Thordaddy said...
The conceit of devout dyke is that Mother is the key to our existence.
But devout dyke also recognizes that Father is responsible for our survival.
And so the memetic strategy is clear.
Denigrate Mother's existential creativity and destroy Father's desire to protect and provide for Mother and child.
This is the path towards radical autonomy for the devout dyke. It's the realization of its nature as inherently anti-heterosexual.
8 comments:
why you so afraid of gays DV?
why you traffic in such lame cliches Anonymous?
Anon,
That's the wrong question...
The question should be, "Why is Anon so subservient to self-annihilators?"
What exactly is in it for YOU?
Whenever one of these sheeps in wolf's clothing asks whether I'm scared that homosexual will try to persuade me to BE sexually averse to women, I say no but I certainly feel THE THREAT by its attempt to persuade my son and daughter to self-annihilate.
I also tell them of THE THREAT I feel they present by propagating a life of self-sexualization, i.e., self-gratification, via the "right" of radical autonomy.
By no means am I downplaying the significance of images, but it gets a whole lot deeper than the images they are projecting. Some elements of the MSM, specifically The Atlantic, have escalated this propaganda to the level of data.
Two articles in The Atlantic bear this out: “Are Fathers Necessary?” and “The End of Men.”
Get a load of this DV.
[In the February issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family, Judith Stacey, a professor of sociology at New York University, and Timothy Biblarz, a demographer from the University of Southern California, consolidated the available data on the role of gender in child rearing. As Stacey and Biblarz point out, our ideas of what dads do and provide are based primarily on contrasts between married-couple parents and single-female parents: an apples-to-oranges exercise that conflates gender, sexual orientation, marital status, and biogenetic relationships in ways that a true comparison of parent gender—one that compared married gay-male couples or married lesbian couples to married heterosexuals, or single fathers to single mothers—would not. Most of the data fail to distinguish between a father and the income a father provides, or between the presence of a father and the presence of a second parent, regardless of gender.
The quality of parenting, Biblarz and Stacey say, is what really matters, not gender. But the real challenge to our notion of the “essential” father might well be the lesbian mom. On average, lesbian parents spend more time with their children than fathers do. They rate disputes with their children as less frequent than do hetero couples, and describe co-parenting more compatibly and with greater satisfaction. Their kids perceive their parents to be more available and dependable than do the children of heteros. They also discuss more emotional issues with their parents. They have fewer behavioral problems, and show more interest in and try harder at school.
According to Stacey and Biblarz, “Two women who chose to become parents together seemed to provide a double dose of a middle-class ‘feminine’ approach to parenting.” And, they conclude, “based strictly on the published science, one could argue that two women parent better on average than a woman and a man, or at least than a woman and man with a traditional division of family labor.”] The Atlantic
Dayum DV, what you got to say about that?
From the second article:
[The postindustrial economy is indifferent to men’s size and strength. The attributes that are most valuable today—social intelligence, open communication, the ability to sit still and focus—are, at a minimum, not predominantly male. In fact, the opposite may be true. Women in poor parts of India are learning English faster than men to meet the demands of new global call centers. Women own more than 40 percent of private businesses in China, where a red Ferrari is the new status symbol for female entrepreneurs. Last year, Iceland elected Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir, the world’s first openly lesbian head of state, who campaigned explicitly against the male elite she claimed had destroyed the nation’s banking system, and who vowed to end the “age of testosterone.”
Earlier this year, for the first time in American history, the balance of the workforce tipped toward women, who now hold a majority of the nation’s jobs. The working class, which has long defined our notions of masculinity, is slowly turning into a matriarchy, with men increasingly absent from the home and women making all the decisions. Women dominate today’s colleges and professional schools—for every two men who will receive a B.A. this year, three women will do the same. Of the 15 job categories projected to grow the most in the next decade in the U.S., all but two are occupied primarily by women. Indeed, the U.S. economy is in some ways becoming a kind of traveling sisterhood: upper-class women leave home and enter the workforce, creating domestic jobs for other women to fill.]
Just wondering DV, are you raising your sons to be stay-at-home dads?
DIVINE INTELLIGENCE REIGNS SUPREME,
connect n’ it will be seen,
an intelligence unconscious to most,
yet, its there…..look….. don’t boast,
NO THING…is out of order,
that’s an illusion you see,
everthing is as it is n’ should be,
the very thing we fear,
ultimately creates sufferin’
paradoxically, that sufferin’ brings healin’
so embrace that which is unknown,
n’ let the light of consciousness,
elevate you to the THRONE
It's crazy when one thinks about the simple calculation that modern female has subconsciously made in order to secure more freedom.
Modern female has simply traded the greater responsibility as "sole provider" for man and child for the lesser responsibility as "sole provider" for no one.
In this choice lies greater freedom...
Until one day modern female finds herself as "sole provider" for man and child...
Needless to say...
NO FEMALE wants to be a "sole provider" for her man and child...
And none really are... They don't have it in them.
Their freedom in career and provider is an illusion as any man will attest when simple RESPONSIBILITY reigns supreme.
So the question becomes thus...
What is the point of all these modern females CHOOSING A LIFE OF LESS RESPONSIBILITY and having that subtle but virulent meme infect modern male into doing the same, i.e., being a "Mr. Mom" (instance of radical autonomy)?
MB,
You should be able to recognize the devout dykism in "science" like this. It's not even hidden anymore. And to think the sheep still call the perpetuation of these viral memes the work of "feminism," i.e., the product of femininity, is even more mindboggling.
The problem of course is clear cut.
Both devout dyke and radical homosexual ASSERT the NON-NECESSITY of the father/mother when CLAIMING the BENEFIT of SEXUAL CLONES.
The reality is that the homosexual DOES NOT SEE ITSELF as a mother or father. Such antiquated manifestations are unnecessary.
So there is the notion of "supremacy" in homosexuality (self-sexualization) and the idea that raising a child to be "in love" with himself is the best path to fulfillment. None of this training requires a mother and father. In fact, the mother/father paradigm is the bulwark against such destructive mentality and must be destroyed.
Post a Comment