That has long been a moral imperative since the time of Our Blessed Lord himself it has been a moral imperative that we help Our Lord’s the sick and Our Lord’s the poor. And we work for them and we raise them up and we make them healthy and we make them wealthy, because if we make them wealthy, then their populations will stabilize.
This is something that every demographer knows perfectly well . Make the population wealthy and it stabilizes. Keep it poor and it will continue to increase. Make it poor if it was wealthy, and it will start to increase again.
And if the environmental left were really serious about saving the planet from a huge CO2 footprint (which I will show doesn’t matter at all) then the first thing they would do is pursue policies that would not, as the extinction of five sixths of your economy would do, make you poor. They would be trying to make everybody rich."
5 comments:
This is the definition of trying too hard.
A coorelation has been established between education level of a woman and the number of children she will have. The CDC's website features numerous studies and statistics on this subject. Then again it isn't necessary to look at those studies. One can draw their own conclusions by researching the average education levels of numerous countries along with their birthrates or by comparing the birthrates of urban and suburban mothers across the U.S.
True Nicki. True.
So what does that tell us?
(If we make a distinction between "education" and "indoctrination", I believe this phenomenon explains itself.)
Found this little essay by Phillip Jones very interesting. What do you think?:
"Feminism has caused a huge fracture in society. Young women are kept busy with their education and careers, and they content themselves with the illusion, that there awaits for them, once they have proved that they can be all that they can be, a life of excitement, romance, husband and children.
They can have it all, they are told. But it's a marketplace illusion.
Many are in reality destroying any chance they may have of finding true happiness through love, marriage and family, by their casual and often promiscuous sexual behavior and their disrespect for themselves and their bodies.
Young men today are also occupied with their education and career and unfortunately all too often treat women in the same way they do other consumer products: a commodity to be consumed and discarded.
They too may also have some far-off non committal idea of someday having a family, but it doesn't run so deeply, and is low down on their list of priorities. Having a good time is the main thing.
Most seem to accept their newfound socio-political impotence, and due to an uncertainty of what their role in the great scheme of things is, content themselves with a life of hedonistic irresponsibility.
Those who are politically conscious, and there aren't that many, lay the full blame for their emasculation on women, and they hate them for it.. This does not a fruitful generation make.
Henry Makow, in his book `The Cruel Hoax,` explains that Feminism was created in order to destabilise society and create dysfunctional people.
Feminism working indirectly on social norms creates isolation, rootlessness, breaks down communities, and denies our nature as men and women.
It has been fatal where families and reproduction are concerned. Few if any young women today place a very high priority on being wives and mothers.
For years before I had any knowledge of the `Depopulation Agenda,` I had been able to equate the decline in the birth rates here in the West with the so-called `women's movement.`
Now I see it for what it truly is: A form of `Final Solution` to what the Illuminati term `the population problem.`
But for the moment, let us continue to unravel the Feminist `ball of string." - Phillip Jones
Methinks that Mr Jones' essay has many valid points. Of these I particular view and wholeheartedly embrace the idea of feminism as a destabilizing force in society.
I dare say that being feminine and being a feminist, although they share the root word, are IMHO polar opposite.
Again I have to submit that problems arise when we allow others to define and or circumscribe our existence. I am a woman naturally. I don't need any to define that for me. I am mother, naturally, and I don't need anyone to define that for me either. I am way feminine and I don't need nor shall I rely on others interpretation of what that should look like or feel like for nicki nicki tembo.
Our decisions have to be conscious ones and not done simply out of inclination, tradition, or based on another person's purported view. Analysis, reasoning, discernment are tools that we must familiarize ourselves with as well teach the children. With those tools in hand truth will stand clear from falsehood. Generations of offspring, all over this globe were raised to not question or defy authority. Such personal abdication has given rise to a host of destabilizing societal factors. Because when we fail to engage and question this creation and the things placed before us we fail to grow, ascend. If you aren't experiencing growth your thoughts and actions become stagnant and or putrid. You become concerned only with your base nature. Such individuals "earn my contempt, for they have been given a brain by mistake, since a spinal cord would suffice".
buahahaha we won! Oyvey!
Thank you Obama & all his loyal supporters!
Post a Comment