not have been more proud. Fist tap to Magic Johnson(sarcasm).
AZT is not a new drug. It was not created for the treatment of AIDS and is not an antiviral. AZT is a chemical compound that was developed -- and abandoned -- over 30 years ago as a potential chemotherapy treatment for cancer. (108) Prior to the first AIDS drug trials in 1986, AZT had never been administered to human beings.
Chemotherapy works by killing all growing cells in the body. Many cancer patients do not survive chemotherapy due to its destructive effects on the immune system and intestines. Because of the damage it causes, chemotherapy is never used as a prevention for cancer, and is only administered for very limited amounts of time.
This label has appeared on bottles containing as little as 25 milligrams, a small fraction (1/20 to 1/60) of a patient's daily prescribed dose of 500 to 1,500 mg. (109)
Since cancer is a condition of persistently growing cells, AZT was designed to prevent the formation of new cells by blocking development of DNA chains. In 1964, experiments with AZT on mice with cancer showed that AZT was so effective in destroying healthy growing cells that the mice died of extreme toxicity. (110) As a result, AZT was shelved and no patent was ever filed. Twenty years later, the pharmaceutical company Burroughs Wellcome (now Glaxo-Wellcome) began a campaign to remarket AZT as an anti-HIV drug based on the idea that AZT would block the formation of HIV DNA chains. Glaxo-Wellcome won FDA approval for AZT as an AIDS treatment after one highly flawed study of only four months duration. (111)"
"On 13-14 February 1991, in Washington DC, a special meeting was held of the Anti-viral Drugs Committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to discuss the validity of AZT use. The first thing that was agreed upon was that the P24 antigen test, upon which AZT effectiveness was assessed, was useless and meaningless, which of course meant that the grounds upon which AZT was approved in the first place were spurious. The main focus of the meeting was the Veterans Administration Co-operative Study 298, the preliminary findings of which were presented by Dr John Hamilton MD. The study was of 338 HIV-positive individuals with AIDS, divided into two groups, both groups given AZT but in different dosage. Dr Hamilton reported that no benefit for either treatment group was detected for survival or the combined chemical end points of AIDS and death. He said that early AZT resulted in transitory benefits in whites, and neutral or harmful effects in black and Hispanic patients. No mention was made of the high risk of cancer for those taking the drug."
HotmfWax- I don't know why blogger keeps eating your comments, but rest assured I did get the info about AZT, I have bookmarked the link to read in more detail later. Some of the info is touched upon briefly in "Vaccines are Dangerous" by Curtis Cost (good book).
He also has an interesting chapter in there about how the symptoms of mercury poisoning are identical to the symptoms of "autism" in order to show the correlation between mercury laden vaccines and the upswing in the incidences of "autism"
I know good natural lifestyle will combat AIDS, but I'm just wondering. Based on waht HOTMF-WAX said wouldn't giving cancer to aids patients cause the two to cancel each other out?
"Oh Shit! ... GMO Food Sterilizes People ... And It's Really A Form of Population Control?"
"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."
INTELLECTUAL INSURRECTIONISTS
Alexander King, Bertrand Schneider - founder Club of Rome - The First Global Revolution, pp.104-105
"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill ... All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
Were We All Kunta Kinte? Or Are We Also Mansa Musa?
Plantation Negros & The New World Order
Illuminati Want My Mind Soul & My Body - A DV Joint
Barry Goldwater 1909-1998
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. "
Robert Mugabe Speaks To Thunderous Approval At Harlem's Mount Olive Baptist Church
The Honorable Elijah Muhammad
"It Is Easier To Change A Man's Religion Than It Is To Change His Diet"
Private Prison Industry
2,000,000 human beings in American prisons and counting
IS THIS LITTLE GUY A PERSON?
The founders of the American state understood that the proper functioning of a democracy required an educated electorate. It is this understanding that justifies a system of public education and that led slaveholders to resist the spread of literacy among their chattels. But the meaning of "educated" has changed beyond recognition in two hundred years. Reading, writing, and arithmetic are no longer sufficient to decide on public policy. Now we need quantum mechanics and molecular biology. The knowledge required for political rationality, once available to the masses, is now in the possession of a specially educated elite, a situation that creates a series of tensions and contradictions in the operation of representative democracy.
Greater Display of Conspicuous Consumption?
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. P
"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
Louis Pasteur
"The Microbe is nothing. The terrain is everything."
