The total population of the United States in 1800 was 5,305,925 of whom 893,041 were slaves.The British banned the importation of slaves in 1807. The United States followed in 1808.
The Plantation says that during the entire Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, over 365, years only 472,381 Africans were actually ever imported to North America.
But we have 30,000,000 "African-Americans" today?
Get The Fuck Outta Here.
The indigenous native population of the eastern seaboard became the slaves and were supplanted with their newly arrived brothers and sisters from Africa.
To call that entire population - African denies them their status as indigenous native sovereigns.
5 comments:
Bruh,I posted on this a year ago. Part one and two. Check the comments and see how the plantation citizens attempted to box with the SupremeUltimate boxer! It was a shame.
http://ensaynreality.squarespace.com/journal/2009/6/15/roots-african-or-american-ii.html
Ensayn and DV,
I don't know if you had ever watch the series, "American Lives" with the brother who had a beer with Obama, Henry Gates.
Bra got paid by some Jewish and Euro Techno cats to disprove that blacks did not have an indian and native american mix. Notice that they used the co-opted brothers to do this dirty deed.
click here
I know his job was to push us back to an African and European background but man the science with they try to use to hot these Nuggas over the head was unbelievable.
I ain't buying it and it proves to me that the plantation is threaten by the combination that would spend this much time to shoot it down.
Exactly, I saw the series, the first one that is. This man is a Harvard professor, when he was told he was of Irish descent he appeared to fall apart, because the believes that Irish meant white. He was even told by the 85 scientist, that he has very little African DNA. I marveled at his ignorance of Black people being the first inhabitants of the now called British Isles. He didn't know of the Roman Pliny writing of the "swarthy" people in that area. Shameful. Yet, we are to believe his
85er scientist telling us we are not indigenous to this AmurrKan Land.
More info from Haiti.
http://www.margueritelaurent.com/pressclips/dessalines.html#autochthones
Even still there are HOLES in that plantation story.—KW
In fact Sister KW, there are so many holes that it’s difficult to pick a starting point. Afrikan-centered scholars were at the forefront of the Afrikan presence in early America scholarship. I know of no one who identifies himself as a Moorish Scientist who has published any scholarly work on this subject.
John G. Jackson and Willis N. Huggins wrote “An Introduction to African Civilizations” in 1937, which dealt with the Afrikan presence in early America. Jackson updated this book in 1970.
“An African scholar, Al Omari, in a work published in Cairo about 1342, tells of mariners of the Mali Empire crossing the Atlantic to the New World during the reign of Mana Musa I.”—Jackson
So the Afrikan presence in pre-Columbian America is not the issue. Statements like this however, are an issue:
[This Moor Is More Likely To Have Been Your Grandfather Than Kunta Kinte
The indigenous native population of the eastern seaboard became the slaves and were supplanted with their newly arrived brothers and sisters from Africa.] – DV
The first statement implies that of the 4 million Afrikans in America in 1865, the majority were descendants of aboriginal Blacks, now being called Moors. If that statement were true, any examination of the culture of these people would reveal the influence of the customs, ethos, folklore, and rituals of the dominant (per DV) aboriginal group.
No study of slave culture identifies these aboriginal influences, compared e.g., to the influence of Afrika on the consciousness of the enslaved, via rituals such as the ring shout, and folklore like King Buzzard, Gullah Joe, and Brer Rabbit.
We are left to conclude that the culture of the majority population (Moors) which merged with the newly arriving minority from Afrika had no impact on the supposedly hybrid population.
The second statement implies that these aboriginal and sovereign Moors capitulated and became slaves, unlike the other indigenous peoples who defended their homeland in one heroic battle after another, in spite of the resulting genocide and near extinction. Particularly, if their population was what DV claims, we would expect that some wars for the defense of their people, a’ la, Queen Nzinga or John Horse, would have been recorded.
Finally, these claims regarding Pangaea take incredulity to a new level. Some Moors claim that they were in North America from the first break-up of Pangaea, approximately 200-175 million years ago. If so, we have ask what form would they have been in?
Homo habilis doesn’t appear until approximately 2.3 million years ago. Homo sapiens emerge about 200,000 years ago.
I suppose we are left to conclude that archeologists have not yet discovered the fossil remains of DV’s 175 million-year-old ancestors which are buried some along the shores of the Chesapeake Bay. And when they do, all of the science linking the DNA of every human on the planet to Mitochondrial Makeda (Eve) will be overturned.
Post a Comment