A DV JOINT
Ask Denmark Vesey
DenmarkVesey1822@hotmail.com
Chris Hedges Warns of The Dangers of The "New Atheists" and "Secular Fundamentalists"
Beverly Johnson. Beverly Hills. 1978
Do You Consider Yourself:
"Bra! Tell Me About It!"
"Most of the trouble I have had in advancing the cause of the race has come from Negroes."
Is President Barack Hussein Obama The Driving Force Behind US Policy?
Ted Turner - CNN founder and UN supporter - quoted in the The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June '
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Lord Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science On Society (Routledge Press: New York, 1951).
"At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars.. War has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective. If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. The state of affairs might be unpleasant, but what of it?"
Denmark Vesey For President 08
1. Troops Out Of Iraq Immediately. Like By Monday. 2. Money Owed To Haliburton and War Contractors Be Given Directly To The Iraqi People 3. Complete Electoral Reform 4. No Corporate Conglomerate Will Be Allowed To Control More Than 5% Of News Market 5. Federal Reserve Abolished 6. For-Profit Prison Industry Abolished
*George Orwell (1903-1950) English novelist, critic
Men can only be happy when they do not assume that the object of life is happiness... If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear... The great enemy of clear language is insincerity... The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it... To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle... For a creative writer possession of the truth is less important than emotional sincerity.
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society will be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.” – Zbigniew Brzezinski
God Don't Make No Mistakes
Subscribe Via eMail
Gordon Parks 1912-2006
"I suffered evils, but without allowing them to rob me of the freedom to expand."
53 comments:
Dont Hurt em DV!
Pretty soon the plantation will get hip to this:
http://www.personalliberty.com/alternative-medicine/no-one-ever-dies-of-cancer-the-shocking-truth/
BTW, Did our buddy get fired from the basement job with Cass? Maybe they took his laptop. :). Can you help him out with the log in issues?
DV- I have a friend who was "diagnosed" with "HIV" in 1982. He took AZT like they tole him to and got extremely ill. After a few months, he stopped talking medication, and used diet, exercise and vitamins to maintain his health. He is is perfect health, and rarely gets ill. He was told he would die within 5 years from "AIDS". All of the people he knew who got the same diagnoses as him took AZT, and ended up dead. He was told he could never have a child because he would transmit this "disease" on to his partner and his child. He has a 2 year old girl now. I asked him if he vaccinated her. Of course not!! This is a smart man to not allow the doctor's to bully him into taking medications, and recognizing that the MEDICATIONS do nothing but weaken the body and cause the problems they call "AIDS"
Ummm Joanna,
The timeline of your "story" is off. You want to try again?
How is my timeline off?? I just spoke to this man a few days ago, and he related all of this information to me. I have know for five years that he was "HIV positive" and that he does not take medication. He just told me a few days ago that he was diagnosed in 1982 and at one point doctors tried to give him AZT (not sure when that was, but it was when AZT first came out). He took it for a few months and got sicker, so he stopped taking it.
DV -does this on many post when using the Mac. Shows up and then disappears.
"Google
Error
Request-URI Too Large
The requested URL /comment.g... is too large to process."
Any idea?
Johanna,
That's for you to figure out. Your timeline is WAY off. And it makes me doubt your story. But, I'm giving you the benefit of doubt, and I'll let you correct yourself before I embarrass you.
johanna,
AZT was not approved for use until 1987. most folk who had the sx associated with HIV/AIDS back in 1982 died shortly after dx as it was still not determined what exactly the dis-ease was or how it was to be treated. just fyi...
tgn
Why you gotta take the fun out of it?
anon...
stop fucking with her...it is obvious she did not know...let's continue to enlighten, not embarrass.
and, if possible it would be nice if u could adopt an online name so we may differentiate u from the other online stalkers...no beef, just a suggestion...
have a good day...
tgn
You know as well as I do that people who make statements like that have already made up what little mind they have to believe in some stupid conspiracy. Look what happened in South Africa because of the same willingness to believe misinformation. I gave her a chance to correct herself, then you jumped in. Let folks jump over the cliff if they want to.
I like my anonymity.
true. that is typical human behavior.we like misinformation because truth is often difficult to wrap our minds around.
and anonymity has it's privileges...
If you read my comment, I said he took AZT AT SOME POINT, not immediately after he was diagnosed. So,if my time line is off, it is because my friend is lying (which I highly doubt) or remembering wrong (although I do not know how you can not remember when you are diagnosed with a supposedly deadly disease) because he told me just the other day he was diagnosed in 1982 and was given 5 years to live, and have been healthy since, except for the time he was on AZT.
I have only known him for 5 years. He told me from Day 1 his was "HIV positive" and did not take medication. I myself was shocked when he had his daughter, because I believed that his fiancee was endangering her life by having sex with him without a condom. I had no idea about this all until recently.
Because a drug was not "approved" for usage means it could not be prescribed?
tgn- thanks for the clarification, btw. I guess he meant he took AZT when it came out, not when he was first diagnosed.
But, still, isn't it true that AIDS was not really a new disease, it was an amalgamation of already existing diseases? And that although most say it is caused by a virus, it is entirely possible that lifestyle factors could be the real cause?
I heard that in Africa and India they diagnose sick people with AIDS without doing any tests, and that these are mainly people who are dying from diseases that were formerly attributed to living in conditions of poverty.
I don't claim my view is based on any expertise on my part, it is just my opinion based on recent research I have done.
Nice try Joanna. Your friend could not have been diagnosed with "HIV" in 1982 because it hadn't been discovered until 1983, and was named later, with a test much later. If your friend had anything it was full blown AIDS, and as the good nurse stated these patients DIED soon after. Why you ask? The soon to be discovered retrovirus attacks, reproduces in and then destroys T-Cells (those immune cells that fight off disease). Without them, your body has little defense against things a person with a competent immune system could fight off easily. Thanks for sharing though. Reading websites does not constitute research.
Ensayn, sure if the guy was in a clinical trial. But again, time line is off.
The lesson here is. CHECK YOUR FACTS before TYPING.
Why are you being so picky about the exact time line? The point is, he was diagnosed more than 25 years ago,does not take medication and is still healthy. Whether he was diagnosed with "HIV" or "AIDS" I do not know. But, he is NOT SICK, even though when he DOES see a regular doctor, they are amazed.
You know what? Don't even answer that question. This is standard operating procedure. You cannot find an explanation for the fact that my friend (and others like him) ARE NOT SICK, so you have to use ONE DETAIL to try to negate the entire situation. Nah, not gonna work. I may capitulate on the exact date of diagnoses, but as for the veracity of the story in general? It is all true.
Why? To be perfectly blunt it's because I think you are full of shit, and just want to jump on the bandwagon. Let's say your friend was diagnosed with GRID or AIDS back in 82. And got on an early clinical trial, or was given AZT when it was available. The man came to the attention of physicians because he exhibited signs of immunodeficiency syndrome and was likely plagued with opportunistic infections.
There wasn't a test back in 82 that detected HIV before someone got sick, like there is today. Either way, your friend wasn't made sick by AZT. You feel me?
...and by the way, have you clinically examined your friend, looked at blood samples, chest X-rays and medical records to confirm that he ever WAS "sick".
Nevermind, don't answer that question. :)
Sure Anon, because a lab test is so much a better gauge then HOW HE ACTUALLY FEELS, right?? And the fact that traditional doctor's have been telling his for YEARS that he was SICK and on the verge of death, while he is still here, still strong, still asymptomatic, makes THEM the "experts"??? Really?? That is funny!
So I guess my friend should have the attitude:
"I feel great, I am strong, I am happy, I have plenty of energy to play with my daughter and work at my job, but I am SICK, because the DOCTOR has been telling me for 20 years I am going to die! And of course, a doctor knows how I am doing so much better than my own feeelings"
Um, I don't think so.
Anony-Doogie Doc MG the Plantation MD...aka "you know who I be"
1. Tired of getting his name put on display in posts after getting beat up
2. OBVIOUSLY him with the "crack a book" and "stupid fucking moron" comments
3. Still shows up eighteen times a day, but is "above all this shit"...so he says anyway.
4. Has a secret crush on Hot MF Wax and DV...like a little kid in the second grade who likes a girl but acts like he doesn't, so he resorts to petty insults. Cut that pro-bono homo puppy love shit out cousin, it ain't a good look. And bring the DMG back with the scalpel! Sharp as a spoon, Lord have mercy...
Joanna,
If you'd put down your chip for 5 seconds, you'd understand that it's your boy who is pulling the wool over your eyes.
1. How did he get diagnosed in 82? It couldn't have been random, he had to be obviously SICK.
2. Being HIV+ only tells you that you have the virus. It says nothing about T-Cells being destroyed...or having an immunodeficiency (read no protection against bacteria and viruses).
So which is it?
Sure. How do you know who is behind any number of characters on this blog?
Hell I could be DV for all you know. A person could have been typing under several different tags for months now, arguing both sides.
You don't think a person can switch up his typing, and speech patterns? Especially in this bunch? You all are so easily fooled anyway.
Don't get paranoid now.
Nigga you know you DMG, stop playin'. You didn't switch up anything except for on that last post...
Unless the real DMG finally realized he was getting beat by a bunch of cats without Jigaboo U Plantation Certified Degrees on their wall.
DMG... oops, I mean Anonymous.... as I said, he could be incorrect about the exact date. He was tested when the first HIV test came out. If it was not 1982, it was whenever the test did come out. He only got tested because he was (at the time) having sex with other men, and he was told that all gay and bisexual men should get tested. He has had doctor's tell him at numerous times that he did not have much longer to live, even though he felt perfectly healthy, and none of their predictions came true. He is not in a relationship with a woman, he has a baby, and she did not become "infected" when they were attempting to have a child. He still avoids doctors because they all want to tell him he needs to go on medication, and they have been telling him for decades that he is going to die if he doesn't take their drugs.
And by the way, I don't eat chips. I try to stick to fruit and nuts if I want a snack.
How many anonymous' do you think you can attribute to a particular person on this blog? I really don't care who you think I am or am not.
I enjoy fucking with you and making you paranoid whenever you see the name "Anonymous". You will spend an inordinate amount of time trying to figure out to whom you are speaking.
You are here for my enjoyment. And so far, you've put on a fantastic show.
Joanna,
Chip as in chip on your shoulder...not the greasy kind that comes in a bag.
Now, your story is making a little more sense. 1982 timeline still doesn't.
I'm merely trying to get you to be more precise in your words, and to confirm the validity of "what people tell you". And how do you know this women and her baby aren't infected? Have you seen their medical records? How do you know if he's perfectly healthy.
THIS person felt "perfectly healthy" so much so that he was playing high school football. His feeling fine was no consolation after he dropped dead suddenly from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
"Feeling" fine has little to do with how healthy you actually are.
So, your story still does not impress.
"You will spend an inordinate amount of time trying to figure out to whom you are speaking." -DMaybeG
HA! Nah buddy, YOU will spend an inordinate amount of time doing whatever it is you do here. It took all of 43 seconds to figure out it was you after the last time you "left".
My goal is not to impress. My goal is to express.... usually an opinion that differs from what the world wants people to believe.
Nice. I've got my own little Negro Minstrel Show. Please continue, spending an inordinate amount of time and energy on this.
Brilliant!! LOL
I again ask you. How many anonymous' have come and gone in the last couple of months? How many could have perhaps been a surgeon in disguise?
Please do continue.
Joanna,
So, you are merely being contrarian. Fair enough. Still doesn't make you correct, or shield you from ridicule when your statements demonstrate clear ignorance of the subject matter, and lack of critical thinking.
Just saying.
Mr. Not So Anonymous....
Weren't you always the first one jumping on other people about posting comments as anonymous? It is kinda obvious who you are, so please follow the advice you gave so many anonymous commenters over time... Get a name or stop talkin!
I don't know. There are many anonymous' hanging about. Some you've laughed and agreed with very recently....
No. I like anonymous.
Wait, wait, wait.... reading over your comments, I can only conclude that many of those people who YOU INSULTED and DERIDED for not "having a name" were actually YOUR alter-egos, and their stances were just YOU trying to put on a good show??? That is rich!
We still haven't come to a conclusion who this anonymous is...or if there is one, two, or three or more different anonymous' taking turns writing to see what sort of response we can get from you.
But as always, your type assumes quite a bit, but we have to admit it does add to the flavor of the show.
i got your back jo! get him!
I think we should all comment as anonymous from now on... can you figure out who I am??? Hint: You have seen me in my pajamas!
Who cares!!! All assholes look/talk alike! Quit feedin' the stink hole people!
The point is, trusting the same people who run the prisons, the vaccinations and our institutions for education is...an amazing suspension of rational thought.
How many assholes have you seen Smile? And why?
Personally, I have never seen as asshole smile.....
Smile says he's willing to help you change that.
Soooo...WTF?!! Buttholes? Really?
Speaking of vaccines though:
www.naturalnews.com/z030657_vaccines_miscarriages.html
H1N1 vaccine linked to 700 percent increase in miscarriages.
There is a link in that article to the source article as well.
Y'all get outside and get some vitamin D providin' sunlight on ya, and stop talking about booty holes please.
Not much sun out here right now, in fact, it is almost dark. But I have been taking 4000 IU of D3 for the past few weeks. After I heard Curtis Duncan talk about it on the radio, I bought enough for like a year. I take 2000IU with breakfast and 2000IU with dinner. When I am out of those, I will switch to taking 5000IU at dinner time!
I also got some herbs (valerian root, chaste tree, and dong quai) but so far I am only taking the valerian. But it really doesn't seem to be doing anything. I still need my anti-anxiety prescription pills, sad to say.
joanna,
do you work out? meaning get at least an hour of cardio in per day?
I don't and I tell myself all the time that I need too, it is just REALLY difficult for me. I tell myself to start out slow (walking even a few blocks at a time) but I only end up doing even that tiny amount once or twice a week. I tried joining a gym, but had no way of getting there. And I get really anxious when I do try to work out, because I have this fear that I will drop dead of a heart attack if I raise my heart rate. I know, I need to get over it, especially since I want a child.
Asshole as in jerk, not anus, D. SMITH (guess we know what's on your mind). Doesn't something smell a bit fishy about your article? 700% increase in miscarriages...but there's a "conspiracy" to hide it from "us" for nefarious reasons. Doesn't your bullshit alarm ring even the tiniest bit??
Sent this last night.
Joanne,
Check this :
The cause of AIDS is AZT. Every symptom of AIDS was/is the side effect of this deadly drug. End of story.
Worse Failed Cancer Drug every created. Held, then used as an insecticide against black folks worldwide later , Master eugenicist Bill Gates and his Dad could not have been more proud. Fist tap to Magic Johnson(sarcasm).
http://www.aliveandwell.org/html/aids_drug_fact/aidsdrugfact.html
"AZT: A Drug in Search of a Disease
AZT is not a new drug. It was not created for the treatment of AIDS and is not an antiviral. AZT is a chemical compound that was developed -- and abandoned -- over 30 years ago as a potential chemotherapy treatment for cancer. (108) Prior to the first AIDS drug trials in 1986, AZT had never been administered to human beings.
Chemotherapy works by killing all growing cells in the body. Many cancer patients do not survive chemotherapy due to its destructive effects on the immune system and intestines. Because of the damage it causes, chemotherapy is never used as a prevention for cancer, and is only administered for very limited amounts of time.
This label has appeared on bottles containing as little as 25 milligrams, a small fraction (1/20 to 1/60) of a patient's daily prescribed dose of 500 to 1,500 mg. (109)
Since cancer is a condition of persistently growing cells, AZT was designed to prevent the formation of new cells by blocking development of DNA chains. In 1964, experiments with AZT on mice with cancer showed that AZT was so effective in destroying healthy growing cells that the mice died of extreme toxicity. (110) As a result, AZT was shelved and no patent was ever filed. Twenty years later, the pharmaceutical company Burroughs Wellcome (now Glaxo-Wellcome) began a campaign to remarket AZT as an anti-HIV drug based on the idea that AZT would block the formation of HIV DNA chains. Glaxo-Wellcome won FDA approval for AZT as an AIDS treatment after one highly flawed study of only four months duration. (111)"
http://chestofbooks.com/health/natural-cure/Ross-Horne/Health-and-Survival-in-the-21st-Century/AZT-The-AIDS-Drug.html
"On 13-14 February 1991, in Washington DC, a special meeting was held of the Anti-viral Drugs Committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to discuss the validity of AZT use. The first thing that was agreed upon was that the P24 antigen test, upon which AZT effectiveness was assessed, was useless and meaningless, which of course meant that the grounds upon which AZT was approved in the first place were spurious. The main focus of the meeting was the Veterans Administration Co-operative Study 298, the preliminary findings of which were presented by Dr John Hamilton MD. The study was of 338 HIV-positive individuals with AIDS, divided into two groups, both groups given AZT but in different dosage. Dr Hamilton reported that no benefit for either treatment group was detected for survival or the combined chemical end points of AIDS and death. He said that early AZT resulted in transitory benefits in whites, and neutral or harmful effects in black and Hispanic patients. No mention was made of the high risk of cancer for those taking the drug."
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/jlcancer.htm
wax
HotmfWax- I don't know why blogger keeps eating your comments, but rest assured I did get the info about AZT, I have bookmarked the link to read in more detail later. Some of the info is touched upon briefly in "Vaccines are Dangerous" by Curtis Cost (good book).
He also has an interesting chapter in there about how the symptoms of mercury poisoning are identical to the symptoms of "autism" in order to show the correlation between mercury laden vaccines and the upswing in the incidences of "autism"
I know good natural lifestyle will combat AIDS, but I'm just wondering. Based on waht HOTMF-WAX said wouldn't giving cancer to aids patients cause the two to cancel each other out?
again just curious.-another anon
Post a Comment